IPv6 deployment monitoring Ghent, 14 December 2010 IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey
The IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey <ul><li>Aim is to establish the best possible comprehensive view  </li></ul><ul><li>...
The IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey <ul><li>RIPE NCC and APNIC carried out this same survey in 2009. In 2010, all RIRs p...
 
RIPE NCC respondents <ul><li>In 2010, the RIPE NCC community generated 769 respondents. This is 159 more than 2009 (610 re...
Does your organization have an IPv6 presence ?
More organizations have or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment
More customers use IPv6 connectivity in 2010 (ISP’s only)
More ISPs consider promoting IPv6 uptake to their customers in 2010
More organizations with IPv6 in production, yet still mostly insignificant
More have IPv6 implementation (plans)
Attitude, perception and experience with IPv6
Why doesn’t your organization consider having an IPv6 allocation cq assignment?
Main motivations to consider having IPv6 allocation cq assignment
The biggest hurdles, compared
The biggest problems with IPv6 in production?
Overall Conclusions IPv6 Survey <ul><li>In the RIPE NCC region,  experience  and  preparedness  with IPv6 has grown a lot ...
IPv6 deployment monitoring Ghent, 14 December 2010 IPv6 Technical bottleneck analysis
IPv6 Technical bottleneck analysis: Goals & work plan <ul><li>What are  currently  the most significant technical issues b...
Question: possible IPv6 impact on the Value Chain Internal  network External  network Operating System Communi- cation sof...
Overview of bottlenecks from the interviews (1) <ul><li>Communication software </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mobile phones, softwa...
Overview of bottlenecks from the interviews (2) <ul><li>External Network </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Inhouse built applications ...
Main findings <ul><li>Feature parity: IPv4 support is still much more widespread than IPv6 </li></ul><ul><li>Vendors need ...
Thank you! Arjen Holtzer (contact person) E-mail:  [email_address]
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Arjen Holtzer - IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey

668

Published on

Arjen Holtzer - IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
668
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Scope: does not include an overview of products and specific features
  • Arjen Holtzer - IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey

    1. 1. IPv6 deployment monitoring Ghent, 14 December 2010 IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey
    2. 2. The IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey <ul><li>Aim is to establish the best possible comprehensive view </li></ul><ul><li>- present IPv6 penetration </li></ul><ul><li>- perceived bottlenecks </li></ul><ul><li>- current future plans </li></ul><ul><li>Best way to establish this is to ask the Internet providers and users, basically: the RIR communities around the world </li></ul><ul><li>ARIN carried out such a survey with its members in March 2008, a starting point for the currently proposed survey </li></ul>
    3. 3. The IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey <ul><li>RIPE NCC and APNIC carried out this same survey in 2009. In 2010, all RIRs participated to the survey: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Survey was prepared and carried out by TNO/GNKS in close collaboration with RIPE NCC, APNIC, ARIN, AFRINIC and LACNIC </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Survey was kept short, and focused on essentials </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Privacy is guaranteed </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Results of 2010 will be compared with those of 2009 to get a good picture of progress </li></ul>
    4. 5. RIPE NCC respondents <ul><li>In 2010, the RIPE NCC community generated 769 respondents. This is 159 more than 2009 (610 respondents). </li></ul><ul><li>Participation is largely comparable to last year for most counts (and is therefore not explicitly presented) </li></ul>
    5. 6. Does your organization have an IPv6 presence ?
    6. 7. More organizations have or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment
    7. 8. More customers use IPv6 connectivity in 2010 (ISP’s only)
    8. 9. More ISPs consider promoting IPv6 uptake to their customers in 2010
    9. 10. More organizations with IPv6 in production, yet still mostly insignificant
    10. 11. More have IPv6 implementation (plans)
    11. 12. Attitude, perception and experience with IPv6
    12. 13. Why doesn’t your organization consider having an IPv6 allocation cq assignment?
    13. 14. Main motivations to consider having IPv6 allocation cq assignment
    14. 15. The biggest hurdles, compared
    15. 16. The biggest problems with IPv6 in production?
    16. 17. Overall Conclusions IPv6 Survey <ul><li>In the RIPE NCC region, experience and preparedness with IPv6 has grown a lot over the last year, yet real use has not grown that much, yet. </li></ul><ul><li>Vendors, gear up! ISPs are ready to go and need good equipment. </li></ul><ul><li>Next year: another global survey to monitor changes </li></ul>
    17. 18. IPv6 deployment monitoring Ghent, 14 December 2010 IPv6 Technical bottleneck analysis
    18. 19. IPv6 Technical bottleneck analysis: Goals & work plan <ul><li>What are currently the most significant technical issues blocking or slowing down IPv6 adoption? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>E.g. availability of hardware and software </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>E.g. standardization, architectural issues, replacement strategies etc. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Include the whole value chain </li></ul><ul><li>Preliminary results based on 16 one-hour interviews with network architects, product specialists and managers related to: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>ISPs with their own network infrastructure (8) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>vendors (4) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>corporate users (3) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>content providers (1) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Thanks to interviewees for their cooperation – much appreciated! </li></ul>
    19. 20. Question: possible IPv6 impact on the Value Chain Internal network External network Operating System Communi- cation software Service website Specific internet service or platform routers, proxies, DMZ, … Residential Gateway core network access network network OAM network provisioning migration techniques Fiber Cable 3G DSL MS, Apple, Linux, … other IP dependent applications Browsers VoIP, chat, … www mail VoIP IPTV p2p …
    20. 21. Overview of bottlenecks from the interviews (1) <ul><li>Communication software </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mobile phones, software apps (fixed & mobile) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Operating System </li></ul><ul><ul><li>In general ok (except for legacy) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Internal Network </li></ul><ul><ul><li>availability of RG’s, large non-IPv6 installed base </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Corporate applications </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>IPv6 in corporate networks is not top priority </li></ul></ul>
    21. 22. Overview of bottlenecks from the interviews (2) <ul><li>External Network </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Inhouse built applications for monitoring and provisioning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>BNG, DSLAM and RG IPv6 feature support and maturity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Is your current platform upgradable? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>replacement strategy for DSLAM’s, CMTS’s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li> Vendors and ISP’s need each other! </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Specific internet service or platform and service website </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Varied landscape of services. Really depends on the company that builds the service </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Load balancers </li></ul></ul>
    22. 23. Main findings <ul><li>Feature parity: IPv4 support is still much more widespread than IPv6 </li></ul><ul><li>Vendors need ISP’s to do operational testing to mature their products </li></ul><ul><ul><li>still, product-specific bugs are regularly encountered </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Application landscape is huge </li></ul><ul><li>IPv6 deployment is possible, but it’s not ‘plug-and-play’ enough yet </li></ul><ul><li>Focus mainly on internet services: no priority for triple play over IPv6 </li></ul>Tests, trials & pilots are a MUST for 2011 Pool of early-adopters large enough? Next year: more specific interviews/survey
    23. 24. Thank you! Arjen Holtzer (contact person) E-mail: [email_address]
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×