Wonca ws ece maja
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
252
Views on SlideShare
252
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Wonca ws ece maja Wonca ws ece maja Presentation Transcript

  • Early clinical exposure in primary care – an experience from Slovenia Marija Petek Šter Janko Kersnik Department for family medicine University of Ljubljana Slovenia Department for family medicine University of Maribor Slovenia Corresponding author: marija.petek-ster@mf.uni-lj.si
  • Fieldwork • Interview with nursing home residents: • Six to eight nursing homes in a neighborhood of the Medical faculty - contraction with Medical faculty • Nursing home staff: rules of behavior, ethical principals • Students in pairs: one of the student performing a semi-structured one-hour interview according to the instructions and the second one is an observer • After the first interview with the first patients, the role with the second patient was changed (an observer became an interviewer)
  • Clinical visit • One day attachment in general practice • General practices all over Slovenia (chosen by the student, tutors trained in giving feedback) • Student is an observer of GPs’ work and communication • Protocols for observation (20 consultations)
  • Assessment • Students have to pass theoretical and practical part of the exam. Each part contributes 50% of final mark. • Theoretical part: MCQ questions (60% of points) • Practical part: seminar and analysis of the communication at office visit (written, oral), criteria for evaluation was prepared in advance
  • Students feedback • During the curriculum: we appreciated students’ oral feedback • At the end of the curriculum: students’ written feedback with the evaluation of the overall curricula and parts of the curricula using evaluation form (Likert scale from 1 to 5) • Students’ feedback is of most importance for future improvement of the curriculum
  • Students’ feedback and assessment of the curriculum – overall • Students’ assessed ECE as of outmost important for their personal and professional development • They found that good relationship is important part of treatment • They would like to have more practical work and opportunity for communication
  • Students’ feedback and assessment of the curricula – interview with nursing home residents • Fears that their skills of communication is inadequate (welcome and respect by the staff and patients) • Emphatic relationship with the elderly • They found that elderly people are much more positive and more vital in their mind that they thought before • An opportunity to learn from life experiences of elderly people
  • Students’ feedback and assessment of the curricula – office visit • White coat – they observed themselves as future physicians • They found that the physicians’ work is complex with many dilemmas • Motivation for future study • Confirmed that decision to become physician is appropriate
  • Teachers’ and tutors’ experiences Positive experiences: • feasible to organize: enthusiasm of the staff in nursing homes and offices • acceptable to patients: most of the patients find the ECE as important and participate in the curriculum, • educationally effective: students greatelly valid their extensive contact with patients Evaluation: subjective in assessing of practical part of the curricula
  • Dilemmas • Inadequate knowledge and experiences in communication • Personal immaturity: problems with acceptance of professional and ethical norms • Interview with elderly nursing home residents is too demanding (no knowledge about the characteristics of residents, problem with empathy, dealing with emotional reactions, ethical issues)