Vietnam value chain development planning

846 views

Published on

Presented by Tom Randolph at the Vietnam Smallholder Pig Value Chain Team Meeting, Delhi, India, 30 April 2012.

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
846
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
25
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Vietnam value chain development planning

  1. 1. VietnamValue Chain Development Planning More milk, meat and fish by and for the poorLivestock and Fish CGIAR Research Program Manesar, India 30 April-1 May 2012 Tom Randolph
  2. 2. Meeting Objectives Develop common understanding of objective and approach begin to define a country strategy Review and refine the implementation plan, including individual roles and responsibilities, and agree on the timetable for 2012  Set of deliverables by Center, with level of effort Identify resource mobilization priorities and agree on responsibilities  Defined as deliverables
  3. 3. More milk, meat, and fish by and for the poor Overview
  4. 4. Reminder: GoalMore milk, meat and fish by and for the poor To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods.
  5. 5. Basic Idea: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact Traditional approach was piecemeal Past research has focused specific aspects of given value chains, commodities and country. Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers ...in Country A Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers ...in Country B Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers ...in Country C Inputs & Services Production Processing Marketing Consumers ...in Country D
  6. 6. Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impactAddressing the whole value chain R4D integrated to transform selected value chains In targeted commodities and countries. Consumers Major intervention with development partners Value chain development team + research partners Strategic CRP 3.7 Cross-cutting Platforms • Technology Generation • Market Innovation • Targeting & Impact INTERVENTIONS TO GLOBAL RESEARCH SCALE OUT REGIONALLY PUBLIC GOODS
  7. 7. Working toward interventions for impact at scale CRP3.7 Prepare intervention Performance Target: double production in x poor households Scaling out Development Partners $90m Knowledge Partners $10m CRP3.7 Strategic Research $10mTime 10 years
  8. 8. FOCUS: 9 Target Value Chains SHEEP & GOATS AQUACULTURE PIGS DAIRY
  9. 9. Delivering CRP3.7 Livestock + FishStructure: Six integrated Components5 Targeting: Foresight, prioritization, Technology 4 Value chain development development: 1 Health Consumers 2 Genetics 3 Feeds Commodity X in Country Y6Cross-cutting: gender, impact, M&E, comms, capacity building
  10. 10. A generic livestock value chain N Taylor 10
  11. 11. A value chain is the set of actors, transactions, A generic livestock value chaininformation flows, and institutions that enable N Taylor value to be delivered to the customer (Baker 2007) 11
  12. 12. The Value Chain Development Component: Working toward interventions for impact at scale Engagement Assessment Piloting Validating Learning at scale Tackling the harder constraints Time 10 years
  13. 13. Engagement / AssessmentEngagement • Scoping R&D partners • Stakeholder event • Catalyze allianceAssessment • ReviewsAssessment • Tool development Reviews • Site selection • Tool development • Rapid VC assessment • Situational analysis • Framework for assessing VC performance • Identify best-bet intervention • Identify • In-depth VC assessment best-bet intervention • In-depth VC assessmentTime 1st year 2nd year 3rd year
  14. 14. Piloting / Validating Piloting • Baseline studies • Action-research trials Validating • Field trialsTime 1st year 2nd year 3rd year
  15. 15. Update on the LaF CRP Preliminary planning meeting held Sept 2011 Officially started January 1st 2012 Planning still ongoing  Strategy logframe  Assigning resources  How many activities can be supported? Unrestricted portion fully funded (CG Fund) Large gap in restricted funded portion  will require major resource mobilization effort
  16. 16. More meat, milk and fish by and for the poor The Planning Process
  17. 17. The Planning Horizon1 Objective 1 Outcome Output 1 Output 2 Output 3 1 3 4 Output 4 2Time 3rd year 6-10 years
  18. 18. The Planning Challenge Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan & Projects Budget 1 2 Subsidy ??Staff time XX X X XX BudgetOther costs XX X X XDeliverables XX X X Work planOutputs Other LaF(Milestones) CRP
  19. 19. The Planning Challenge Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan & #1 Starting Projects Budget point 1 2 Subsidy ??Staff time XX X X XX BudgetOther costs XX X X XDeliverables XX X X Work planOutputs Other LaF(Milestones) CRP
  20. 20. The Planning Challenge Restricted + CG Fund = Work Plan & #1 Starting Projects Budget point 1 2 Subsidy ??Staff time XX X X XX BudgetOther costs XX X X XDeliverables XX X X Work plan #2 Still to negotiateOutputs Other LaF(Milestones) CRP
  21. 21. Working toward interventions for impact at scale CRP3.7 Prepare intervention Performance Target: double production in x poor households Scaling out Development Partners $90m Knowledge Partners $10m CRP3.7 Strategic Research $10mTime 10 years
  22. 22. Engagement / AssessmentEngagement Output 1: Methods for • Scoping R&D partners identifying pro-poor • Stakeholder event upgrading opportunities in • Catalyze alliance animal-source food valueAssessment chains • Reviews • Tool development • Site selection • Rapid VC assessment • Situational analysis • Framework for assessing VC performance • Identify best-bet intervention • In-depth VC assessmentTime 1st year 2nd year 3rd year
  23. 23. Engagement / AssessmentEngagement • Scoping R&D partners Output 2: R&D innovation • Stakeholder event alliances created to promote • Catalyze alliance target pro-poor value chainsAssessment • Reviews • Tool development • Site selection • Rapid VC assessment • Situational analysis • Framework for assessing VC performance • Identify best-bet intervention • In-depth VC assessmentTime 1st year 2nd year 3rd year
  24. 24. Engagement / AssessmentEngagement Output 3: Pro-poor, gender- • Scoping R&D partners sensitive technological and • Stakeholder event institutional options devised • Catalyze alliance and validated for each targetAssessment value chain • Reviews • Tool development • Site selection • Rapid VC assessment • Situational analysis • Framework for assessing VC performance • Identify best-bet intervention • In-depth VC assessmentTime 1st year 2nd year 3rd year
  25. 25. Piloting / Validating Piloting • Baseline studies • Action-research trialsOutput 4: Integrated pro-poor, gender-sensitiveintervention strategiesformulated and piloted in Validatingeach target value chain • Field trials Time 1st year 2nd year 3rd year
  26. 26. Working toward interventions for impact at scale Begins happening in Years 3-5EngagementAssessment Piloting Validating Learning at scale Tackling the harder constraintsTime 10 years

×