• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Comparative Framework on Forest Landscape Restoration
 

Comparative Framework on Forest Landscape Restoration

on

  • 1,001 views

Presentation and audio on the comparative analysis framework for Forest Landscape Restoration projects

Presentation and audio on the comparative analysis framework for Forest Landscape Restoration projects

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,001
Views on SlideShare
969
Embed Views
32

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0

3 Embeds 32

http://forestlandscaperestoration.ning.com 27
http://www.forestlandscaperestoration.org 4
http://www.ideastransformlandscapes.wageningenportals.nl 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Refer to slide with stars*** add small picture of slide?

Comparative Framework on Forest Landscape Restoration Comparative Framework on Forest Landscape Restoration Presentation Transcript

  • Natasha de Bats Marcus Granz Madelon Lohbeck Lotty Nijhuis Rinchen Yangzom Teleconference Enhancing social learning on Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR)
  • Contents
    • Introduction
    • Objectives
    • Methodology
    • Results
      • Visual communicative tool
      • Small interactive part
    • Conclusions
    • Questions ?
  • Introduction
    • ‘ FLR is a process that aims to regain ecological integrity and enhance human well-being in deforested or degraded forest landscapes.’ (Maginnis et al. 2008)
    • Main principles:
    • Active stakeholder participation
    • Restoring forest functions
    • Working across landscapes
    • Learning and adapting
    • Social learning is a ‘learning system’ in which people learn from and with one another and, as a result, collectively become more capable of withstanding setbacks, of dealing with insecurity, complexity and risks (Wals et al. 2009).
      • CDI initiated Learning network
      • Exchange experiences/ knowledge
  • Objectives
    • Framework for comparative analysis
    • Enhance social learning network
    • Improved FLR practices
  • Methodology
    • Data collection
      • Preliminary analysis
      • Case study analysis
        • Designed a model and a guideline
    • Participation on learning network
      • Facilitating discussion
        • Refined model
  • Results
    • Developed a framework for comparative analysis
  • PES, ecotourism, conservation subsidies recreation, NTFP’s for subsistence subsistence agriculture logging, commerical agriculture A communicative tool for mapping stakeholder interests and stimulating participatory planning of FLR projects worldwide Commercial interests Non profit (Requires financial input) Ecological integrity (Regulating and supporting services) Material use-values (Provisioning services)
  • Example- how to create a stakeholder domain for an FLR project Ecological integrity (Regulating/ supporting services) Material use-values (Provisioning services) Commercial interests Non profit (Requires financial input) 1 4 3 2 Stakeholder B, interest: Land for subsistence agriculture, may sell to local market Stakeholder C, interest: Profit from timber plantation Stakeholder A, interest: Sustaining livelihoods with NTFPs
  • Material use-values (Provisioning services) 1 4 Indonesia – Kampar Peninsula Ecological integrity (Regulating/ supporting services) Commercial interests Non profit (Requires financial input) 3 2
  • Ghana – Pamu Berekum Ecological integrity (Regulating/ supporting services) Material use-values (Provisioning services) Commercial interests Non profit (Requires financial input) 1 4 3 2
  • Ecological integrity (regulating/ supporting services) Material use-values (Provisioning services) Commercial interests Non profit Requires financial input 1 4 3 2 NL – Westersche Veld van Rolde
  • PES, ecotourism, conservation subsidies recreation, NTFP’s for subsistence subsistence agriculture logging, commerical agriculture
    • Where would you place your project in the model?
    • Current state?
    • Future?
    Commercial interests Non profit (Requires financial input) Ecological integrity (Regulating and supporting services) Material use-values (Provisioning services)
  • A Communicative Tool for Forest Landscape Restoration projects Practitioners’ guidelines for mapping stakeholder interests and stimulating participatory planning Guideline for model Free download available at:
  • Guidelines for use in stakeholder discussions
    • Mapping stakeholder interests
    • Clear purpose of meeting
    • Open discussion
    • Explain the model
    • People’s interests and concerns
    • Map people’s interests
    • Collaborative decision-making
    • Stakeholder groups present
    • Open discussion
    • Negotiate the domain with all groups
  • Conclusion
    • Model
      • Visualizing differences in focus among project – allowing broad comparisons
      • Visualization of future trends –anticipating changes by learning from other experiences
      • Visualization of stakeholder interests – enhancing stakeholder communication and discussions
  • Acknowledgements
    • Cora van Oosten – Commissioner
    • Dr. Freerk Wiersum – Expert
    • Francesco Melita – Coach
    • Students of the previous group
    • Participants of the Learning Network
  • Thank you for your attention!
    • Questions?