Session 3 Results


Published on

Published in: Technology, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Session 3 Results

  1. 1. Session 3 results
  2. 2. Session 3 Cluster workshop introduction <ul><li>During the Irish Future Internet Forum we hosted a panel session on cross domain topics from across SFI research. This session was chaired by Nick Wainwright from Hewlett Packard, UK who plays a significant role in the European Future Internet Assembly. Panellists included Prof. Linda Doyle, TCD, Prof. Stefan Decker, NUIG, Prof. Vincent Wade, TCD, Prof. Doug Leith and Dr. Tom Dowling, NUIM. Each panellist gave a short presentation on insights into their own research area; this was followed by a question and answer session. </li></ul><ul><li>Subsequently each panellist joined a pre-defined cluster group of approximately 10 members. The cluster topics included Internet Security, Wireless communication systems, Semantics in the Future Internet, IoT (sensors and embedded systems) and Service Delivery in the Future Internet. Each cluster was given a possible approach to take for the discussion. The c luster members were to raise a question around the Future Internet, identify problems, issues and the downfall of the current Internet. To encourage some group interaction and participation each cluster member was asked to write a word or two on a post-it note, these were collected and used as input to visualization output: http:// = ifif and output from wordle application as illustrated on the next slide. </li></ul><ul><li>Cluster chairs presented their results to the IFIF, output from the cluster was a slide describing a possible way forward, what could / should the Future Internet do. </li></ul>
  3. 4. Session 3 results <ul><li>Cluster 1-Internet Security </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Question – the requirements for the FI seem to be in conflict with human nature how can we design with this in mind? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Education </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Proactive </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Risk analysis as a life skill </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Legislation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Appropriate </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Principle based </li></ul></ul></ul>
  4. 5. Cluster Output - 2 Semantics in the Future Internet (Digital Content Access & Delivery in the Future Internet) Stefan Decker (DERI) Philip Robinson (SAP) Tom Sheedy (Enterprise Ireland) Nick Wainwright (HP) Vincent Wade (TCD) Alan Davy (WIT-TSSG) Owen O’Connor (Cernam) Steven Davy (WIT-TSSG) Bernard Butler (WIT-TSSG) Martin Serrano (WIT-TSSG)
  5. 6. Some Notes … Semantics in the Future Internet <ul><li>Digital Access. </li></ul><ul><li>Localization. </li></ul><ul><li>Personalization. </li></ul><ul><li>Interconnected </li></ul><ul><li>network. </li></ul><ul><li>Intra-Links. </li></ul><ul><li>Increase Security. </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of </li></ul><ul><li>Service. </li></ul><ul><li>Business Model-Driven </li></ul><ul><li>Optimization </li></ul><ul><li>Standardization </li></ul><ul><li>Facilitate </li></ul><ul><li>Services. </li></ul><ul><li>Market </li></ul><ul><li>Demands. </li></ul><ul><li>Embedded </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge </li></ul><ul><li>Wide-Area </li></ul><ul><li>Services </li></ul>
  6. 7. <ul><li>Identified problems </li></ul><ul><li>Semantics for users vs Semantics for Infrastructures. </li></ul><ul><li>- Breaking Networks Layers. </li></ul><ul><li>- Application and network interoperability. </li></ul><ul><li>- Service Infrastructure. </li></ul><ul><li>M o ving from information to knowledge. </li></ul><ul><li>Reasoner engines operation . </li></ul>Cluster on Semantics in the Future Internet Round Table Discussion …
  7. 8. <ul><li>Downfalls of Current Internet </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of Service . </li></ul><ul><li>Computing Supporting Trust and Identity. </li></ul><ul><li>Infrastructure limitations. </li></ul><ul><li>Business model of Internet Services. </li></ul><ul><li>Government Regulations. </li></ul>Cluster on Semantics in the Future Internet Round Table Discussion …
  8. 9. <ul><li>On the way towards a knowledge-based world. </li></ul><ul><li>Transition over secure network and services. </li></ul><ul><li>User-Centric Design </li></ul><ul><li>More Internet & Society Interacton </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge Dissemination </li></ul>Cluster on Semantics in the Future Internet Wrap-up and Conclusions …
  9. 10. Cluster on Semantics in the Future Internet Digital Enterprise Research Institute
  10. 11. Cluster 3 –Wireless communication systems Issues Raised <ul><li>Cost of Wireless Access – how to address </li></ul><ul><li>Universal Access – a human right? </li></ul><ul><li>Energy issues </li></ul><ul><ul><li>– what is overall CO2 footprint of ICT </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>How can technology design reduce footprint </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Health issues – is exposure dangerous in the long term? </li></ul>
  11. 12. Cluster 8 results <ul><li>Opportunities for Future Internet </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Firmware Updates - everyone's machines vulnerable </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Proposed solution, area for research priority </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Solve the “Node Introduction” problem </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Change of the model of “Identity.” on the Internet </li></ul></ul>
  12. 13. Service Delivery in the Future Internet Dr Brendan Jennings FAME SRC, TSSG, Waterford Institute of Technology
  13. 14. Cluster 10: Service Delivery in the FI <ul><ul><li>Services research: automating service composition </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Brokerage will always be required </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Non-functional aspects a challenge (eg. charging) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need better development tools! </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Supporting virtual communities </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Smaller enterprises struggle with technical awareness </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cloud based services? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>privacy and trust issues </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Simpler technology might be better </li></ul></ul>