Epidemiology of African swine fever virus in southern Africa
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Epidemiology of African swine fever virus in southern Africa

on

  • 1,415 views

Presented by Wilna Vosloo at the African Swine Fever Diagnostics, Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, 20-21 July 2011

Presented by Wilna Vosloo at the African Swine Fever Diagnostics, Surveillance, Epidemiology and Control Workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, 20-21 July 2011

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,415
Views on SlideShare
1,415
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
26
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Epidemiology of African swine fever virus in southern Africa Epidemiology of African swine fever virus in southern Africa Presentation Transcript

    • Wilna VoslooCSIRO-Australian Animal Health Laboratory
    •  ASF has probably been around in Africa for millennia It most probably caused outbreaks in pigs introduced to sub- Saharan Africa by Portuguese missionaries and colonists about 500 years ago The first outbreaks in domestic pigs were reported in East Africa in the early 1900s In South Africa, where contact between domestic pigs and warthogs occurred, similar outbreaks were recorded from 1926
    •  Thereafter the disease was also reported in Angola, northern Mozambique (1954), most countries in central and southern Africa and then spread to West Africa {Senegal (1978 OIE) and Guinea Bissau – 1959?} Since 1978 at least 26 African countries have reported outbreaks of ASF and since 1996 devastating outbreaks have occurred in West Africa This increase in number of outbreaks is most probably due to increased numbers of pigs
    •  ASF appears to persist in at least 3 different cycles: ◦ Sylvatic cycle involving soft ticks and wild suids (savannah zones mostly in central, east and southern Africa) ◦ Domestic pigs and soft ticks ◦ Domestic cycle involving only pigs  Direct contact between pigs  Indirect transmission (iatrogenic, hands, clothing etc)  Virus in pig tissues / meat products fed to pigs
    •  Outbreaks in pigs where the sylvatic cycle is not evident could be due to low level infection which then occasionally causes high mortalities Pigs with innate resistance probably play a key role in maintaining and propagating ASFV Village pigs seem to be more resistant and survive infection as shown by serological surveys where up to 40% of pigs can be sero-positive after an outbreak Experimental infection indicated that this apparent resistance is not inherited
    • Epidemiology of ASF in Mozambique: an endemic area Main Objectives: ◦ To determine the prevalence of soft ticks in the area ◦ To verify the contact between wild and domestic pigs with soft ticks ◦ To establish whether wild and domestic pigs and soft ticks are infected with ASFV ◦ To determine the molecular epidemiology of the ASFV isolates found in the area
    •  ASFV-endemic region High density of warthogs in the park Communities surrounding the park are heavily dependent on pig rearing as a source of income
    • N2 N3 N4 N1 Trans-Stadial N5 transmission Eggs AdultPersistent infection Ticks from warthog burrows and pig pens Sylvatic Cycle Domestic Cycle Blood and sera Blood and sera from from warthogs domestic pigs
    • ASF sero-prevalence in warthogsBlood and sera from warthogs  Samples collected from 12 warthogs  75% (9/12) of the warthog sera tested positive for ASFV antibodies  This suggest a high prevalence of ASF in the warthog population
    • Prevalence of soft ticksTicks from warthog burrowsand pig pens  2556 ticks (O. porcinus porcinus) collected from 29 out of 32 warthog burrows searched in GNP (90% prevalence)  203 ticks (O. p. domesticus) collected from 2 out of 63 pig pens searched in buffer zone outside GNP (3% prevalence)
    • Soft ticks in sylvatic cycle Assays Burrows positives (%) Nested PCRs (screening assays) 72.4 % (21/29) Virus isolation 48.3 % (14/29)Soft ticks in domestic cycle Assays Pig pens positives (%) Nested PCRs (screening assays) 100 % (2/2) Virus isolation 50 % (1/2)
    • Prevalence of ASFV in soft ticks Internodal stages ♂ ♀ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - + M • There was no correlation between the likelihood of a positive result and any of the internodal stagesPCR result obtained for the different internodal stagesof ticks collected from a single warthog burrow
    • 48 Moz 14/2006 53 Moz 15/2006 62 Moz 17/2006 53 AF270708 Mozambique/1960 AF301541 Tengani/60 Genotype V Phylogenetic relationships of isolates 90 46 60 AY494553 MAL/1/02 AF270709 Mozambique/1979 obtained in this study base din p72 93 AF270711 MOZ/1/94 AF270712 MOZ/8/94 AF270710 SPEC265 gene sequences RSA/1/96 MOz 11/2006 28 Moz 10/2006 75 Moz 18/2006 New genotype 50 59 Moz 16/2006 42 Moz 19/2006 60 AF302818 RSA/1/98 SPEC/245 3 RSA/1/99/Thab SPEC/257 4 RSA/3/96 30 I 13 Lillie Moz 8/2006 Moz 13/2006 Moz 1/2006 33 Moz 12/2006 50 Moz 9/2006 Moz 6/2006 Moz 7/2006 Genotype II 6 AY351518 MOZ/2/02 MAU/2007/1 69 Moz 4/2006 AF270706 MAD/1/98 40 Moz 3/2006 Moz 2/2006 Moz 5/2006 ZIM/1/92 SPEC/205 62 AF301542 ANG/70 81 AF302816 BEN/1/97 54 AF301539 Lisbon/60 NAM/1/95 AY351555 NYA/12 43 AY494552 TAN/1/01 70 AY494551 TAN/2/03 61 AY351542 SUM/1411 II AY351543 MZI/1/92 52 AY351522 KAB/62 45 AF270705 MOZ/1/98 AF449463 BUR/1/84 100 AF449475 UGA/1/95 III 97 UGA/1B/03Neighbour-Joining tree 0.030 0.028 0.026 0.024 0.022 0.020 0.018 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.000
    •  Genotype II was most prevalent in tick isolates obtained from the GNP Newly identified genotype (XXIII) comprised isolates from ticks both in the park and in domestic sties
    •  Sporadic episodes of high mortality in pigs have been reported throughout the sample period 10.32% (66/639) of the serum samples tested positive for ASFV antibodies Low prevalence may be due to high mortality rates of infected pigs and most of samples came from young survivors and re- stocked animals
    • Prevalence of anti-ticks antibodies in domestic pigs • 500 serum samples collected from domestic pigs were tested for the presence of anti-tick antibodies • 44% of the sample contained detectable levels of antibodies • There is a statistically significant association between anti-tick antibodies and ASFV antibodies. Mid-p < 0.03 (x2 test, 95% CI)
    • Moz Tick 1 53 Moz Tick 5 64 GNP and GNPBZ Moz Tick 3 85 Moz Tick 4 L34328.1|O. moubata 92 69 DQ159456.1|O. Porcinus/p Mkuzi81B DQ159455.1|O. Porcinus/p Mkuzi50A 97 South Africa 56 DQ159451.1|O. Porcinus/p KNPSku7 47 DQ159450.1|O. Porcinus/p KNPBoy1 98 DQ159449.1|O. Porcinus/p TAN-195 Tanzania 99 DQ159453.1|O. Porcinus/p HW713 Zimbabwe 100 DQ159452.1|O. Porcinus/p HW714 99 DQ159448.1| O. savignyi OS-01 Namibia EU009925.1|O. parkeri 93 L34327.1|O. turicata DQ234709.1|O. sonrai NG2 100 DQ234707.1|O. sonrai INA1 West Africa DQ234708.1|O. sonrai NG1 DQ234706.1|O. sonrai BAN2 99 AY669024.1|O. coriaceus HR3 AY669023.1|O. coriaceus CR2 99 AY669017.1|O. coriaceus isolate SB8 77 AY669016.1|O. coriaceus isolate SB70.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00
    •  SA is zoned with a northern region where the sylvatic cycle has been studied in some detail All outbreaks since 1939 were in the ASF control zone where this known sylvatic cycle is present and where free-ranging pigs are kept Expansion of wildlife farming and a focus on eco-tourism has resulted in an increased number of wild animals and warthogs are more abundant
    •  The Transfrontier Conservation Areas planned for Africa could positively impact on warthog numbers Warthogs cannot be fenced in and their range may increase This could impact on the sylvatic cycle which seems to give rise to more genetically variant viruses This in turn could impact on the development of vaccines to control ASF
    •  In Africa, ASF affects mostly the people who can least afford it and threatens food security The epidemiology of ASF on the African continent is complex The epidemiology may be changing due to climatic conditions and farming practices and should be monitored regularly More studies are needed to fully understand the factors that would impact on disease control strategies Regional control policies are needed Training pig keepers and rapid diagnosis could assist in alleviating the negative impact of ASF virus outbreaks
    •  Molecular epidemiology can be applied in ASFV risk analysis and outbreak tracing, but should be based on multiple genes The apparent segregation of genotypes based of their geographical distribution may be due to under-sampling Continued monitoring of both captive and wild suid populations as well as soft tick distribution is essential to effectively addressing the ASFV problem in sub-Saharan Africa
    •  L.E. Heath , B.A. Lubisi, R.M. Dwarka, N. Msthali, C. Quembo, A. Bastos, C. Boshoff Staff of the Transboundary Animal Diseases Programme, ARC-OVI Dr. Ferran Jori from CIRAD for assistance with sampling strategies and sampling in Mozambique Wellcome Trust for funding (Mozambique studies) Esther Blanco - CISA-INIA, Valdeolmos, Spain