SolarGroupies — I’ll assume that you are trying to ask an honest question, and that you are open-minded about energy matters (although the 500,000 year comment is a hint that this may not be so). If you are, please look at my main presentation on SlideShare, which should answer your question. If not, email me at 'aaprjohn@northnet.org'.
I don’t get it! Maybe a better product is a nuclear power plant, which will cost up to a BILLION dollars to ’decommission, ad our ’con-man ’ will be long gone! WE and our children are stuck with the BILLION DOLLAR bill AND a pile of radioactive waste to store for the next 500,000 years!
**To go through the presentation at your own pace I recommend that you select ’full’ and then navigate using the arrow keys on your keyboard.**
As is shown in the Presentation, my email is ’aaprjohn@northnet.org’. In addition to posting them here, please feel free to send me questions, comments, or suggestions.
For a much more detailed discussion of renewable energies, choose the ’More by user’ tab above right, and view my 'Electrical Energy - A Matter of Life & Death' presentation on SlideShare.
Make SURE to View This Presentation
in the FULL SCREEN Mode!
Click the “FULL” icon
in the lower right hand corner.
Then use your keyboard arrow keys to navigate...
John Droz, jr. is a physicist and has been an environmental activist for over 25 years. Currently he is a
leading individual on four New York statewide issues (electrical energy, water extraction, water quality,
and property taxes).
He received undergraduate degrees in physics and mathematics from Boston College, and a graduate
degree in physics from Syracuse University. He is a participating member of several environmental
organizations (like the Adirondack Council, AfPA, RCPA, and Sierra Club). Due to his love of nature, he
lives on a lake in the Adirondacks of upstate NY.
These areas of interest and expertise (science & environmentalism) have merged with his focus on energy
matters, especially wind power. John’s basic position is that we should be taking aggressive measures to
solve our energy and pollution issues, and should not be wasting time and money on illusionary solutions
— which are primarily promoted by those with vested financial interests in them.
This slide presentation is copyrighted and is for personal use only. Any reproduction, quoting, referencing,
or other use of this material is prohibited without the author’s express written consent.
For questions, comments or permission to use any material in this presentation, please email Mr. Droz at:
aaprjohn@northnet.org
Credits for graphics and photos —
Monopoly Men <<http://www.worldofmonopoly.co.uk/fansite/>>
Applause <<http://88e2dce4bd-custmedia.vresp.com/library/1177473215/4d4214bae3/applause.jpg>>
Question Men <<http://startupblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/question-mark.jpg>>
Capitol Dome <<http://tinyurl.com/d2ezqb>>
Sailboat <<http://www.reflexivity.us/blog/sailboat.jpg>>
Students <<http://www.ed.gov/news/photos/2005/0916/0916_1.jpg>>
Wind Turbine <<http://secretscotland.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/windgen.jpg>>
Is support for renewable electrical energies based more
Is support for renewable electrical energies based on science or lobbyists influence? The facts are that all renewable enegy sources are not equal to each other, AND that renewables are not (by definition) equal to (or better than) conventional electrical power sources. less
3 comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3 previous next Post a comment