and included the 18th century parliamentary papers, Archival sound recordings, British Library 19th century newspapers, Medical journals backfiles, NewsFilm Online and Online historical population reports.
Recognising the potential historical value of printed ephemera, John (de Monins) Johnson (initially a papyrologist but, from 1925, the Printer to the University) assembled his collection of printed ephemera between about 1923 and 1956. He collected retrospectively, with 1939 as a cut-off point, and while the majority of material dates from the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries, there is ephemera dating back to 1508 [2 fragments of a printed indulgence - printed by Pynson]. [Pretty wide spread of pre-1800 material, much of it with a political theme (elections, squibs, etc.) [Project pre-1800 strengths in Booktrade, some Advertising, some Prints] [Already digitised much 18th century Entertainment] Originally housed at the Oxford University Press (where it was known as The Constance Meade Collection of Ephemeral Printing, after one of the Collection’s major benefactors), it was transferred to the Bodleian Library in 1968. There are now in the region of 1.5 million items in the Collection, and it is from these that material has been selected for the digitization project.
The main Collection web-page, with links to the catalogue, finding aids and other projects can be found here… >
And so to the project itself… See separate sheet
See separate sheet
… here is the fifth. As you can see, a gory detail from a murder broadside, a strong design on the cover of a hat manufacturer’s advertisement, a rather ornamental plate from a publisher, a similarly ornamental theatre playbill, and a print of what seems to be a country dance or some such. There are various options in the brown bar towards the top, and also above it a ‘quick search’ free-text option, in which we’ve entered the search term ‘Alhambra’. We press ‘Go!’ and >
Right, as the service still has a few months before it is launched, I can only show you some screen shots from the test version to illustrate how it will work. There are 5 versions of the entry page (which will change each time you refresh or log on), each with five different images representing the five subject areas covered – here are 4 of them, and…>
.. It gives us our results – 152 of them. A basic entry, with a thumbnail of the first image associated with the record. There are various options on the right, saving and archive options in the green list at the top, and filter options in the beige list below. We scroll down >
Let’s say we know what we’re looking for is a folded sheet, we click the physical form option from the filter list, and select the folded sheet option. >
Now we only have 8 items to choose from. Let’s choose the first one. >
We have a basic record, with the image below.
As you can see, above the main image is a thumbnail with a red square which helps you to navigate as you zoom and move about within the image. At the bottom, options to zoom in and out, to move left, up, down and right, and to rotate the image.
Here we’ve zoomed in on a clown, and in the thumbnail in the corner the red outline box tells us where we are in the image as a whole. >
We’ve seen the basic record, now we see the full record which illustrates just how detailed these catalogue records are. All entertainments mentioned, venue, date etc., all composers (from Library of Congress authorities where possible), all performers (again from authority files where available)… >
We scroll down, again extremely detailed description throughout… subject and illustration information from Library of Congress authorities and thesauri, and from IconClass as necessary. You may notice some of this needs cleaning up a bit but these shots were taken while it was very much at the development stage >
A quick illustration of the rotation option – here we have a theatre programme with adverts at the top and along the side. If we want to read the advert for champagne on the right, we simply rotate…
> > > >
Discussions began almost 2 years before a public announcement was made in Dec. 2004 Google brings resources and technical expertise that OULS could never generate in-house. OULS’ extensive holdings make possible economies-of-scale which make the project attractive to both parties (e.g. fitting-in with the planned large-scale movement of stock into the new OULS Depository) C19th holdings: large collection, generally in good condition, amenable to scanning and OCR, large runs held physically close together make bulk operations feasible
Empower a project leader or a management team to define and articulate the mission of the project and the steps needed to reach goals Select leaders and key staff with requisite experience; clearly communicate mission and goals of the organisation; and create an atmosphere that encourages an entrepreneurial spirit, including a willingness to test new ideas. Craft a strong value proposition Create a resource that offers unique value and continue to add value to the resource based on an understanding of users’ needs. Find creative ways to lower the direct costs of running the project Secure contributions from the host institution; outsource work through vendors and other external partnerships; work with volunteers Cultivate sources of revenue to cover both direct costs and ongoing upgrades Experiment with different revenue models to find the ones that are the best fit for the project; show willingness to try new models; cultivate the ability to identify and communicate the value of the resource to the target audience (of customers, authors, subscribers and so forth) E.g. Subscription, licensing to publishers, licensing to users, custom services & consulting, corporate sponsorship/advertising, author fees, endowment, grants, donations Establish a system of accountability and measurement of the success of the resource and the revenue model. Establish goals and targets and determine the balance between financial and mission-related returns; assess progress towards mission-based and financial goals and targets
JISC Mass Digitization And Sustainable Business Models - Presentation Transcript
Michael Popham Oxford Digital Library
Outline
What makes a project “sustainable”?
Two (mass-)digitization projects at Oxford
Electronic Ephemera
Oxford-Google Digitization Partnership
Review recommendations from EU and JISC
What do we mean by “sustainable”?
“ Whether a project is ‘sustainable’ or not depends entirely on how sustainability is defined” Sustaining Digital Resources....(July 2009)
“ ...having a mechanism in place for generating, or gaining access to, the economic resources necessary to keep the intellectual property or the service available on an ongoing basis” Sustainability and Revenue Models....(May 2008)
JISC
JISC Mass Digitization programme
Phase One: 6 projects began in 2004
Phase Two: 16 projects (= £12 M ) began in January 2007
The application process
2 stage (April '06, August '06)
Examples of other Phase II projects
WWI Poetry Archive, C19th Pamphlets, BL Newspapers, Welsh journals etc.
Why the John Johnson?
JISC criteria
exposing a “hidden collection”
of interest to a wider community
large, fragile, constraints on physical access
Previous digitization work
Toyota City Imaging
Backstage
ODL Development Fund (x2)
Ephemera ‘ the minor transient documents of everyday life…’ Maurice Rickards ‘ the ephemera of today becomes the evidential data of tomorrow ...’ John de Monins Johnson
John de Monins Johnson (1882-1956)
http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/johnson/johnson.htm
Project content
Entertainment : theatre material (mainly by venue) and non-theatrical material (mainly by genre). Mainly 19 th -century, as much 18 th -century entertainment material is already available through the Oxford Digital Library at: http://www2.odl.ox.ac.uk/gsdl/cgi-bin/library
Booktrade : publishing material (e.g. prospectuses of books and journals) and bookplates
Noteheadings and Popular Prints : record of locations, landscapes and topography, architecture, events, and popular tastes for artistic works and humour
Crime, Murders, and Executions : detailing aspects of the judicial system and its punishments
Advertising : in all its printed forms
Project method
the JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee) provides funds and a project framework
the Bodleian manages the content development aspects of the project:
sorting & shelfmarking
cataloguing
conservation
tracking
digitisation (Capita)
ProQuest are responsible for delivery of the resource, and its associated services, on the web
i2010 European Digital Libraries Initiative
Sub-group on Public Private Partnerships (May 2008), critical success factors:
Partners clearly state their strategic objectives and the benefits for the citizen to be achieved through the project
The partnership fully utilises the experience and expertise of the partners , and brings complementary contributions
The partnership maximises public access and takes into account long-term preservation and sustainability issues
The partnership operates within the framework of applicable copyright and intellectual property law
i2010 European Digital Libraries Initiative
(cont.) Sub-group on Public Private Partnerships critical success factors :
The partnership does not establish exclusive agreements. Where exclusive agreements are necessary to provide a service in the public interest, that such exclusive arrangements are time-limited , regularly reviewed and transparent.
The partnership is transparent, accountable, and managed through a formal governance structure
The partnership is formally established through a memorandum of understanding or contract.
Public domain content in the analogue world should remain in the public domain in the digital environment . If restrictions to user’s access and use are necessary in order to make the content available at all, these restrictions should only apply for a time-limited period.
Why ProQuest?
ProQuest’s experience and expertise
Chadwyck-Healey brand
Early English Books Online (EEBO-TCP)
Knowledge of the potential audience
Design skills (visual literacy + HCI)
Promotion and marketing
Helpline and documentation
Why ProQuest?
Business model
JISC Consortium Agreement between partners
ProQuest manages digitization by a third-party
Commercial experience; protects Oxford
Sustainability
ProQuest licenses access to non-UK subscribers
Revenues generated to cover ProQuest’s costs
Royalty payments made to Bodleian
Up-front data preservation costs (@Oxford) covered by grant
Bodleian commitment to maintaining resource “in perpetuity”
Thomas Bodley’s Vision
Bodleian founded 1602
Universal library – Bodley’s “Republic of Letters”
Legal deposit privilege since 1610
~60% of Bodleian readers not members of Oxford University
>95% users of online collections from outside ox.ac.uk
Why partner with Google?
The synergy between missions:
Bodley’s “Republic of Letters”
Google’s “To organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”
Emphasis is on access not conservation
Oxford University Library Services: opening-up our closed stacks
Google: “…the next generation of the card catalog”
Bring more Oxford-held content into the digital landscape making it available for scholarly and public benefit.
Builds on the work of the Oxford Digital Library (ODL)
What to digitize?
Direct discussions with Google since 2003
Mutual benefits for both parties
Identified extensive holdings of out-of-copyright material (vast majority out-of-print )
Oxford differs from most other partners in this aspect of our agreement (Michigan vs Harvard)
Decision made to begin with the 19 th century material
Scope = approximately 1+ million items
Formal contract(s), covered by Non-Disclosure Agreement
towards full-text searching (n.b. variable accuracy)
New ways to add value to content and services
Ithaka Report: Sustainability & Revenue Models
Project leaders require a shift in mindset...
Assuming that grant funding will always be available is not likely to lead to a successful sustainability plan.
Project leaders need to adopt a more comprehensive definition of ‘sustainability’. It is not enough to cover operating costs; projects need to generate capital for ongoing reinvestment in their content and/or technology.
The value of a project is quantified by the benefits it creates for users – what it allows them to do that they could not do before.
Project leaders need to consider a range of options for long-term governance.
Ithaka Report: Sustainability & Revenue Models
(cont.) Project leaders require a shift in mindset…
The web is a highly competitive environment. Projects must embrace the best operating practices of their competitors for mindshare and resources, a group which includes commercial organisations.
Leaders must also embrace the fact that their environment is rapidly changing. OAR project leaders (and their funders) must continually ask whether they are headed in the right direction and be prepared to adapt when necessary.
Running a start-up is a full-time job and requires full-time leadership .
Innovation depends on experimentation, and project leaders should embrace the fact that there are generally no straightforward solutions.
Ithaka report: Sustaining Digital Resources...
Empower a project leader or a management team to define and articulate the mission of the project and the steps needed to reach goals
Craft a strong value proposition
Find creative ways to lower the direct costs of running the project
Cultivate sources of revenue to cover both direct costs and ongoing upgrades
Establish a system of accountability and measurement of the success of the resource and the revenue model.
What do we mean by “sustainable”?
“ ... Sustainability is the ability to generate or gain access to the resources – financial or otherwise – needed to protect and increase the value of the content or service for those who use it . A sustainable project covers its operating costs through a combination of revenue sources and cost-management strategies and continues to enhance its value based on the needs of the user community.” Sustaining Digital Resources....(July 2009)
References and links
Strategic Content Alliance
Ithaka Report on revenue models... (May 2008)
Sustaining Digital Resources...(July 2009)
Toolkit for the Impact of Digitised Scholarly Resources
John Johnson digitization
The John Johnson collection: an archive of printed ephemera
0 comments
Post a comment