Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Evaluation 0500311
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Evaluation 0500311

539

Published on

Evaluation report for yr 2 Study Day 2, 5 March 2011

Evaluation report for yr 2 Study Day 2, 5 March 2011

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
539
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Evaluation of Study Day 5 March 2011 Based on 85 responses Faculty of Education, Sport and Travel PGCE/Certificate in Education (Post-Compulsory Education)
  • 2. Q1 n Very 28.9% 24 Quite 48.2% 40 A little 16.9% 14 No 3.6% 3
  • 3. Q2 Very 45.8% 38 Quite 34.9% 29 A little 15.7% 13 No 2.4% 2
  • 4. Write-in comments on lecture <ul><li>Not sure how to use lecture info, </li></ul><ul><li>Amazed some did not get KE's position, </li></ul><ul><li>KE could have promoted own view more, </li></ul><ul><li>KE a refreshing voice in today's world, </li></ul><ul><li>Balanced view of topic, </li></ul><ul><li>Not clear what topic was, </li></ul>
  • 5. Q3 Very 32.5% 27 Quite 31.3% 26 A little 16.9% 14 No 12.0% 10
  • 6. Write-in comments on “What next?” <ul><li>What next covered before, </li></ul><ul><li>What next more for PGCE, (2) </li></ul><ul><li>MA stuff irrelevant, </li></ul>
  • 7. Q4 Very 37.3% 31 Quite 34.9% 29 A little 14.5% 12 No 9.6% 8
  • 8. Write-in comments on technology session <ul><li>Should be hands on </li></ul><ul><li>Needs more time (several) </li></ul><ul><li>Great from people like us ( i.e. student contributions) </li></ul><ul><li>Shame ICT resources limited </li></ul><ul><li>Purpose of tech session not clear </li></ul>
  • 9. Q5 Very useful 9.6% 8 Quite useful 61.4% 51 Not at all useful 24.1% 20 No answer 3.6% 3
  • 10. Write in comments on Interest Groups <ul><li>No feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Have more specific tasks </li></ul><ul><li>more lectures, less Igs </li></ul><ul><li>make_forum_required </li></ul><ul><li>lacked_continuity, </li></ul><ul><li>too small </li></ul><ul><li>Most effective work on resources </li></ul><ul><li>A combined responsibility </li></ul><ul><li>not appropriate </li></ul><ul><li>need more structure (several) </li></ul>
  • 11. Q6 A lot? 8.4% 7 Some? 43.4% 36 A little? 41.0% 34 Not at all? 7.2% 6
  • 12. Q7 Plenaries 48.2% 40 Interest groups 19.3% 16 Networking 22.9% 19 Other 2.4% 2
  • 13. Q8 n Plenaries 12.0% 10 Interest groups 49.4% 41 Networking 20.5% 17 Other 2.4% 2
  • 14. Write-in general comments <ul><li>Most useful study day (several) </li></ul><ul><li>All useful (2) </li></ul><ul><li>Need to share, </li></ul><ul><li>Provision for disabled poor, </li></ul><ul><li>Only Sue C useful, , </li></ul><ul><li>Not enough practical tips, </li></ul><ul><li>Sorry missed Coffield, </li></ul>

×