Evaluations 030312
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Evaluations 030312



Usual summary report of Study Day 3 March 2012

Usual summary report of Study Day 3 March 2012



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



8 Embeds 205

http://bedspce.blogspot.co.uk 152
http://bedspce.blogspot.com 44
http://www.bedspce.blogspot.co.uk 3
http://bedspce.blogspot.fr 2
http://www.bedspce.blogspot.com 1
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
http://bedspce.blogspot.com.es 1
http://bedspce.blogspot.it 1



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Evaluations 030312 Evaluations 030312 Presentation Transcript

  • Evaluations from second Year 2 Study Day PGCE/Cert Ed (PCE) University of Bedfordshire 3 March 2011
  • Based on 53 returns; probably only about 25% of the attendance, so it’s possible that a substantial number of questionnaires have gone missing. If they are found we will up-date this summary.
  • 1: Was Prof. Ecclestone’s session useful? View slide
  • • Confirmed what Ive been saying for years• Interesting, but useful?• More use in y1, for unit 3 (5) Write-in  comments on• Powerpoint not suitable for dyslexic students• Long-winded, slides dull and too much information the lecture• More robust style needed • Good analysis of disempowerment of teachers in FE• Long-winded and not as interesting as previous speakers• ...and weve heard too much about feedback • Dull, pointless• Boring uninspiring dross (2) • armchair posturing • Enjoyed the Q & A• Question time was more moaning--not proper questions View slide
  • 2: Was the briefing for thework of the Interest Groups:
  • 3:How do you rate the work you did in your group?
  • Write-in comments on Interest Groups• Discussion useful; poster exercise not• Discussed a lot but wandered off point • Good tutor running session• Not enough direction in meeting • A lot of negativity from members• Two members dominated
  • 4: Was the session onProgression, CPD and QTLS:
  • Write-in comments on the “Progression” session• Confusing• Not focused enough on QTLS to be useful • Too many people for personalised questions • 4th time weve had this• Pointless sales pitch
  • 5: Was the session on ‘E’ andtechnology-enhanced learning:
  • • More of this would be good Write-in• Always interesting to share resources• More websites with resources, please comments on• Should have more--especially at start of coursetechnology  session• Rushed (4)• Useful but rushed • Repeated year 1 material• Covered this before in college• Pointless exercise• Dont believe in using technology for the sake of it • We are post-16; some suitable for lower levels• Images sexist, not appropriate or decent• Some US spellings & mistakes
  • Other write-in comments • Whole day a waste of time (3)• Would like hot food (4)• Room directions for afternoon sessions incorrect.