Kin 188 Standards Of Practice, Legal And Ethical Considerations - Presentation Transcript
KIN 188 – Prevention and Care of Athletic Injuries Standards of Professional Practice Legal and Ethical Considerations
Standards of Practice
Definition and perspective
NATA Code of Ethics
BOC Standards of Practice for Athletic Training
Definition
Standards of practice are ethical responsibilities that guide one’s actions and promote high standards of conduct and integrity to assure high quality health care
Perspective
ATC should never compromise the health of any participant/client
Decisions regarding participation status should be based upon sound medical judgment
Participants should be informed of risk, protected from injury when possible and if injured, should receive expedient health care and rehabilitation
Patients/clients have a right to confidentiality regarding their health status
NATA Code of Ethics
Basic principles to follow
Members shall respect the rights, welfare and dignity of all individuals
Members shall comply with the laws and regulations governing the practice of athletic training
Members shall accept responsibility for the exercise of sound judgment
NATA Code of Ethics
Basic principles to follow (continued)
Members shall maintain and promote high standards in the provision of services
Members shall not engage in any form of conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest or that adversely reflects on the profession
BOC Standards of Practice
“ The Professional Practice and Disciplinary Process of the BOC are intended to assist and inform the public, certificants, and candidates for certification, of the BOC Standards of Professional Practice and the Disciplinary Process relative to professional conduct and disciplinary procedures. “
Legal Considerations
Tort Law
Standard of Care
Clearance for Participation
Negligence
Legal Liabilities
Legal Defenses
Preventing Litigation
Tort Law
Tort is a civil wrong done to an individual whereby the injured party seeks a remedy for damages suffered.
Act of omission
Act of commision
Actions measured against a standard of care provided by individuals who have a direct duty to provide care
Act of Omission
Occurs when an individual fails to perform a legal duty
Act of Commission
Occurs when an individual commits an act that is not his or hers to perform
or
Occurs when an individual commits an act that is his or her duty to perform, but carries out the wrong procedure leading to injury or harm
Standard of Care
Standard of care measured by what another minimally competent individual, educated and practicing in that profession would have done in the same or similar circumstances
Standard of care is dictated by profession’s duty or scope of care
Scope of Care
Scope of care outlines the role and responsibility of an individual in that profession and delineates what should be learned in the professional preparation of that individual
Scope of Care
In athletic training, scope of care is determined by the competencies that define the educational content that students must master
Delineating scope of care for entry-level ATCs establishes the standard of care that the public can expect to receive from an ATC
Forces individuals practicing athletic training services to hold ATC credential and state registration, certification or registration where applicable
Clearance for Participation
Final authority regarding clearance for participation for an individual is outside the scope of care of an ATC
Authority rests with team and/or primary care physician
Parents of minors cannot assume risk involved in participation for their child
Negligence
ATCs, coaches, etc. have a duty to provide care to participants under their supervision
Failure to provide such care can result in liability or negligence
Negligence may occur as a result of
Malfeasance
Misfeasance
Nonfeasance
Malpractice
Gross negligence
Negligence Definitions
Malfeasance
Occurs when an individual commits an act that is not their responsibility to perform
Misfeasance
Occurs when an individual commits an act that is their responsibility to perform, but uses the wrong procedure, or does the right procedure in an improper manner
Negligence Definitions
Nonfeasance
Occurs when an individual fails to perform their legal duty of care
Malpractice
Occurs when an individual commits a negligent act while providing care
Gross negligence
Occurs when an individual has total disregard for the safety of others
Negligence
In order for an individual to be found liable or negligent, the injured party must prove that:
There was a duty of care owed to them
There was a breach of that duty
There was harm caused to them
The harm caused was a direct result of the breach of duty
Legal Liabilities
Several steps can be taken to minimize the risk of litigation in the following areas
Failure to warn
Foreseeability of harm
Informed consent
Refusing help
Product liability
Confidentiality
Failure to Warn
Participants in sport/activity should be warned of the risks of injury associated with participation
Especially important for parents of minors and for novices vs. advanced participants
Typically done in pre-season meetings and with the use of signed assumption of risk forms – may also post warning signs and require appropriate protective equipment and adherence to safety related rules
Foreseeability of Harm
Exists when danger is apparent or should have been apparent
Danger must be recognized as potentially injurious and removed prior to injury occurring
Typically done with regular inspection of facilities/equipment and adherence to established precautions/protocols regarding disease/infections
Informed Consent
Implies that an injured individual has been reasonably informed of necessary treatment, possible alternatives, and advantages/disadvantages to each
Individual must be physically/mentally competent or parent of a minor for informed consent to be valid – typical exceptions in case of emergency
Informed Consent
Typically addressed with signed document at preseason meeting
Consider exclusionary clause to address things not within the scope of care for practitioner
Application of treatment without receipt of informed consent may constitute battery (unpermitted/intentional contact with another without their consent)
Refusing Help
Injured individuals may refuse help due to religious beliefs, cultural differences, avoidance of additional pain/suffering, or desire to be treated by more advanced medical personnel
As long as they’re conscious and medically competent, that is their right unless greater risk of injury to the individual and/or others exists if they’re not treated
Best to establish witness to refusal of help
Product Liability
Manufacturers of equipment have a duty of care to design, manufacture and package safe equipment that will not cause injury when used as it’s intended – known as implied warranty
Expressed warranty is a written guarantee that the product is safe for use
Product Liability
Strict liability makes the manufacturer liable for any and all defective or hazardous equipment that unduly threatens an individual’s safety
Alteration/modification of equipment may invalidate manufacturer liability
Important to supervise proper fitting, use and regularly warn participants of dangers associated with misuse of equipment
Confidentiality
Individuals have a right to privacy
Release of medical information must be acknowledged in writing by individual (parent if minor) before it’s shared
Often have generic form in colleges and professional sports allowing exchange of information between ATCs and MDs
Coaches and parents of non-minors have no right to information unless authorized by individual
Legal Defenses
Assumption of risk
Good Samaritan laws
Comparative negligence
Assumption of Risk
Some risks are inherently assumed via participation in sport
Participants should be informed of risks and advised that participation is voluntary
Participants do not assume the risk that a professional will breach their duty of care
Assumption of Risk
Typically have participants sign an expressed assumption of risk form which
Acknowledges the material risks and appreciates that injury and even death can occur
Acknowledges an opportunity to ask questions and have them answered satisfactorily
Affirms understanding of risks of participation and voluntary choice to participate assuming all risks of injury or death from participation
Good Samaritan Laws
Crafted in 1960’s to encourage bystanders to assist others in need of emergency care by granting them immunity from potential litigation
Immunity typically applied when individual
Acts during an emergency
Acts in good faith to help the victim
Acts without expected compensation
Is not guilty of any malicious misconduct or gross negligence toward the injured party
Comparative Negligence
Comparative negligence refers to the relative degree of negligence on the part of the plaintiff and defendant/s
Damages awarded on basis proportionate to each person’s degree of negligence
Preventing Litigation
Members of sports medicine team should be aware of their duty of care consistent with current state law and should complete that duty of care within established policies and standards of practice
0 comments
Post a comment