• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Dr V K Tiwari
 

Dr V K Tiwari

on

  • 894 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
894
Views on SlideShare
894
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Dr V K Tiwari Dr V K Tiwari Presentation Transcript

    • Operations Research in Health and Family Planning byProf V. K. Tiwari, NIHFW, N Delhi
      XIII Annual Conference of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, UP-UK Chapter, HIHT Dehradun
      25-9-2010
    • Background of OR
      OR Used in second world war to precisely hit enemy targets by Americans
      Thereafter, focus shifted to Management problems in business and industries
      During sixties, WHO and Population Council started OR applications in Health and Family Planning.
    • What is operations research?
      OR is the application of scientific methods, techniques and tools to problems involving the operations of a system so as to provide those in control of operations with optimum solutions to the problem.
    • Goals of operations research
      Provide program managers/policy makers with information to make decisions to improve program operations (to solve problems) eg:
      • Increase efficiency, effectiveness and quality of service delivered by providers
      • Increase availability, accessibility and acceptability of services desired by users
    • Focus and Objectives of OR
      Focuses on:
      • Day-to-day activities or ‘operations’ of Health, FP and HIV/AIDS programs etc
      • Search for solutions
      Objectives:
      • To yield answers to perceived program problems
      • To seek practical solutions to problem situations
      • To provide information to improve/scale up existing services and plan future ones
    • Five basic steps of OR
      • Problem identification and diagnosis-situation analysis and other qualitative methods including triangulation.
      • Strategy selection-cost effective, feasible, non interfering too much.
      • Strategy experimentation and evaluation-field research/computer simulation or analysis.
      • Information dissemination and utilization.
      • Replication and up-scaling.
    • Step I
      Problem identification and diagnosis  
    • Problem definition
      • Problem should be defined in terms of its
      - Occurrence, intensity, distribution, and other measures (such as impact) for which data are already available.
      -It emphasises on performance problem ie gap between desired and existing parameters
      • Defining a problem includes
      -Review of relevant literature, examine current service statistics, seeking educated opinion from programme managers, obtain probable reasons for the problem from social, economic, and health perspectives/theory
    • Problem justification
      The key aspects in justifying the research problem are:
      • Knowing whether the problem is current and timely (topical) and perceived by programme managers
      • How widespread is the problem?
      • Does it affect key population?
      • Is problem related to ongoing program activities?
      • Solutions not known
      • Does it relate to broad social, economic and health issues (unemployment, status of women, HIV, FP etc)?
      • Is solution replicable?
    • Step II
      Strategy selection
    • Selecting a strategy
      Identify potential (alternate) strategies that could be used to solve the program problem
      • Indicate why the selected strategies are most appropriate
      • Justify the selection of strategy by:
      -Past success
      - Simplicity of implementing the strategy
      - Potential for sustaining the strategy
      - Cost effectiveness of strategy
      - Technical feasibility of strategy etc
    • Criteria for selecting strategy-example
      • Does the selected strategy have the potential to enhance HIV prevention from parents to children?
      • Is there a perceived need for the strategy among stakeholders?
      • Does the strategy build upon previous work and thus:
      -accelerate the scaling-up,
      - leverage existing research capacities and structures?
      Is the strategy sustainable?
    • Defining study objectives and hypothesis
      • Ultimate objective -
      - Describes expected contributions arising from the study (overall expected outcome)
      - Contribute to the justification of why the research on the problem was required (relate purpose of study to larger health outcomes)
      For example – “Ultimate objective of the intervention study is to contribute towards improving the quality of life for PLHA and the effectiveness of prevention, care and support activities offered by CBOs to PLHA”
    • Defining study objectives
      • Immediate objective (state what will happen)        
      - Relate directly to the research problem situation
      - Indicate the variable that will be examined and measured
      - Should be stated in behavioral terms
      - Specify-Who will do; How much of what; To whom; When; Where, and What purpose?
      For example –
      1. “By 2008, the national program in India will develop a youth- friendly program to provide comprehensive VCT to youth aged 16-
      18 years.
      2. Assess program in terms of utilization of services by youth, cost- effectiveness of services and reduction in sexual risk behaviours.
    • Defining study hypotheses
      • Statement about an expected relationship between two or more variables that permit empirical testing
      • It specifies the expected relationship among variables
      • Most appropriate when conducting field intervention studies
      • They serve to direct and guide our research
      • They indicate major independent and dependent variables of interest
    • Examples of hypotheses
      • PLHA who receive comprehensive counseling on ART that includes discussion of side effects and their management before ARV treatment begins are more likely to adhere effectively after a year than PLHA who have not received counseling on ARV before they begin therapy
      • Community-based HIV/AIDS organizations that actively involve PLHA in planning and implementation of programs will be more likely to achieve their objectives that similar organizations that do not involve PLHA in planning and implementation of programs
      • Dual protection programs that focus on counseling women together with their male partners will be more successful than dual protection programs that focus only on counseling women
    • Independent and Dependent Variables
      • Independent variable causes, determines or influences the dependent variables (direct relationship)
      • Dependent variables is the central concern of the research proposal’s problem statement
      • Independent variable acts on the dependent variable through intervening variables which increase or decrease the effect the independent variable has on dependent variable
      Eg – To increase condom use (dependent variable) a program initiates a large BCC program (independent variable). Campaign alone can not increase condom use. The intervening variables that might influence the dependent variable would be people’s knowledge, attitudes, sexual risk behaviors and risk perception.
       
      Most HIV/AIDS behavioral research studies are based on a model that includes intervening variables
    • To summarize –
      All OR studies should include:
      • Ultimate objective (state the anticipated contributions of the study)
      • Immediate objective (state what will be done immediately)
      • Hypotheses (state the expected relationship between two or more variables)
      • Research Question (Why, how etc)
    • Possible OR topics
      Reducing stigma & discrimination at workplace for HIV patients
      • Manage risky sexual behaviour among secondary school students
      • Quality of care for people living with HIV and AIDS
      • Reducing transmission of HIV from Parents to children
      • Best ways to introduce ECPs
      • Optimum cost of injectible contraceptives
      • Best ways to involve PPs in FP/RNTCP etc
      • Thinking points?
      - Provide 3-4 points to define and justify the problem
      -      Identify strategy
      - State objectives (at least) and frame hypotheses
    • Step III
      Experimentation and Evaluation
    • Intervention Description
      • Who will be responsible for implementing the intervention
      - indicate organization(s) responsible and categories of people eg teachers, doctors, peers etc.
      • Where will the intervention activities take place
      - be as specific eg in 30 clinics, 20 slums etc.
      • What activities will be initiated
      - describe sequence of events eg may start with training of health providers (describe nature and duration of training); next a series of meetings in the health facilities (describe frequency and purpose of meetings
    • Testing Intervention-OR
      • Intervention study designs range from
      - True-experimental
      - Quasi-experimental
      - Non-experimental
    • Common notation
      RA- Random assignment
      Experimental group receives intervention
      Control group –does not receive intervention
      X – program intervention; denotes experimental
      Q – observation measurement passage of time
      Experimental Group
      Control Group
      RA
      X
      O
      Notation of Study Designs
    • Time
      01 X1 02
      03 04
      Experimental Group 1
      RA
      Control Group
      True Experimental Design I
    • Time
      01 X1 02
      03 X2 04
      05 06
      Experimental Group 1
      Experimental Group 2
      Control Group
      RA
      True Experimental Design II
    • Time
      01 X1 02
      03 X2 04
      05 X1+X2 06
      Experimental Group 1
      RA
      Experimental Group 2
      Control Group
      True Experimental Design III
    • Quasi-Experimental
      • Quasi-experimental – no randomization between intervention and control group
      Experimental group 01 X 02
       
      Control group 03 04
    • Non-experimental designs
        Time
       
      Posttest only X 01
       
      Pretest-Postest 01 X 02
    • Study methods
      • Data Collection Technique
      • Quantitative – numerical based
      - Survey/structured questionnaire
      • Qualitative – descriptive
      - In-depth interviews
      - Key-informant interviews
      - Focus group discussions
      • Data collection framework – to plan for data collection identify study outcomes, indicators to measure the outcomes, respondent and data collection methods
    • Study outcome
      Indicators/area of inquiry
      Respondents
      Data collection methods
      Quality of post natal CARE given when women return to health care facility
       
      Percentage of essential practices administered correctly
       
      Percent of essential messages given
      Postpartum HIV –positive women - clients
       
      Health care providers
      Observations of providers
       
       
       
      Key informant interviews with providers
       
      Survey
    • THANK YOU