Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) Challenge for Local Governments - Presentation Transcript
California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32, H&S Code § 38500, et seq.) Prepared and Presented by Joel Ellinwood, AICP/Attorney, Sacramento “ Respect Local Control . . . Provide Regional Perspective” Western Riverside Council of Governments Challenge for Local Government
Think Globally Act Locally
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Goals & Challenges
Lower to 1990 levels by 2020
25 – 30 % below current levels
Population increase of 18 – 20 % (7 million)
Lower to 80% of 1990 level by 2050
Population increase of 10 – 15 million MORE
How? – catch me later
“ Scoping Plan” by 1/1/2009
New regulations by 1/1/2011 to be
effective on 1/1/2012
Climate Action Team Players
Cal Environmental Protection Agency
California Air Resources Board (CARB)
California Resources Agency
California Energy Commission (CEC)
California Business Transportation & Housing Agency
Cal Dept. of Transportation (CalTrans)
Climate Action Team Bench
Land Use Planning
Governor’s Office of Planning & Research (OPR)
Charged with State Planning & Coordination of all State, Regional & Local Agencies – Issue Delegated to Energy Commission (?)
Sea Level Rise
California Coastal Commission
SF Bay and Delta Commissions
Flooding and Drought
Flood Control Commission (Reclamation Bd)
Levee Districts
Food & Ag Dept, Dept of Forestry, Water Resources
Climate Action Team Also Rans Playing Catch-Up Big Time
State Legislature
Pending implementation measures
Attorney General
Represents State in suits by automakers
Sues Federal Government
Sues Local Governments (CEQA)
Climate Action Team No Shows
Local Government
COGs Metro Planning Agencies
Local & Regional Initiatives
Conference of Mayors
Silicon Valley Leadership Group
Clean Cities Coalition
Emission Source Inventory
Industrial sources (refineries, cement
plants, steel etc.) 18%
Power plants 28%
Transportation – internal combustion
powered VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED 39%
historic trend 2% average annual increase in VMT
Greenhouse Gas End Users
Built environment (materials, lighting,
heating & cooling) 48%
Transportation 27%
Industry 25%
Trending up
(Source: AIA)
Potential Means of Emissions Reduction
New technology / rethink old choices
(e.g. natural gas vs. nuclear power)
Regulation – command & control
Market Mechanisms – Trading, Carbon Tax
Retrofit & Infill – reduce existing sources
Zero Carbon Footprint of new growth & development
Locus of government authority
Federal control
Foreign Policy; Tax Policy; Budget
State seeks exemptions or power
Clean Air Act Vehicle Emissions standards
Railroads
Ports and maritime
Carbon Credit Trading Markets
State control
Highways
Power and public utilities
Water and air quality enforcement; Tax policy
Locus of government authority
Local Control = Key to VMT reduction
Land Use – Where people live and work
Public transit – How they get there
Redevelopment – Rebuilding the core
Local districts – means to finance
No Intermediate Regional Legal Authority
Mismatch of scale between problems, solutions and authority to plan & implement
Locus of government authority
Local Control with Responsibility for Global Impacts and Regional Scale of Problems and Solutions =
Local Powerlessness & Loss of Control
Empowerment and Incentives for Local Control to Implement Regional Strategies
The sum of all personal & local decisions are as important as state or national decisions
Reform of Regional Planning and Development Decision Making
Rationalization of Existing Agency
Powers & Priorities
LAFCos
Councils of Governments – Metro Planning Agencies
Regional Transportation Planning Agencies
Regional Transit Agencies
Regional Air Quality Enforcement Districts
Regional Water Quality Control Boards
Regional Air Quality Control Boards
Reform of Regional Planning and Development Decision Making
Authority to Implement Regional Solutions
Regional Impact Fees (Mitigation Fee Act JPA)
Preservation of Open Space
Location, Entitlements and Financing for
New Sustainable Communities
Coordination of Transportation & Land Use
Reform of Regional Planning and Development Decision Making
Top Down – State Mandates to Existing Local
Governments, e.g. new General Plan element
One Size Fits All ● Unfunded Mandates
Irrational equality for diverse contexts and problems
Incentives and Funding for Regional
Cooperation – Tolerance for Diversity of Means
Bottom Up - Local Vision, Initiative, Cooperation
Reform of Regional Planning and Development Decision Making
Key Interest Groups Will Influence Outcome
State Agencies (CalTrans vs. CARB)
Cities & Counties, COGs & LAFCos
Professional & Advocacy Groups (APA,
Environmental Groups, Chamber, Farm
Bureau, etc.)
Building Industry Association (BIA)
Reform of Regional Planning and Development Decision Making
Pending Legislation:
SB 375 – Steinberg
RTIP/Blueprint becomes key
CEQA Climate Change Compliance Incentive
“Sustainable Community Strategy” (SCS) to accommodate new growth & development
Reform of Regional Planning and Development Decision Making
Pending Legislation:
AB 842 – Jones
Each regional transportation plan provide for 10% reduction in the growth increment of VMT
HCD to administer the Infill Incentive Grant Program to fund capital improvement projects ranking applicants based upon reduction of VMT resulting from project
Current Issues for Local Government from Climate Change What to do while waiting for the sky to fall
CEQA Climate Change Impact Analysis of Pending Projects – litigation issue de jour
Planning & Building Standards
Local Government GHG Reduction Plans
Public/Private Partnerships for Innovation
CEQA Climate Change Analysis
Quantification – Baseline, Factors
Threshold of Significance – MND or EIR?
Mitigation Measures
Alternatives Analysis
Significant Unavoidable Impact / Finding of Overriding Considerations?
OPR Guidelines Coming 7/1/2009 – SB 97
Planning & Building Standards
LEED Certification
Solar / Alternative Energy Mandates
Pedestrian & Bicycle Friendly
Transit-Oriented Development
Higher density near transit
Mixed use
Quality and Special Sense of Place
Common Open Spaces
Local Government GHG Reduction
Department level employee and public participation
Short-term and longer term strategies and goals, regular assessment
Everyone can contribute and make a difference – empowerment & hope
Less can mean better
Meaningful context and support for personal responsibility
Public/Private Partnerships for Innovation
Millennial Challenge for Survival on a
Global Scale
Remake economic, social and natural relationships
Shared risk and common interest surpassing race, class, religion, culture, even species
Attitudes Toward Climate Change What to do while waiting for the sky to fall
Denial / Resistance
Let Someone Else Figure It Out
Why Bother if China and India Don’t Act First ?
Do Anything and Everything Because We Need It All - Henny Penny
If We Each Do What is Within Our Power It Increases the Likelihood that Together We Will All Do Enough
Big Government / Local Government
Who first said:
“ That government is best which governs least .”
Ronald Reagan ?
Thomas Jefferson ?
Thomas Paine ?
Henry David Thoreau
Big Government / Local Government
“ The least government that can govern is best .”
(most local) ^ v (Solve the Problem, Meet the Need) The greater the power of remote and unaccountable government the less we can control our own community and individual liberty.
Think Globally Act Locally “ Respect Local Control . . . Provide Regional Perspective”
0 comments
Post a comment