• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this document? Why not share!

LID LEED and Policy Barriers to Implementation (Dec-2010)

on

  • 673 views

There are many reasons that people give for not using LID or LEED standards when developing property. It basically comes down to perceived costs and perceived benefits/barriers

There are many reasons that people give for not using LID or LEED standards when developing property. It basically comes down to perceived costs and perceived benefits/barriers

Statistics

Views

Total Views
673
Views on SlideShare
673
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    LID LEED and Policy Barriers to Implementation (Dec-2010) LID LEED and Policy Barriers to Implementation (Dec-2010) Document Transcript

    • LID and Policy: SustainableDevelopment PracticesWhat is Stopping Us? Jon Barsanti Jr Masters in City and Regional Planning BA Interdisciplinary Study in Biology and Chemistry jbarsanti@alumni.unc.edu 919.943.1915 Who Developers DesignersDepartments Decision Makers Who Why Developers Others Aren’t Designers Others AreDepartments Infrastructure Decision Good all Makers around
    • Who Why Why Not Developers Others Aren’t “Cost” Designers Others Are ResistanceDepartments Infrastructure Ordinances Decision Good all Fear of Loss Makers around Land UseTransportation Water Quantity/ Water Quality All Development Occurs in a Watershed Wetlands are more than Undevelopable Land Stream Buffers Impact Development and Developments Impact Stream Buffers All Land Uses have a Pollutant/Volume Profile
    • Undeveloped Land can be valuable LID & LEED can improve Water Quality and Quantity; Cost LessNeed to view Run-off as a Resource Run- Net Density versus Gross DensityAll Development Occurs in a Watershed Three Parts: Watershed Critical Areas Watershed Protected Areas Remainder of the Watershed Barriers: • “Highest and Best Use of the Land;” • One person’s/community’s out-flow is another’s intakeWetlands are more than Undevelopable Land Wetlands are nature’s filtration system Wetlands manage volume and sediment load Wetlands are key to wildlife habitat preservation Barrier: Wetland is undevelopable; Can fill and replace, although manufactured is not as good as natural
    • Stream Buffers Impact Development Developments Impact Stream Buffers Stream Buffers protect encroachment on ecosystem by development Stream Buffers Protect development from encroachment by ecosystem (e.g. floods.) Barriers: Inconsistent setbacks between communities; Vertical versus Horizontal Setbacks All Land Uses have a Pollutant/Volume Profile Volume of water flow Nutrients Temperature of water flowing off the land Toxins Bacteria From Kimberly Brewer’s Presentation to the TJCOG Smart Growth Committee ftp://ftp.tjcog.org/pub/tjcog/regplan/smrtgrow/devwq.pdf All Land Uses have a Pollutant/Volume Profile Sources Land-Use Contribution Contribution to N Load to P Load Residential (SF) 29% 12% Residential (MF) Agriculture 36% 51% Forest 19% 15% Commercial/ 9% 6% Industrial Other 7% 16%Data from A Nutrient Credit Trading Framework for the Jordan Lake Watershed: Using Market-Based Mechanisms to Make Watershed Restoration More Cost-Effective http://www.cfra-nc.org/documents/FinalReport-FullReport_000.pdf
    • All Land Uses have a Pollutant/Volume Profile Sources Land-Use Contribution Contribution to N Load to P Load Residential (SF) 14% 29% 12% Residential (MF) 1% Agriculture 20% 36% 51% Forest 56% 19% 15% Commercial/ 3% 9% 6% Industrial Other 6% 7% 16% Data from A Nutrient Credit Trading Framework for the Jordan Lake Watershed: Using Market-Based Mechanisms to Make Watershed Restoration More Cost-Effective http://www.cfra-nc.org/documents/FinalReport-FullReport_000.pdf Soil Compaction Occurs in almost all situations How much is reversible? http://www.cwp.org/Resource_Library/Center_Docs/PWP/ELC_PWP36.pdfTable 1: Comparison of Bulk Density for undisturbedSoils and Common Urban Conditions (Compiled fromvarious sources)Undisturbed Soil Type or Urban Surface BulkCondition Density (g/cc)Peat 0.2 to 0.3Compost 1.0Sandy Soil 1.1 to 1.3Silty sands 1.4Silt 1.3 to 1.4Silt Loams 1.2 to 1.5Organic Silts/Clays 1.0 to 1.2Glacial Till 1.6 to 2.0Urban Lawns 1.5 to 1.9Crushed Rock Parking Lot 1.5 to 2.0Urban Fill Soils 1.8 to 2.0Athletic Fields 1.8 to 2.0ROW and Building Pads 1.5 to 1.8(85% Compaction)ROW and Building Pads 1.6 to 2.1(95% Compaction) Compaction)Concrete Pavement 2.2Quartzite 2.65 http://www.cwp.org/Resource_Library/Center_Docs/PWP/ELC_PWP36.pdf
    • Reversing Compacted Soils • Soil Amendments • Compost Amendments • Reforestation • Timehttp://www.cwp.org/Resource_Library/Center_Docs/PWP/ELC_PWP37.pdf Benefits of Compost Amendments Compost Amendments Can: • Increase Porosity • Reduce Peak Flows • Produce Thicker lawns • Reduce Fertilizer Applications and Watering Needs • Create better lawns, faster http://www.epa.gov/ednnrmrl/publications/reports/epa600r00016/epa600r00016.pdf EPA/600/R-00/016 FAQ regarding Compost Amendments Compost Amendments Appear to: • Increase Concentrations of N and P • Decrease Total N & P (Less water means lower concentration) • Amendments can be tilled or applied directly and reseeded. • 2:1 ratio soil to compost tilled to at least 12 inches • Construction compaction can reach 24 inches http://www.epa.gov/ednnrmrl/publications/reports/epa600r00016/epa600r00016.pdf EPA/600/R-00/016
    • Other perspectives on Compost Amendments Barriers: It takes time and money to measure predevelopment conditions and post-development conditions Cost to amend soil decreases, per lot, as area amended increases LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity How we develop Where we develop (and where we do not) What we do with the Run-off (Pipe or Percolate) What is disturbed – What is conserved? LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantityhttp://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/water_resource.htm http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/water_density.htm
    • LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity • Impacts on Land Start At the Grading Stage • Fertilizers can have an impact on water quality, even in LID Neighborhoods • Volume and Peak Flows were kept at predevelopment levels. • Need to Control Compaction, Minimize Soil Disturbance, and have on-site supervision.http://www.jordancove.uconn.edu/jordan_cove/publications/final_report.pdf LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity Conventional Development negatively impacts water-related ecosystems Impacts water Quality through • Impervious Surfaces • Introduction of Contaminants • Site Location of Development relative to natural featureshttp://www.nahb.org/fileUpload_details.aspx?contentID=112936 LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity Perceived Barrier: It costs more and does not provide a benefit to the builder Actual Barrier: Educating the entire community to the value versus costs of LID (Almost always costs lesshttp://www.nahb.org/fileUpload_details.aspx?contentID=112936 than conventional)
    • LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity … (In) the vast majority of cases, significant savings were realized due to: • reduced costs for site grading and preparation, • stormwater infrastructure, site paving, and landscaping. • Total capital cost savings ranged from 15 to 80 percent when LID methods were used...http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/lid/costs07/documents/reducingstormwatercosts.pdf LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/lid/costs07/documents/reducingstormwatercosts.pdf LID Can Improve Water Quality & Water Quantity • Site Design was 103 Lots on 24 Acres • Conventional Site Design required 270,000 Cu Ft of Stormwater Facilities • LID Required 55,000 cu ft of stormwater facilities • 62% of land was saved as open space • Cost Savings of 20% to the Developer • 10% More units were able to be built than conventional design would have allowed. Managing stormwater in Pierce County: Kensington Estates case study sheds light on low impact development http://www.djc.com/news/en/11135654.html
    • LID: How do we define conservation/disturbedType of Residential Disturbed Open Space Conserved SpaceDevelopment SpaceLow Density Could be entire Yes – may be No(e.g. 1 unit/2a) site yardCluster Could Be entire Fragmented No siteOpen Space 50% or less 50% or More Open Space can be undevelopableConservation Less than 50% More than 50% Undevelopable area excludedBarrier(s): How each is defined varies by community/county What is being conserved? Belvedere Subdivision – Charlottesville, VA http://www.belvedereneighborhood.com What is being conserved? 2008 Green Project of the Year NAHB Green Building Award Hidden Lakes Preserve – Wake Forest, NC http://www.hiddenlake-crescent.com
    • What is being conserved? Pleasant Green Farms – Hillsborough, NC – Durham County http://www.pleasantgreenfarms.com/PropertyMap.aspxWhat is being conserved? Bundoran Farm -- North Garden, VA http://www.bundoranfarm.com/What is being conserved? Pale Yellow – Public Viewshed Pale Peach – Productive Farmland Green/Dark Blue – Active Forestry Wildlife Habitat Aqua Stream Corridor & Wetlands Bundoran Farm -- North Garden, VA http://www.bundoranfarm.com/
    • What is being conserved? Pale Yellow – Public Viewshed Pale Peach – Productive Farmland Green/Dark Blue – Active Forestry Wildlife Habitat Aqua Stream Corridor & Wetlands Bundoran Farm -- North Garden, VA http://www.bundoranfarm.com/What is being conserved? Pale Yellow – Public Viewshed Pale Peach – Productive Farmland Green/Dark Blue – Active Forestry Wildlife Habitat Aqua Stream Corridor & Wetlands Bundoran Farm -- North Garden, VA http://www.bundoranfarm.com/What is being conserved? Pale Yellow – Public Viewshed Pale Peach – Productive Farmland Green/Dark Blue – Active Forestry Wildlife Habitat Aqua Stream Corridor & Wetlands Bundoran Farm -- North Garden, VA http://www.bundoranfarm.com/
    • Need to change thinking from stormwater as waste to stormwater as resource. Barrier: Need to change the way we think about waterhttp://waterparadigm.org/indexen.php?web=./home/homeen.html http://www.onthecommons.org/media/pdf/original/OurWaterC omonsOctober2008English.pdf Need to change thinking from stormwater as waste to stormwater as resource. Barrier: We cannot solve our problems at the same level of thinking that created them We need a new way of looking at our water quality and water quantity problemshttp://www.clemson.edu/restoration/events/past_events/sc_water_re http://www.coe.neu.edu/environment/DOCUMsources/t4_proceedings_presentations/t4_zip/zimmer.pdf ENTS/Wingspread%20Final%20Report.pdf Need to change from Environment or Economy to Environment & Economy “An urban area is an ecological system wherein humans, habitat, transportation and water infrastructure, and terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna exist in symbiosis and interdependence. Urban fresh waters are the lifeline for ecological and economical sustainability, yet the fresh water resources are being impaired to a point that the integrity of urban waters has been damaged by excessive development and overuse….” http://www.coe.neu.edu/environment/DOCUM ENTS/Wingspread%20Final%20Report.pdf
    • Need to Change thinking from stormwater as waste to stormwater as resource. resource. The concept of the Cities of the Future, the fifth paradigm of urbanization… is a paradigm of integration • Future, and existing, urban developments will accommodate landscape, drainage, transportation and habitat infrastructure systems • Cities will be resilient to extreme hydrological events and pollution • There will be an optimal balance between recreation, navigation and other economic uses of water. http://www.coe.neu.edu/environment/DOCUM ENTS/Wingspread%20Final%20Report.pdf Water is Water Paradigm Shift All Development Impacts Water Quality Highest use versus the best use of the land Wetlands and stream buffers are undervalued One community’s outflow is another community’s intake Reducing usage of drinking water for irrigation and toilets Barriers to Implementing LEED Across the Region Similar to Implementing LID “Everybody knows….” it costs more.http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2908
    • Barriers to Implementing LEED Across the Region • Sometimes, its is not about the costs (price,) rather it is really playing up the benefitshttp://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=2908 Barriers to Implementing LEED Across the Region Cost premiums ranging from ZERO% to 6.27% Energy Savings from 23% to 50% Water Savings from Zero to 78% Case Study: Residential Development • 73 Projects • Range Under 5 Acres to Over 100 Acres • Utilization of LEED techniques depend on points awarded and cost to develop • Gold and Platinum Certified Utilize Green Technologies and Green Construction • Platinum tend to include affordable housing and http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/316990__914017852.pdf Habitat/wetland restoration
    • Halted construction fills N.C. waterways with silt BY PAGE IVEY - The Associated Press Photograph: Chuck Burton AP May 5, 2010 News and Observer November 19, 2010 San Diego – South Orange County Restrictions on Lawn Run-off Restrictions on Car wash Run- off http://www.danapointtimes.com/view/full_story/10385460/article-Keep-Your-Water--New-Regional-Water-Quality-Control-Board-Water-Quality-Regulations-? Our Floating Future? • Research by NC State University and Bill Hunt • Being Tested in City of Durham – Hillendale Golf Course and Museum of Life and Science • Originated in Montana (2000) • Costs: $30/sq ft"When all the plants have grown up, youdont actually see any of the green plastic. • Benefit: “natural”Its just a lush green environment on top of removal of Phosphorus andthe pond, so in theory theres a habitat for Nitrogen usingfish, frogs, wildlife as well." Ryan Winston wetland/bog plantsNews and Observer – 4/14/2010
    • Barriers to Implementing LID Across the RegionNeed to look at Decentralized solution for a Decentralized problem Our ordinances hold us back “Everybody knows….” Maintaining it after it is built Conclusion We have a new resource We can ‘sing from the same songbook.’ We can customize our solutions to meet the requirements of our communities and our region. We can have a Win-Win-Win for the consumer, the developer, and the community. If we ‘only’ apply to new construction, existing conditions will ‘only’ not get worse.
    • http://www.ecospecifier.org/ http://www.pharosproject.net/ http://www.bluewildernessgroup.com/ http://www.bre.co.uk/index.jsp Jon Barsanti Jr.jbarsanti@alumni.unc.edu 919.943.1915Presentation available athttp://www.slideshare.net/JonBarsantiJr