Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Earth's Temperature _ A Brief History Of Recent Changes
Earth's Temperature _ A Brief History Of Recent Changes
Earth's Temperature _ A Brief History Of Recent Changes
Earth's Temperature _ A Brief History Of Recent Changes
Earth's Temperature _ A Brief History Of Recent Changes
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Earth's Temperature _ A Brief History Of Recent Changes

1,221

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,221
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Earths Temperature : A Brief History Of Recent ChangesApproximate temperature range:Low: 5°C... 41°FHigh: 17°C... 63°Fvariety : 12°C... 22°FAtmospheric Carbine Dioxide under 300 ppmvin the Iast 10 ,000 many years :Hunter-gathers grew to become farmersPlant as well as animal varieties were domesticatedCivilizations were developedGlobal mean temps probably didnt vary by more than 1°C... 2°F in a 100-year periodthe surface temperature of the world tends to increase rapidly after which settle down again in cyclesof approximately 100,thousand years because shown above in this UN atmosphere Programme(UNEP) chart. The blue line traces the temperature differences (within degrees Celsius) over the last420,000 many years compared to the existing time, understood to be the year 1950.In 1950, according to NASAs Goddard start for room Studies, the actual mean surface temperatureof the world was 14° Celsius or even 57° Fahrenheit. Thus the earths absolute temperature (asopposed to its temperature alter ) during the last 420,000 many years varied from a low around 5°Cor even 41°F to a high of about 17°C or even 63°F, a variety of approximately 12°C or 22°F.Although this particular range is no more than exactly what most of us experience in the course of theyears period going from summer in order to winter, UNEP refers to these temperature modificationsas "very significant" and to the earths climate throughout most of these many years as "unstable."Towards the base of the variety the temperature was chilly enough for glaciers to improve in size andalso at the top was warm enough for glaciers to become reduced by melting. The actual colder manyyears are referred to as periods of glaciation and also the warmer many years as intervals ofinterglaciation.Although estimations of the age of our varieties , homo sapiens, vary broadly , 420,thousand yearsmost likely covers the majority of if not all in our existence on this planet. But it was only 10 ,000 or soyears ago that we learned how you can grow our own food, the development that resulted in thecreation of set communities, the actual division of labor and all the benefits of what we phonecivilization.This last 10 ,000 many years (see vertical red line drawn on the population chart above), known asthe Holocene Epoch, has been among interglaciation exactly where temperatures, when compared toprior 410,000 many years , have been remarkably stable. Through the Holocene, based on UNEP,"based on the incomplete evidence available , it is unlikely that global mean temps have diverse by alot more than 1°C [2°F] in a hundred years."If we were to trace the concentration of carbon dioxide (C02) in the atmosphere over the same420,000 many years , we would look for a very similar design to surface temperature. Atmospheric
  • 2. co2 is the most large of the so-called greenhouse gases that soak up heat branched out from thefloor and then expand some of it back to the Earths surface , keeping our planet warmer compared toit otherwise would be. Without greenhouse gases and atmospheric water watery vapor (which servesthe same perform ), the imply temperature of the world would be about 0°F or even minus 18°Cinstead of (within 1950) 57°F or 14°C.The concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere during the last 420,thousand was never up to300 components per million by volume (ppmv) till about a century ago when it rose about 300 ppmv,reaching 311 ppmv within 1950. It has been rising since.The 100 ,000 year cycles of Earths temperature shown in the UNEP charts was first hypothesized bya Serbian astrophysicist as well as mathematician called Milutin Milankovitch in the 20s and ‘30s.Building on the work of other researchers who experienced observed how the Earths orbit around thesun was irregular in 3 particular aspects , Milankovitch created a model to show how the amount ofsunlight (solar the radiation ) reaching our planet varied based on the interaction from the cycles ofthese three irregularities , which are described below:The eccentricity cycle affects how much more sunlight the Earth receives when it is closest to thesun (perihelion) compared to when it is furthest from the sun (aphelion) as well as enhances or evendecreases the result on sunlight of the additional two irregularities. But it is not really strong enough tocreate our months.The obliquity cycle produces our months. The greater the actual tilt, the greater pronounced thetimes of year -- hotter summers, cooler winters.The precession cycle causes the times of year to migrate , which is why it is also called thePrecession of the Equinoxes -- as well as why the age of Pisces will ultimately pass the actual torchto the Age of Aquarius.1. Eccentricity: inside a cycle of roughly 100 ,000 many years , the shape from the Earths orbitaround the sun varies from an almost perfect group to a better elliptical shape , with the sun nearer 1end (instead of in the middle), after which back to a more circular shape.2. Obliquity: inside a cycle around 40,thousand years, the actual tilt from the Earths axis relative tothe actual plane of its orbit round the Sun differs from 22.1 degrees in order to 24.five degrees as wellas back.3. Precession: In a cycle of a small over twenty ,000 many years , the point of the earths axiswobbles so that the northern axis factors now in order to Polaris (its northern border Star) howeverwill eventually point to Vega prior to returning to Polaris.But Milankovitch wasnt simply interested in tracking changes in sunlight with his model -- he wantedto clarify why ice ages happened , why at various times in the background of the Earth glaciers wereformed and later on melted aside.To that end he constructed a numerical model for the 600,thousand years prior to 1800 whichcalculated solar radiation as well as surface temps at particular latitudes, particularly Latitude 65°North -- the latitude of Fairbanks, Alaska as well as Oulu, Finland -- in the month of July. Their theorywas that within cooler summers the winter snows did not totally melt however over time
  • 3. accumulated and led to glaciation.As might happen , say, once the Earths orbit is maximally elliptical, obliquity is minimum (less tip ,cooler summers ) and the north Hemispheres summer time occurs when the planet is furthest fromthe sun.Milankovitchs theory was mostly ignored till , in 1976, a study based on deep-sea deposit coreswithin Antarctica substantiated that changes in temperature going back 450,thousand years mostlyconformed in order to changes in the earths orbit. The actual eccentricity, obliquity and precessionvariations within Milankovitchs model are said to possess accounted for, respectively, 50%, 25% and10% of temperature change. Milankovitchs theory is now accepted as the greatest explanation ofclimate change "on time weighing scales of hundreds and hundreds of years." And the theorysuggests that to expect time for Earth to begin a new long-term cooling cycle.In 1967 the Russian scientist named Mikhail Budyko made a prediction: increasing man-made co2 inthe environment would conquer any cooling effects soon and cause Earths temperature to increase.By coincidence, which same year a young Iowan named james Hansen joined NASAs GoddardInstitute for Space research in new york city as a study associate. He had just finished his doctoralthesis on the atmosphere from the planet Venus where co2 was thick and the surface temperaturewould be a scorching 460°C (860°F), right now he was assigned to the question elevated by Budyko -- might climate forcings (as they are called) from human causes cancel out natural forcings of coolertemps and cause global warming soon ?Hansen and his colleagues built a simple environment model reflecting various assumptions ofhuman activity. What they found was , in Hansens words, "which human-produced greenhousegases should become a dominating forcing and even exceed additional climate forcings, such asvolcanoes or the sun , at some point in the future." when ? They didnt know.They began collecting temperature data from weather channels around the world. Finally , in 1981, inan analysis released in Science and referenced in a front page article in the New York Times, theyverified Budykos conjecture , showing which temperatures experienced started rising a decadeprior to.In 1988, on a record-breaking hot summer time day within Washington, deb.C., having "weighed thecosts of being wrong versus the costs of not really talking," Hansen testified before our electedrepresentatives that he was 99% assured we were inside a long-term heating trend anf the husbandsuspected greenhouse gases were causing it. His accounts and claims to reporters afterward werewidely reported in the media. Global warming had gone public.In the two years since Hansens testimony, the actual increases in both greenhouses gases andtemperature have accelerated. The chart below from a recent NASA report compares the situationtoday to 1880, a century or so after the (human-made) Industrial revolution got going ahead.Atmospheric carbine dioxide, the major culprit among greenhouse gases , reached 384 ppmv(components per million by volume ) in 07 compared to 290 in 1880, about 280 before thecommercial Revolution started , and never a lot more than 300 during the 420,thousand years prior tothe Industrial revolution.
  • 4. Atmospheric co2• is 35% higher than when Industrial revolution began• is higher than any kind of period within last 420,000 years• is primary cause of temperature increase (not really the other way around)If no action is take to abate greenhouse gases --Earths temperature• may increase by 2-6°C... 4-11°F in the 21st Centurywhich will be higher than at any point• in the last 10 ,000 many years (Holocene Epoch) when we developed the foods which support all of us and the fruit of our civilization• since the middle Pliocene Epoch 3 million years ago when sea level may have been 25 meters or 80 feet higher than todayThe temperature increase was much less dramatic -- 0.85°C (1.53°F) -- however much of the actualcarbon dioxide added in this time period will remain in the atmosphere as well as continue to warmthe Earth for hundreds of years to come.The NASA statement said that the actual "only viable description for heating after 1950 is an rise ingreenhouse gases."So what happened in order to Milankovitch?Before the Industrial revolution and the huge increase in populace that followed, temperature changeover the long term was mostly caused by alternation in sunlight described by the Milankovitch Cycles.Temperature change influenced change in greenhouse gases, that in a so-call positive feedbackmechanism then accelerated the actual temperature alter.Now, nevertheless , the recent surge within greenhouse gasoline emissions offers trumped the actualMilankovitch cycles. The number one cause of the current upwards trend within Earths temperatureis the increase within atmospheric co2 , not an rise in sunlight. And also the increase in co2 istriggered primarily by human exercise , notably the actual burning of fossil fuel (oil, natural gas andfossil fuel ), not through the temperature increase -- even though in an additional positive suggestionsmechanism the actual temperature increase may help to improve the amount of co2 in theenvironment.James Hansen took global warming public in the Congressional accounts in the summer of 1988,however Congress has never taken action , and neither has the Executive department. Indeed, thefinal three administrations (Bush, Clinton, Bush) have tried to snout him.In its 2007 global warming Synthesis Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), which discussed that seasons Nobel serenity Prize along with Al Gore, projected temperatureincreases in the 21st century of from 2 in order to 6°C (four to 11°F) if no action is actually taken pastwhat small has already been come to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.Should we be worried? should our grandkids ?According in order to Hansen, "in the event that further global warming reaches two or three degreesCelsius, we will likely see modifications that make planet a different planet than the one we know.
  • 5. The last time it was which warm was... About three million years ago, when sea level was believed tohave been about twenty five meters (80 feet) higher than today."In 04 2008, Hansen and 7 other researchers from as many universities as well as institutions postedan abstract to Science entitled Target atmospheric co2 : Where should humanity goal ? their ownconclusion: "If mankind wishes in order to preserve a planet similar to the 1 on which civilizationdeveloped and also to which life on Earth is actually adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoingclimate change suggest that CO2 will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm [in 2008] in orderto at most 350 ppm."When bill McKibben, longtime global warming activist and author of The End of Nature, study thesewords , he began a new grassroots climate motion called 350.org "to make sure everybody knows thetarget to ensure that our political leaders feel real pressure to act."He admits its a bit of the Hail Mary. The last year when carbon dioxide was down to 350 was 1987.What if we do not make it?"People may doubtless survive on a non-350 planet," McKibben writes, "however those who do willbe so preoccupied, dealing with the limitless unintended consequences of an overheated planet,which civilization may not."------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------All comments , questions as well as views tend to be welcome!costa rica volcano

×