×
  • Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
 

Economic evaluation. Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and coronary angiography (CXA) combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) test.

by on Sep 24, 2012

  • 386 views

Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and coronary angiography (CXA) combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) test.

Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and coronary angiography (CXA) combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) test.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
386
Views on SlideShare
386
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via SlideShare as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Economic evaluation. Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of  cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and coronary angiography (CXA) combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) test. Economic evaluation. Comparative cost-effectiveness analyses of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and coronary angiography (CXA) combined with fractional flow reserve (FFR) test. Presentation Transcript