Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Adversity as opportunity: Complexity and diversity as new frontiers in development research, October 2008
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Adversity as opportunity: Complexity and diversity as new frontiers in development research, October 2008


Published on

Adversity as opportunity: Complexity and diversity as new frontiers in development research, October 2008, by ILRI Director General Carlos Seré

Adversity as opportunity: Complexity and diversity as new frontiers in development research, October 2008, by ILRI Director General Carlos Seré

Published in: Technology

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Adversity as opportunity Complexity and diversity as new frontiers in development research Carlos Sere, ILRI
  • 2. Main propositions • The ‘big’ challenges we face today are not ‘simple’, they arise out of dynamic complexity • To address them we will require new approaches: – Programmatically – Organisationally
  • 3. Complex challenges • Often have many causes, interacting in complex and conditional ways; • Causes and consequences are often scale-dependent, or operate across scales; • Sometimes have their roots in differences in human value systems.
  • 4. Towards an understanding of the programmatic challenge
  • 5. Food crisis and agriculture
  • 6. The growth in crop yield gains has slowed, while food demand continues to rise rapidly Growth in Crop Yield Gains Developing Country Consumption Source: World Development Report, 2008
  • 7. Stubborn maize yields 10 Burundi Comoros 9 DRC 8 Djibouti Egypt Maiza Yield (Tonne/Ha) 7 Eritrea 6 Ethiopia Kenya 5 Libya 4 Madagascar Malawi 3 Mauritius 2 Rwanda Seychelles 1 Sudan 0 Swaziland 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Uganda Zambia Year Zimbabwe
  • 8. Global crisis, regional exceptions FAO global food 160 price index 150 Ethiopia 140 Food Price Kenya 130 120 Tanzania 110 Uganda 100 90 Madagascar 80 Malawi 70 Mar- Jun- Sep- Dec- Mar- Rwanda 07 07 07 07 08 Source: FAO, 2008; country statistics offices, cited in Karugia et al 2008
  • 9. Regional response to food price crisis • Protect the vulnerable • Exploit regional diversity and facilitate regional trade • Enhance supply response • Strengthen and use regional institutions for preparedness and response
  • 10. Reducing vulnerability, risk, building assets • Vulnerability not only damages people’s welfare, it also reduces growth directly by destroying assets … (Dorward et al 2008) • Need to assist poor people in the agricultural sector by reducing: – The risk and vulnerability to shocks and stresses, and – the perceptions of high risk in the sector, which may otherwise prevent the poor from venturing into new opportunities.
  • 11. New organizational approaches to addressing complex challenges
  • 12. East African Dairy Development
  • 13. Overall Goal • To transform the lives of 179,000 families—or approximately one million people —by doubling household dairy income by year 10 through integrated interventions in dairy production, market-access and knowledge application • Beneficiaries: – 169,000 poor smallholder dairy families that earn less than $2 per adult equivalent per day and have 1-5 cows – 10,000 Fodder producers that earn less than $ 2 per adult per day • US$ 48 million investment
  • 14. Three major objectives • To generate information for evidence based decision-making on the dairy value chain and to develop innovative solutions for use of resources that increase income • To expand dairy markets and increase market access for smallholder farmers • To increase dairy productivity and efficiency in a sustainable manner
  • 15. Confronting Complexity • Challenges – Business model – Conflicting objectives and trade-offs • Opportunities – The hub concept – Multi-country project
  • 16. EADD project model: Dairy Hubs
  • 17. Dairy Sector Value Chain Farmer ILRI Heifer ABS ICRAF Techno Serve Heifer ILRI Techno Serve Techno Serve Techno Serve ILRI Consumer
  • 18. However… • Policy research on African agriculture is progressively long on prescriptions for – what needs to be done to spur agricultural growth but short on – how such prescriptions might be implemented in practice (Omamo, 2003). • The issue is how to promote – “evidence-readiness” among inherently conservative and pragmatic policy makers and practitioners and – “user-readiness” among inherently abstraction- oriented researchers (Omamo 2004).
  • 19. CGIAR Reform
  • 20. CGIAR has evolved to a System with more than 8,500 CGIAR scientists and staff working in over 100 countries, addressing every critical component of the agricultural research sector IFPRI ICARDA Washington, DC Aleppo, Syria ICRISAT USA Patancheru India IRRI Los Baños Philippines Bioversity International Rome,Italy WorldFish Penang IITA Malaysia Ibadan CIMMYT Nigeria Mexico City Mexico IWMI ILRI Colombo Nairobi Sri Lanka CIFOR Kenya CIP Bogor Lima, Peru CIAT Indonesia Cali Colombia Africa Rice Center-WARDA Cotonou, Benin
  • 21. Since its launch, CGIAR has delivered innovations that have resulted in feeding an additional 13 million people per year Without the CGIAR’s investment: – World food production would be 4 to 5 percent lower – Developing countries would produce 7 to 8 percent less food – 13 to 15 million more children would be malnourished
  • 22. CGIAR launched a change initiative at the beginning of 2008 in service of greater impact FROM TO  Clear vision with focused priorities that respond to  Mission creep and trying to do everything global development challenges  Duplicative mandate of the Centers without clear  Centers that collaborate, work toward the System System-wide vision and strategy for impact agenda and priorities, and deliver impact  Complex and cumbersome governance and lack of  Streamlined and effective System-level governance accountability with clear accountability  Static partnerships that are not enabling scalable  Strong and innovative partnerships with NARS, the impact and research adoption private sector and civil society that enable impact  Lack of coordination among investors  Strengthened, coordinated funding mechanisms that are linked to the System agenda and priorities  Declining core resources  Stabilization and growth of resource support Greater impact on food security and poverty reduction
  • 23. With additional resources, existing capabilities could be scaled up and out to provide even more impact on emerging challenges ILLUSTRATIVE SOLUTIONS  Drought-tolerant chickpea  Combating deforestation, the source of 20% of annual GHG emissions CGIAR Capabilities Capabilities  Disease resistant potatoes Currently  Drought-tolerant high-yielding rice Leveraged Untapped Against  Drought-tolerant maize with 30% higher yields Capabilities Development  Flood-tolerant rice with yield 2-3 Challenges  Super-early chickpeas  Pest resistant maize  New Rice for Africa(NERICA) - pests and disease resistant - reduced import dependence  Aquaculture techniques double yields
  • 24. Conclusions: networked science to address complex challenges Forward looking, opportunity oriented – For researchers: • All kinds of research can have impact • Classical ideas of ‘critical mass’ less valid • Must be networked, have ‘digital footprint’ – For research managers: • Huge expectations of transformation of societies • Need to engage much more in networked science • Engage with postmodern approaches
  • 25. Thank you!