Access and Benefit-Sharing for Animal         Genetic Resources:   How it could work for livestock               keepers  ...
Small-scale livestock keepers• provide a collective service by maintaining  breeds “in-situ” and stewarding eco-systems.• ...
Possible entry point:           The Nagoya Protocol• requires countries to support the  development of community protocols...
Experiences with Biocultural         Community Protocols (BCPs)•    Over the last couple of    years, several livestock ke...
Raika of Rajasthan (India)
Banni Maldhari of Gujarat (India)
Bargur Hill Cattle Breeders (Lingayat) of           Tamil Nadu (India)
Samburu and the Red Maasai Sheep Samburu Herders Kenya                Sheep Market in Kenya                   RM in Resear...
Pashtoon Pastoralists of Pakistan
Jaisalmer Camel Breeders
Advantages of BCPs(according to practitioners at Livestock Futures Conference held                       in Bonn in 09/201...
Desireable Benefits identified by           livestock keepers• Monetary rewards at national level through  payments for en...
Benefit sharing fund/pool at         international level ?Could be financed through• Livestock genetics companies in the c...
Use of Benefit-Sharing Fund for• Education and awareness raising about local  breeds, fairs• Product development and marke...
Conditions for receipt of funds would be thatthe beneficiaries have a BCP in place.Furthermore, communities should have di...
Thanks to•   Misereor•   Fondation d‘entreprise Hermés•   FAO•   LIFE Network•   Natural Justice
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Access and Benefit-Sharing for Animal Genetic Resources: How it could work for livestock keepers

517 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
517
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Access and Benefit-Sharing for Animal Genetic Resources: How it could work for livestock keepers

  1. 1. Access and Benefit-Sharing for Animal Genetic Resources: How it could work for livestock keepers Ilse Köhler-Rollefson LPP
  2. 2. Small-scale livestock keepers• provide a collective service by maintaining breeds “in-situ” and stewarding eco-systems.• should be rewarded for this service that they provide for the future of humankind.• How could this be done under the ABS system?
  3. 3. Possible entry point: The Nagoya Protocol• requires countries to support the development of community protocols for ABS by indigenous and local communities.• will also need to be implemented with respect to animal genetic resources, unless an alternative sui-generis system is developed.
  4. 4. Experiences with Biocultural Community Protocols (BCPs)• Over the last couple of years, several livestock keeping communities have developed BCPs.• While the methodology still needs to be improved, they make visible the linkages between breeds and the communities that have developed them.• BCPs establish breeds as the “prior art” of communities and they therefore represent community claims over animal genetic resources.
  5. 5. Raika of Rajasthan (India)
  6. 6. Banni Maldhari of Gujarat (India)
  7. 7. Bargur Hill Cattle Breeders (Lingayat) of Tamil Nadu (India)
  8. 8. Samburu and the Red Maasai Sheep Samburu Herders Kenya Sheep Market in Kenya RM in Research Station
  9. 9. Pashtoon Pastoralists of Pakistan
  10. 10. Jaisalmer Camel Breeders
  11. 11. Advantages of BCPs(according to practitioners at Livestock Futures Conference held in Bonn in 09/2012)• are a tool for documenting bio-assets, production systems, products.• give a voice to pastoralists and other small-scale livestock keepers.• raise awareness about culture and tradition to address challenges, such as cross breeding and product innovations• Invoke rights (grazing, breeding)• Generate information exchange and communication with other stakeholders
  12. 12. Desireable Benefits identified by livestock keepers• Monetary rewards at national level through payments for environmental services, such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation.• Provision of an enabling environment that supports them to continue their livelihood and breed conservation activities (livestock keepers rights, grazing rights, services).• Support for developing a special label for livestock products from bio-diversity based production systems (“Ark of Bio-diversity”)
  13. 13. Benefit sharing fund/pool at international level ?Could be financed through• Livestock genetics companies in the context of Corporate Social Responsibility ?• The GPA funding strategy ?• Companies interested in marketing the products from local breeds ?
  14. 14. Use of Benefit-Sharing Fund for• Education and awareness raising about local breeds, fairs• Product development and marketing• Research on local breeds and production systems• Women empowerment, food sercurity and breed management• For conservation breeding• Legal support for rights (grazing, breeding, etc.)
  15. 15. Conditions for receipt of funds would be thatthe beneficiaries have a BCP in place.Furthermore, communities should have directaccess to the Benefit-sharing fund.
  16. 16. Thanks to• Misereor• Fondation d‘entreprise Hermés• FAO• LIFE Network• Natural Justice

×