Small Wind Big Future Iskra/Evance

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Small Wind Big Future Iskra/Evance - Presentation Transcript

    1. Small Wind, Big Future? Pete Allen C.E.O.
    2. Evance – formerly known as Iskra Wind Turbines
      • Evance is the new name for Iskra Wind Turbines, to support our international expansion and new products
      • Evance, founded in 1999, design and manufacture small wind turbines in the UK, based on expertise gained in designing utility scale turbines
      • Our lead product is the Evance Iskra R9000, a 5kW turbine typically mounted on a 12m free standing tower
      • Producing 9000kWh of energy per year (at a 5m/s site), our main markets are rural and semi-rural residential homes, schools, farms, and light commercial.
    3. Characteristics of Small Wind
      • Product
      • Technology
      • Market
      • Costs
    4. Small wind – Product Characteristics
      • Define small wind as 3kW – 50kW, on free-standing towers – 10m – 20m high
      • On a ‘human’ scale – ‘tree-sized’ or lamp-post’ sized and so blend into the environment
      • Generate useful amounts of energy – e.g. Evance Iskra R9000 will produce sufficient for two homes
      • For the individual on-grid owner, selling surplus energy to the grid is a key part of the economics
      • Distinct from Micro wind – c. 1kW, often building mounted
      • Distinct from Utility scale wind – e.g. wind farms –’power station replacement’
      • Enables distributed generation – no transmission losses
    5. Small wind – Technology
      • Mercedes McLaren SLR
        • 0 – 60mph: 3.8 seconds
        • 466kW, 7000rpm
        • Aerodynamics – vital
        • Engineering difficulty – hard
      • Evance Iskra R9000
        • 0 – 60mph: never
        • 5kW, 220rpm
        • Aerodynamics – vital
        • Engineering difficulty – harder?
      • Small wind turbines are exponentially harder to engineer than micro wind
      • Interface between aerodynamics, electrical, mechanical and structural loading very complex and difficult to optimise
      • Expertise to design and engineer is globally thin on the ground
      • UK leads the world in this technology
      Max wind speed over aerodynamic surface = c. 240 mph Max wind speed over aerodynamic surface = c. 150 mph
    6. Small wind – Market
      • Current market is predominantly developed world – UK, North America, Europe
      • UK & USA are biggest markets – USA set to expand rapidly with new incentive scheme
      • UK will hopefully follow suit when appropriate incentive mechanism is implemented (Feed-in Tariff)
      • Predominantly On-Grid applications, some Off-Grid
      • Volumes are hundreds of small turbines per year
      • USA leads in market volumes and Government support – including finance and expertise for R & D
    7. Small wind – Costs
      • Predominantly manufactured in high cost economies
      • Volumes only hundreds per year - very low in manufacturing terms
      • In the UK, planning and grid connection permission accounts for up to 10% of the installed cost
      • The difficulty and inconsistency of planning and grid connection is estimated to reduce sales by half – reducing volume and increasing sales costs
      • Low volumes mean installation costs are also relatively high
      • Against this cost background, what are the current economics?
    8. The economics of small wind and the Importance of Volume
    9. Small wind – Current Economics
      • How does small wind compare to other energy sources?
      • Small wind is already approaching grid electricity costs, delivered
      • Small wind is the most economic distributed electricity source available:
        • 2 times more cost effective than solar PV or diesel generation
      Unsubsidised cost over 20 year life, order of magnitude, UK prices 15 15 Small Wind 35 35 Diesel Genset 30 30 Solar PV 10 5-7 Big Wind 10 2 – x? Grid Delivered Cost p/kWh Generated Cost p/kWh Source
    10. Cost/kWh generated Maturity of technology & market Small Wind x1 Big Wind x .5 Solar PV x2 Diesel Genset x2.3 Volume 00’s 000’s 00,000’s Millions No reduction possible Some reduction possible > 50% reduction possible Costs vs Volume – where are we now? Cost/volume curve
    11. Costs vs. Volume – Conclusions
      • An Evance Iskra R9000 has roughly the same manufactured cost as a Ford Focus!
        • but is only one quarter of the weight
        • and has c. 30 times fewer components
      • Volume production will clearly reduce costs – by up to 80%
      • This would enable a reduction in installed cost by 50%
      • Small wind would become economically viable unsubsidised if produced in sufficient volumes
      • E.g. same volumes as Solar PV, heavily subsidised by UK, USA and European Governments
      • No technology leap is required – it exists now !
      • All that is required is volume
    12. The cyclical effect of increasing volumes
      • Imagine market reaches 10,000 units/year ~ £150m
        • or 60% of the UK Government pledge on electric vehicles
        • or c. 20% of just one new car model
      Large volume increase minimises cost Increased volume reduces costs Improved economics generate significantly higher demand
      • Result: Small Wind rapidly achieves full economic potential
      • Mass market, and significant role in CO2 reduction
    13. Conclusions – the Future of Small wind
      • The UK leads the world in small wind technology
      • The technical barriers to entry are high
      • Current volumes are very low, so costs are high…
      • … but small wind is already the most economic distributed generation technology
      • High volumes would reduce costs substantially, to point of mass market
      • There is no requirement for new technology – it is all available
      • But there is a requirement for design for high volume
    14. This Future will be delivered by:
      • Governments: Costs of inconsistent and unnecessary barriers must be removed
        • Minimal but sensible planning and grid connection
      • Governments: Stop ‘love affair’ with Solar PV
        • Technology blind incentives – let the market decide
      • Governments: Incentives sufficient to rapidly expand market
        • Appropriate level of Feed-in Tariff
      • Governments: support for Product Development for higher volumes
      • Manufacturers: Deliver high reliability with much lower costs
      • Market: Economic renewable energy generation on mass scale
      • Government: Subsidies eventually phased out
      • The UK can, and should, take the lead
    15. Thank you
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + IskraWindTurbinesIskraWindTurbines Nominate

    custom

    1170 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Pete Allen, CEO, Iskra Wind Turbines
    BWEA, Interna more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 1170
      • 1170 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 22
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories