• Like
Visual Scene Displays
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Visual Scene Displays

  • 573 views
Published

Presentation at the More Than Gadgets Conference, Perth 2011

Presentation at the More Than Gadgets Conference, Perth 2011

Published in Health & Medicine
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
573
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Visual Scene Displays
    Pretty Playthings or Powerful Pictures?
  • 2. Jane Farrall
    Speech Pathologist
    AAC Support Services Manager
    Spectronics
  • 3. Visual Scene Displays
    A visual scene display (VSD) is a picture, photograph, or virtual environment that depicts and represents a situation, place or experience. Individual elements such as people, actions and objects appear within the visual scene (Blackstone, 2004).
  • 4. Visual Scene Displays
    Different from a traditional grid display
    The visual scene shows elements such as people, actions and objects in a visually integrated image.
    Messages can be accessed from the picture.
    Additional displays might also be triggered from the visual scene display
  • 5. Visual Scene Displays
    Visual scene displays (VSDs) are meant primarily to address the needs of beginning communicators and individuals with significant cognitive and/or linguistic limitations. These groups are unserved or underserved by current AAC technologies. (Blackstone, 2004)
  • 6. Let’s have a look....
  • 7. Why so common recently?
    VSDs are much easier to do on dynamic display touch screens
    Dynamic display touch screens are now common and with a range of software options
    Dynamic display touch screens are more portable e.g. iPad, Maestro
  • 8. Three main areas of research with VSDs
    People with aphasia
    Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Young children with Complex Communication Needs
    Majority (but not all) of this research has been conducted by members of AAC RERC www.aac-rerc.com
  • 9. VSDs and people with Aphasia
    Research primarily conducted by David Beukelman and colleagues. Summary webcast available at www.aac-rerc.com
    Looked at research which showed that AAC and Speech Generating Devices (SGDs) were most successful with people who retained literacy
    Wanted to look at ways of allowing people without literacy skills to retain social networks
  • 10. VSDs and people with aphasia
    Beukelman et al (2003), Beukelman et al (2007) and AAC RERC (2009)
    VSDs have been very successful with people with chronic aphasia
    Need to be customised, real photos from their life. Higher uptake if individual is involved in selection of pictures and generation of utterances
  • 11. VSDs and people with aphasia
    “After her stroke, our mother refused to attend (social) functions due to embarrassment of the challenges she faced when interacting with people outside of her immediate family . . . Her success (with a Visual Scenes Display AAC device) led to a renewed interest in attending family gatherings. Six weeks after the introduction of (the AAC device), she left her house for the first time (after her stroke), to engage socially – she went to a family holiday gathering’’ (Personal communication with the adult daughter of a woman with severe, chronic aphasia, Beukelman et al 2007)
  • 12. VSDs and people with aphasia
    The most successful VSDs:
    Provide context (setting, people, objects and activities)
    Show Interaction with people or the environment
    Are personally relevant
    Are clear photos
    Have the ability to be used for personal story telling
  • 13. Environment: Low
    Interaction: None
    Personal relevance: Medium
    Clarity: High
  • 14. Environment: High
    Interaction: High
    Personal relevance: High
    Clarity: High
  • 15. Environment: Low
    Interaction: Low
    Personal relevance: Low
    Clarity: High
  • 16. Environment: High
    Interaction: High
    Personal relevance: High
    Clarity: High
  • 17. VSDs and people with aphasia
    Lots of Publisher templates available with tested formats
    From aac.unl.edu/intervention.html
    Visual Scene Display – Adult (Aphasia/TBI) user in DynaVox Series 5 devices
  • 18. VSDs and children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Research primarily conducted by Howard Shane and colleagues.
    Looked at VSDs as
    Visual Expressive Mode
    Visual Organizational Mode
    Visual Instructional Mode
    Called VSDs “Maps”
  • 19. Visual Maps
  • 20. Visual Organisational Mode
    Maps can be more successful than traditional schedules or charts because they convey more information
    Can convey not just that the individual will be going to McDonalds but also when, who will attend and what will happen.
  • 21. Visual Instructional Mode
    Visual scenes compensated for the child’s comprehension or auditory processing difficulties (helped them to understand better what was being said by others)
    Built comprehension
  • 22. Puddingstone Place
    This was created as an interactive virtual environment for children to learn language
  • 23. Boston Children’s Hospital
    Now looking into use of iPads as visual supports throughout the day
    http://www.childrenshospital.org/clinicalservices/Site2016/Documents/Visualand%20tech%20to%20support%20language%20ASD%20Abramson&Laubscher.pdf
  • 24. VSD Apps
    Lots of talking photo album options e.g. Click ‘nTalk.
    SceneSpeak
    Scene&Heard
  • 25. Visual Expressive Mode
    Drager et al. (2005) repeated some of the studies done with children with developmental disabilites and found similar results in a study of preschoolers with autism (ages 3 – 5).
  • 26. VSDs and young children
    Research primarily conducted by Janice Light and colleagues. Summary webcast available at www.aac-rerc.com
    Idea partly came from a AAC RERC meeting where the feedback from parents was that SGDs needed to:
    Decrease learning demands
    Increase appeal
  • 27. Children and Symbols
    Drager et al (2008) asked typically developing children to draw pictures of 10 emerging language concepts.
    The children’s pictures were:
    Grounded in context
    Involved familiar experiences
    Used entire scenes
    This was mostly consistent across a variety of ethnic/cultural groups.
  • 28. Generic VSD for young child
  • 29. Hybrid VSD for young child
  • 30. VSDs and young children
    Drager et al (2003) found that 2.5 year olds were most accurate locating vocabulary on VSDs even if displays were not customised for them
    Drager et al (2004) found that 3 year olds had trouble with all forms of vocabulary arrangement on initial exposure, but after just one session performed significantly better with the visual scenes than a grid format.
  • 31. VSDs and young children
    Light et al (2004) found that by ages 4 and 5, the children were able to locate vocabulary within the visual scene displays and the grid layouts with similar levels of accuracy, but they had significant difficulty learning to use iconic encoding.
  • 32. VSDs and Young Children
    Light and Drager (2008) reported on a study using VSDs with young children with developmental disabilities, aged 1 – 3.
    They concluded: .....
  • 33. Young Children and VSDs
    All the children were able to use VSDs to participate in social interactions with only one session of modelling
    The children demonstrated significant increases in turn taking immediately
    The children sustained these turn taking and social communication gains
    Children tended to plateau, but improved again following introduction of hybrid scenes and then grid displays
  • 34. VSDs and Young Children
    A lot of this research has had small sample sizes and in some studies children were only exposed to SGDs for short periods each time
    Focus has been on making AAC easier, acknowledging limited intervention many children receive
  • 35. Case Study
  • 36. Dynamic Display Devices
    Lucas received his first dynamic display device (Dynavox MT4) when he was 6 years old.
    At the time his multi-level communication book was organised by ‘semantic categories’ and so his device mirrored this.
  • 37. Dynamic Display Devices
    • When he was 9 years old Lucas received a Dynavox V.
    • 38. He had a Pragmatically Organised Dynamic Display (PODD) communication book.
  • Using Visual Scene Displays
    Why it was decided to use VSDs
    Already was programmed on the device
    Evidence suggested it was an effective way for some people to communicate
    Lucas was motivated to use
    As he was motivated it was hoped using them would increase his device use
  • 39. Visual Scene Displays
    Advantages
    Lucas like the idea of them and was more motivated to use his device
    They look ‘pretty’ and so appealed to other people, making them more motivated to use the device
    Disadvantages
    It takes a long time to scan to parts of the visual scene
    It adds an extra cognitive step to the process (ie remembering where in the visual scene things are placed) particularly because of moving between PODD and VSDs
    It makes it difficult for other people to model the device as it is impossible/difficult to tell where things are placed on the visual scene
    At times the visual scene itself can be a distraction
    Using VSDs means that any multi-level communication book must be organised differently. For Lucas this meant learning and remembering two systems – VSDs and his PODD book.
  • 40. PODD
    Due to the disadvantages Lucas now uses a PODD communication book and his device is programmed to reflect this book as closely as possible.
  • 41. References
    AAC RERC. (2009). AAC for Aphasia: A Review of Visual Scenes Display Project. Retrieved April 27, 2009, from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index-21030.php.html
    AAC RERC. (2009). AAC Interventions to Maximize Language Development for Young Children. Retrieved April 27, 2009, from http://aac-rerc.psu.edu/index-16147.php.html
    ASHA. (2009). Children’s Representations of Early Language Concepts: Implications for AAC Symbols. Retrieved May 01, 2009 from http://convention.asha.org/handouts/1420_2072Drager_Kathryn_073157_Nov16_2008_Time_072254PM.pdf
  • 42. References
    Beukelman, D., Fager, S., Ball, L. and Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 230 – 242
    Beukelman, D., Fager, S., Ball, L., Prentice, C., Jakobs, T., & Caves, K. (2003). New AAC interfaces: Field test results. ASHA Leader, 8, 144.
    Blackstone, S. (2004). Clinical news: Visual scene displays. Augmentative Communication News, 16(2), 1-8.
  • 43. References
    Drager, K., Light, J., Carlson, R., D’Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L. (2004). Learning of Dynamic Display AAC Technologies by Typically Developing 3-Year-Olds: Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47(5), 1133– 1149
    Drager, K., Light, J., Curran-Speltz, J., Fallon, K., & Jeffries, L. (2003). The performance of typically developing 2 ½-year-olds on dynamic display AAC technologies with different system layouts and language organizations. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 298 – 312.
  • 44. References
    Drager, K., Light, J., Angert, E., Finke, E., Johnson, J., Larson, H., et al. (2005). AAC & interactive play: Language learning in children with autism. Seminar presented at the annual conference of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, San Diego, CA
    HB Munroe Barkley AAC Centers. (2009). Visual Scene Resources. Retrieved April 28, 2009, from http://aac.unl.edu/intervention.html
    Light, J., & Drager, K. (2004). Re-thinking access to AAC technologies for young children: Simplifying the learning demands. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 5 – 12.
  • 45. References
    Light, J. & Drager, K. (2008) Evidence-based AAC interventions to build language and communication skills with infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Paper presented at the ISAAC biennial conference, Montreal, Canada.
    Light, J., Drager, K., McCarthy, J., Mellott, S., Parrish, C., Parsons, A., et al. (2004). Performance of typically developing four and five year old children with AAC systems using different language organization techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 63 – 88.
  • 46. References
    Light, J. and Drager, K. (2007) AAC technologies for young children with complex communication needs: State of the science and future research directions, Augmentative and Alternative Communication,23(3), 204 – 216
    Shane, H. C. (2006). Using visual scene displays to improve communication and communication instruction in persons with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Perspectives in Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(1), 8 – 13.