Arun Shourie   Eminent Historians
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Arun Shourie Eminent Historians



A PowerPoint Presentation of the excellent book of Arun Shourie by the same name in which he discloses the story of how India academia was taken over by the Leftist establishment during the tenure of ...

A PowerPoint Presentation of the excellent book of Arun Shourie by the same name in which he discloses the story of how India academia was taken over by the Leftist establishment during the tenure of Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister of India. She authorized the Communization of Indian academia under the Education Ministry of Dr. Nurul Hasan who was a card-carrying cadre of the Communist Party. Here is a short presentation of the eye opening book.



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



1 Embed 5 5



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Arun Shourie   Eminent Historians Arun Shourie Eminent Historians Presentation Transcript

    • Eminent HistoriansTheir Technology, Their Line, Their Fraud PRESENTATION BASED ON A BOOK BY ARUN SHORIE
    • During the Britishrule ofIndia, Historytaught in schoolswas speciallydoctored to deprivethe „natives‟ of theknowledge of theirown heritage andculture, and on theother hand toinculcateadmiration of theirrulers.
    • Arun Shourie‟s„EminentHistorians‟, informsthe reader that thisdangerous trend inthe writing ofIndian History isstill rampant. Arun Shourie
    • History must not be made a tool for serving political or other ends
    • Marxist historians have been suppressing facts and inventing lies by seizing control of institutions such as the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), the National Council of EducationalResearch Training (NCERT), large parts of Indian academia, and nearly all of theEnglish-media newspapers and publishing houses.
    • Marxist historians and the corruption by them Scholars Project Status of project K. Rajayan Before 1857 Submitted but not traceable S.R. melhotra 1857-1885 Not submitted Bipin Chandra 1885-1886, 1932-1934 Not submitted B.R. Grover 1899-1902 Submitted and published Sumit Sarkar 1905-1907, 1907-1909 Not submitted M.N. Das 1920-1915 Not submitted T.K. Ravindran 1915-1919 Not submitted V.N. Dutta 1919-1920 Submitted and published Sita Ram Singh 1920-1922 Submitted and published Amba prasad 1924-1926 Not submitted Bimal Prasad 1927-1929, 1930-1931 Not submitted Gopal Krishna 1934-1937 Not submitted
    • Included as principals in this group of Marxist historians are Romila Thapar, Satish Chandra, K.M. Shrimali, K.M.Pannikar, R.S. Sharma, D. N. Jha, Gyanendra Pandey, and Irfan Habib.
    • The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history.
    • Marxist party line is to project Hindus as exploitative feudalists and Muslims as liberators!
    • Book: Bharat Katha, prepared by the Burdwan Education Society, Teachers Enterprise, published by Sukhomoy Das.Page 113: “According to Islamic law non-Muslimswill have to choose between death and Islam. Onlythe Hanafis allow non-Muslims to pay jaziya inexchange for their lives.”After Edition:By paying jaziya to Alauddin khaliji,Hindus could lead normal lives.”
    • Page 89: “sultan mahmud used force for widespread murder, loot, destruction and conversion.”After Edition: “There was widespread loot and destruction by Mahmud.”No reference to killing, No reference to forcible conversions.
    • How the Buddhist priesthood perished by the swords of the Muslim invaders has been recorded by Muslim historians themselves.Still Marxist historians are suppressing this fact.
    • Sultan Mahmudbin IbrahimSharqi( AD1440-1457):in Tabkat-i-akbari“After sometime heproceeded to Orissawith the intension ofjihad. He attackedplaces in theneighborhood of thatprovince and laidthem waste, anddestroyed thetemples afterdemolishing them…”
    • Sultan Sikandar Lodi at Mathura(UP): In abu’llah’sTarikh-i-Da’udi“He was so zealous aMusalman that heutterly destroyeddiverse places ofworship of theinfidels, and left nota vestige remainingof them. He entirelyruined the shrines ofMathura…”
    • 25 May 1679:Auragzeb’s reign“Khan-i-jahanBahadur returnedfrom Jodhpur afterdemolishing itstemples, andbringing with himselfseveral cart-loads ofidols. The emperorordered that theidols should be castin the quadrangle ofthe court and underthe steps of Jamamasjid for beingtrodden upon”
    • The language of the record speaks foritself. It leaves no doubt that they tookimmense pride in doing what they did.
    • Sultan AhmudShah I WaliBahmani(ad1422-1435):in Tarikh-i-Firishta.“…wherever he(AhmudShah) went put to deathmen, women, children,without mercy…”“…Whenever thenumber of slainamounted to 20,000,he halted 3 days, andmade a festivalcelebration of thebloody event…”
    • 1 January 1705:Aurangzeb’s reign“The Emperor,summoningMuhammad Khaliland Khidmat Rai, thedarogha of hatchet-men …,ordered themto demolidh thetemple ofPandharpur, and totake the buthers ofthe camp there andslaughter cows in thetemple… It wasdone.”
    • Even after records provided by Aurangzeb himself, Marxist historians force us to believe that whatever Aurangzeb did wasfor economic purposes. That there were no conflicts on the base of Religion.
    • The real color of ISLAM
    • Even after all this, such extracts were found from the textbook for Class V, saying:“…Islam and Christianity are the only religionswhich treated man with honor and equality…”
    • Excerpts from Quran Quran, 9:123 :"O you who believe, fight those of the unbelievers near you and let them see how harsh you can be...” Quran, 4.89: “...take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back [to their homes], then seize them and kill them wherever you find them...”
    • Historians shut their eyes to all this.“Composite culture” is all they speak.
    • How a group of fewinvading Aryansover-ran thisextensive culturewithout leaving anyarcheological orliterary traces. It isnever explained.Still this ridiculoustheory which hasno historicalrecords is taught inschools. Excavation shows Harappan civilization covered areas from musa khel in the North – west to Kolapur in southern- maharashtra to the far east.
    • Historical records dose not support Aryaninvasion theory. It is a concoction of the Europeans to make Indians feel lowly of their culture. But these historians still force us to believe it.
    • The main concern of our “eminent historians”is to completely forgive Islam of these notions and of campaigns and deeds which flow from them.
    • These Historians have always malignHinduism. But they don‟t see any fault with Islamic killing.
    • When anybody tries to rewrite the true history, they say it‟s a plot to distort the history.
    • Arun Shourie and K.M. Shrimali wereinvited on “aap ki adalat” ,aprogramme on Zee TV.Raghuvanshi asked Shrimali whetherAurangzeb was a religious bigot.But, Shrimali gave no clear answer, onlyasserting that Aurangzebs court had manyHindu nobles.
    • Foul play of Marxist historians There are two pillars of present history-writing in India: To produce evidence which will establish Hindus to be intolerant . To respect and show an sympathetic understanding of Islamic communalism.
    • Foul play of Marxist historiansN. Jha says: The Brahmins depend on sacrifices. He even said that “animal sacrifice was a source of their livelihood.” So Ashoka preached Buddhism and non-violence to undermine Brahmin influence. No need for any historical evidence.
    • Effect of History on Students Effects on students of the history taught in schools and colleges They get estranged from the real history. They takes these assertions to be truth. They never ask for the evidences. For them it becomes: A truth which has been proven for ages.
    • The communist theory has failed in other partsof the world.But not India.Because these people occupy pivotal positionsin media and the educational structure.
    • After 34 years scholarly work is again being done which reveals the real facts.But it is not being allowed to reach a large number.