Steen Lohmann Poulsen, Head of Division for International Economic Coorperation, Taxation and Financial Markets, Ministry of Finance: What measures is Denmark taking to prevent capital flight and support tax mobilisation?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Obviously, no one knows the exact magnitude of tax evasion in developing countries Different estimates mentioned here today Regardsless, it a most probably a big number and therefore an issue to tackle Tax evasion is a particular problem for developing countries because their tax bases are small. Difficult to raise taxes in developing countries Major constraints to raising tax in derevenue include: heavy reliance on tariffs (problem when liberalizing trade) and need for broadening tax base outflow of income to tax havens

    We want to provide a framework securing a fair and full taxation for developoing countries The OECD has developed standards for transparency and exchange of information, requiring Exchange of information on request where where it is ”foreseeably relevant” to the administration and enforcement of domestic tax laws No restriction on exchange due to bank secrecy 2 OECD models – double taxation and exchange of information (TIEA) TIEA: Tax Information Exchange Agreement Double taxation includes information on exchange of information. But exchange of information: Can not refuse to provide the information OECD standards updated every 6 months UN Source principle Both OECD and UN ’s double taxation models include articles on transfer pricing. OECD has developed guidelines on how to evaluate, legislate and monitor transfer prices. UN is currently working on pracitical manual on transfer pricing for developing countries.

    Probably a major political breakthrough in the fight of tax evasion in the shaping of momentum of fight of tax evasion Agreed during the Danish EU presidency in 2002 But intentionally filled with loop holes We need to revise it. Will return Also: Directives on mutual assistance for administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and recovery of claims

    Fight of international tax evasion high on the political agenda in the G20 since beginning of 2009. - Expanding the OECD forum to include developing countries: Presently, includes OECD-countries and tax havens. maintaining momentum in dealing with non-cooperative jurisdictions - countermeasures: Not clear what is meant but probably coupling other international agreements on trade or transfers to tax havens A lot of progess

    Responding to G20 calls, OECD Global Forum agreed to monitor how developing countries are benefitting from more transparent environment and to accelerate work on mulitlateral initiatives The Southern Caribbean Project (NL) The Northerne Caribbean Project (UK) The Pacific project (OECD) Convention: 14 countries have signed the convention, including Denmark. No tax havens have signed yet

    Since OECD’s first progress report was published in April 2009, 17 jurisdictions have moved to the ”white” list The criterion for joining the white list is the Jurisdictions that have substantially implemented the internationally agreed tax standard, i.e. jurisdictions having implemented at least 12 tax agreements. The “black” list is empty now A lot of progress!

    Still many countries om the grey list Second parenthesis: the progress since april 2009. Look at Liechtenstein Also progress here, but still some way to go

    Bilateral agreement: Update in particular with respect to exchange of information - Nordic cooperation: with Sweden, Norway, Finland and Iceland

    EU: legal persons, not just individuals other income than interest payments

    No magic bullit CbC reporting. Maybe but accounting is very complex and we should avoid putting massive brudens on companies which are not cheating becasue we want to catch a some that are. Multilateral agreements: Yes, a very appealing thought but let me share a real life experience on mulitilateral tax negotiations:´ECOFIN last Tuesday The point is that those negotiations are lenghty and that tax havens are very reluctant to strike a deal for obvoius reasons. Then what to do? We have the bilaleral framework within OECD. Countries on hte white list can not refuse to do more than the required 12 agreements. All developing countries have to do is to approach these countries and ask for an agreement. As simple as that! Even if we had a multilateral framework, would it lead to fair and full taxation in the developing countries ? I hope so but I doubt it. Would the tax authorities know what to do with the information, would they approach the persons og companies to be taxed. It will not work without considerable better administrations. We also need to focus there. Developing world need to take a responsabilty and we can help

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Steen Lohmann Poulsen, Head of Division for International Economic Coorperation, Taxation and Financial Markets, Ministry of Finance: What measures is Denmark taking to prevent capital flight and support tax mobilisation? - Presentation Transcript

    1. What measures are Denmark taking to prevent capital flight and support tax mobilisation? Presentation by Steen Lohmann Poulsen – Danish Ministry of Finance
    2. The problem of capital flight and tax evasion
      • Estimates of proceeds from criminal activities, corruption and tax evasion in developing and transition economies range from 500-800 billion US dollars per year .
      • Of this, roughly 250 billion US dollars per year is from tax evasion.
    3. The Legal Framework – OECD and UN
      • OECD’s Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information:
          • Exchange of information on request
          • No restriction on information exchange due to bank secrecy
          • 2 OECD models – double taxation and exchange of information (TIEA)
      • UN model double taxation convention
          • follows OECD standards to a large extent
          • targeted bilateral agreements between developed and developing countries
    4. The EU framework
      • Savings Tax Directive (2003)
          • Coverage: only taxation of savings income – interest payments
          • Automatic exchange of information. Transition period for Luxembourg, Austria and Belgium
          • Corresponding agreements with Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino and Andorra (withholding tax)
    5. Progress in G20
      • G20 declarations call for:
          • the end of bank secrecy
          • adherement to international standards for information exchange
          • - expanding the OECD Global Forum to also include developing countries
          • countermeasures against tax havens from March 2010
    6. Multilateral initiatives
      • OECD:
          • multilateral negotiations of bilateral agreements on exchange of information
          • opening the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters to developing country participation - multilateral agreement drawn up by Council of Europe and OECD which covers:
            • information exchange on request
            • indirect and direct taxation
            • all legal persons (both individuals and companies)
            • upcoming revision: remove restrictions on bank secrecy
    7. OECD – ”White” list, October 20th, 2009 San Marino Japan Denmark Russian Federation Italy Czech Republic Portugal Israel Cyprus US Virgin Islands Poland Isle of Man China United States Norway Ireland Cayman Islands United Kingdom New Zealand India Canada United Arab Emirates Netherlands Antilles Iceland British Virgin Islands Turkey Netherlands Hungary Bermuda Switzerland Monaco Guernsey Belgium Sweden Mexico Greece Barbados Spain Mauritius Gibraltar Bahrain South Africa Malta Germany Austria Slovenia Luxembourg France Australia Slovak Republic Korea Finland Aruba Seychelles Jersey Estonia Argentina Jurisdictions that have substantially implemented the internationally agreed tax standard
    8. OECD – ”Grey” list, October 14th, 2009 (0) – (2) (0) (0) – (11) (0) – (2) 2009 2009 2009 2009 Malaysia Phillipines Singapore Uruguay (5) – (6) (0) (0) (0) 2009 2009 2009 2009 Brunei Chile Costa Rica Guatemala Other Financial Centres (0) (0) (0) (1) – (5) (0) (0) – (5) (0) – (3) (0) – (5) (0) 2003 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 Nauru Niue Panama St Kitts and Nevis St Lucia St Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa Turks and Caicos Islands Vanuatu (0) – (5) (4) (7) – (9) (1) – (3) (0) (0) – (1) (1) (1) (0) (1) – (10) (1) (0) 2009 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2007 2009 2007 2002 Andorra Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Belize Cook Islands Dominica Grenada Liberia Liechtenstein Marshall Islands Montserrat Tax havens Number of agreements Year of commitment Jurisdiction Number of agreements Year of commitment Jurisdiction Jurisdictions that have committed to the internationally agreed tax standard, but have not yet substantially implemented
    9. What measures have Denmark taken?
      • Bilaterally - recent revision of agreements with Switzerland, Austria, Luxembourg and Singapore in accordance with the OECD standards
      • Nordic cooperation - bilateral information exchange agreements within a multilateral framework. Agreements with Jersey, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Cayman Islands, Bermuda, the Virgin Islands, Aruba og the Dutch Antilles.
      • EU - pushing for speedy adoption of a revised Savings Tax Directive and anti-fraud agreements with Liechtenstein and other third countries
      • OECD - supports work in the Global Forum
    10. The international work program:
      • EU
          • Anti-fraud agreements with third countries
          • Revision of the Savings Tax Directive to increase coverage
      • OECD - responding to G20 call to make it easier for developing countries to benefit from tax cooperation – report expected prior to G20 Finance Ministers meeting in November
      • Denmark – continuing to push for progress in the EU and work for more tax agreements within the Nordic framework
    11. The way forward for developing countries?
      • Proposals:
      • Country-by-country reporting?
      • Multilateral agreements?
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + IBISIBIS Nominate

    custom

    128 views, 0 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Steen Lohmann Poulsen, Head of Division for Interna more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 128
      • 123 on SlideShare
      • 5 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds
    • 3 views on http://ibis.dk
    • 2 views on http://www.ibis.dk

    more

    All embeds
    • 3 views on http://ibis.dk
    • 2 views on http://www.ibis.dk

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories