Capital Structure: What leverage level should firms hold?


Published on

Published in: Business, Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Capital Structure: What leverage level should firms hold?

  1. 1. Capital Structure: What leverage level should firms hold? JOAN TAPIA BOIL
  2. 2. Table of Contents 1. Introduction (I and II) 2. Pillars of Capital Structure 3. Trade-off Theory 4. Pecking Order Theory 5. Agency Costs Theory 6. Conclusion 7. Bibliography
  3. 3. Introduction (I)  “the mix of securities and financial resources used by corporations to finance real investment” (Myers, 2001, p. 81)  The way to finance assets (investments)  Resarch by Modigliani and Miller in 1958  Two forms of capital:  Debt (long and short term)  Capital (retained profits, contributed capital)
  4. 4. Introduction (II)  Questions:  How much should firms borrow?  Understanding Balance Sheet  Overcoming recessions  Three main pillars: Interest tax shield, asymmetric information and agency costs
  5. 5. Pillars of Capital Structure • Interest Tax is deductible. • Debt can reduce firm taxes and increase firm cash flows Corporate taxes • Adverse Selection • Moral Hazzard Asymmetric Information • Relationship between shareholders, creditors and managers • Conflicts of Interest Agency Relationships
  6. 6. Trade-off Theory (I) Trade-off between the tax benefits on the interest of debt and the costs of financial distress Trade-off determines optimal capital structure  Value of the leveraged firm L  VL = VU (firm without debts)+PV(tax shield) - PV (cost of distress)  With higher profits, higher leverage ratios to reduce the taxable income.
  7. 7. Pecking Order Theory  No optimal capital structure  Based on the asymmetric information  Hierarchal sort of financial sources to fund new investments: 1. Retained profits 2. Debt 3. Hybrid Securities such as convertible bonds 4. Equity  Applied for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME)
  8. 8. Agency Costs Theory  Agency Relationships:  Manager and Shareholders Relationship  Agency equity costs  Usage of the Cash Flow  Debt holders and Shareholders relationships  Agency debts costs  Risky Investments  Optimal Capital Structure:  Overall costs are at the lowest level
  9. 9. Conclusion  There is no a magical formula for the optimal debt ratio  No one theory can capture everything that drives that lead to the debt vs. equity choices  Helpful theories depending on the firms characteristics.  SME  Pharmaceutical firms  “It doesn't matter whether a company is big or small. Capital structure matters. It always has and always will” Mr. Milken (2009)
  10. 10. Bibliography  Aybar Arias, C. A. Casino Martínez and J. López Gracia, 2001, “Jerarquía de preferencias y estrategia empresarial en la determinación de la estructura de capital de la pyme: un enfoque con datos de panel”. WP–EC 2001–06, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas.  Binks, M. R., Ennew, C. and Reed, G., 1988. “Small Business and Banks: A Two Nation Perspective”. The Forum of Private Business, UK and the National Federation of Independent Businesses, USA.  Brealey, R.A., Myers, S.C., Partington, G. and Robinson, D. (2011), “Principles of Corporate Finance”. 7th edition, Irwin McGraw-Hill.  Ferrer, M. A. and Tresierra, A, 2009. “Las PYMES y las teorías modernas sobre estructura de capital” Compendium, 22, pp. 65- 83.  Frank M.Z., and Goyal V.K., 2003. “Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217-48.  Harris, M. and A. Raviv, 1991. “The theory of capital structure”. The Journal of Finance 46, pp. 297–355.  Jensen M. C. and Meckling W.H., 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure”. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305-60.  Modigliani, F. and M.H. Miller, 1958. “The Costs of Capital, Corporate Finance, and the Theory of Investment”. American Economic Review 48 (June): 261-297.
  11. 11. Bibliography  Modigliani, F. and M.H. Miller, 1963. “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction”. American Economic Review 53 (June): 433-443.  Myers, S.C., 1977. “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing”. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147-175.  Myers, S.C., 1984. “The Capital Structure Puzzle”. Journal of Finance 39, 575-592. Myers, S. C., 2001. “Capital structure”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 81-102.  Scott, J. H., 1977. “Bankruptcy, secured debt, and optimal capital structure”. The Journal of Finance, 32, 1-19  Sogorb, M. F., 2005. “How SME uniqueness affects capital structure: Evidence from a 1994–1998 Spanish data panel”. Small Business Economics, 25, 447–457.  Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss, 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”. American Economic Review 71(3), 393–410.  Wald, J. K., 1999. “How firm characteristic affect capital structure: an international comparison”. Journal Financial Research, 22(2), 161 – 88.  Zambrano, S. M. and Acuña, G. A. (2011). “Estructura de capital. Evolución teórica”. Criterio Libre 15(9), 81-102.  Zoppa, A. and McMahon, R., 2002. “Pecking Order Theory and the Financial Structure of Manufacturing SMEs from Australia‟s Business Longitudinal Survey”. School of Commerce, The Flinders University of South Australia. Research Paper Series 02-1. Australia.
  12. 12. The End.