Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Dean's Breakfast
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Dean's Breakfast

665

Published on

Dean Lewis's Breakfast Talk from August 8, 2011.

Dean Lewis's Breakfast Talk from August 8, 2011.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
665
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Jason Kelly
  • At 4% increase grows to 2.7% in 2025
  • History Working Papers Project
  • History Working Papers Project
  • Transcript

    • 1. Dean’s Breakfast David Lewis August 8, 2011
    • 2. Library Update• Budget – $100K in base and $50K in cash for materials to support new degree programs – $20K in base to support continuing added hours – New base to cover salary increases – Saved $50K on electronic resources due to consortial contracts and renegotiations of existing contracts
    • 3. Library Update• Staffing – Four staff took the early retirement incentive – Four new staff • Waheedah Bilal – Team Leader for Liberal Arts • Heather Coates – Digital Libraries Team • Summer Durant – Liberal Arts Team • Katie Emery – Business Librarian
    • 4. Library Update• Programs – “College Ready” information literacy project – Data management – Kiwanis International archive – Review of e-books options and opportunities
    • 5. Library Update• Programs – Digital Projects • Indianapolis Recorder digitization complete • History of Western Medicine in China • History Working Papers Project • Mau Mau interviews • Ketterson/Nolan dark-eyed junco project
    • 6. Library Update• Space – Completed 2120 technology lab – Popular reading alcove – Learning Spaces 3 – Wish List • Readers Sanctuary • Expanded Herron Artist Book Alcove
    • 7. On My Mind1. The Inevitability of Open Access2. Transformation of Collections
    • 8. The Inevitability of Open AccessOpen-access (OA) literature is digital, online,free of charge, and free of most copyright andlicensing restrictions. OA removes pricebarriers (subscriptions, licensing fees, pay-per-view fees) and permission barriers (mostcopyright and licensing restrictions). – Peter Suberhttp://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
    • 9. The Inevitability of Open Access1993 – 20 OA journals publishing 247 articles2000 – 741 OA journals publishing 35,519 articles2005 – 2,837 OA journals publishing 90,720 articles2009 – 4,767 OA journals publishing 191,851 articlesMikael Laakso, Patrik Welling, Helena Bukvova, Linus Nyman, Bo-Christer Bjork, and Turid Hedlund, “TheDevelopment of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009,” PLos ONE 6(6): 2011 e20961.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961. Available at:http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0020961
    • 10. The Inevitability of Open Access Figure 1: Straight-line Extrapolation of Direct Gold OA Share of Scholarly Articles 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Laakso, et. al. Estimates Staight-line Extrapolation Based on 2000-2009 Straight-line Extrapolation Based on 2005-2009
    • 11. The Inevitability of Open Access• Open Access is a disruptive innovation (Clayton Christensen) – New technology – New business model – Starts out as an inferior product – Improves over time and its advantages make it dominant – Adoption follows an S-curve not a straight line
    • 12. The Inevitability of Open Access 100%% of Market using Innovation 0% Time
    • 13. The Inevitability of Open Access Figure 2: Pace of Substitution of Direct Gold OA for Subscription Journals (log scale) 100.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 10.0% 1.0% Laakso, et. al. Estimates S-curve Extrapolation Based on 2000-2009 S-curve Extrapolation Based on 2005-2009
    • 14. The Inevitability of Open Access Figure 3: Pace of Substitution of Direct Gold OA for Subscription Journals (normal scale) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Laakso, et. al. Estimates S-curve Extrapolation Based on 2000-2009 S-curve Extrapolation Based on 2005-2009
    • 15. The Inevitability of Open Access• Good for libraries because scholarly journals will not eat up our budget Between 1975 and 2005 the average cost of journals in chemistry and physics rose from $76.84 to $1,879.56. In the same period, the cost of a gallon of unleaded regular gasoline rose from 55 cents to $1.82. If the gallon of gas had increased in price at the same rate as chemistry and physics journals over this period it would have reached $12.43 in 2005, and would be over $14.50 today.
    • 16. The Inevitability of Open Access• Good for scholars because their work will be available to all who can use it, and their reputations will be enhanced• Good for the public because scholarship won’t be locked up in libraries
    • 17. The Inevitability of Open Access• Bad for established publishers – I don’t care• Libraries not part of the delivery system• Libraries should support OA on the production side – Advance in Social Work – Indiana Libraries – Umbrella
    • 18. The Inevitability of Open Access• Policy on author fees – who pays?• Deposit mandate or not?
    • 19. Transformation of Collections
    • 20. Transformation of Collections1. The digitization of content
    • 21. Transformation of Collections2. The development of print repositories
    • 22. Opportunity Costs of Print Collections $5.00 to $13.10 $28.77 $50.98 to $68.43 $141.89Life cycle cost based on 3% discount rate. From Paul N. Courant and Matthew “Buzzy” Nielsen, “On the Cost of Keeping a Book,”in The Idea of Order: Transforming Research Collections for 21st Century Scholarship, CLIR, June 2010, available at:http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub147abst.html
    • 23. Transformation of Collections3. The development of e-readers and print-on- demand publishing
    • 24. Transformation of Collections4. The growth of open access Figure 3: Pace of Substitution of Direct Gold OA for Subscription Journals (normal scale) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Laakso, et. al. Estimates S-curve Extrapolation Based on 2000-2009 S-curve Extrapolation Based on 2005-2009
    • 25. Transformation of Collections5. The challenges to establish academic publishing organizations
    • 26. Transformation of Collections6. The growth new forms of scholarship based on openness and social productivity
    • 27. Openness (from Gideon Burton)1. Open Access2. Open Review3. Open Dialogue4. Open Process5. Open Formats6. Open DataGideon Burton, “Scholarly Communications must be Open,” August 25, 2009 at:http://www.academicevolution.com/2009/08/scholarly-communications-must-transform-2.html
    • 28. Openness (from Gideon Burton)“It comes down to this: the more academiawishes to enjoy the benefits of the digitalmedium, the less it can hold on to restrictiveand closed practices in theproduction, vetting, dissemination, andarchiving of information.”Gideon Burton, “Scholarly Communications must be Open,” August 25, 2009 at:http://www.academicevolution.com/2009/08/scholarly-communications-must-transform-2.html
    • 29. Transformation of Collections1. Deconstruct legacy print collections2. Move from item-by-item book selection to purchase-on-demand and subscriptions3. Manage the transition to open access journal collections
    • 30. Transformation of Collections5. Focus on curating unique items6. Develop new mechanisms for funding national infrastructure
    • 31. Questions/Comments

    ×