• Like

Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Educ 6240 assignment one data overview

  • 303 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
303
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Hello and welcome to Ben Martin Accelerated Learning Academy. This is a presentation to show one instructional area of focus for our school. Objective 2.3: Improve students’ proficiency in math for a changing globally competitive environment as measured by state assessments to meet or exceed 85% by 2012. This presentation will highlight some of the results from the 2009-2010 school year and will show how we are performing as a school according to state testing by grade levels, in comparison with our district and state, the performance trends, performance by subgroup and showing future target information. At the end of this presentation, I hope that you will have a better understanding of our school data in relations to math and our school objective.
  • This slide shows our students during the 2009-2010 school year and represents how well our 4 th and 5 th grade students are performing in math according to state testing with growth from the previous year. Students who are at or above the 1.5 ratio is considered having high growth in math. Students overall and 4 th grade had high growth and those in 5 th grade at grade level. The reason 3 rd grade isn’t shown here is because students in 3 rd grade were not tested in 2 nd grade from the previous year therefore will not be able to show “growth”.
  • This slide shows students in 3 rd , 4 th and 5 th grade in comparison with the state and district. As you can tell, students in our 3 rd grade are close to meeting the state and district’s grade level performance, while 4 th and 5 th grade students have a bigger gap to reach.
  • This slide shows how well the students in 3 rd , 4 th , and 5 th grade have been performing the past 3 years. It shows that students in all grade levels have increased in performing at or above grade level each year. This also shows that 3 rd grade students in math perform better than 5 th graders.
  • This slide shows overall how students have been performing from year to year. Students have increased in overall math performance in each of the years.
  • This slide represents the percentage of students achieving at or above grade level in performance according to subgroups. As you can see here, the White student population is doing better than all the others and same with the overall percentage.
  • This slide shows the target for each year for the state and how we have been comparing. The good news is that the difference between our school and the state has decreased. But, on the other hand, this year the target for the state in math has increased as well so we will have to make up a bigger gap if we want to hit the target for math achievement for grades 3-5. By 2013-2014, the state’s target is to be able to be 100% proficient in math performance.

Transcript

  • 1. Data Overview Objective 2.3: Improve students’ proficiency in math for a changing globally competitive environment as measured by state assessments to meet or exceed 85% by 2012. Ben Martin Accelerated Learning Academy By: Janna Abo-George
  • 2. High Growth Math Achievement Note: 2009-2010 school year. Chart depicts ratio of students achieving growth objective to those not achieving objective. Ratios > 1.5 = high growth.
  • 3. 2009-2010 Math Performance by Grade Level Note: Percentage of students’ scores at or above grade level.
  • 4. 3 Year Math Performance Trend by Grade Level Note: Percentage of students’ scores at or above grade level.
  • 5. 3 Year Overall Math Performance Trend Note: Percentage of students’ scores at or above grade level.
  • 6. 2009-2010 Math Performance by Subgroup Note: Percentage of students’ scores at or above grade level.
  • 7. Ben Martin ALA vs State Targets Grades 3-5 School Year Ben Martin State Difference 2007-2008 62.1 77.2 (15.1) 2008-2009 71.6 77.2 (5.6) 2009-2010 74.3 77.2 (2.9) 2010-2011 ? 88.6 ? 2011-2012 ? 88.6 ? 2012-2013 ? 88.6 ? 2013-2014 ? 100 ?
  • 8. Where do we go from here?
    • How do we help our students achieve grade level achievement or “high growth” in mathematics?
    • What can we do to “close the gap”?
    • What can we do as a school community, grade level or classroom?
    • Questions? Comments?
    Information from this presentation can be found at: http://www.ncreportcards.org/src/schDetails.jsp?pYear=2009-2010&pLEACode=260&pSchCode=414