Intranet pecha kucha sydney
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Intranet pecha kucha sydney

on

  • 353 views

Presentation at the Intranets2014 conference in Sydney.

Presentation at the Intranets2014 conference in Sydney.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
353
Views on SlideShare
338
Embed Views
15

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
3
Comments
0

1 Embed 15

https://twitter.com 15

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Intranet pecha kucha sydney Intranet pecha kucha sydney Document Transcript

  • ”Help! We’re drowning in e-mail” Back in 2004, we got a call from a client, one of the biggest retail chains in Sweden. They mananger said ”We’re drowning in e-mail!” And we said ”Well, perhaps you need an intranet?” He said ”We already have an intranet, but nobody is using it!” So we said ”Maybe you should redesign it?” He said ”We just did that. It didn’t help!” So we decided on something else.
  • map the routes of information We said ”Let’s MAP the information. What information is useful to people? What works? What information DOESN’T work? WHERE do they GET it from? How does it travel in the organisation today? So we interviewed more than 40 people. From the HQ to the truckdrivers to the store managers to the people sitting at the cash registers. And of course , they gave us completly different answers.
  • Interviews with +40 people What was important to the manager was one thing, to the truck driver something completely differnet. How to make sense of that? But when I analyzed all the answers, I realized that every interview, every person, had something in common. It was in the answer ”Which information works well?” Here you have ONE seconds to guess what. Hint: it wasn’t the lunch menu.
  • [a name] Everybody’s answer contained A NAME. A different name, but everyone mentioned A SPECIFIC PERSON. They said things like ”Information on projects works well because Maggie Smith has a newsletter with updates, that she sends every thursday”. Or ”Info on rebates works well, because Carlos Fuentes has an Excel file with all numbers on his server, that we can access.
  • Maggie Smith Carlos Fuentes Kim Li Or ”Info on allergies works well, because Kim Li came to us in November and told us about her work, so if I need any updates about it, I will contact her.” And this is when I had a revelation. I realized that this is ancient.
  • Old knowledge I realized that this is ancient. This goes way back, hundreds of thousands of years, or even millions. To our predecessors on the savannahs of Africa. And the revelation also turned me, temporarily, into Sir David Attenborough.
  • This is a skull of Homo erectus, upright man, 1.9 million years ago in Africa. Replaced the smaller, earlier Homo habilis. It had some AMAZING new capabilities Of which the most important was the very first intranet.
  • Language! Language! And language was not only communicartion. With language came ANOTHER extrordinary ability. What our predecessors discovered and learned to take advantage of was that ...
  • ... other people’s brains are very smart places to STORE KNOWLEDGE. Evolution has optimized our brains for social use. And that is what turned our predecessors into MORE than apes, That TRANSFORMED them into people. Or in some cases, beetles.
  • – Remember where the water hole was?) – Under that huge grey rock! – BORK? – GRAWK! When information could be SENT, SHARED, STORED and RETRIEVED, it opened up an ENTIRELY new possiblity for survival. You could query the database for vital information. Matters of life and death. Query syntax has changed, obviously -
  • – Remember where the K-431 form was? – Under the right- hand menu! (Nothing
  •   new) but else, - the same thing applies today. This means that information also carries, or is perhaps carried by, an enormous amount of TRUST and CREDIBILITY. Information and trust - tightly knit together by the IDENTITY of a person.
  • ? Which server holds the Beijing documents? G-disc H disc I discK disc L disc It is extremly hard for us to guess, for example, ”On which server or which portal might the Beijing documents be?” As humans, we’re very bad at that. But we are, on the other hand ... ... extremly good at remembering ”Who knows anything about the Beijing documents?”
  • Who knows about the Beijing documents? George Harold IngridKevin Liza Or even guessing ”Who MIGHT know anything about the Beijing documents?” And that’s the reason, if I ask you about the Beijing docs, and you say ”Yeah, there filed at K-disc slash projects, slash, China slash 2012 slash Finished slash background” then I will say... ” Could you mail it to me?”
  • Bjornman/Flickr And mail - before and nowadays - ties the knowledge to a name in a very clear way. The IT department and database nerds will call mail ”unstructured data”. But it is structured in the very way that is important to humans: connecting knowledge with people.
  • the human model This is the human model for information sharing, for an organzation, and indeed for society. It is an extremely efficient model for an information ecology, and for an organization. It’s resilient. And over millions of years, it has left the competion in the dust. Because there is an alternative.
  • The alternative model is this: the hierarchical one. When information is governed by one source, controlled and distributed by one master. It has been tried and tested in nature. And the results are in: this is the species that still relies on this model:
  • the gorilla model The gorilla model, where the flock is dominated and controlled by one great silverback master. Preferred by many organizations, it’s nevertheless far less efficient. It never evolved to the agile, dynamic environment that characterizes human societies.
  • too much ”information”... ... not enough feedbackThere is much to say about this, many implications to be drawn. I’ll just add one thing; Today, we’re drowning in a sea of ”information”. Numbers, quantified goals, measurements, the ”new public managment”. There is a cult of ”information”. But a serious lack of feedback.
  • What was the problem? ”Nobody sees what I do” Back at the retail company, we also discovered the roots of the email deluge. The managers that complained about emails didn’t even sit in the same space as their employees; but in a separate office several kilometers away. To make themselves known as useful, they employees had to tell the world by email.
  • Jonas Söderström • InUse Experience • Intranets2014, Sydney slideshare.net/Jonas_inUse/ speakerdeck.com/jonas_blind_hen/ Although this was in 2004, long before Facebook and other social media, this simple study made it clear to me, that SOCIAL will trump anything This story actually continues with interesting connections to Joseph Stalin and some other stuff, but I’ll have to share that with you during drinks. The slides are available on Slideshare and Speakerdeck under my nicks - but I’m sure, that you’ll ask me: ”Can you mail it to me?” Thank you.
  • Pictures under Creative Commons-license Silverback gorilla by tiswango /flickr DSP 142: Drowning in M&Ms 2007-10-06 by vernhart / flickr Mappa Lundi by Matt Lancashire / flickr Japan-markets-stock by artemuestra /flickr mail by Bjornman / flickr