Loading…

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

Like this presentation? Why not share!

Supportive and motivating environments in schools

on

  • 1,316 views

The conference Developing Strength and Resilience in Children, 1-2 Nov. 2010 in Oslo.

The conference Developing Strength and Resilience in Children, 1-2 Nov. 2010 in Oslo.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,316
Views on SlideShare
1,316
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
32
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Supportive and motivating environments in schools Supportive and motivating environments in schools Presentation Transcript

    • Main factors to make wellbeing and learning a reality Anne G. Danielsen (PhD) Oslo, 2010
    • 1. Background 2. Outcomes: Wellbeing and learning 3. Aim 4. Theoretical perspective 5. Previous research 6. Research questions 7. Methods 8. Results 9. Conclusions 10. Implications Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen
    • a risk or resource for students’ wellbeing (Samdal, 1999) Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Subjective wellbeing  Positive development in children and youth  Focus on ◦ Developing strengths ◦ Positive responses to adversity ◦ Strenghtening important institutions  Complements, does not replace, risk behaviour- and disability-approaches  Main purpose: Identitfying supportive and motivating factors that may relate to  wellbeing and learning of students (Danielsen, 2010). Anne G. Danielsen
    •  (a) positive subjective experiences, ◦ like subjective wellbeing , self-determination, self- efficacy and self-regulated learning (academic initiative)  (b) positive personality – a perspective on human beings as self-organizing, self-directed, adaptive entities, ◦ e.g. self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) and social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1997), and  (c) positive institutions ◦ e.g. schools, bringing out the best in positive character and subjective experiences (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). ◦ School setting: the major extra-familial environment Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Belonging at school: ◦ economic or educational success as adults ◦ long-term health and wellbeing (OECD, 2004)  Success in education: ◦ individuals’ opportunities to live a successful life (Ottawa Charter to Health Promotion, 1986; Masten & Coatsworth, 1998; OECD, 2004).  Individuals’ wellbeing and learning ◦ prerequisite for societies to achieve sustainable socio-economic and democratic development (OECD, 2004) Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Chapter 9a. The pupils’ school environment  Section 9a-1. General requirements  All pupils attending primary and secondary schools are entitled to a good physical and psychosocial environment conducive to health, wellbeing and learning. Anne G. Danielsen
    • Subjective Wellbeing  Quality of life or “happiness”  people’s own evaluations of their lives, both affective and cognitive Anne G. Danielsen
    •  life satisfaction, as for school students in Norway, and  school satisfaction, considering school as one of the important life domains of wellbeing ◦ such as work, family, friends, or community (Huebner, Suldo, Smith, & McKnight, 2004a; Huebner, Valois, Suldo, Smith, McKnight, Seligson et al., 2004b). Anne G. Danielsen
    •  an important cognitive aspect of subjective wellbeing (Huebner, Valois, Paxton, & Drane, 2005)  views of life conditions and wellbeing experienced and assessed by the individuals themselves (Huebner et al., 2004)  global, cognitive judgments of one’s life (Pavot, Diener, Colvin, & Sandvik, 1991)  a person’s evaluation of various areas of his or her life (such as the school context) Anne G. Danielsen
    •  A right to feel good about themselves and the institutions in which they function (Verkuyten & Thijs, 2002)  An important outcome of schooling in itself  An affective variable, students’ enjoyment and evaluation of their school experiences (Huebner & Gilman, 2006)  Social belonging and inclusion (PISA-studies; educational policy documents)  Liking school: (Health Behaviour in School-aged Children-studies)  Disaffection with school may reflect alienation or disconnection from school and withdrawal from school activities Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Engagement in challenging, task oriented behaviour (Larson, 2000)  Self-regulated learning; motivational processes ◦ Goal setting, effort, positive beliefs, valuing learning (Schunk & Zimmerman, 1997)  Obtain better results (more likely)  Become lifelong learners (more likely)  Major new goal of education (OECD, 2004)  Contribution to creating a good life (Report No. 16 [2006-2007] to the Norwegian Parliament) Anne G. Danielsen
    •  a critical developmental period in shaping patterns of mental health (WHO, 2000) and  health enhancing-behaviors (Larson, Wilson, Mortimer, 2002).  Both growth and problems are potential outcomes of the adolescent period, depending on the kind of care and opportunities that adults and institutions afford (Roeser, Eccles, Sameroff, 1998).  improving a student’s school initiative may prevent student boredom, disaffection, and drop-out from school (cf. Finn, 1989; Fredricks et al.). G. Danielsen Anne
    • Apply a positive psychological perspective School-related factors Lower secondary schools, i.e. grade 8-10 relate positively to students’ Life satisfaction, School satisfaction and Academic initiative Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000)  What are  supportive and motivating environments in schools  according to self-determination theory? Anne G. Danielsen
    • Supportive and Motivating Environments Active en- Student needs Student motivation Outcomes couragement Life Warmth satisfaction vs Relatedness Hostility Self- determined Structure Motivation School Competence - satisfaction vs Caos Engagement Autonomy- Academic Support vs Autonomy initiative Coercion Figure 1 Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Relatedness; belonging and feeling connected to others  Competence; to control outcomes and to experience effectance, such as having a sense of mastery over one’s capacity to act in the environment  Autonomy; to be agentic, to feel like the “origin” of one’s actions, and to have a voice, initiative, input or choice in determining our own behavior (Ryan & Deci, 2000; Deci & Ryan, 2000). Anne G. Danielsen
    • Warmth vs Hostility  Interpersonal involvement Competence-involving structure Structure vs  Chaos Autonomy-  Support vs Autonomy-support Coercion Reeve (2002); Reeve et al. (2008) Anne G. Danielsen
    • Warmth vs Hostility  Interpersonal involvement (Reeve, 2005)  The creation of social bonds ◦ a) the other person cares about my welfare ◦ b) the other person likes me (Baumeister & Leary, 1995)  Support for relatedness provided by teachers ◦ a sense of being close to students, ◦ a sense of warmth, affection, and acceptance of students (Reeve, 2006; Reeve et al., 2008) ◦ pedagogical caring (Goldstein, 1999; Wentzel, 1997; Noddings, 2005). ◦ can be important to students’ development of secure relations to adults (Furrer & Skinner, 2003) Anne G. Danielsen
    • Structure vs Chaos  Competence-involving structure  Continued feed-back provided by teachers:  clear expectations, optimal challenges, and timely, informative, consistent, sensitive, and responsive feedback (in contrast to chaos or laissez-faire)  suggestions for how future performance can be improved, may ◦ reduce perceptions of uncertainty ◦ help the student in developing a sense of perceived control over possible stressful circumstances (Rosenfeld et al., 2000, Hattie, 2009; Hattie & Timperley, 2007; OECD, 2005; Reeve, 2002). Anne G. Danielsen
    • Autonomy- Support vs Coercion  Autonomy-supportive teachers ◦ help students develop a sense of congruence between their classroom behavior and their inner motivational resources ◦ provide students with high-quality interpersonal relationships (Reeve, 2002).  Responsive, supportive, motivate through interest, asking students what they want (Reeve; Reeve & Jang, 2006). ◦ enhanced motivation, engagement, learning, and psychological wellbeing (Reeve & Halusic, 2009) Anne G. Danielsen
    •  two independent contextual variables ◦ can be complementary and mutually supportive  Teachers can ◦ provide little or much competence-involving structure  Teachers can ◦ be controlling or autonomy-supportive  “A lack of structure yields not an autonomy-supportive environment but instead one that is permissive, indulgent, or laissez-faire” (Reeve, 2006, p. 231). Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Most young adolescents report  relatively high levels of life satisfaction (Currie, Gabhainn, Godeau, Roberts, Smith, Currie et al., 2008).  11, 13 and 15-year-old school-students in 41 countries and regions across Europe and North America.  social support from family, teachers, and peers is associated with perceived life satisfaction (Diener & Fujita, 1995). Anne G. Danielsen
    •  School may be one of the life domains with the largest impact on students’ life satisfaction (Huebner, Laughlin, Ash & Gilman, 1998)  Literature in this area is scant (Suldo, Riley, & Shaffer, 2006).  Knowledge about the impact of school satisfaction on students’ life satisfaction:  important for understanding how school- related resources influence (and change) health and well-being. Anne G. Danielsen
    •  if the school context  provides social support for  relatedness,  competence and  autonomy (Baker et al., 2003).  Associated with increased school satisfaction  In accordance with self-determination theory (Ryan & Deci, 2000) Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Large cross-country differences in the prevalence of students reporting to like school (Currie, et al., 2008).  Female students tend to report higher levels of school satisfaction than males do, but  this gender gap narrows between ages 11 and 15.  Compared with other countries; ◦ Norwegian students tend to report very high levels of liking school (Currie et al.) and also a very high sense of belonging to their school (ILS, 2006). Anne G. Danielsen
    •  -such as  perceived teacher support  care, understanding, fairness, and friendliness,  appear very influential on  students’ school satisfaction (Rosenfeld et al., 2000; Reddy, Rhodes, & Mulhall, 2003; Hamre & Pianta, 2006; Skinner et al., 2008). Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Youth initiative  studied in different social contexts,  structured voluntary activities, but also in  school, family, and when students spend time with peers in more unstructured ways  during schoolwork, students report low intrinsic motivation. (Larson, 2000; Hansen et al., 2003; Larson et al., 2005) .  academic initiative was not previously examined Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen
    • S Support in e Student outcomes l the school f - environment d e t e Psycho- r Academic social m School Initiative support i Students’ n satisfaction from Life a parents, t Perceived Satisfaction General teachers i competence Self-Efficacy and o classmates n t h e o r y Figure 2
    •  1. To what extent is support in the school environment related to students’ perceived life satisfaction, school satisfaction and academic initiative?  2. To what extent do perceived teacher support, perceived classmate support, and perceived student autonomy relate to students’ self-reported academic initiative at the individual and at the school class levels? Anne G. Danielsen
    • 1: Danielsen, Samdal, Hetland, & Wold, 2009; The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 303–318. 2: Danielsen, Wiium, Wilhelmsen, & Wold, 2010; Journal of School Psychology, 48, 247-267. 3: Danielsen, Breivik, & Wold, in press; Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Anne G. Danielsen
    •  nationally representative samples of 13 and 15 year-olds,  the sixth and seventh World Health Organization (WHO) survey of  Health Behavior in School-aged Children (Currie et. al., 2004; Currie, et al., 2008). rriet Anne G. Danielsen
    •  National ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics (REK). Data collection  Teachers, or other specially trained personnel, supervised the students’ self-completion of the questionnaires in the school classrooms Anne G. Danielsen
    •  Descriptive analysis  Structural equation modeling (SEM)  Two-level modeling  Multiple-group analysis Anne G. Danielsen
    •  The sample sizes were large  The samples were nationally representative (Currie et al., 2001).  The results can be generalized to the Norwegian populations that were studied Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen
    • Preliminary results Anne G. Danielsen
    • . .16 Classmate .14 support .23 School .18 satisfaction Life- .47 . satisfaction .55 . .37 .25 Teacher .19 General .43 support -Self- efficacy .43 . Perceived .05 competence .68 Parent .27 support .16 Figur 2. Structural model of relationships between support in the school environment and students’ perceived life satisfaction (paper 1) Anne G. Danielsen
    • Note: ***p < .001 (a) Student level **p < .01 Teacher .75*** .32*** support PCAS Academic Initiative .47*** .43*** .13** Student Classmate R2=.16*** autonomi support (b) Class level Figure 3. Teacher .83*** PCAS .86** Two level analysis. support * Academic Dependent variabel: Initiative “Academic Initiative”. .37 .18 .85*** PCAS: Combined Student Classmate Teacher support and autonomi support R2=.88*** Student autonomy (paper 2) Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen
    •  pedagogical caring and  perceived competence are related to  academic initiative and  life satisfaction  in 13- and 15-year old students. Anne G. Danielsen
    •  - in consistency with previous US studies (Rosenfeld et al. 2000; Reddy, Rhodes, & Mulhall, 2003; Hamre & Pianta, 2006)  This result is in accordance with self-determination theory;  social contexts that support the needs of relatedness, competence, and autonomy are associated with psychological well-being (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Anne G. Danielsen
    •  The students’ perceptions of  pedagogical caring and autonomy support (PCAS) from their teachers were  strongly related (.86) to self-reported academic initiative at the class level.  Students’ perceptions of teacher support  varied considerably between school classes.  Some school classes provide more favourable environments for the development of academic initiative than do others. Anne G. Danielsen
    •  the findings furthermore support  the existence of a relational zone (Goldstein, 1999), and the importance of  pedagogical caring (Wentzel, 1997; Noddings, 2005),  relatedness (e.g. Furrer & Skinner, 2003; Skinner, Furrer, Marchand, & Kinderman, 2008), and  emotional support (Malecki & Demaray, 2003) in the learning environment. Anne G. Danielsen
    •  crucial to human life, both to nurture a global need to belong and to provide more situational or task specific support (cf. Baumeister & Leary, 1995).  Because relatedness is likely to facilitate  internalization of the value of schoolwork,  relatedness may facilitate students’ engagement with school and  have a positive influence on students’  initiative for those school tasks that initially are not intrinsically motivated. Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen
    •  By supporting students’ experiences of relatedness, competence, and autonomy in schools,  a developmental pathway to psychological wellbeing and increasing learning may open.  Self-determination theory:  interpersonal involvement,  competence-involving structure, and  autonomy-support  are crucial and mutually supportive factors Anne G. Danielsen
    • Anne G. Danielsen