YoungWarriors

789 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
789
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
552
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

YoungWarriors

  1. 1. TOPIC: Plugging the Leaks: Improving reach and efficiency of the Public Distribution System DRONACHARYA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING:- Rahul Rajpal (coordinator) Saurabh Setia Kirti Sharma Praveen Rohilla Raman Khanna
  2. 2. Public Distribution System (PDS) is an Indian food security system. Established by the Government of India under Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food, and Public Distribution and managed jointly with state governments in India, it distributes subsidized food and non- food items to India's poor. Major commodities distributed include staple food grains, such as wheat, rice, sugar, and kerosene, through a network of Public distribution shops, also known as Ration shops established in several states across the country. Both the central and state governments shared the responsibility of regulating the PDS. While the central government is responsible for procurement, storage, transportation, and bulk allocation of food grains, state governments hold the responsibility for distributing the same to the consumers through the established network of Fair Price Shops (FPSs). State governments are also responsible for operational responsibilities including allocation and identification of families below poverty line, issue of ration cards, supervision and monitoring the functioning of FPSs. Under PDS scheme, each family below the poverty line is eligible for 35 kg of rice or wheat every month
  3. 3. The problems face by PDS have serious implications for the performance, impact and delivery cost of TPDS. These, along with certain weaknesses in the delivery mechanism , have led to large scale leakages (36.38%) and diversion (21.45%) of subsidized grains to unintended beneficiaries. Wide inter-State variations in different types of leakages have been observed. The States are grouped with respect to the intensity of the problem of leakage of subsidized grains. A 2012 Asian Development Bank study on the subsidies offered by India’s Public Distribution System (PDS) observed that deserving poor receive only 10% of the intended benefits; 19% of the subsidy goes to the non- poor, illegal diversion and administrative expenses consume 43% and 28% of the same respectively. The Economic Survey of 2011 admitted that 40% of all food grains do not reach intended recipients.
  4. 4. • Irregular delivery schedule of FPS quota is a persistent problem in most States. This has contributed to low off-take by consumers and hence to large diversion of subsidized grains to the open market. • Monitoring of activities of FPSs through inspection by district/ taluka level officials was irregular and ineffective. In addition to leakages, PDS suffers from diversions of subsidized grains to unintended beneficiaries (APL households) because of Error of Inclusion. While small inclusion errors and diversions could be ignored (as these could be due to genuine measurement errors), in the States of Andhra Pradesh (36%), Himachal Pradesh (20%), Karnataka (42%), Kerala (21%) and Tamil Nadu (50%), the proportion of subsidized grains received by APL households is unacceptably large. Notes prepared by the field units of PEO suggest that a section of the APL households holding BPL cards actually do not lift their ration quota. Thus, a part of the entitlement of these APL households holding BPL cards is actually leaked out of the PDS supply chain. It is, however, difficult to capture this form of leakage empirically.
  5. 5. Leakages and diversions raised the delivery cost in the sense that for every kilogram of food grains delivered to the poor, the GOI had to issue 2.4 kg. of subsidized grains from the Central Pool. In other words, the amount of implicit subsidy per kilogram of food grains delivered to the poor is more than the difference between the Economic Cost and Central Issue Price. The break up the Central Subsidy to the poor in terms of intended and unintended subsidies for 2003-04
  6. 6. The key challenge faced by the government is to improve the existing PDS Solutions: Notwithstanding greater participation of consumers and higher off-take of food grains by the poor households under TPDS, the findings of the study reveal that PDS has neither led to a reduction of budgetary food subsidies, nor has it been able to benefit the large majority of the food insecure households in the desired manner. The two pivotal issues that relate to the implementation of PDS are; a)Evolving a method for the identification of the poor that minimizes errors and economies resources; and b) instituting a delivery system that is effective, efficient and transparent. The forgoing analysis suggests that corrective measures are required in both these areas for realization of the objectives of PDS.
  7. 7. On Making Delivery Mechanism Effective The full monthly quota of food grains for distribution must reach the retail outlets (FPSs) within the first seven days of the month. For this, doorstep delivery of grains to FPS in the presence of PRI members or any other responsible organization is required. For ensuring transparency in delivery, it should be authenticated by the PRI or other designated agencies. transparent operation To minimize leakages at FPS level and ensure their transparent operation, these retail outlets must be made financially viable. Through simulation exercises w.r.t. alternate values of the relevant parameters
  8. 8. The main objective of holding Consumer Awareness program is to emphasize the commitment of the Government towards consumer welfare and also to make them aware of their rights and other entitlements on Public Distribution System, Packaged Commodities Rights, Legal Metrology Act & Rules and Consumer Protection Act, etc. Organizing a skit on this issue would be appealing with a bunch of artists who will work honorary . The campaign should be supported with banners and loud speakers. We’ll organize various awareness campaigns specifically to make people aware about the right policies and their rights. This can be done through skits (street plays) by taking help from any of a NGO or even forming a NGO own our own. Our TAKE on this ISSUE
  9. 9. There are many NGOs working against corruption as inefficiency and leakage in PDS is majorly due to corruption. One of the NGOs could be approached or we can have volunteers from general public. The volunteers will set up information booths, which also serve as grievance redressal cells. Complaints pertaining to non-functioning or inadequate functioning of government schemes will be registered. We’ll hire a few Governance Guides who will counsel the villagers and brief them on action points to be followed up by the team. A signature campaign to showcase solidarity on the issues will be carried out. The camps will also mark the launch of Governance mail, an provision enabling the villagers to voice their concerns and suggestions to the Centre and State government, Commissions and Judiciary.
  10. 10. References: • http://www.smsfoundation.org • www.pdsportal.nic.in • http://www.indianexpress.com/news/improving-pds-critical-to-food- security-law-says-food-minister/1141719/ • www.planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/10th/.../v2_ch3 _4.pdf

×