Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

System redesign in animal production: Dutch experiences and broader relevance

901

Published on

Presented by Dr. Laurens Klerkx at ILRI, Addis Ababa, 12 September 2012.

Presented by Dr. Laurens Klerkx at ILRI, Addis Ababa, 12 September 2012.

Published in: Technology, Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
901
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  1. “System redesign in Animal Production:Dutch experiences and broader relevance”Dr. Laurens KlerkxKnowledge, Innovation and Technology GroupILRI, 12 September 2012, Addis Ababa
  2. What will I talk about? A brief introduction of our research cluster The case of ‘Rondeel’ as an example of system redesign process following a ‘new product development approach’: ● The context in which the process emerged ● The NPD/system redesign process ● The implementation in practice of the Rondeel system ● Key issues and implications emerging from the the NPD/system redesign Discussion on implications for ILRI’s work
  3. Our group Founded in 1968 as Extension Science: study of communication to enhance technology adoption In the 1980’s a more critical and systemic perspective to innovation: AKIS -> name changed to Communication and Innovation Studies In 2002 two groups developed: ● Communication and innovation studies ● Communication strategies Very recent clustering and reorganization: ● Knowledge, innovation and technology group ● Communication strategies group ● Applied philosphy group
  4. Different lines of investigation of thecluster Innovation systems and innovation networks/platforms Intermediaries/brokers in innovation systems Action and participatory research Research governance analysis Self-organization of actors Frame analysis Individual behaviour change and persuasive communication Risk communication
  5. Different lines of investigation of thecluster Participatory video and media analysis Discursive strategies of actors Critical technology analysis (technography) and political agronomy (SRI/biotech/pesticides) Ethical analysis of technology development and agricultural production Reflexive process monitoring
  6. Some current projects Convergence of Science- Strengthening Innovation Systems (COS-SIS) The Evolution of SRI as a Socio-Technical Phenomenon Intermediary actors in the Kenyan AIS Support of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture (SOLINSA) Preparing African Farmers against Parasitic Weeds in a Changing Environment (PARASITE) Determining the cost-effectiveness of an effective intervention to improve adherence among treatment- experienced HIV-infected patients in the Netherlands Expert-lay interaction about food and technology
  7. System redesign in egg production: theRondeel case
  8. Starting point: crisis in Dutch animalproduction systems  Low animal welfare  We import soy and keep the dung  Contagious disease and multiple resistant bacteria  Meat consumption and obesity  Animal production and climate change  Low protein conversion ratio
  9. Need to radically reform the ‘regime’
  10. Government policy to stimulate radicalinnovation Create and stimulate sustainable niches – overcome system failures (e.g. strong and weak networks, institutional failure) Various instruments ● R&D ● Platforms ● Linkage building ● Innovation subsidies ● Consumer awareness raising
  11. What kind of R&D is needed? System innovation requires a holistic perspective connecting scientific disciplines Research should be transdisciplinary, involve stakeholders Beyond research, enabling conditions for innovation need to be brought into place (co-evolution of hard-, soft-, orgware) Research should translate desirable futures and stakeholder demands into appealing but attainable visions Following Sumberg and Reece (2004), research should take a ‘New Product Development’ focus
  12. Method of ‘interactive reflexive design’(e.g., Bos et al., 2010) Actual production system and socio-technical regime are ‘locked-in’ Visionaries are invited to think in possibilities, not current problems and constraints Surveys among citizens on ideal production system Also views farmers , scientists, and hens (through ethological scientists) are integrated Briefs of requirements: what needs should the system fulfil? Quick prototypes: images, scale models
  13. Main steps in RID
  14. Program of demands
  15. Artist impressions
  16. Nice design process outputs, but whatnext? Government funded design projects – pre-competitive phase Now companies should take up the ideas and develop them in real systems
  17. Some firms took up the challenge:consortium
  18. Design process outputs gave guidance, butthese firms still had many uncertainties  On technological development  On resources needed  On public policies  On consumer behaviour  On supplier behaviour  On retailers behaviour
  19. Internal and external capacities Vencomatic and Kwetters have well qualified staff that could help some of these uncertainties (e.g. on marketing, technology) But also need for external resources and comptences ● External consultancy (in CSR, technology, market, business model) – look for and verify options ● To make contacts in different ‘worlds’ – government, retail, NGOs ● To get to know other similar experiences and creative solutions ● To find and obtain capital
  20. External capacities Livestock Research: R&D and brokering Transition and Society: CSR consultancy, process facilitation and brokering TransForum: brokering, funding, process facilitation and monitoring
  21. Also visualization design helped to ‘sell the story’ Towards local authorities Towards the national government Towards farmer’s organization Towards Animal Protection Society Towards supermarkets Towards farmers
  22. Different components of innovation areinterdependent  To sell egg: need to have system built and operational  For funding: guaranteed retail purchases needed  No construction: no purchases from retail  No promise of purchase of retail: no funding  Vicious cycle: who comes with the money?
  23. How to get a guarantee? Vencomatic as SME can invest, but not bear all risks Innovation subsidies are insufficient Banks do not lend for uncertain innovations But state support also has its limits Continuous lobby and opportunity searching needed
  24. Guarantee paved the way Bank gave loan Construction of first Rondeel
  25. Guarantee paved the way
  26. Guarantee paved the way Construction first Rondeel enabled having serous negotiations with supermarkets for shelve space Eggs sold under private label ‘AH Pure and Honest’ NGO’s enthousiastic – free publicity
  27. Key elements  Building strong but adaptive vision through interactive design  Building interfaces – spanning boundaries and mediating  Mobilizing powerful and influential advocates  Role of science as designer, advisor  Reflexive process monitoring to enhance adaptive management
  28. Rondeel project is just beginning – part ofniche
  29. Reflection: is there a relevance for ILRIwork? Different system boundaries in smallholder agriculture– less discrete systems Different resource endowments and enabling (or disabling) environments Many more people involved/targeted in innovation processes ILRI works in But parts of RID have been applied on dairy chains in Ethiopia (system analysis)So what lessons can be learned, e.g. for ILRI’s R4D/innovation platform work?
  30. Thank you foryour attention!Further reading on this topic, see:Bos, A.P., Groot Koerkamp, P.W.G., Gosselink, J.M.J., Bokma, S., 2009. Reflexiveinteractive design and its application in a project on sustainable dairy husbandrysystems. Outlook on Agriculture 38, 137-145.Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., Leeuwis, C., 2010. Adaptive management in agricultural innovationsystems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment.Agricultural Systems 103, 390-400.Klerkx, L., Van Bommel, S., Bos, B., Holster, H., Zwartkruis, J.V., Aarts, N., 2012. Designprocess outputs as boundary objects in agricultural innovation projects: Functions andlimitations. Agricultural Systems 113, 39-49.Sumberg, J., Reece, D., 2004. Agricultural research through a new product developmentlens. Experimental Agriculture 40, 295-314See also my homepage for links to related articles:http://www.com.wur.nl/UK/Staff/Klerkx

×