SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
1




                                    Re-cast of the RoHS Directive
                               Commission proposal COM(2008)809final:
                                 Request for consistency with REACH


                                                              15 July 2009


Summary

The Commission’s intention to re-cast Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of certain
hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS) has been outlined in proposal
COM(2008)809final. Cefic welcomes certain elements of the proposal but takes this opportunity to
underline the necessity of an alignment with REACH. Indeed, Cefic would like to express concerns
about aspects of this proposal relating to the evaluation and restriction of substances under RoHS, a
topic also dealt with in REACH.

Cefic regrets that a full merger between RoHS and REACH has not been considered immediately
possible. However, Cefic believes major inconsistencies need to be addressed immediately while the
need for further clarification can be assessed and foreseen in the perspective of the upcoming
REACH review.

1. Duplication of restriction procedures and criteria must be avoided.
Cefic believes it is crucial that the Commission’s proposal foresees full alignment with the restriction
rules laid down by the REACH Regulation.
2. Assessment of substances must be dealt with using appropriate expertise.
As the REACH legislation has put in place instruments for the assessment of chemical substances,
involving the participation of chemicals specialists, Cefic opposes the proposal to establish a parallel,
duplicating system within RoHS, where the development of a substance assessment methodology as
well as the assessment of chemical substances is undertaken by a Committee composed of waste
experts.
3. Unnecessary administrative burdens must be avoided.
Cefic is concerned that Annex III will lead to unnecessary administrative burdens vis-à-vis
preparatory work provided for under Title VIII of REACH.
4. The new RoHS Directive must take the upcoming REACH review into consideration.
A review of the REACH Regulation is foreseen by 2012, which will inevitably affect the RoHS
Directive. Therefore Cefic believes the current recast needs to keep the possibility for assessing and
introducing further future legal clarification where needed during the upcoming REACH review, when
also further experience with REACH implementation will be available.




 Chemistry making a world of difference
 European Chemical Industry Council
 Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
2




Cefic, the European Chemical Industry Council, is concerned that the proposed new RoHS directive
overlaps with REACH and fears that it will lead to an unnecessary duplication of procedures and
conflicting requirements on electrical and electronic equipment.

The Commission gives two reasons for the revision: the commitment to develop a better regulatory
environment and to review the measures provided for in the Directive, among others for the adaptation of
the list of restricted substances. While Cefic fully supports the Commission’s aim to simplify existing
legislation, we would like to express our concern at how this is suggested for this specific case, where
coherence with REACH appears to be sought but not achieved.

1. Concern: Legal consistency

REACH lays down harmonised rules for the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of
chemical substances. The Commission and Member States are entitled to consider Restriction when a
substance on its own, in a preparation or in an article poses a risk to human health or the environment
that is not adequately controlled and needs to be addressed. Therefore, electrical and electronic
equipment (EEE) are articles under REACH.

REACH and RoHS are equally ambitious when it comes to restricting substances posing a risk to human
health and the environment. Therefore, the revision of the RoHS directive has to be made consistently
with REACH.

Yet, the new RoHS Directive, as currently drafted, provides for the creation of a separate restriction
procedure while such a procedure is already in force under the REACH Regulation. Article 4 (7) of the
RoHS recast says:

“When there is an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment, arising from the use of
substances, and in particular the substances listed in Annex III, which needs to be addressed on a
Community-wide basis, the list of prohibited substances in Annex IV shall be reviewed using a
methodology based on the process set out in Articles 69 to 72 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Those measures designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive shall be adopted in
accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(2).”

Cefic understands the difficulties a merger between RoHS and REACH would raise for the time being.
However, legal coherence is imperative and the new RoHS Directive needs to develop in a manner as
consistent as possible with REACH.

Cefic believes the Commission’s proposal does not provide for the optimum degree of consistency as it
leads to duplication of procedures and criteria, inappropriate assessment of substances, unnecessary
administrative burdens and bears the risk of conflicting requirements.

Further, the scope of the REACH Regulation will be reviewed by the Commission by 1 June 2012. In the
perspective of this review, Cefic considers the text should allow for the possibility to remove additional
unnecessary overlaps.

a. Short-term concerns

Cefic considers the Commission’s proposal is inconsistent with REACH as it leads to duplication of
procedures, inappropriate assessment of substances and unnecessary administrative burdens.


  Chemistry making a world of difference
  European Chemical Industry Council
  Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
3




         Avoiding duplication of restriction procedures

The current RoHS Directive entered into force before REACH. The situation is now different as REACH
now applies and provides for a comprehensive restriction procedure, which entered into force on 1 June
2009.

One of the objectives of the revision of the RoHS Directive is to avoid duplication and inconsistencies
vis-à-vis other legal instruments; notably REACH. However, the proposal foresees a separate process to
adopt restrictions of substances contained in EEE.

In the interest of legal certainty and coherence, Cefic believes it is crucial that any additional procedure
for restriction of substances contained in EEE fully follows the procedure laid down under REACH.

         Avoiding inappropriate means for assessment of chemical substances

The new RoHS Directive proposal involves a Committee composed of waste experts in the assessment
of chemical substances. CEFIC doubts this Committee can provide the most appropriate expertise.
Within the context of REACH, assessment of chemicals relies on specific bodies, the Risk Assessment
Committee and the Socio Economic Analysis Committee. Therefore, Cefic opposes the parallel system
envisaged by the RoHS recast proposal and believes assessment of chemicals under RoHS should be
dealt with by the Committee REACH refers to in Article 68 and which has the relevant expertise.

Such proposal does not affect the nature of the comitology procedure at stake as both the current
proposal and REACH foresee a regulatory procedure with parliamentary scrutiny.

         Avoiding unnecessary administrative burdens

Article 4 (7) proposes a new list of substances – highlighting them for particular attention – before any
risk assessment procedure has been conducted and without expressing a rationale for their selection.
Cefic considers this list will inevitably lead to unnecessary additional administrative burdens vis-à-vis
Title VIII of REACH. Indeed, the regulation already foresees the conditions under which restriction of
substances may be considered. Therefore, there would be no need for a restriction “candidate list” in
RoHS.

We therefore request that Annex III be removed from the re-cast.

b. Long-term concern

         Removing remaining overlaps

REACH is to be reviewed in 2012. Cefic considers the new RoHS Directive needs to take this review as
an opportunity to further assess and clarify its relationship with REACH and to foresee the removal of
remaining overlaps.

Cefic proposes a new recital to allow for the possibility to assess and introduce such a further
clarification where necessary.




  Chemistry making a world of difference
  European Chemical Industry Council
  Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
4




   2. Suggested amendments

   We suggest the following amendments to Art. 4 paragraph 7 and to Annex III.

   Amendment 1

                   Commission proposal                                                     Proposed amendment

 Article 4, paragraph 7                                                  Article 4, paragraph 7

 “When there is an unacceptable risk to human health                     “When there is an unacceptable risk to human
 or the environment, arising from the use of substances,                 health or the environment, arising from the use of
 and in particular the substances listed in Annex III,                   substances, which needs to be addressed on a
 which needs to be addressed on a Community-wide                         Community-wide basis, the list of prohibited
 basis, the list of prohibited substances in Annex IV                    substances in Annex IV shall be reviewed using the
 shall be reviewed using a methodology based on the                      process set out in Articles 68 to 73 of Regulation
 process set out in Articles 69 to 72 of Regulation (EC)                 (EC) No 1907/2006.”
 No 1907/2006.
 Those measures designed to amend non essential
 elements of this Directive shall be adopted in
 accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny
 referred to in Article 18(2).”


                                                                 Justification

Evaluation and restriction of substances under RoHS have to be as consistent as possible with REACH.
Consistency requires avoiding parallel procedures. Restriction of substances contained in EEE must fall
under the REACH procedure and be dealt with using the appropriate expertise.


   Amendment 2

                   Commission proposal                                                     Proposed amendment

 Annex III                                                               Annex III

     1.   Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD)                                 Deleted
     2.   Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)
     3.   Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP)
     4.   Dibutylphthalate (DBP)




                                                                    Justification


   The deletion goes with the deletion in Article 4, paragraph 7.




      Chemistry making a world of difference
      European Chemical Industry Council
      Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
5




   Amendment 3


                  Commission proposal                                                     Proposed amendment

                                                                        New Recital

                                                                        A thorough analysis of the added value of the
                                                                        RoHS Directive shall be carried out at the
                                                                        upcoming REACH review with a view to
                                                                        integrating Directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS) into
                                                                        Regulation (EC) N° 1907.2006.



                                                                   Justification

The upcoming REACH review will inevitably affect the RoHS Directive. Therefore, the recast needs to keep
the possibility to assess the need for possible further alignment at the occasion of the REACH review.




     Chemistry making a world of difference
     European Chemical Industry Council
     Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org

More Related Content

Similar to Cefic Final Position On RoHs Recast 15 July 2009

In Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status Article
In Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status ArticleIn Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status Article
In Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status Articlekbots
 
Cefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basics
Cefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basicsCefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basics
Cefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basicsElise Barre Tran
 
Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...
Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...
Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...OECD Environment
 
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14James Stevens
 
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14James Stevens
 
11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises
11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises
11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premisesJames Andrews
 
Regulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLP
Regulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLPRegulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLP
Regulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLPLoren Larson, CHMM, CSO, CEI
 
REACH - Enforceability of new restrictions
REACH - Enforceability of new restrictionsREACH - Enforceability of new restrictions
REACH - Enforceability of new restrictionsLorenzo Zullo
 
Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...
Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...
Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...v2zq
 
Reach test report of jizo security
Reach test report of jizo securityReach test report of jizo security
Reach test report of jizo securityCathy Zhu
 
Spring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn
Spring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake LapthornSpring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn
Spring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake LapthornSustainable Business Partnership
 
John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"
John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"
John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"Sustainable Business Partnership
 
RoHS awareness Training By Manish Dwivedi
RoHS awareness Training By Manish DwivediRoHS awareness Training By Manish Dwivedi
RoHS awareness Training By Manish DwivediEr. Manish Dwivedi
 
Assent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHS
Assent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHSAssent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHS
Assent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHSMatt Whitteker
 
Overview -REACH Trng.pptx
Overview -REACH Trng.pptxOverview -REACH Trng.pptx
Overview -REACH Trng.pptxJohnOo4
 
Environmental quality standards directive
Environmental quality standards directive Environmental quality standards directive
Environmental quality standards directive hatec
 

Similar to Cefic Final Position On RoHs Recast 15 July 2009 (20)

In Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status Article
In Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status ArticleIn Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status Article
In Compliance Magazine - RoHS Status Article
 
Cefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basics
Cefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basicsCefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basics
Cefic publication on_reach_restriction_regime_-_the_basics
 
Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...
Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...
Webinar on greener water and oil repellents in the textile industry: Recommen...
 
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
 
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
RoHS Roundtable FH 2009 July 14
 
11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises
11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises
11.11 co2 regulation of pharmacy premises
 
Safer chemicals within REACH
Safer chemicals within REACHSafer chemicals within REACH
Safer chemicals within REACH
 
Regulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLP
Regulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLPRegulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLP
Regulatory Briefing | Overview of REACH Directive | Caltha LLP
 
REACH - Enforceability of new restrictions
REACH - Enforceability of new restrictionsREACH - Enforceability of new restrictions
REACH - Enforceability of new restrictions
 
Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...
Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...
Toward a Toxic Partnership - A critique of the EU position on chemicals under...
 
Reach test report of jizo security
Reach test report of jizo securityReach test report of jizo security
Reach test report of jizo security
 
REACH
REACH  REACH
REACH
 
Reach
ReachReach
Reach
 
Spring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn
Spring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake LapthornSpring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn
Spring / Summer 2011 Legal Update; John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn
 
John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"
John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"
John Mitchell, Blake Lapthorn - "Environmental Legislation Update"
 
RoHS awareness Training By Manish Dwivedi
RoHS awareness Training By Manish DwivediRoHS awareness Training By Manish Dwivedi
RoHS awareness Training By Manish Dwivedi
 
Assent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHS
Assent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHSAssent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHS
Assent Compliance Guide for 2011 REACH/RoHS
 
REACH
REACHREACH
REACH
 
Overview -REACH Trng.pptx
Overview -REACH Trng.pptxOverview -REACH Trng.pptx
Overview -REACH Trng.pptx
 
Environmental quality standards directive
Environmental quality standards directive Environmental quality standards directive
Environmental quality standards directive
 

Recently uploaded

PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examplesamberjiles31
 
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in JhangMC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in Jhangmcgroupjeya
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfAnhNguyen97152
 
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês  em formato pptPlano de marketing- inglês  em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato pptElizangelaSoaresdaCo
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..dlewis191
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.ukaroemirsr
 
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...Brian Solis
 
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.mcshagufta46
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHelene Heckrotte
 
Trauma Training Service for First Responders
Trauma Training Service for First RespondersTrauma Training Service for First Responders
Trauma Training Service for First RespondersBPOQe
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003believeminhh
 
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toLecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toumarfarooquejamali32
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
 
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in JhangMC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
 
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês  em formato pptPlano de marketing- inglês  em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk
 
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
 
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
 
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
 
Trauma Training Service for First Responders
Trauma Training Service for First RespondersTrauma Training Service for First Responders
Trauma Training Service for First Responders
 
Investment Opportunity for Thailand's Automotive & EV Industries
Investment Opportunity for Thailand's Automotive & EV IndustriesInvestment Opportunity for Thailand's Automotive & EV Industries
Investment Opportunity for Thailand's Automotive & EV Industries
 
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
 
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toLecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
 

Cefic Final Position On RoHs Recast 15 July 2009

  • 1. 1 Re-cast of the RoHS Directive Commission proposal COM(2008)809final: Request for consistency with REACH 15 July 2009 Summary The Commission’s intention to re-cast Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (RoHS) has been outlined in proposal COM(2008)809final. Cefic welcomes certain elements of the proposal but takes this opportunity to underline the necessity of an alignment with REACH. Indeed, Cefic would like to express concerns about aspects of this proposal relating to the evaluation and restriction of substances under RoHS, a topic also dealt with in REACH. Cefic regrets that a full merger between RoHS and REACH has not been considered immediately possible. However, Cefic believes major inconsistencies need to be addressed immediately while the need for further clarification can be assessed and foreseen in the perspective of the upcoming REACH review. 1. Duplication of restriction procedures and criteria must be avoided. Cefic believes it is crucial that the Commission’s proposal foresees full alignment with the restriction rules laid down by the REACH Regulation. 2. Assessment of substances must be dealt with using appropriate expertise. As the REACH legislation has put in place instruments for the assessment of chemical substances, involving the participation of chemicals specialists, Cefic opposes the proposal to establish a parallel, duplicating system within RoHS, where the development of a substance assessment methodology as well as the assessment of chemical substances is undertaken by a Committee composed of waste experts. 3. Unnecessary administrative burdens must be avoided. Cefic is concerned that Annex III will lead to unnecessary administrative burdens vis-à-vis preparatory work provided for under Title VIII of REACH. 4. The new RoHS Directive must take the upcoming REACH review into consideration. A review of the REACH Regulation is foreseen by 2012, which will inevitably affect the RoHS Directive. Therefore Cefic believes the current recast needs to keep the possibility for assessing and introducing further future legal clarification where needed during the upcoming REACH review, when also further experience with REACH implementation will be available. Chemistry making a world of difference European Chemical Industry Council Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
  • 2. 2 Cefic, the European Chemical Industry Council, is concerned that the proposed new RoHS directive overlaps with REACH and fears that it will lead to an unnecessary duplication of procedures and conflicting requirements on electrical and electronic equipment. The Commission gives two reasons for the revision: the commitment to develop a better regulatory environment and to review the measures provided for in the Directive, among others for the adaptation of the list of restricted substances. While Cefic fully supports the Commission’s aim to simplify existing legislation, we would like to express our concern at how this is suggested for this specific case, where coherence with REACH appears to be sought but not achieved. 1. Concern: Legal consistency REACH lays down harmonised rules for the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemical substances. The Commission and Member States are entitled to consider Restriction when a substance on its own, in a preparation or in an article poses a risk to human health or the environment that is not adequately controlled and needs to be addressed. Therefore, electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) are articles under REACH. REACH and RoHS are equally ambitious when it comes to restricting substances posing a risk to human health and the environment. Therefore, the revision of the RoHS directive has to be made consistently with REACH. Yet, the new RoHS Directive, as currently drafted, provides for the creation of a separate restriction procedure while such a procedure is already in force under the REACH Regulation. Article 4 (7) of the RoHS recast says: “When there is an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment, arising from the use of substances, and in particular the substances listed in Annex III, which needs to be addressed on a Community-wide basis, the list of prohibited substances in Annex IV shall be reviewed using a methodology based on the process set out in Articles 69 to 72 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Those measures designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(2).” Cefic understands the difficulties a merger between RoHS and REACH would raise for the time being. However, legal coherence is imperative and the new RoHS Directive needs to develop in a manner as consistent as possible with REACH. Cefic believes the Commission’s proposal does not provide for the optimum degree of consistency as it leads to duplication of procedures and criteria, inappropriate assessment of substances, unnecessary administrative burdens and bears the risk of conflicting requirements. Further, the scope of the REACH Regulation will be reviewed by the Commission by 1 June 2012. In the perspective of this review, Cefic considers the text should allow for the possibility to remove additional unnecessary overlaps. a. Short-term concerns Cefic considers the Commission’s proposal is inconsistent with REACH as it leads to duplication of procedures, inappropriate assessment of substances and unnecessary administrative burdens. Chemistry making a world of difference European Chemical Industry Council Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
  • 3. 3 Avoiding duplication of restriction procedures The current RoHS Directive entered into force before REACH. The situation is now different as REACH now applies and provides for a comprehensive restriction procedure, which entered into force on 1 June 2009. One of the objectives of the revision of the RoHS Directive is to avoid duplication and inconsistencies vis-à-vis other legal instruments; notably REACH. However, the proposal foresees a separate process to adopt restrictions of substances contained in EEE. In the interest of legal certainty and coherence, Cefic believes it is crucial that any additional procedure for restriction of substances contained in EEE fully follows the procedure laid down under REACH. Avoiding inappropriate means for assessment of chemical substances The new RoHS Directive proposal involves a Committee composed of waste experts in the assessment of chemical substances. CEFIC doubts this Committee can provide the most appropriate expertise. Within the context of REACH, assessment of chemicals relies on specific bodies, the Risk Assessment Committee and the Socio Economic Analysis Committee. Therefore, Cefic opposes the parallel system envisaged by the RoHS recast proposal and believes assessment of chemicals under RoHS should be dealt with by the Committee REACH refers to in Article 68 and which has the relevant expertise. Such proposal does not affect the nature of the comitology procedure at stake as both the current proposal and REACH foresee a regulatory procedure with parliamentary scrutiny. Avoiding unnecessary administrative burdens Article 4 (7) proposes a new list of substances – highlighting them for particular attention – before any risk assessment procedure has been conducted and without expressing a rationale for their selection. Cefic considers this list will inevitably lead to unnecessary additional administrative burdens vis-à-vis Title VIII of REACH. Indeed, the regulation already foresees the conditions under which restriction of substances may be considered. Therefore, there would be no need for a restriction “candidate list” in RoHS. We therefore request that Annex III be removed from the re-cast. b. Long-term concern Removing remaining overlaps REACH is to be reviewed in 2012. Cefic considers the new RoHS Directive needs to take this review as an opportunity to further assess and clarify its relationship with REACH and to foresee the removal of remaining overlaps. Cefic proposes a new recital to allow for the possibility to assess and introduce such a further clarification where necessary. Chemistry making a world of difference European Chemical Industry Council Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
  • 4. 4 2. Suggested amendments We suggest the following amendments to Art. 4 paragraph 7 and to Annex III. Amendment 1 Commission proposal Proposed amendment Article 4, paragraph 7 Article 4, paragraph 7 “When there is an unacceptable risk to human health “When there is an unacceptable risk to human or the environment, arising from the use of substances, health or the environment, arising from the use of and in particular the substances listed in Annex III, substances, which needs to be addressed on a which needs to be addressed on a Community-wide Community-wide basis, the list of prohibited basis, the list of prohibited substances in Annex IV substances in Annex IV shall be reviewed using the shall be reviewed using a methodology based on the process set out in Articles 68 to 73 of Regulation process set out in Articles 69 to 72 of Regulation (EC) (EC) No 1907/2006.” No 1907/2006. Those measures designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(2).” Justification Evaluation and restriction of substances under RoHS have to be as consistent as possible with REACH. Consistency requires avoiding parallel procedures. Restriction of substances contained in EEE must fall under the REACH procedure and be dealt with using the appropriate expertise. Amendment 2 Commission proposal Proposed amendment Annex III Annex III 1. Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) Deleted 2. Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) 3. Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP) 4. Dibutylphthalate (DBP) Justification The deletion goes with the deletion in Article 4, paragraph 7. Chemistry making a world of difference European Chemical Industry Council Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org
  • 5. 5 Amendment 3 Commission proposal Proposed amendment New Recital A thorough analysis of the added value of the RoHS Directive shall be carried out at the upcoming REACH review with a view to integrating Directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS) into Regulation (EC) N° 1907.2006. Justification The upcoming REACH review will inevitably affect the RoHS Directive. Therefore, the recast needs to keep the possibility to assess the need for possible further alignment at the occasion of the REACH review. Chemistry making a world of difference European Chemical Industry Council Avenue E. van Nieuwenhuyse 4 B - 1160 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 676 72 11 Fax: +32 2 676 73 01 mail@cefic.be www.cefic.org