SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 39
Tier-2 Dissolution Method –
A Testing Lab’s Perspective
Jian-Hwa Han,
Dissolution Group, NCE-Analytical R&D,
Global Pharmaceutical Sciences, Abbott Labs
June 11, 2012 (USP Workshop – Challenges in Dissolution)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
2
 What is gelatin cross-linking? What is the cause?
 Common practice in an Analytical/Dissolution lab
 USP <711>
Tier-2 Method
Practice
 Do we have good control of enzyme activities in the
media?
 The pepsin and pancreatin activity comparison
 Pass / Fail – Biorelevant?
Enzyme Power
 Understand the cross-linking behavior and identify the
sources of variability of Tier-2 testing
 2-step Tier-2 approach (for poorly soluble drug using
SDS as media)
Applications,
Limitations
& Remedy
Agenda
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
3
Common Causes of Cross-linking
Aldehyde
• Active Ingredient
• Excipients
• Packaging Materials
• Process Environments
Temperature
Humidity
UV Light
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
4
Cross-linking? How Do I Know? – Observe Capsule Opening
(Data generated by Fiber Optic Dissolution System)
1st. - Delayed Capsule
Opening!
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time, Minutes
%LC
Control 1hr-1 1hr-2 1hr-3 2hr-1 2hr-2
2hr-3 4hr-1 4hr-2 4hr-3
0
5
10
15
20
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time, Minutes
%LC
Control 1hr-1 1hr-2 1hr-3 2hr-1 2hr-2
2hr-3 4hr-1 4hr-2 4hr-3
For Example:
Fresh capsules = <2 min.;
Aged capsule = > 5 min.
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
5
Visual Evidence of Cross-linking - Pellicle Formation
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
6
Evidence of Cross-linking - Threading
Thin/fine tread-like materials stretching out from the
capsule shell
Need careful observation to identify
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
7
Common Practice
?
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
8
Use of Enzymes per USP <711>
Water or a medium with a pH of less than 6.8:
• Add purified pepsin that results in an activity
of 750,000 units/L or less
Media with a pH of 6.8 or greater:
• Add pancreatin at NMT 1750 USP units of
protease activity per Liter
Question: Do these two conditions provide
equal power to open the cross-linked gelatin
capsules?
[Ref: Jean Gallery, Jian-Hwa Han, and Chiramel Abraham, “Pepsin and
Pancreatin performance in the dissolution of cross-linked gelatin capsules
from pH 1 to 8”, Pharmaceutical Forum, 2004, Vol. 30(3), p.1084]
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
9
Pepsin and Pancreatin Activity as a Function of pH
Ref: D.W. Piper and B.H. Fenton, “pH Stability
and Activity Curves of Pepsin with Special
Reference to Their Clinical Importance”, Gut
(6): 506-508, 1965
Pancreatin contains many
enzymes, including trypsin,
amylase, lipase, and
protease.
Enzyme pH Optimum
Lipase 8.0
Trypsin 7.8 ~ 8.7
Amylase 6.7 - 7.0
Pepsin
pH 5~6.8
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
10
Do we have good control for enzyme activities in the
media?
Do we perform pepsin/pancreatin activity test each
time we do Tier-2 testing?
Could we rely on the vendor provided activity value
from C of A?
How much do we know about the reported activity
value?
• There are multiple testing methods for pepsin activity.
• There are many different ways to present pepsin activity
level.
Example: Pepsin, Sigma, P7000
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
11
Experimental Design -
Select the right sample –
Highly soluble throughout the physiological pH range
Generate artificially cross-linked samples –
Aldehyde treatment (Daily preparation)
Evaluate Pass/Fail criteria
Observe variability and reproducibility of cross-linking
Compare method performance: Pepsin vs. Pancreatin
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
12
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time, Minutes
%LC
Control 1-hour 2-hour 4-hour
Verification of Tier-2 Testing Results
Tier-1
Fail
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time, Minutes
%LC
Control 1-hour 2-hour 4-hour
Pass
Similar Profiles
Tier-2
Two levels of comparison: (i) Pass the Q Spec; and (ii) Full recovery
of the profile to check the effectiveness of the enzyme digestion.
(Samples are 1, 2,
and 4 hours
treated with
formaldehyde for
both Tier-1 and
Tier-2 testing)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
13
Efficiency of Pepsin on Cross-linked Samples
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
14
Efficiency of Pancreatin on Cross-linked Samples
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (min.)
%Released
pH 4, Tier2
pH 4, Tier1
79.2
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (min.)
%Released
pH 6, Tier2
pH 6, Tier1
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (min.)
%Released
pH6.8,Tier2
pH6.8,Tier1
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Time (min.)
%Released
pH8,Tier2
pH8,Tier1
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
15
Test Comparison: 0.1N HCl/Pepsin vs pH 6.8/Pancreatin
(with 4-hour Aldehyde Treated Samples)
Tier-2, pH 1
Tier-1, pH 1
Tier-2, pH 6.8
Tier-1, pH 6.8
Control /Ref.
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
16
One Step Further:
Impact of Multiple Levels of Pancreatin on Cross-linking
2 X
3 X
5 X
1X
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
17
Impact on Bioequivalence - Pass/Fail Determination
 Pepsin and Pancreatin Levels were determined by the Gelatin Capsule
Working Group in 1998
 FDA BE Criteria:
80~125%
 F/P Passed;
F/F Failed Cmax –
Too High! (???)
References:
Gelatin Capsule Working Group, “Collaborative Development of Two-Tier Dissolution Testing
for Gelatin Capsules and Gelatin-Coated Tablets using Enzyme Containing Media”,
Pharmaceutical Forum 24: 7046-7050 (1998)
Marvin C. Meyer, etc., “The Effect of Gelatin Cross-Linking on the Bioequivalence of Hard
and Soft Gelatin Acetaminophen Capsules”, Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 17, No. 8, p.
962-966 (2000)
Capsule
did open!
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
18
Bioequivalence Consideration for Pass/Fail Control
 It is believed that the mildly cross-linked capsules will still be
efficacious
 Even though cross-linking can occur on stability, it is rarely
so extreme as to adversely affect performance for a well-
designed formulation
 Nevertheless, a QC measurement to evaluate the impact of
cross-linking is necessary
 Overall, 0.1N HCl with Pepsin method provides the optimal
power to digest cross-linked gelatin
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
19
General Observations for Gelatin Cross-linking
 Difficult to predict when or which gelatin capsule sample will
show cross-linking
 Highly variable capsule-to-capsule behavior
 May be seen around 6 months under stressed condition
(i.e. 40°C/75RH)
 If cross-linking is observed in 6 months under stressed
condition (e.g. 40°C/75RH), similar result is expected at ~12
months under 25°C/60RH
 With a well designed Tier-2 method, the product could pass
24 months stability (Note - The objective of a Tier-2 method
is not to make the product pass – it is to eliminate the
potential artifact of cross-linking)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
20
Some Soft Spots in Current Practice
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
21
Recommendations
 Identify alternative enzyme for pH ~4.5?
 2-Step Tier-2 Method for Poorly Soluble Drugs using
Surfactant Media
• Step 1: Run samples in enzyme media w/o Surfactant
• Step 2: Add surfactant concentrate to match original Tier-1 method
 2-Step Method Development Considerations:
• Volume consideration (pH, hydrodynamics)
• Media Preparation
• Step 1 treatment time (10~15 minutes)
• Verification – to make sure the method serves the purpose
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
22
2-step Tier-2 Verification #1: Turbulence Impact (Avoiding
Artificial Capsule Eruption during the Addition of Medium)
 Follow 2-step Tier-2
procedures without
using enzyme for step-1
to evaluate the
turbulence impact
 Sample is treated for 4-
hours with formaldehyde
 Result: The capsules
won’t open despite the
introduced turbulence
(i.e. addition of the 2nd
solution)
2-step w/o Enzyme
Control / Tier-1
X-linked / Tier-1
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
23
2-step Tier-2 Verification #2: Enzyme Power
X-linked / Tier-1
Control / Tier-2 X-linked / Tier-2
 Compare the
dissolution behaviors
of Control (untreated)
and cross-linked (4-hr
treated) samples
following the 2-step
Tier-2 procedures
 Result: The Tier-2
dissolution outcome
of cross-linked
samples matches up
with the control
samples.
Control / Tier-1
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
24
Summary and Discussion
 Cross-linking problems can be difficult to overcome for
analytical labs, but they can be circumvented with a basic
knowledge of formulation and process
 It is desirable to clearly identify the enzyme activities
required for each enzyme that can provide “equivalent”
digestion power cross-linked gelatin capsules
 If the capsule opening is the only concern for cross-linked
capsule samples, it would be nice to utilize other testing
method which is simpler and better controlled.
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
25
Acknowledge
 Abbott Analytical Scientists:
• Susan George
• Anagha Vaidya
• Ameesha Patel
• Daniel Bonilla
• Jean Gallery
• Chiramel Abraham
• Leonard Ferro
• Whitney Harman
• Steven Anderson
• Gregory Webster
 Abbott Management Support
for Dissolution Research and
Development
 External Inputs:
• Thomas Langdon, American
Laboratories, Inc.
• Steven Leinbach, Capsugel
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
26
Questions?
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
27
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
28
Pepsin
 <711>: Where water or a medium with a pH of less than 6.8
is specified as the Medium in the individual monograph, the
same Medium specified may be used with the addition of
purified pepsin that results in an activity of 750,000 Units
or less per 1000 mL.
 Gastric Fluid, Simulated, TS—Dissolve 2.0 g of sodium
chloride and 3.2 g of purified pepsin, that is derived from
porcine stomach mucosa, with an activity of 800 to 2500
units per mg of protein, in 7.0 mL of hydrochloric acid and
sufficient water to make 1000 mL.
 Example: Pancreatin from porcine pancreas
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
29
Pepsin (cont.)
For Example: Sigma, P7000
Before 2011: Pepsin, from porcine gastric mucosa,
Powder , 800 ~ 2500 units/mg protein
After 2011: Pepsin, from porcine gastric mucosa,
Powder , > 250 units/mg solid
USP <711> Dissolution: Pepsin, 750,000 Units (or Less) / 1000 mL
Lot # %Protein Units/mg Protein Units/ mg Solid Pepsin needed / L.
SGF,
Units/L
<711>
vs. SGF
#010M1513 49 806 1899 mg (~1.9 g) 1,263,808 59%
#050M1304V 49 920 1664 mg (~1.7 g) 1,442,560 52%
#061M1205V 376 1995 mg (~2.0 g) 1,203,200 62%
#071M0103V 473 1586 mg (~1.6 g) 1,513,600 50%
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
30
Pancreatin:
 <711>: For media with a pH of 6.8 or greater, pancreatin
can be added to produce not more than 1750 USP Units of
protease activity per 1000 mL.
 Intestinal Fluid, Simulated, TS—Dissolve 6.8 g of
monobasic potassium phosphate in 250 mL of water, mix,
and add 77 mL of 0.2 N sodium hydroxide and 500 mL of
water. Add 10.0 g of pancreatin, mix, and adjust the
resulting solution with either 0.2 N sodium hydroxide or 0.2
N hydrochloric acid to a pH of 6.8 ± 0.1. Dilute with water to
1000 mL.
 Example: Pancreatin from porcine pancreas, 8 × USP
specifications* (Sigma, P/N. P7545; *C of A: Conforms)
 Pancreatin, 8 × USP Protease 8.0 - 9.0 x USP (American
Laboratories, Inc. specification)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
31
Pancreatin (cont.)
USP <711> Dissolution:
Pancreatin, 1,750 Units (or Less) / 1000 mL
Protease
x USP
Protease
USP
units/mg
Wt per
1000 ml
(mg)
Concentra
tion USP
units/L
Conc X
1750
8.0 200.0 8.75 1750 1.00
8.1 202.5 8.75 1772 1.01
8.2 205.0 8.75 1794 1.03
8.3 207.5 8.75 1816 1.04
8.4 210.0 8.75 1838 1.05
8.5 212.5 8.75 1859 1.06
8.6 215.0 8.75 1881 1.08
8.7 217.5 8.75 1903 1.09
8.8 220.0 8.75 1925 1.10
8.9 222.5 8.75 1947 1.11
9.0 225.0 8.75 1969 1.13
Intestinal Fluid, Simulated, TS:
Protease
x USP
Protease
USP
units/mg
Wt per
1000 ml
(mg)
Concentra
tion USP
units/L
Conc X
1750 vs.
<711>
1.0 25 10000.0 250000 143
2.0 50 10000.0 500000 286
3.0 75 10000.0 750000 429
4.0 100 10000.0 1000000 571
5.0 125 10000.0 1250000 714
6.0 150 10000.0 1500000 857
7.0 175 10000.0 1750000 1000
8.0 200 10000.0 2000000 1143
9.0 225 10000.0 2250000 1286
10.0 250 10000.0 2500000 1429
11.0 275 10000.0 2750000 1571
12.0 300 10000.0 3000000 1714
(Data Source: Tom Langdon, American Laboratories, Inc.)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
32
Selected Soft Gelatin Capsule: No cross-linking
Tier-1 Tier-2
(Q = 80% at 30 min.)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
33
Cross-linking Levels Evaluation – Aldehyde Treated Samples
(Dissolution at pH 1 with or without Pepsin)
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
34
Reproducibility of Artificial Crosslinking Procedure:
Tier-1 Testing with 4-Hour Aldehyde Exposure
(pH Dependent!)
pH 1
pH 8
Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012
© 2012 Abbott
35
Impact of Media pH on Capsules Opening
 Capsule opening time is pH
dependent due to gelatin
solubility
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time, Minutes
%LC
pH 4.0 pH 4.5 pH 5.0 pH 5.5 pH 6.0 pH 6.5 pH 6.8 (n=5)
Tier-1 Testing w/o Enzymes:
Normal Capsules:
Cross-linked Capsules:
(Data Source: Steven Leinbach, Capsugel)
pH 1
pH 4
pH 4.0
pH 6.0 ~ 6.8
Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011
© 2011 Abbott
36
Delay of Capsule Opening: Tier-1 (0.1N HCl) with Varying
Degree of Cross-linking
Significant delay of capsule
shell opening for all conditions.
Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011
© 2011 Abbott
37
Variability from Samples & Testing (0.1N HCl)
Sample variability (Tier-1) Testing variability (Tier-2)
4-hour Treated samples
Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011
© 2011 Abbott
38
Testing Comparison (0.1N HCl): Tier-1 vs. Tier-2
Tier-1 Tier-2
Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011
© 2011 Abbott
39
2-step Tier-2 Trial Method – Case Study
 Tier-1: [USP App 2 @ 50 RPM; 900 mL of 50 mM
Phosphate with 0.5% SDS, pH 6.8]
 Tier-2, Step-1: [USP App 2 @ 50 RPM; 500 mL of
0.1N HCl w/pepsin (750,000 unit/L)]* for 10 ~ 15 minutes
 Tier-2, Step-2: Add 400 mL 118mM Phosphate with
1.125% SDS
 Sampling time points: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes
(* Considering gastric exposure)

More Related Content

What's hot

Evaluation for stability data q1 e
Evaluation for stability data q1 eEvaluation for stability data q1 e
Evaluation for stability data q1 eNayan Jha
 
Ipqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenteralsIpqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenteralsceutics1315
 
Stability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines ppt
Stability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines pptStability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines ppt
Stability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines pptAman K Dhamrait
 
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slideRelated Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slideBhanu Prakash N
 
Ipqc tests for tablet
Ipqc tests for tabletIpqc tests for tablet
Ipqc tests for tabletMalay Jivani
 
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & uspAnalytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & uspGANESH NIGADE
 
Developing specifications q3 q6
Developing specifications  q3 q6Developing specifications  q3 q6
Developing specifications q3 q6NamrataBawaskar
 
ICH Q2 Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2  Analytical Method ValidationICH Q2  Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2 Analytical Method ValidationNaila Kanwal
 
Qualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptx
Qualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptxQualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptx
Qualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptxGNIPST
 
Analytical Method Validation basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
Analytical Method Validation  basics by Dr. A. AmsavelAnalytical Method Validation  basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
Analytical Method Validation basics by Dr. A. AmsavelDr. Amsavel A
 
USP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview Dr.A.Amsavel
USP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview  Dr.A.AmsavelUSP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview  Dr.A.Amsavel
USP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview Dr.A.AmsavelDr. Amsavel A
 
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"Talha Mahmood
 
Inprocess as per usp ip bp tablets
Inprocess as per usp ip bp tabletsInprocess as per usp ip bp tablets
Inprocess as per usp ip bp tabletsDeepak Jain
 
Analytical method validation, ICH Q2 guideline
Analytical method validation, ICH Q2 guidelineAnalytical method validation, ICH Q2 guideline
Analytical method validation, ICH Q2 guidelineAbhishek Soni
 

What's hot (20)

Evaluation for stability data q1 e
Evaluation for stability data q1 eEvaluation for stability data q1 e
Evaluation for stability data q1 e
 
Ipqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenteralsIpqc for parenterals
Ipqc for parenterals
 
Stability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines ppt
Stability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines pptStability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines ppt
Stability studies ICH Q1A-Q1E Guidelines ppt
 
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slideRelated Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
Related Substances-Method Validation-PPT_slide
 
Ipqc tests for tablet
Ipqc tests for tabletIpqc tests for tablet
Ipqc tests for tablet
 
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & uspAnalytical methods validation as per ich & usp
Analytical methods validation as per ich & usp
 
Developing specifications q3 q6
Developing specifications  q3 q6Developing specifications  q3 q6
Developing specifications q3 q6
 
ICH Q2 Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2  Analytical Method ValidationICH Q2  Analytical Method Validation
ICH Q2 Analytical Method Validation
 
CGMP guidelines
CGMP guidelinesCGMP guidelines
CGMP guidelines
 
Qualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptx
Qualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptxQualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptx
Qualification of Friability Test Apparatus.pptx
 
PHOTOSTABILITY TESTING SEM I SEMINAR
PHOTOSTABILITY TESTING SEM I SEMINARPHOTOSTABILITY TESTING SEM I SEMINAR
PHOTOSTABILITY TESTING SEM I SEMINAR
 
ICH- Q3 Impurity
ICH- Q3 ImpurityICH- Q3 Impurity
ICH- Q3 Impurity
 
Analytical Method Validation basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
Analytical Method Validation  basics by Dr. A. AmsavelAnalytical Method Validation  basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
Analytical Method Validation basics by Dr. A. Amsavel
 
USP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview Dr.A.Amsavel
USP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview  Dr.A.AmsavelUSP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview  Dr.A.Amsavel
USP General Notices &General Chapters An Overview Dr.A.Amsavel
 
Extractable and leachables
Extractable and leachablesExtractable and leachables
Extractable and leachables
 
Case study on Out of Specification (OOS).
Case study on Out of Specification (OOS).Case study on Out of Specification (OOS).
Case study on Out of Specification (OOS).
 
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
ICH Q8 " PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT"
 
Residual solvents
Residual solventsResidual solvents
Residual solvents
 
Inprocess as per usp ip bp tablets
Inprocess as per usp ip bp tabletsInprocess as per usp ip bp tablets
Inprocess as per usp ip bp tablets
 
Analytical method validation, ICH Q2 guideline
Analytical method validation, ICH Q2 guidelineAnalytical method validation, ICH Q2 guideline
Analytical method validation, ICH Q2 guideline
 

Viewers also liked

Dissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 Final
Dissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 FinalDissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 Final
Dissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 FinalJian-Hwa Han 韓建華
 
A seminar on dissolution media
A seminar on dissolution mediaA seminar on dissolution media
A seminar on dissolution mediapratik5493
 
Dissolution test apparatus
Dissolution test apparatus Dissolution test apparatus
Dissolution test apparatus Sagar Savale
 
Sistema operativo elizabeth aguilar
Sistema operativo elizabeth aguilarSistema operativo elizabeth aguilar
Sistema operativo elizabeth aguilarelizatlv29
 
Redes aguilar vargas
Redes aguilar vargas Redes aguilar vargas
Redes aguilar vargas elizatlv29
 
Pitch book presentation 1.2
Pitch book presentation 1.2Pitch book presentation 1.2
Pitch book presentation 1.2Trishala Rasya
 
Endevinalla Paraigües
Endevinalla ParaigüesEndevinalla Paraigües
Endevinalla ParaigüesAniaLaRed
 
It takes a person to personalize learning
It takes a person to personalize learningIt takes a person to personalize learning
It takes a person to personalize learningMrs-Ramsey
 
Huellas labiales invisibles
Huellas labiales invisiblesHuellas labiales invisibles
Huellas labiales invisiblesW.E O.R
 
Toolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIF
Toolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIFToolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIF
Toolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIFESF Vlaanderen
 
Rugo Machine Shop Services Case Study Article
Rugo Machine Shop Services Case Study ArticleRugo Machine Shop Services Case Study Article
Rugo Machine Shop Services Case Study ArticleLindsey Rugo
 
Redes informáticas
Redes informáticasRedes informáticas
Redes informáticasittor__6
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Dissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 Final
Dissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 FinalDissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 Final
Dissolution Testing_USP Workshop_2014 Final
 
Stimuli PF 40 6 final
Stimuli PF 40 6 finalStimuli PF 40 6 final
Stimuli PF 40 6 final
 
Global Comparator Standards
Global Comparator StandardsGlobal Comparator Standards
Global Comparator Standards
 
A seminar on dissolution media
A seminar on dissolution mediaA seminar on dissolution media
A seminar on dissolution media
 
Dissolution test apparatus
Dissolution test apparatus Dissolution test apparatus
Dissolution test apparatus
 
DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP
DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUPDAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP
DAFTAR RIWAYAT HIDUP
 
Sistema operativo elizabeth aguilar
Sistema operativo elizabeth aguilarSistema operativo elizabeth aguilar
Sistema operativo elizabeth aguilar
 
Vietnam.rb rom talk
Vietnam.rb rom talkVietnam.rb rom talk
Vietnam.rb rom talk
 
Redes aguilar vargas
Redes aguilar vargas Redes aguilar vargas
Redes aguilar vargas
 
Pitch book presentation 1.2
Pitch book presentation 1.2Pitch book presentation 1.2
Pitch book presentation 1.2
 
Endevinalla Paraigües
Endevinalla ParaigüesEndevinalla Paraigües
Endevinalla Paraigües
 
Tapa cloths
Tapa clothsTapa cloths
Tapa cloths
 
It takes a person to personalize learning
It takes a person to personalize learningIt takes a person to personalize learning
It takes a person to personalize learning
 
Scan
ScanScan
Scan
 
Huellas labiales invisibles
Huellas labiales invisiblesHuellas labiales invisibles
Huellas labiales invisibles
 
Written_CVB_SEOR_State
Written_CVB_SEOR_StateWritten_CVB_SEOR_State
Written_CVB_SEOR_State
 
Toolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIF
Toolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIFToolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIF
Toolkit for supporting social innovation with the ESIF
 
Rugo Machine Shop Services Case Study Article
Rugo Machine Shop Services Case Study ArticleRugo Machine Shop Services Case Study Article
Rugo Machine Shop Services Case Study Article
 
Redes informáticas
Redes informáticasRedes informáticas
Redes informáticas
 
Pra latihan
Pra latihanPra latihan
Pra latihan
 

Similar to USP Disso Workshop_Tier 2 Method_JHH 11Jun2012 Final v3

Dissolution_Technique.ppt
Dissolution_Technique.pptDissolution_Technique.ppt
Dissolution_Technique.pptRavi Kumar G
 
Formulation development and evalution of matrix tablet of
Formulation development and evalution of matrix tablet ofFormulation development and evalution of matrix tablet of
Formulation development and evalution of matrix tablet ofGajanan Ingole
 
Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...
Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...
Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...iosrphr_editor
 
Preformulation guide
Preformulation guidePreformulation guide
Preformulation guideRitul Shah
 
Detection identification characterization of degraded products
Detection identification characterization of degraded productsDetection identification characterization of degraded products
Detection identification characterization of degraded productsGnanabhaskar Danaboina
 
chemical character OF DRUG.pptx
chemical character OF DRUG.pptxchemical character OF DRUG.pptx
chemical character OF DRUG.pptxlaxmidharsahoo7
 
Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...
Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...
Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...Jing Zang
 
SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS
SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS
SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS sumel ashique
 
Dissolution and drug release testing
Dissolution and drug release testingDissolution and drug release testing
Dissolution and drug release testingRoshan Bodhe
 
Preformulation studies part 2 mz
Preformulation studies part 2 mzPreformulation studies part 2 mz
Preformulation studies part 2 mzXenChisti
 
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic BiomassEnzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic BiomassBiorefineryEPC™
 
Formulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac Sodium
Formulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac SodiumFormulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac Sodium
Formulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac SodiumSagar Savale
 

Similar to USP Disso Workshop_Tier 2 Method_JHH 11Jun2012 Final v3 (20)

Dissolution_Technique.ppt
Dissolution_Technique.pptDissolution_Technique.ppt
Dissolution_Technique.ppt
 
Formulation development and evalution of matrix tablet of
Formulation development and evalution of matrix tablet ofFormulation development and evalution of matrix tablet of
Formulation development and evalution of matrix tablet of
 
Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...
Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...
Preparation, In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization of Solid Dispersions of La...
 
Preformulation guide
Preformulation guidePreformulation guide
Preformulation guide
 
validation of disso method 2.pdf
validation of disso method  2.pdfvalidation of disso method  2.pdf
validation of disso method 2.pdf
 
Detection identification characterization of degraded products
Detection identification characterization of degraded productsDetection identification characterization of degraded products
Detection identification characterization of degraded products
 
chemical character OF DRUG.pptx
chemical character OF DRUG.pptxchemical character OF DRUG.pptx
chemical character OF DRUG.pptx
 
Preformulation Guide
Preformulation GuidePreformulation Guide
Preformulation Guide
 
USP EP Meeting_2013 Final
USP EP Meeting_2013 FinalUSP EP Meeting_2013 Final
USP EP Meeting_2013 Final
 
Dk1719 ch02
Dk1719 ch02Dk1719 ch02
Dk1719 ch02
 
Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...
Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...
Formulation and Evaluation of Solid dispersion for Dissolution Enhancement of...
 
SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS
SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS
SUSTAINED RELEASE BEADS
 
Shah Chintan H
Shah Chintan HShah Chintan H
Shah Chintan H
 
Dissolution and drug release testing
Dissolution and drug release testingDissolution and drug release testing
Dissolution and drug release testing
 
Biorelevant ppt
Biorelevant pptBiorelevant ppt
Biorelevant ppt
 
Preformulation studies part 2 mz
Preformulation studies part 2 mzPreformulation studies part 2 mz
Preformulation studies part 2 mz
 
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic BiomassEnzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocellulosic Biomass
 
New methods of solubility
New methods of solubilityNew methods of solubility
New methods of solubility
 
H045047053
H045047053H045047053
H045047053
 
Formulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac Sodium
Formulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac SodiumFormulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac Sodium
Formulation and Evaluation of W/O/W Multiple Emulsions with Diclofenac Sodium
 

USP Disso Workshop_Tier 2 Method_JHH 11Jun2012 Final v3

  • 1. Tier-2 Dissolution Method – A Testing Lab’s Perspective Jian-Hwa Han, Dissolution Group, NCE-Analytical R&D, Global Pharmaceutical Sciences, Abbott Labs June 11, 2012 (USP Workshop – Challenges in Dissolution)
  • 2. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 2  What is gelatin cross-linking? What is the cause?  Common practice in an Analytical/Dissolution lab  USP <711> Tier-2 Method Practice  Do we have good control of enzyme activities in the media?  The pepsin and pancreatin activity comparison  Pass / Fail – Biorelevant? Enzyme Power  Understand the cross-linking behavior and identify the sources of variability of Tier-2 testing  2-step Tier-2 approach (for poorly soluble drug using SDS as media) Applications, Limitations & Remedy Agenda
  • 3. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 3 Common Causes of Cross-linking Aldehyde • Active Ingredient • Excipients • Packaging Materials • Process Environments Temperature Humidity UV Light
  • 4. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 4 Cross-linking? How Do I Know? – Observe Capsule Opening (Data generated by Fiber Optic Dissolution System) 1st. - Delayed Capsule Opening! 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time, Minutes %LC Control 1hr-1 1hr-2 1hr-3 2hr-1 2hr-2 2hr-3 4hr-1 4hr-2 4hr-3 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time, Minutes %LC Control 1hr-1 1hr-2 1hr-3 2hr-1 2hr-2 2hr-3 4hr-1 4hr-2 4hr-3 For Example: Fresh capsules = <2 min.; Aged capsule = > 5 min.
  • 5. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 5 Visual Evidence of Cross-linking - Pellicle Formation
  • 6. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 6 Evidence of Cross-linking - Threading Thin/fine tread-like materials stretching out from the capsule shell Need careful observation to identify
  • 7. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 7 Common Practice ?
  • 8. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 8 Use of Enzymes per USP <711> Water or a medium with a pH of less than 6.8: • Add purified pepsin that results in an activity of 750,000 units/L or less Media with a pH of 6.8 or greater: • Add pancreatin at NMT 1750 USP units of protease activity per Liter Question: Do these two conditions provide equal power to open the cross-linked gelatin capsules? [Ref: Jean Gallery, Jian-Hwa Han, and Chiramel Abraham, “Pepsin and Pancreatin performance in the dissolution of cross-linked gelatin capsules from pH 1 to 8”, Pharmaceutical Forum, 2004, Vol. 30(3), p.1084]
  • 9. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 9 Pepsin and Pancreatin Activity as a Function of pH Ref: D.W. Piper and B.H. Fenton, “pH Stability and Activity Curves of Pepsin with Special Reference to Their Clinical Importance”, Gut (6): 506-508, 1965 Pancreatin contains many enzymes, including trypsin, amylase, lipase, and protease. Enzyme pH Optimum Lipase 8.0 Trypsin 7.8 ~ 8.7 Amylase 6.7 - 7.0 Pepsin pH 5~6.8
  • 10. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 10 Do we have good control for enzyme activities in the media? Do we perform pepsin/pancreatin activity test each time we do Tier-2 testing? Could we rely on the vendor provided activity value from C of A? How much do we know about the reported activity value? • There are multiple testing methods for pepsin activity. • There are many different ways to present pepsin activity level. Example: Pepsin, Sigma, P7000
  • 11. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 11 Experimental Design - Select the right sample – Highly soluble throughout the physiological pH range Generate artificially cross-linked samples – Aldehyde treatment (Daily preparation) Evaluate Pass/Fail criteria Observe variability and reproducibility of cross-linking Compare method performance: Pepsin vs. Pancreatin
  • 12. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 12 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time, Minutes %LC Control 1-hour 2-hour 4-hour Verification of Tier-2 Testing Results Tier-1 Fail 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Time, Minutes %LC Control 1-hour 2-hour 4-hour Pass Similar Profiles Tier-2 Two levels of comparison: (i) Pass the Q Spec; and (ii) Full recovery of the profile to check the effectiveness of the enzyme digestion. (Samples are 1, 2, and 4 hours treated with formaldehyde for both Tier-1 and Tier-2 testing)
  • 13. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 13 Efficiency of Pepsin on Cross-linked Samples
  • 14. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 14 Efficiency of Pancreatin on Cross-linked Samples 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min.) %Released pH 4, Tier2 pH 4, Tier1 79.2 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min.) %Released pH 6, Tier2 pH 6, Tier1 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min.) %Released pH6.8,Tier2 pH6.8,Tier1 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Time (min.) %Released pH8,Tier2 pH8,Tier1
  • 15. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 15 Test Comparison: 0.1N HCl/Pepsin vs pH 6.8/Pancreatin (with 4-hour Aldehyde Treated Samples) Tier-2, pH 1 Tier-1, pH 1 Tier-2, pH 6.8 Tier-1, pH 6.8 Control /Ref.
  • 16. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 16 One Step Further: Impact of Multiple Levels of Pancreatin on Cross-linking 2 X 3 X 5 X 1X
  • 17. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 17 Impact on Bioequivalence - Pass/Fail Determination  Pepsin and Pancreatin Levels were determined by the Gelatin Capsule Working Group in 1998  FDA BE Criteria: 80~125%  F/P Passed; F/F Failed Cmax – Too High! (???) References: Gelatin Capsule Working Group, “Collaborative Development of Two-Tier Dissolution Testing for Gelatin Capsules and Gelatin-Coated Tablets using Enzyme Containing Media”, Pharmaceutical Forum 24: 7046-7050 (1998) Marvin C. Meyer, etc., “The Effect of Gelatin Cross-Linking on the Bioequivalence of Hard and Soft Gelatin Acetaminophen Capsules”, Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 17, No. 8, p. 962-966 (2000) Capsule did open!
  • 18. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 18 Bioequivalence Consideration for Pass/Fail Control  It is believed that the mildly cross-linked capsules will still be efficacious  Even though cross-linking can occur on stability, it is rarely so extreme as to adversely affect performance for a well- designed formulation  Nevertheless, a QC measurement to evaluate the impact of cross-linking is necessary  Overall, 0.1N HCl with Pepsin method provides the optimal power to digest cross-linked gelatin
  • 19. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 19 General Observations for Gelatin Cross-linking  Difficult to predict when or which gelatin capsule sample will show cross-linking  Highly variable capsule-to-capsule behavior  May be seen around 6 months under stressed condition (i.e. 40°C/75RH)  If cross-linking is observed in 6 months under stressed condition (e.g. 40°C/75RH), similar result is expected at ~12 months under 25°C/60RH  With a well designed Tier-2 method, the product could pass 24 months stability (Note - The objective of a Tier-2 method is not to make the product pass – it is to eliminate the potential artifact of cross-linking)
  • 20. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 20 Some Soft Spots in Current Practice
  • 21. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 21 Recommendations  Identify alternative enzyme for pH ~4.5?  2-Step Tier-2 Method for Poorly Soluble Drugs using Surfactant Media • Step 1: Run samples in enzyme media w/o Surfactant • Step 2: Add surfactant concentrate to match original Tier-1 method  2-Step Method Development Considerations: • Volume consideration (pH, hydrodynamics) • Media Preparation • Step 1 treatment time (10~15 minutes) • Verification – to make sure the method serves the purpose
  • 22. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 22 2-step Tier-2 Verification #1: Turbulence Impact (Avoiding Artificial Capsule Eruption during the Addition of Medium)  Follow 2-step Tier-2 procedures without using enzyme for step-1 to evaluate the turbulence impact  Sample is treated for 4- hours with formaldehyde  Result: The capsules won’t open despite the introduced turbulence (i.e. addition of the 2nd solution) 2-step w/o Enzyme Control / Tier-1 X-linked / Tier-1
  • 23. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 23 2-step Tier-2 Verification #2: Enzyme Power X-linked / Tier-1 Control / Tier-2 X-linked / Tier-2  Compare the dissolution behaviors of Control (untreated) and cross-linked (4-hr treated) samples following the 2-step Tier-2 procedures  Result: The Tier-2 dissolution outcome of cross-linked samples matches up with the control samples. Control / Tier-1
  • 24. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 24 Summary and Discussion  Cross-linking problems can be difficult to overcome for analytical labs, but they can be circumvented with a basic knowledge of formulation and process  It is desirable to clearly identify the enzyme activities required for each enzyme that can provide “equivalent” digestion power cross-linked gelatin capsules  If the capsule opening is the only concern for cross-linked capsule samples, it would be nice to utilize other testing method which is simpler and better controlled.
  • 25. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 25 Acknowledge  Abbott Analytical Scientists: • Susan George • Anagha Vaidya • Ameesha Patel • Daniel Bonilla • Jean Gallery • Chiramel Abraham • Leonard Ferro • Whitney Harman • Steven Anderson • Gregory Webster  Abbott Management Support for Dissolution Research and Development  External Inputs: • Thomas Langdon, American Laboratories, Inc. • Steven Leinbach, Capsugel
  • 26. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 26 Questions?
  • 28. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 28 Pepsin  <711>: Where water or a medium with a pH of less than 6.8 is specified as the Medium in the individual monograph, the same Medium specified may be used with the addition of purified pepsin that results in an activity of 750,000 Units or less per 1000 mL.  Gastric Fluid, Simulated, TS—Dissolve 2.0 g of sodium chloride and 3.2 g of purified pepsin, that is derived from porcine stomach mucosa, with an activity of 800 to 2500 units per mg of protein, in 7.0 mL of hydrochloric acid and sufficient water to make 1000 mL.  Example: Pancreatin from porcine pancreas
  • 29. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 29 Pepsin (cont.) For Example: Sigma, P7000 Before 2011: Pepsin, from porcine gastric mucosa, Powder , 800 ~ 2500 units/mg protein After 2011: Pepsin, from porcine gastric mucosa, Powder , > 250 units/mg solid USP <711> Dissolution: Pepsin, 750,000 Units (or Less) / 1000 mL Lot # %Protein Units/mg Protein Units/ mg Solid Pepsin needed / L. SGF, Units/L <711> vs. SGF #010M1513 49 806 1899 mg (~1.9 g) 1,263,808 59% #050M1304V 49 920 1664 mg (~1.7 g) 1,442,560 52% #061M1205V 376 1995 mg (~2.0 g) 1,203,200 62% #071M0103V 473 1586 mg (~1.6 g) 1,513,600 50%
  • 30. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 30 Pancreatin:  <711>: For media with a pH of 6.8 or greater, pancreatin can be added to produce not more than 1750 USP Units of protease activity per 1000 mL.  Intestinal Fluid, Simulated, TS—Dissolve 6.8 g of monobasic potassium phosphate in 250 mL of water, mix, and add 77 mL of 0.2 N sodium hydroxide and 500 mL of water. Add 10.0 g of pancreatin, mix, and adjust the resulting solution with either 0.2 N sodium hydroxide or 0.2 N hydrochloric acid to a pH of 6.8 ± 0.1. Dilute with water to 1000 mL.  Example: Pancreatin from porcine pancreas, 8 × USP specifications* (Sigma, P/N. P7545; *C of A: Conforms)  Pancreatin, 8 × USP Protease 8.0 - 9.0 x USP (American Laboratories, Inc. specification)
  • 31. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 31 Pancreatin (cont.) USP <711> Dissolution: Pancreatin, 1,750 Units (or Less) / 1000 mL Protease x USP Protease USP units/mg Wt per 1000 ml (mg) Concentra tion USP units/L Conc X 1750 8.0 200.0 8.75 1750 1.00 8.1 202.5 8.75 1772 1.01 8.2 205.0 8.75 1794 1.03 8.3 207.5 8.75 1816 1.04 8.4 210.0 8.75 1838 1.05 8.5 212.5 8.75 1859 1.06 8.6 215.0 8.75 1881 1.08 8.7 217.5 8.75 1903 1.09 8.8 220.0 8.75 1925 1.10 8.9 222.5 8.75 1947 1.11 9.0 225.0 8.75 1969 1.13 Intestinal Fluid, Simulated, TS: Protease x USP Protease USP units/mg Wt per 1000 ml (mg) Concentra tion USP units/L Conc X 1750 vs. <711> 1.0 25 10000.0 250000 143 2.0 50 10000.0 500000 286 3.0 75 10000.0 750000 429 4.0 100 10000.0 1000000 571 5.0 125 10000.0 1250000 714 6.0 150 10000.0 1500000 857 7.0 175 10000.0 1750000 1000 8.0 200 10000.0 2000000 1143 9.0 225 10000.0 2250000 1286 10.0 250 10000.0 2500000 1429 11.0 275 10000.0 2750000 1571 12.0 300 10000.0 3000000 1714 (Data Source: Tom Langdon, American Laboratories, Inc.)
  • 32. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 32 Selected Soft Gelatin Capsule: No cross-linking Tier-1 Tier-2 (Q = 80% at 30 min.)
  • 33. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 33 Cross-linking Levels Evaluation – Aldehyde Treated Samples (Dissolution at pH 1 with or without Pepsin)
  • 34. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 34 Reproducibility of Artificial Crosslinking Procedure: Tier-1 Testing with 4-Hour Aldehyde Exposure (pH Dependent!) pH 1 pH 8
  • 35. Tier-2 Dissolution, 11Jun2012 © 2012 Abbott 35 Impact of Media pH on Capsules Opening  Capsule opening time is pH dependent due to gelatin solubility 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time, Minutes %LC pH 4.0 pH 4.5 pH 5.0 pH 5.5 pH 6.0 pH 6.5 pH 6.8 (n=5) Tier-1 Testing w/o Enzymes: Normal Capsules: Cross-linked Capsules: (Data Source: Steven Leinbach, Capsugel) pH 1 pH 4 pH 4.0 pH 6.0 ~ 6.8
  • 36. Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011 © 2011 Abbott 36 Delay of Capsule Opening: Tier-1 (0.1N HCl) with Varying Degree of Cross-linking Significant delay of capsule shell opening for all conditions.
  • 37. Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011 © 2011 Abbott 37 Variability from Samples & Testing (0.1N HCl) Sample variability (Tier-1) Testing variability (Tier-2) 4-hour Treated samples
  • 38. Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011 © 2011 Abbott 38 Testing Comparison (0.1N HCl): Tier-1 vs. Tier-2 Tier-1 Tier-2
  • 39. Tier-2 Dissolution, 21Oct2011 © 2011 Abbott 39 2-step Tier-2 Trial Method – Case Study  Tier-1: [USP App 2 @ 50 RPM; 900 mL of 50 mM Phosphate with 0.5% SDS, pH 6.8]  Tier-2, Step-1: [USP App 2 @ 50 RPM; 500 mL of 0.1N HCl w/pepsin (750,000 unit/L)]* for 10 ~ 15 minutes  Tier-2, Step-2: Add 400 mL 118mM Phosphate with 1.125% SDS  Sampling time points: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes (* Considering gastric exposure)

Editor's Notes

  1. My name is Jian-Hwa Han. I have worked in dissolution area for 12 years. I am the only speaker got extra time for presentation, and I do have a lot of information to share. I would like to ask you to hold your question if possible, and we have plenty time for discussions later. Quick survey: (i) How many people heard about gelatin cross-linking issue? (ii) How many people perform dissolution testing? (iii) How many people actually had cross-linking headache before? Workshop – “Challenges in Dissolution” I have one of my own QbD term - “Dissolution Space”, which is a knowledge space contains all the dissolution concepts and practices. And, in my Disso Space, the gelatin cross-linking only take up a very small portion in this space. “A very small problem” but caused a very huge headache for the whole industry. Good thing about this issue is – It is generic. Therefore, if we can share all of our knowledge and experiences, we should be able to come up a good solution for it.
  2. &amp;lt;number&amp;gt; We all have heard about “gelatin cross-linking”. But, do we know how that happens, when it could happen. Or, is there any way to prevent it? What would be a good strategy for employing Tier-2 testing? The Tier-2 testing provides us a helpful second chance to re-assess the quality of our gelatin products. We all appreciate to have this second chance. Does the Tier-2 testing work? – Yes! (May be!) Can we make it better? – Certainly! That is what we are here for! The key point for Tier-2 method to work is the enzyme activity. Do we know what exactly the enzyme activity is for the material that we currently use? Do we have good control on enzyme activity for our testing? Does pepsin and pancreatin work equally well for digestion of the cross-linked gelatin? Can we correlate our Tier-2 results to in vivo performance? We want to learn the basics and apply the knowledge to better control our testing method. When we hit the road block, are we bold enough to try something new and be able to convince the agencies?
  3. There is one section in the new USP general chapter &amp;lt;1094&amp;gt; talking about gelatin cross-linking and the common causes. There are chemical and physical factors from the materials, environment, and packaging, … etc.. The true solution for solving the cross-linking problem is to identify the root causes, and find the ways to prevent it from happening, or slow down the progress. (The dissolution testing is only a tool to show the quality of the product. We can ONLY improve the method, but we can not improve the quality of the product.)
  4. When some test results “Do not conform” to the Dissolution specification, it may or may not due to gelatin cross-linking. We need to be aware that Tier-2 testing can ONLY solve the problems if the issue is “gelatin cross-linking”. Here are some tips can help you to identify if the problem is “gelatin cross-linking”. The key word is “visual observation”! &amp; “Visual observation” means nothing if you don’t document it. (#4) Capsule opening time: In acid media, a fresh capsule would open within 2 minutes (HGC/SGC), and the aged capsules may not open until 3~5 minutes or even later.
  5. (#5) Pellicle Formation is the strongest evidence for gelatin cross-linking: Different gelatin products/different levels of cross-linking  Different characteristics of pellicles.
  6. (#6) Threading: Trivial but important. It is an early sign of gelatin cross-linking which has been ignored most of the times. At this stage, you will not fail your spec, but you can expect the cross-linking is happening. It could buy you the time for preparation, and avoid the panic shock at the later time. (I use these pictures to help me to make a point here. Actually, the threads are very fine - too fine to be captured by camera. So, you will need to train your eyes for it.)
  7. With this background knowledge, we can build up a reasonable common practice for utilizing Tier-2 testing. When we receive a sample (release or stability), we will always follow Tier-1 testing protocol first. If the testing results are good as expected, we report the results and are done with it. !!! If the result is questionable (note - during early development phases there is no spec set yet), we would track back the observation records to exam the possibility for gelatin cross-linking. If the answer is possible, then we will perform Tier-2 testing. The grey area is an important conceptual box which we should always think about how to correlate the dissolution results to product in vivo performance. At this time, I would push it to the background. After the Tier-2 testing, if the testing result is acceptable, we will report the results. (Done!) If the results are still not acceptable, then we will initiate a lab investigation to identify the possible root causes and design an action plan to tackle the problem. (i.e. a CAPA activity) If the cross-linking behavior is not confirmed, we will initiate the lab investigation right at that time.
  8. Now, USP &amp;lt;711&amp;gt; gives us two options. Question: Do these two options provide equal power to open the cross-linked gelatin capsules? Do these two options can apply to all dissolution methods that we are using?
  9. The activities of pepsin and pancreatin are both pH dependent. Pancreatin contains several enzymes, and which enzyme plays the most important roles to digest the cross-linked gelatin?
  10. The enzyme activity is a very complicated subject for discussion. There are at least 7 different ways to define the pepsin activity by different organizations around the world. And, there are many different testing methods for pepsin activity, and they don’t produce the same results. Therefore, it is important to have a harmonized way for us to get the right information for use. In 2010, when Sigma changed the activity statement in their CofA for its pepsin product, P7000, it created a big confusion for many analytical labs. Working in a dissolution lab, I am hoping for the vendors who can provide us stable enzymes with reliable activity values. So, I can just use the materials referring to their activity values to run my tests. I can not afford to perform the enzyme activity assay when I need to run my Tier-2 testing.
  11. To be able to get meaningful data, we need to: Select a right sample works from pH 1 to pH 6.8 and above. Also, we can focus the impact to dissolution only from the capsule shell. We need to be able to reproduce representative cross-linked samples for comparison. We have to make the sample everyday for the experiments. Observe details and correlate to the results. Accumulate the knowledge and come up with answers.
  12. Slides 12 – (HGC; 0.1N HCl/Pepsin) Here are the results comparing different levels of cross-linked samples by Tier-1 and Tier-2 testing using 0.1N HCl/Pepsin media. The HGC samples are treated with aldehyde for 1-hour, 2-hrs, and 4-hrs to achieve different levels of cross-linking. The plot on the left is Tier-1 results, and on the right is Tier-2 results. Acceptance criteria? At least, it has to pass the Q spec for sure. Ideally, we would like to see the Tier-2 dissolution profile is comparable to the control profile. Then, we will select a sample with suitable level of cross-linking for further evaluation.
  13. Slide 13 – (SGC) After we have identified the level of cross-linking that will fail Tier-1 and pass Tier-2, then we use this sample to evaluate the pH effect. This slide shows Pepsin’s performance in media with different pH range from pH 1 to pH 6.8. This experiment is performed with SGC sample treated with aldehyde for 4 hours. The Tier-2 results are satisfactory at pH 1 and pH 4. It fails badly at pH 6.8. For highly soluble and fast dissolving drug products, it may pass Tier-2 at pH 6. Drug with less solubility or slow dissolving formulation may not be able to pass because the delayed capsule opening will not provide enough time for dissolution.
  14. Slide 14 – (SGC) Similar experiments performed for Pancreatin from pH 4 to pH 8. In this case, the sample can only pass Tier-2 testing at pH 6.8 which still show significant slow down at 20-minute time point.
  15. Slide 15 – (HGC) This is a direct comparison of the Tier-2 method performance for the two options that we have from USP &amp;lt;711&amp;gt; (i.e. 0.1N HCl/pepsin and pH 6.8/Pancreatin). This experiment is performed with HGC sample treated with aldehyde for 4 hours. From this plot, we can see that these two Tier-2 testing conditions do not provide equivalent outcomes. The 0.1N HCl/Pepsin is better than pH 6.8/Pancreatin. The other reason is that the gelatin is more soluble in acid and capsules will open faster in pH 1 than in pH 6.8.
  16. Slide 16 – (SGC: ABT-627 @pH 8) Additional experiments have been performed to see different dissolution results when we applied more Pancreatin in the media. Our finding shows that at USP &amp;lt;711&amp;gt; specified level, it just barely passed the Q spec (at 30 minutes). Using 2X of USP &amp;lt;711&amp;gt; specified level, we can warrant a clear pass for Q spec. While using 3X of USP &amp;lt;711&amp;gt; specified level, we can match the dissolution profile to the control profile (i.e. normal capsule tested by Tier-1).
  17. So far, we have only discussed in vitro testing results for cross-linked capsules. How does it correlate to in vivo performance? [Ref] At the end of last century, there was a working group worked very hard on this subject. They developed three different levels of cross-linked capsule samples which were (i) P/P: Control sample - pass both Tier-1 and Tier-2; (ii) F/P: Mildly cross-linked sample – failed Tier-1 and passed Tier-2, and (iii) F/F: Severely cross-linked sample – Failed both Tier-1 and Tier-2 testing. These three samples had been clinically tested for bio-equivalency. I would like to ask you a simple question. What is the concern about gelatin cross-linking for in vivo drug performance? Are we afraid of the capsules won’t open in human body? If the capsule does not open, what would be the outcome from the BE study? It should fail the Cmax or AUC, right? Now, what do you think? It would fail high or fail low? The results from this report showed the F/F sample ONLY failed Cmax a little bit too high??? The AUC is perfectly ok. From the results, I am pretty sure the all capsules have opened in human body. (Ding!!!)
  18. [Are we too uptight on the in vitro dissolution testing?] From QC point of view, no matter what, we do need to have a system to measure the quality of our product. Therefore, we still need to have a reliable Tier-2 method which can serve for QC purpose. I believe we do have enough information for in vivo performance of the cross-linked capsules. What we need is to harmonize Tier-2 testing to have equivalent enzymatic power for digesting the cross-linked gelatin throughout the physiological pH ranges.
  19. Gelatin cross-linking happens randomly from sample-to-sample, from batch-to-batch. It is very hard to predict when or which gelatin capsule sample will show cross-linking. When it happens in a batch, it has highly variable capsule-to-capsule behavior. For a stability sample, the early detection may be from the 6 month, 40C/75RH stressed samples. If you observe cross-linking in 6 months stressed sample (i.e. 40°C/75RH), you may expect to see some cross-linking at ~12 months for the 25°C/60RH samples. With good packaging, the 24 months stability sample usually will not fail Tier-2 testing. However, most of the time, the problem is not around the mean value but from some really bad individual capsules. [So, if you have a question in mind that when we go to Tier-2 testing, do we follow S-1, S-2, and S-3 any more? That is a good question! I will leave it for further discussion.]
  20. After hearing all the stories about Tier-2 testing, you should feel less stress than before. However, there are still a few weak spots in the whole process map. (i) Neither Pepsin nor Pancreatin work well around pH 4.5! (ii) Surfactant compatibility issue with enzymes. For poorly soluble drugs, we have to use surfactant in the media to improve the solubility, but many commonly used surfactants may denature the enzymes and reduce the enzyme activities.
  21. The Expert Panel has started looking for alternative enzymes to be used around pH 4.5. The preliminary testing results are very promising, so stay tuned. For poorly soluble drugs, we may consider using a 2-step Tier-2 testing method for capsules products. The concept is drop the sample in media with enzyme but no surfactant run for 10~15 minutes, then add surfactant concentrate to bring up the surfactant concentration to the level as Tier-1 media. Some Method development considerations: How much volume used for the initial step? How much volume for the surfactant concentrate? The volume impacts hydrodynamics of the method, and also impacts the media preparation. It may be very hard to have a perfect alignment for Tier-1 and Tier-2 testing conditions for this kind of method. If something is significant different, we will need to perform impact assessment to evaluate the method performance.
  22. Here is an example for 2-step Tier-2 method development. First, we want to check the hydrodynamics impact. In this case, we used 500 mL for the initial media, then added 400 mL concentrated solution as a worst case scenario. We want to show there is no artificial capsule opening by the introduced turbulence during the addition of the second solution. The blue profile represents the normal capsules, and the red profile is for the cross-linked capsules tested by Tier-1 method. The X-linked samples failed Tier-1. The brown profile is for the same cross-linked capsules went through a “mimic” 2-step method without using enzyme to explore hydrodynamic impact to the samples. The finding shows that we will not generate any false passing result.
  23. The other thing we need to confirm is enzyme power provided by the first treatment step (i.e. the timing). In this case, we used 0.01N HCl/Pepsin as media and treated for 10 minutes during the first step, then added the surfactant concentrate and continue for the testing. Both good capsules (control) and cross-linked capsules are tested by Tier-1 and Tier-2 testing. From the results, we have confirmed the testing condition is satisfactory.
  24. Cross-linking is a big headache to dissolution analysts since the Tier-2 method is not easy to develop. It is always better to prevent the cross-linking from happening. Eventually, the headache can be prevented or minimized. It is desirable to identify the enzyme activity level required for each enzyme used at different pH’s that can provide “equivalent” digestion power for the whole physiological pH ranges. If the capsule opening is the only concern for cross-linked capsule samples, it would be nice to utilize other testing method which is simpler and better controlled. I had worked on an oil-filled SGC project. The dissolution method is very complicated, and we have to identify special lots of surfactant to be used for that method due to significant oil/surfactant/drug interaction/interference for the HPLC analysis. It was a mess! I was able to correlate the disintegration results to dissolution results from cross-linked samples. At the end, the agency agreed to allow us using disintegration to replace dissolution testing for that product.
  25. At the end, I would like to thanks for my Abbott Dissolution colleagues for the great efforts and wonderful team work. Thanks to my management for providing us the opportunities to do dissolution researches. Thanks to Mr.Tom Langdon from American laboratories for helping me to learn a lot about enzymes. Thanks to Mr. Steven Leinbach from Capsugel for sharing the results and good discussions for the new enzymes explorations.
  26. Significant delay of capsule shell opening for all conditions Sample variability from cross-linking treatment
  27. Sample variability from cross-linking treatment Testing variability: Rupture &amp; re-seal