Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Low toxicity dusts: new concerns for old stuff.

352

Published on

A presentation I made at the Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists (AIOH) conference in Sydney December 2013.

A presentation I made at the Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists (AIOH) conference in Sydney December 2013.

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
352
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • This is a bit of technicality – the Regs don’t actually specify a limit they have these criteria that set out when the requirements to control come into play.
  • The need to classifymany dust together as low toxicity is because it is difficult (impossible for mixtures) to have individual limits.
  • You may want to dispense with this one? My estimate of the number of people exposed to airborne dust based on employment stats and job title/industry.
  • This is from the book on the second slide,
  • These are data from NCB and the PFR (these are data from surface operations NOT underground)Not sure why the PFR is lower but it may be something to do with the location of the Samplers. TP data was converted to be roughly equivalent to the MRE using the appropriate MNI (Mass-Number Index)
  • In a review of published evidence for temporal trends that we published in 2007 we identified 38 cases where there was informative data for aerosols. We analyzed the temporal trends on the log-scale assuming an exponential decline in exposure level over time. 58% of these involving aerosols there was a significant reduction in exposure, typically between 5% and 10% per year. Only one dataset (3%) showed a significant increase.
  • Okamoto et al, (1998) obtained comparative data from simultaneous measurements made using Respirable and Inhalable dust samplers. They found a statistically significant association between the two measures (correlation coefficient = 0.78, on the log-transformed data) with the regression equation of the form log(R) = 0.59 xlog(I) - 0.57 ). These data showed that Inhalable dust levels were on average 2.6 times the Respirable dust levels with a range of Inhalable to Respirable ratios from 2 (welding) to 5.1 (foundry work), corresponding to 50% and 18% of the dust being Respirable, respectively. The ratio of Total dust to Respirable dust in British coalmines was reported in the IOM report by Cowie et al (1981), where the average ratio between total and Respirable dust levels was 5.5 (i.e. 18% Respirable) and the correlation between these two measures was 0.89.
  • Loss similar magnitude to the loss caused by smoking 20 cigarettes a day.
  • instilled rat lungs with small masses of a number of low toxicity, low solubility particles (TiO2, CB and latex) in different size ranges including uf, and assessed short-term inflammation
  • Transcript

    • 1. Low Toxicity Dusts: New Concerns for Old Stuff John Cherrie INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE . Edinburgh . UK www.iom-world.org
    • 2. Summary… • • • • • There has been a gradual realisation that exposure to most dusts can harm the lung The unifying factor may be the surface area and surface properties of the dust Even relatively low exposure to low-toxicity dust may be harmful and current exposure limits are probably not protective Exposures are lower than in the past and so current exposure limits are not helpful Many people are probably still exposed
    • 3. COPD • • • • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is characterised by progressive airflow obstruction and destruction of lung It is caused by chronic exposure of genetically susceptible individuals to environmental factors It is associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response Smoking is an important cause, but about a quarter of COPD patients are non-smokers
    • 4. Lung function assessments • Symptoms of COPD include: • • • • • Dyspnea (breathlessness) Chronic cough Chronic sputum production Episodes of acute worsening of these symptoms (exacerbations) often occur Spirometry used to make a clinical diagnosis • • • the presence of a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70. “Mild” if FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted “Moderate” if 50% ≤ FEV1 < 80% predicted http://www.GoldCOPD.org/
    • 5. In Australia… • • • • Wheeze and shortness of breath with mild exercise very common in over 40‟s Around 10% in those aged over 40 years have COPD 4% of all deaths attributed to COPD, e.g. 4,800 death in 2006 Over 50,000 hospital admissions in Australia attributed to COPD, with an average length of stay of 7 days Toelleet al (2013) Respiratory symptoms and illness in older Australians: the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study. MJA; 198(3): 144-148.
    • 6. In Britain, HSE says… • Work related COPD is a priority because of the human costs in terms of suffering, its effects on the quality of life and the financial costs due to working days lost and medical treatment • • • • Around 15% of COPD may be caused or made worse by dusts, fumes and irritating gases 4,000 COPD deaths every year may be related to work exposures 40% of COPD patients are below retirement age A quarter of those with COPD below retirement age are unable to work at all
    • 7. “Inert” or nuisance particulates • Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) 1969 • • • Published in Britain by Department of Employment as Technical Data Note 2/69 TLV = 15 mg/m3 or 50 mppcf of total dust <1% crystalline silica “… a number of dusts or particulates that occur in the working environment ordinarily produce no specific effects upon prolonged inhalation.”
    • 8. Nuisance particulate • By 1974 limit reduced TLV 10 mg/m3 or 30 mppcf, <1% crystalline silica • “… when inhaled in excessive amounts, so called ‘nuisance’ dusts have a long history of little adverse effect on the lungs and do not produce significant organic disease or toxic effect when exposure is kept under reasonable control.” • By 1980 TLV was… 30 mppcf or 10 mg/m3 of total dust <1% quartz or 5 mg/m3 of respirable dust
    • 9. Dust, not otherwise specified • • 1984 HSE publish Guidance Note EH40, Occupational Exposure Limits Recommended Limit of 10 mg/m3 of total dust or 5 mg/m3 of respirable dust.
    • 10. COSHH Regulations • From 1988 the definition of a “substance hazardous to health” included dust of any kind…present at a concentration in air greater than • • • 10 mg/m3, as a time-weighted average over an 8hours, of total inhalable dust, 5 mg/m3, as a time-weighted average over an 8-hours, of respirabledust From 1997 revised sampling criteria for respirable dust and the “limit” was reduced from 5 mg/m3 to 4 mg/m3
    • 11. In Australia… • Exposure standards for dusts not otherwise classified (NUISANCE DUSTS) • • • …high concentrations of dust in the workplace may cause unpleasant deposition of dust in the ears, eyes and upper respiratory tract and reduce visibility in the workplace. Standard = 10 mg/m3, measured as inhalable dust (8-hour TWA) …compliance with the exposure standard for dusts not otherwise classified should prevent impairment of respiratory function. Safe Work Australia (2013) Guidance on the interpretation of workplace exposure standards for airborne contaminants.
    • 12. Low toxicity dusts • • Do NOT include: quartz, asbestos or toxic metals Could include: amorphous silica, silicon, silicon carbide, pulverised fuel ash, limestone, gypsum, graphite, aluminium oxide, titanium dioxide, coal dust, other mineral dusts with low crystalline silica content, etc
    • 13. How many people are exposed to dusts? • Estimated as 9,200,000 • • • • • • • Manufacturing - 29% Construction - 19% Hospitality - 11% Professional etc. - 9% Wholesale/retail - 8% Agriculture - 6% Utility - 5% 9% 4% 11% 9% 8% 9% 9% 5% 24% 9%
    • 14. Past exposure to dust
    • 15. Past exposure to dust • In British coal mines in the 1940s dust levels could be very high Total (mg/m3) Respirable (mg/m3) Longwall stalls 394 14 Narrow places 215 20 Bedford and Warner (1943) Chronic pulmonary disease in South Wales coalminers – II Environmental studies. London: HMSO.
    • 16. Exposures decreased over time
    • 17. Exposure decreases over time… Creely KS et al. (2007) Trends in inhalation exposure--a review of the data in the published scientific literature. Ann OccupHyg.; 51(8): 665-678.
    • 18. Respirablevs Inhalable • • Which size fraction causes the adverse health effects? How are these size fractions related? • • Implicitly one might expect inhalable dust to be about twice respirable dust levels (based on the limits) In typical situations inhalable dust is probably between about 2 and 5 times respirable dust concentrations
    • 19. Log10(INHALABLE concentration (mg/m3)) Respirablevs Inhalable Log10(RESPIRABLE particulate concentration (mg/m3)) Okamoto S, et al. Variation in the ratio of respirable particulates over inhalable particulates by type of dust workplace. Int Arch Occ Environ Health 1998; 71: 111–116.
    • 20. PVC dust • • • • Study of 818 workers in a PVC manufacturing plant Highest respirable dust levels about 2.5 mg/m3 FEV1 was statistically significantly lower among men with higher PVC dust exposure This is equivalent to a loss of 52 ml of FEV1 for the mean cumulative respirable dust exposure, equivalent to 0.7 mg/m3 for 20 years Soutar et al. (1979) An epidemiological study of respiratory disease in workers exposed to polyvinylchloride dust. IOM TM 79/02.
    • 21. Some people become seriously disabled… • • • The average reduction in lung function is relatively modest when compared with the effects of aging or cigarette smoking However, 12% of those exposed at the limit (5 mg/m3) for 40 years would be twice as likely as controls to report breathlessness 7% would report „walking slower than other people on the same level because of my chest‟
    • 22. Surface area is an important factor… • Inflammatory response (neutrophils) in bronchoalveolarlavage: TiO2, CB and latex Donaldson K, Brown D, Clouter A, et al. The pulmonary toxicology of ultrafine particles. J Aerosol Med 2002;15:213–220.
    • 23. …unifies biological response to dusts TiO2 (rectangle and diamond), BaSO4 at two exposure concentrations (triangles) and data from Oberdörster for TiO2 (fine and ultrafine, stars) Faux et al (2003) In vitro determinants of particulate toxicity: The dose-metric for poorly soluble dusts. HSE report RR 154.
    • 24. A No Observed Adverse Effect Level • • We used a mathematical model based on animal toxicity data to estimate the NOAEL for low toxicity dust – TiO2 Based on avoiding impairment of clearance and recruitment of inflammatory cells into the lung • • Inflammation judged as beginning when neutrophils (PMN) constituted 2% of the total cells in the lung Analysis estimated human NOAEL as 1.3 mg/m3 Tran et al. (2003) Risk assessment of inhaled particles using a physiologically based mechanistic model. HSE report RR 141.
    • 25. Our recommendation… • The current British limit values for respirable and inhalable dust (4 and 10 mg/m3, respectively) are unsafe and it would be prudent to reduce exposures as far below these limits as is reasonably practicable • We suggest that, until safe limits are put in place, employers should aim to keep exposure to respirable dust below 1 mg/m3
    • 26. It’s not for me to tell you what to do… • • • You could take the lead in changing attitudes to dusts Stop thinking about these as „nuisance dusts‟ Consider promoting lower exposure limits and a limit for respirable dust
    • 27. More information… Cherrie J, Brosseau LM, Hay A, Donaldson K (2013) A Commentary for the Annals of Occupational Hygiene: Low-Toxicity Dusts: Current Exposure Guidelines Are Not Sufficiently Protective. Annals of Occupational Hygiene.

    ×