Maintaining Good User Experience as Touch Screen Size Increases
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Maintaining Good User Experience as Touch Screen Size Increases

on

  • 561 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
561
Views on SlideShare
561
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Maintaining Good User Experience as Touch Screen Size Increases Maintaining Good User Experience as Touch Screen Size Increases Document Transcript

  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases Maintaining good user experience as touch screen size increases Todd Severson and Henry Wong, Cypress Semiconductor - July 20, 2013 Capacitive touchscreens in consumer electronics to took off with the launch of Apple’s iPhone in 2007. The 3.5” screen introduced a multi-touch user experience that changed the way we interact with our electronics. Touchscreen displays are now a standard in consumer electronic products such as DSCs (Digital Still Cameras), PNDs (Portable Navigation Devices), e-readers, tablets, Ultrabooks and AIO (All-In-One) PCs. A key trend in all of these devices is the move to larger screen sizes. Not only are capacitive touchscreens growing to address new market segments such as Ultrabooks or notebooks, they are also increasing within their current product segment. For example, smartphone OEMs are making the move from smartphones to superphones, providing larger screen sizes as a key differentiation in the market. The main product segments for touch-enabled devices today are smartphones with screen sizes between 3” to 5”; super-phone or phablet in the range of 5” to 8”; tablets 8” to 11.6;, Ultrabooks 11.6” to 15.6”; and notebooks ranging as high as 17”. Tablets are considered one of the fastest ramping mobile devices in its five years of product history; sales are predicted to overtake PC sales by 2015 (Figure 1). This is causing PC vendors to shift their focus to adopting touch- friendly designs such as convertible notebooks that can function as notebooks or tablets. Figure 1. Worldwide tablet and PC growth
  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases As screen sizes of touch-enabled devices grow larger, the main challenge for designers is maintaining the same high performance users have come to expect from a cell phone but over a larger screen. This means scanning more intersections over more surface area in the same amount of time. In addition, the processor has to work with less signal and more noise while still maintaining the speed, precision, and responsiveness required for a desirable user interface experience. Users expect large screen devices to have similar performance and touch experience to that of their smartphones, but large screen devices often deal with different use cases than what is typical on a smaller phone. Notebooks or PCs are more likely to be used while plugged into a power source, there is more surface area to rest palms or other large objects on the screen when typing, and users are more likely to set larger devices on a table or in their lap instead of holding it in their hands. All of these conditions and circumstances change the electrical properties of a device. The key ingredients to a robust and responsive user experience include sensitivity, tracking multiple moving touch objects, recognizing and tracking fingers in different noise environments, recognizing and tracking fingers under different environmental conditions, and maintaining acceptable power consumption to achieve the desired battery life. Capacitive touchscreens operate by driving a transmit voltage into the sensor panel on the device that creates a signal charge. This signal is then received by the touchscreen controller, which is able to determine the sensor capacitance by measuring the change of the sensor charge. The current received by the chip is equivalent to the capacitance of the panel multiplied by the voltage of the transmit drive (Q1 = C * VTX). A baseline circuit is able to remove the nominal non-touch sensor charge so the system can focus on measuring the change of sensor charge due to finger touch. This improves touch measurement, resolution and sensitivity. The main problem with larger screens is that the transmit voltage has more surface area to cover and the resistance and capacitance of the sensor increases. The touch panel is limited by the higher parasitic capacitance and resistance, affecting the RC time constant, which results in slower transmit frequency. The transmit operating frequency affects signal settling, refresh rate and power consumption. The goal is to determine the highest transmit operating frequency conditions for a consistent touch response across the panels while minimizing scan time and power. Refresh rates versus user interface needs Refresh rate is the number of times in a second that the touchscreen controller can measure a touch on the screen and report it back to the host processor. A higher refresh rate will provide a responsive user experience by collecting more x/y data coordinates in a shorter amount of time. Most consumer electronics devices require a touch controller refresh rate of greater than 100 Hz, or about 10 ms. Certain applications, such as digital drawing pads or Point of Sale (POS) terminals require even higher refresh rates to capture and recognize signatures and quick pen strokes.
  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases It is challenging for large screens to maintain fast refresh rates because the touch controller needs to sweep greater surface area, gather data from all the intersections, and then process that data. The two main components that effect refresh rate are how fast the screen is scanned and how fast the scanned data is processed. A 17” screen has 11 times more intersections than a 5” screen with the same sensor characteristics (3108 vs. 275). In order to maintain the user experience of the 5” screen, the 17” screen requires more scanning and processing power. One technique to help solve the scanning problem is to make sure the touch controller has enough receive channels to sweep the screen in a single pass. Most touchscreen stack-ups are composed of sensor patterns under the cover glass in an array of ‘unit cells’ that run in the x and y direction, with x being transmit and y being receive or vice versa. The receive channel will collect the data and use analog to digital converters (ADC) to convert the change in mutual capacitance of each unit cell into digital data for the host to interpret where the finger touch coordinates are located. If the number of receive channels or ADCs are inadequate, then it will take multiple scans and more time to sweep the entire panel. This results in fewer samples that can be taken in a given time period, leading to an unsatisfactory user experience. A technique to help solve the processing problem is to add a bigger processor to the touch controller or offload some of the computing to the system’s main processing unit. This means sending capacitive data to the host side and running algorithms on the applications or graphics processor. One implementation would be to use the touchscreen controller to scan the sensor, search for first touch, and then transfer the image to the host processor. The host will then process the full array, filter noise, find touch coordinates and track finger IDs. This use of parallel processing allows the heavy number crunching to be done in the multi-GHz, multi-core processors that serve as a host for the touchscreen and display. Changing requirements for panel SNR SNR (signal to noise ratio) is the ratio of signal power to noise power, or, in other words, the ratio of useful information to false or irrelevant data. The sensor on a touchscreen panel acts as a large antenna (Figure 2) that is able to pick up system and environmental noise such as fluorescent lights, LCDs or chargers. Figure 2. Flatpanel screens act like antennae for noise signals
  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases Larger screens act as larger antennas so it is easier to pick up noise and saturate a receive channel. This can greatly affect touch performance by causing false touches, dropped touches, or a locked up touchscreen that will not report data at all. In order to overcome this interference, the touchscreen controller needs to be able to increase signal or decrease noise. Some of the primary ways to achieve better SNR include boosting the transmit voltage to increase signal, using hardware and digital filtering to decrease noise, or using frequency hopping to move away from noisy frequencies. SNR increases linearly, proportional with transmit voltage. Transmit voltage can be delivered from a transmit charge pump or VDDA driver. A charge pump is able to take a typical 2.7-3V power supply, found in most consumer electronic devices, and boost it up to a higher voltage. The problem with large screens is that a charge pump has limited drive strength capability for high capacitance panels. This means that an external pump or power supply must be added, which can increase cost and power consumption. If there is not enough signal, the other option is to minimize noise. The first line of defense is using filters to create a cleaner capacitive image. If this is not effective the second line of defense is using frequency hopping to find a frequency where there is less interference. As mentioned earlier, large panels have higher parasitic capacitance and resistance, affecting the RC time constant that results in a slower transmit frequency. A slower frequency means it is harder to scan the panel outside of the noise range. A higher transmit frequency gives the touch controller more room to move away from a noise source. A max transmit frequency of 350 kHz or greater is ideal, but a constant trade-off between SNR, refresh rate and power is required to optimize each device based on the customer’s objectives. An individual playing games on a desktop PC is more interested in responsiveness than power consumption, whereas portable devices need to account for power consumption to save on battery life. Bigger screens and power consumption As mobility becomes a bigger part of our lives, power consumption is a key factor in a consumer’s selection for portable electronic devices. Market surveys (Figure 3) show that a majority of users believe battery life is one of the most important features when purchasing a new portable device.
  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases Figure 3. Users want bigger screens AND longer battery life. The LCD is a big portion of the power draw from the overall system. Power usually scales with larger screens due to the increased LCD size. One way of maintaining battery life is to put a larger battery pack in the system. However, this increases the weight of the system and affects the user experience in terms of portability. Another alternative is to decrease performance by reducing refresh rate, reducing transmit voltage, disabling various digital filters, or using the lowest possible analog and digital power supplies. Again, these solutions negatively impact the user experience so they are not ideal options. As weight and performance are key factors to a good device, the best resolution for extending battery life is to optimize power draw for individual components in the system. From a touchscreen controller point of view, that means having flexible power management schemes for the device. The overall power consumption depends on the state or usage of the device (Figure 4). A smart and energy efficient touchscreen controller has multi-state power management in which each state has a unique scheme to lower power consumption, such as an active state, low power state, and deep sleep state. This is all managed by the touch controller’s configuration parameters.  The active state provides the fastest touch response time because the touchscreen is actively scanned to determine the presence of a touch and identify the coordinates.  The low power state is entered when no touch is detected after a certain time during the active state. This state further reduces power with corresponding increase in the response time. Any touch detected will automatically switch the device into active state.
  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases  The deep sleep state has the lowest power consumption. No scanning is performed and no touches are reported. An interrupt is required to wake up the touch screen controller and put it into active state. Figure 4. Power useage depends on LCD UI configuration state. The various power states are determined by the system environment. For example, if the screen hasn’t been touched in a while, the system will deactivate the user interface to save battery life. This is done by the host managing the components in the device, for example by turning off the LCD screen and placing the touch controller into a low-power state. When a touch is detected in the low-power state, the touchscreen controller will transition to active mode and continue scanning to determine the touch coordinates on the panel. If no touch is detected in the low- power mode, the host will drive the touch controller into deep sleep to conserve power. These dynamic power management states provide consumers flexibility between touch performance and power consumption for mobile devices on-the-go. Maintaining satisfactory user experience as touchscreens grow takes a system wide approach. Touchscreens are limited by physics, and if capacitive touch is to remain the technology of choice in mobile consumer electronic devices, then ingenuity and integration are key. New touchscreen materials are being developed to increase panel speeds, and host processing architectures are being defined to offload some of the heavy number crunching. Hardware and software improvements are constantly being made to increase signal strength while filtering out noise. A system wide approach to power consumption is being used to increase battery life. Making this all more cost effective is the next big challenge for designers. Todd Severson is a Product Marketing Engineer for TrueTouch touchscreen solutions at Cypress Semiconductor Corp. He has a BS degree in Engineering Management with a concentration in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy. You may reach him at todd.severson@cypress.com
  • http://www.embedded.com/design/power-optimization/4418629/2/Maintaining-good-user- experience-as-touch-screen-size-increases Henry Wong is a Senior Product Marketing Manager for TrueTouch touchscreen solutions at Cypress. He has a BS degree in Computer and Systems Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Henry has over 16 years of engineering and marketing experience in the semiconductor and consumer electronics industry worldwide. You may reach him at henry.wong@cypress.com