• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Detlef dumon  sport for development and peace
 

Detlef dumon sport for development and peace

on

  • 1,117 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,117
Views on SlideShare
1,117
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Detlef dumon  sport for development and peace Detlef dumon sport for development and peace Document Transcript

    • Detlef Dumon ICSSPE Executive Director: Sport for Development and Peace - How can this working area benefit from a structured global and multi-disciplinary approach? 1. Defining the frame Actors in sport, academia, the private sector, non-profit and non-governmental organisations, government and UN agencies, the general public as well as young people are increasingly interested in the potential of sport as a tool to reach personal, community, national and international development objectives. Many of these organisations and individuals are interested in how to use sport as a tool for addressing some of the challenges that arise from humanitarian crises in conflict and post-conflict settings. Hence the sport and development potential ranges from post-disaster intervention, through reaching people or communities in crisis, to economic development and the creation of job opportunities, including many different forms of social and psycho-social interventions. In contrast to the development of sport, sport for development and peace is seen as something new by the general public, although there have been initiatives prior to resolution 58/5 that was adopted by the UN General Assembly in November 2003. It is characterised by mostly practical approaches; and we are here to discuss if, how and in what areas the link to academia should be strengthened. 2. Objectives It is suggested that initiatives that are being conducted under the umbrella of sport for development and peace might be measured against their effectiveness in reaching the Millennium Development Goals. As a consequence we need to ask ourselves whether and to what extend our activities can contribute to eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, achieving universal primary education, promoting gender equality and empowering women, reducing child mortality and improving maternal health, combatting HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases, ensuring environmental sustainability, and developing a global partnership for development. You will appreciate that these are extremely important issues and in light of these we need to be careful with our claims that sport can help to make this world a better place. 3. Existing Activities It is impossible to count existing programmes and projects in total but we know that there is a huge amount and diversity. A comprehensive analysis of internet entries will allow us to identify dominant sports and regions where activities occur; and the objectives of the various providers. Whether these are representative for the reality of development activities, again, cannot be testified with certainty. A close look will reveal that there are many local activities we are not aware of and of which the media does not take any note. Development work is not easy to sell. Many existing activities have a psycho-social character, being field projects that aim at participation. Many of the initiatives stress that they follow an inclusive approach. Others focus on accessibility which not only includes projects and programmes for people with different abilities; accessibility is limited for different groups of people for different reasons.
    • Health and life issues are being adressed in many initiatives, eg HIV/AIDS programmes etc. Others aim at development of facilities, infrastructure and economy. Finally, another group links field work with the development of means which allow for monitoring and evaluation of process and results. These have the potential to bridge the gap between the field and the academic world. 4. Research activities Talking about monitoring and evaluation; when and what do we wish to monitor and evaluate? There is a need for thorough process monitoring to adapt strategies to specific needs and for evaluation of outcomes. Both require quantitative and qualitative work and cover very different aspects of projects and programmes such as: development of individuals, towards different purposes, eg relief of trauma, rehabilitation, upskilling; development of structures towards sustainability and self improvement; development of organisations; types of sport; group dynamics; conflict competence; attitudes; performance; growth. Apart from the wish to monitor the process and evaluate results as well as apart from the need for research in this specific area, the dynamic progress of sport for development and peace world-wide evokes research tasks in many different areas. UN agencies, responsible national ministries and private companies that provide funding for development projects may measure outcomes against political objectives and policies and are more likely to support initiatives that can demonstrate value through scientific evidence. The important reason for research, however, is to be able to react sensibly and sensitively to existing needs. A social scientific audit of costs and benefits over time, across cultures, individuals and groups involved is necessary, but there is an urgent need for robust methods of securing and using evidence of benefit for sport and development. Most current evidence largely dependent upon case studies, is seen as “soft” by funders. But if enough case studies are available which have included the right kinds of indicators of benefit, they can be used together as harder evidence. However, there is an ongoing need to engage with impact measurement, and learn from other areas which have advanced more, eg environmental and social work. ICSSPE is willing to contribute to this task, as ithe organisation is already doing through its participation in different contexts. 5. Academic programmes As academic and specific training of facilitators for sport for development and peace is not yet sufficiently developed, their backgrounds are diverse. Facilitators come from various sectors, including the social and the sport sector. The University of Trinidad and Tobago offers a Masters Degree to prepare for career opportunities and leadership positions at the local, regional and international level in development through sport. The University of the Western Cape, in cooperation with several partners, is in the process of implementing a Masters Programme as well. Other universities offer classes that are relevant for sport and development without providing a full programme. It is however debatable whether a specific university programme is needed, or whether a comprehensive cross-disciplinary range of courses in the context of a sport science or physical education programme could be sufficient and lead to a degree in sport for development. Yet specific challenges typical for sport
    • for development and peace initiatives, like entrepreneurship and legal issues, do need to be addressed. In any case, designing academic programmes requires the expertise of other sport science disciplines like pedagogy, psychology, sociology, marketing, legal aspects, cultural studies, anthropology, and others. This explains the need for cross-disciplinary and sectoral collaboration as well as between practitioners and the academic community. Their close collaboration can be a crucial prerequisite for funding, for the implementation and outcomes of sport and development projects and especially for long-term and sustainable planning. 6. Activities in the governmental and non-governmental human sector Despite the long standing implementation of sport for development-initiatives by non-governmental organisations, increasing support and interest from governmental organisations, both at national and international level can be noticed, especially since the UN General Assembly in 2003 declared the year 2005 as the International Year of Sport and Physical Education and implemented a United Nations Inter-Agency Task Force on Sport for Development and Peace. The division of sport and physical education at UNESCO was shifted from the Education Department to the Social and Human Science Department. After the International Working Group on Sport for Development and Peace was founded in 2004 to promote the adoption of policy recommendations to governments, the Intergovernmental Committee of Physical Education and Sport (CIGEPS) at UNESCO has implemented a working group on sport and development for the years 2008 and 2009. In this context two development conferences in Tansania and Jamaica, both in September 2008, were held. The mandate for the International Working Group on Sport for Development and Peace has been extended in 2008, and UN agencies and the International Olympic Committee are seeking a closer collaboration. FIFA is discussing during their current congress 9-10 June 2010 that 30 Mio US$ will be allocated to the Football for Hope-project for the years 2011-2014 – all these are signals that the links between sport and development will last for the near future 7. Partners outside sport As sport becomes increasingly part of humanitarian and development work, as well as part of the corporate social responsibility practices of private sector companies, interested parties are anxious to explore the potential, as well as the limitations, of sport in their work. There are quite a few societal areas that can be seen as natural stakeholders, especially the health, youth and education sector which should be addressed. Today there are also examples where national ministries collaborate rather than each of them claiming responsibilities for themselves. But these examples need to be expanded. And there are examples where national cultural bodies such as British Council, CIDA and USAID support sport for development-initiatives. ICSSPE and the Psycho-social Competence Centre of the International Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement have also signed a partnership. 8. Communication, visibility, awareness and marketing of projects Visibility, public perception and public reputation are important in the context of sport and development initiatives. This is due to the character of development initiatives which are to a large extend dependent on project funding. From a sport marketing perspective a critical analysis of investments is suggested as
    • well as an analysis of the claims and realities of governments, sports federations and the corporate sector regarding their involvement. Stakeholders in sport and development need to link practical work, research and policy development with another in order to be successful. Good practice needs to be exemplified and evidence disseminated. ICSSPE is brokering and encourageing multi-disciplinary work through its network with a wide range of disciplinary organisations and expertise, and offers access to multi-disciplinary researchers and expertise. The Council is involved in many governmental and non-governmental initiatives. Additionally, the Council organises conferences and seminars and puts emphasis on the inclusion of sport and physical activity in crisis and post- disaster intervention. Only through parallel action in education, science and advocacy we will be able to contribute significantly to the agenda of policy makers and thus to the overall development of our society.