Gender in value chain: ILRI/IPMS experience in Ethiopia
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Gender in value chain: ILRI/IPMS experience in Ethiopia

  • 3,151 views
Uploaded on

Presented by Ephrem Tesema at the Multi-Stakeholder’s Symposium on Empowering Women in Value Chains, Beshale Hotel, Addis Ababa, 15 March 2012.

Presented by Ephrem Tesema at the Multi-Stakeholder’s Symposium on Empowering Women in Value Chains, Beshale Hotel, Addis Ababa, 15 March 2012.

More in: Technology , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
3,151
On Slideshare
1,943
From Embeds
1,208
Number of Embeds
5

Actions

Shares
Downloads
43
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 1,208

http://unjobs.org 1,201
http://www.ilri.org 3
http://www.unjobs.org 2
http://search.mywebsearch.com 1
https://www.docsnode.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Gender in Value Chain: ILRI/IPMS Experience in Ethiopia Ephrem TesemaMulti-Stakeholder’s Symposium on Empowering Women in Value Chains Beshale Hotel, Addis Ababa, 15 March 2012
  • 2. Outline Background Objective Target PLW Objective of Gender Analysis Methods & Processes Findings & Learning Conclusion
  • 3. Background to ILRI/IPMS Project Market Oriented Agricultural Productivity (Crop & Livestock) Gender Sensitive Approach Innovative Approach Targeted Smallholder men & women Farmers Commodity Based
  • 4. Objective of ILRI/IPMS Increased Productivity Ensured Market Success Capacity Building and Partnership
  • 5. Target PLW 10 PLW in 4 regions 4PAS/woreda 10-28 community members/PA 1/3-1/2 are women participants Separate discussions held with M&W 4 communities involved in the analysis
  • 6. Objective IPMS Gender Analysis To understand the role of men & women in rural communities: -Production -Marketing -Decision Making - Benefit Sharing
  • 7. Gender Objective Cont’d To identify potential barriers: -For men’s and women’s participation in market led development initiative To identify -The required action by the project -potential partners
  • 8. Methods and Processes M hd etM hd etM hd etM hd etM hd et T M e
  • 9. Focus of the Analysis Division of labor in commodity production Gender roles in marketing commodities Access, control and benefits of resources Control of income from the sale of commodities Decision making roles…
  • 10. Sharing & Dissemination Using various events Using various communication Mediums Publication -Working papers -Participatory toolkits -Training manuals -IEC Materials
  • 11. Findings/Learning (Gender in Rural Population) Gender Characteristics of Rural populations Women -Workload of rural women In Ethiopia -Most rural women work 10-12 hours/day -Vary b/n wet & dry season -Have little time for leisure or socializing -Major source of labor in agriculture
  • 12. Findings/Learning Cont’d -Engaged in diverse off-farm activities, -Influenced by the local farming systems -Resource endowments -Wealth in rich and middle wealth hhs -Half less time to participate in formal dev.
  • 13. Findings/Learning Cont’d -Sell fuel wood, sorghum/maize stalk -Engaged in cotton spinning or injera making for sell -Brewing and selling local alcohol Men -Work as casual laborer on farm and in the home of rich HHs
  • 14. Findings/Learning Cont’d -Men also undertake a wide range of off- farm activities influenced by wealth -Rich men involved in activities that require capital -Trading in agricultural product -Investing in processing equipments -Lending money -Poor HHs work as casual laborers -Migrate temporarily for work
  • 15. Findings/Learning Cont’d -In rain fed farming systems, men’s workload is lightest during the dry season compared to HHs with access to irrigated land FHH -15-35% average in Ethiopia -Belongs to poorer HH in most communities
  • 16. Findings/Learning Cont’d• -Few FHH in the rich or middle wealth categories -The challenges of FHHs are different from those MHHs -Often overlooked by development partners
  • 17. Findings/Learning Cont’dProduction (skill, input & Technology)Men -Dominate decisions HH /information -Higher access for technology/Skills -Higher control for productive assets -Dominate decision in Technology uptake
  • 18. Findings/Learning Cont’dWomen Lack of access for formal information sources Lack of access for skills training Lack of access for extensions services Less involved in uptake of improved T. But situations vary ( HH types, region etc.)
  • 19. Key Lessons from IPMS Couples Training Enforce gender balanced involvement in Trainings Taking skills to the village (FTC) Capacitate front line development agents Women’s involvement: - field day, visits, exhibitions etc. Linkage with GO,NGO and PS
  • 20. Key Lessons from IPMS Women Dominated commodities Men Dominated commodities Commodities done by both sexes Training Composition (%) Ways of Information Dissemination
  • 21. Findings/Learning Cont’d Market( men, women, poor, middle & rich) -Men from R & M HH sell major crops -Travel distant markets/secure better prices -Women & poor farmers accept prices at local markets -Same directly sell to consumers -Men in better off HH sell P. to P. traders & cooperatives
  • 22. Key Lesson from Marketing Market engagement differs for men & women (wealth & HH category) Women have little control over high value crops Of 13 crop commodities men controls income from 11crops Women controls & share income only from 2 crops
  • 23. Challenges Partnership Availability of Technology Partner staff mobility Gender balance in partner public org. Capital scarcity stands as a major barrier -women farmers - poor - tends to leave them out of the technology development process
  • 24. Conclusion While designing projects -Gender diagnostic analysis -women potentials not part of the problems It is also relevant to consider • -input preferences of women in the value chain analysis (market/home consumption) • -Mapping men and women roles • -Its relevance in gender in value chain
  • 25. Conclusion• - Challenges of men/women in technology uptake• -Challenges in accessing financial and other productive resources• -Mapping institutions along the value chain and its gender aspect
  • 26. ConclusionEmphasis: It is required to conduct site and commodity specific analysis to understand gender roles and relations in livestock and crop value chain: Diagnostic…Gender in V C.
  • 27. Thanks W/ro Elfinesh Bermeji, a successful women farmer sharing her experience on beekeeping for AGP-gender Trainees, from Tigrai, Amhara, Oromiya and SNNP Regional State,Denkaka PA, Adaa IPMS Pilot Learning Woreda, Oromia,Photo by Ephrem Tesema,Nov.18,2011.