QUANTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL     IMPACTS OF URBAN AND PERI URBAN    AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, SRI LANKA            ON CLIMA...
Climate Change Climate change is caused due to absorption of infrared  radiation by green house gases (GHGs) which slows ...
Climate Change in Global Picture
How it affects Sri Lanka Sri  Lanka is an agricultural economic based  developing country CC causes change in temp, extr...
Why urban Agriculture & Forestry(UPAF) Urban areas are more vulnerable to CC due to high  population, deforestation and u...
How UPAF contribute to adapt CC Reduce food miles Reduce fertilizer milesOther advantages ; Green environment Micro cl...
How to Monitor Good monitoring mechanism has to be introduced to  demonstrate the results of the project has to be done ...
Monitoring Mechanism1.   Impacts on Climate Change        Collect and plot data for at least 10 years of time period     ...
Monitoring Mechanism ctd…3. Other indicators     Solid waste management ( reusing disposable      materials such as plast...
Quantification of potential impacts of UPAF onClimate ChangeDevelopment                        Contribution of UPAF to Con...
Development interventions         Contribution of UPAF to         Contribution of UPAF to               Indicator to Measu...
Development                        Contribution of UPAF to Contribution of UPAF to                 Indicator to Measureint...
Thank you
Quantification of Potential Impacts of Urban and Peri Urban Agriculture and Forestry, Sri Lanka on Climate Change
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Quantification of Potential Impacts of Urban and Peri Urban Agriculture and Forestry, Sri Lanka on Climate Change

1,167 views
1,043 views

Published on

C. Semasinghe, N. Jayathilake, H.Manthrithilake, K. Jinapala, R. Ariyaratne

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,167
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
196
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Quantification of Potential Impacts of Urban and Peri Urban Agriculture and Forestry, Sri Lanka on Climate Change

  1. 1. QUANTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF URBAN AND PERI URBAN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, SRI LANKA ON CLIMATE CHANGEC. Semasinghe, N. Jayathilake,H.Manthrithilake, K. Jinapala, R. Ariyaratne
  2. 2. Climate Change Climate change is caused due to absorption of infrared radiation by green house gases (GHGs) which slows its escape from the atmosphere Main consequences of Climate change are global warming, change in cloud cover & precipitation, melting ice caps & glaciers, reducing snow cover etc It has serious impacts on economy, health & safety, food production and food security
  3. 3. Climate Change in Global Picture
  4. 4. How it affects Sri Lanka Sri Lanka is an agricultural economic based developing country CC causes change in temp, extreme weather events such as high intensity rainfall followed by flash floods & landslides and extended dry periods causing water scarcity which directly influences crop & livestock production, hydrologic balances, input supplies etc
  5. 5. Why urban Agriculture & Forestry(UPAF) Urban areas are more vulnerable to CC due to high population, deforestation and urban heat island effect Urban agriculture is a viable solution as a mitigation measure to CC as well as it contributes to the economical development of the country
  6. 6. How UPAF contribute to adapt CC Reduce food miles Reduce fertilizer milesOther advantages ; Green environment Micro climate environment Clean air Aesthetic value Reduce soil erosion Solid waste management
  7. 7. How to Monitor Good monitoring mechanism has to be introduced to demonstrate the results of the project has to be done in two folds  To monitor the success of the project  To monitor its impacts on climate change Record maintaining for the Lessons learnt in order to replicate the project elsewhere
  8. 8. Monitoring Mechanism1. Impacts on Climate Change  Collect and plot data for at least 10 years of time period  Monitoring indicators are daily temperature, daily precipitation, frequency of flooding an frequency of drought2. Progress of the project  Food ( Qty, Price)  Fertilizer ( cost of fertilizing)  Energy ( bio gas production)  Water resources ( rainwater harvesting,reusing wastewater)  Aesthetic value ( increase in land value & bio diversity)
  9. 9. Monitoring Mechanism ctd…3. Other indicators  Solid waste management ( reusing disposable materials such as plastic bottles, vessels etc)  Institutional changes ( in terms of capacity & commitment for planning, implementing and sustaining the project)
  10. 10. Quantification of potential impacts of UPAF onClimate ChangeDevelopment Contribution of UPAF to Contribution of UPAF to Indicator to Measureinterventions CC Mitigation and Reduce Food/ Fertilizer/Fuel Adaptation milesFoodDevelopment of Home Temperature, GHG Increase of UPAF food Household income andGardens emissions, Urban heat production and income savings island effect, Heat waves, Monthly expenditure on food Rainfall, C sequestration,Vertical gardens minimize storm water Transporting, storing, runoff refrigerating(cost/ volumes)Introduction of new Food pricesCropping patternsIncrease agro forestry cover Food wasteReuse non-biodegradable Collection/transport of SW Number/extent of dumpsites/solid waste as cultivate vessels cost of collection and disposal(bottles, plastic bags, etc.) of SW Sun light intensity meterFresh water fish production Increase in UPAF fish Monthly expenditure on fish(Inland ponds) Transporting, storing, refrigerating fish(cost/ volumes)
  11. 11. Development interventions Contribution of UPAF to Contribution of UPAF to Indicator to Measure CC Mitigation and Reduce Food/ Fertilizer/Fuel Adaptation milesFertilizerComposting GHG emissions, Reuse of Fertilizer replaced by compost Fertilizer( Quantity, cost) waste Transport of fertilizer Cost incurred for fertilizer transporting Collection of SW Labour and other related costs to collect SW Transport of solid waste Fuel needs for transporting SW soil quality C-N ratio, soil water retention capacity Cost of rehabilitating dump sites Number/ extent of dump sites/ Area freed for UPAFErosion control & soil Minimize degradation of soil, Soil quality C-N ratio, soil water retentionimprovement measures minimize storm water run off capacityEnergyBio Gas production GHG emissions, Reuse of Reduction of domestic fuel needs(LP Household energy cost/ waste gas/wood) Dependability on CEB electricity supplyPromotion of use of fire woodUse of energy saving Stoves(saw Collection/transport of SW Cost of collection and disposal ofdust and other waste as fuel) SW
  12. 12. Development Contribution of UPAF to Contribution of UPAF to Indicator to Measureinterventions CC Mitigation and Reduce Food/ Fertilizer/Fuel Adaptation milesWater ResourcesWastewater/Grey water Mitigate floods, water More water resilient cities Area of water retentionirrigation scarcity, Droughts, ErosionGround water development Monthly water billRainwater harvesting Water treatment cost Labour daysManagement of storm water Storm water O&M costdrainage reduction Disaster relief costAesthetic ValueEco forestry Temperature, GHG Reduction of energy to cool( Land use maps( forestry) emmissions,Urban heat A/C,Fans)Wind/ shelter belts island effect, Heat waves, Attraction of tourists/ new wind erosion citizensInstitutional ChangesInstitutional audit and capacity Empowering institutes to Institutional changes to reducebuilding adapt and mitigate CC food/fertilizer/fuel miles impactsGenderGreater involvement of women Empower women to adapt Self-reliance on local food Involvement of women inin UPAF(individuals, groups to CC UPAF( number of individuals,etc.) groups etc.)
  13. 13. Thank you

×