Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Larry Hinman - BW3108 - The impact and correlation of virtualization and data center facilities strategies
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Larry Hinman - BW3108 - The impact and correlation of virtualization and data center facilities strategies

437

Published on

HP Expert: Larry Hinman, presentation deck from HP Discover 2012 Las Vegas “The impact and correlation of virtualization and data center facilities strategies" …

HP Expert: Larry Hinman, presentation deck from HP Discover 2012 Las Vegas “The impact and correlation of virtualization and data center facilities strategies"

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
437
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Larry HinmanDirector/Strategist© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 2. BW3018Impacts of virtualization on data center frameworksLarry Hinman, Director/StrategistJune 2012© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 3. ―Consolidation using virtualization is here to stay. It works – it saves money by increasing computing throughput per watt of power consumed, freeing up floor space, providing head room for growth, facilitating load migration, and disaster recovery.‖ The Green Grid© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 4. What we are hearing from customers‖This is a reset – not business as usual‖ ―Current economic ―Each investment is now a ―I need a conditions and uncertainty strategic and accountable future-proof has dramatically purchase.‖ infrastructure.‖ impacted IT.‖ ―Our IT & Facilities have to be more agile.‖4 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 5. Business case for virtualization When you virtualize your infrastructure you put yourself on the path to two types of savings: capital cost savings and operational cost savings. Reduced capital costs Reduced operational costs • Server hardware • Power and cooling • Storage hardware • Server provisioning and • network hardware mgmt • Data center space • Disaster recovery • Data center power • Unplanned/planned • Data center cooling downtime5 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 6. Capital cost savings Capital cost savings come in the form of reduced expenses for IT hardware and data center facilities. Costs Savings How achieved Fewer servers due to typical consolidation ratios of Server hardware 50% or more 6:1 or more onto virtual machines Storage ~25% Increased storage utilization up to 80% on SANs hardware Network Up to 70% Fewer servers mean less switching & connectivity hardware Data center Fewer servers lead to less facilities space, power, Up to 60% space and cooling infrastructures6 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 7. Operational cost savings For virtualized environments, operational cost savings stem from reductions in power and cooling costs, management costs, and costs associated with server downtime. Cost Savings How achieved Power and Fewer servers due to consolidation ratios of $800+ per server virtualized cooling 6:1 or more on to virtual machines Server Fewer servers to provision, use of template- provisioning costs 10x in time based VMs and time Fewer servers to restore, faster restore of Disaster recovery Up to 75% virtual machines Unplanned Ability to move VMs between physical Up to 75% downtime machines while performing maintenance7 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 8. Virtualization Trade-Offs Upside Downside  Performance • Availability  Provisioning • Performance  Availability/Disaster Recovery • Compliance  Staffing • Problem isolation  Legacy support • Staffing  Development/Testing • Tools  Higher facilities utilization • Possible facilities power/cooling issues • Requires tight correlation between IT & Facilities strategies/plans.8 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 9. Data center facilities - virtualization trends &impacts• Much higher IT Infrastructure densities• Modular DC and raised floor areas, i.e. data halls and modularity within the data halls.• IT rack deployments within structured power ranges and deliberate power load densities, i.e. 4, 8, 12, or 16 kW racks within each Data Hall.• Highly scalable facility space/power/cooling plans and designs• Power loads at watts per sq/ft no longer applicable - Power loads engineered as watts per/rack Source Rack Power Load Density Rack power load 4-8 kW Low-nominal power load/density Rack power load 8-12 kW Medium-nominal power load/density Rack power load > 12 kW High-nominal power load/density9 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 10. Virtualization within the converged journey Converged cloud Converged Infrastructure Journey As data centers transform in response to the growing demand for cloud computing, mobility, big data, and social media, data center managers are simultaneously challenged with the desire to consolidate, simplify, and virtualize IT environments. Virtualization is front and center with today’s data center strategies.10 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 11. Physical impacts to the data centerTypical IT infrastructure deployments – 1U/2U pizza box/low density Non-virtualized • Low density IT deployment, (8) servers per/rack • Each rack = engineered for Network Area Storage Area 4kW total PWR capacity • (96) total server racks = 384 kW of available power load • 153.6 kw of additional total IT power capacity available; or 1.6 kW for each rack = Low density rack (i.e. </= 4kW11 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 12. Physical impacts to the data centerTypical IT infrastructure deployments - 1U/2U moderate density Non-virtualized • Higher density IT deployment, (16) servers per/rack Network Area Storage Area • Each rack = engineered for 4kW total PWR capacity • (96) total server racks = 384 kW of available power load • 153.6 kW total power deficiency to accommodate total IT power load, thus requiring the elimination of IT server racks for future deployments There is no power available for the remaining (32) = Moderate density rack (i.e. </= 4kW Racks.12 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 13. Physical impacts to the data centerTypical IT infrastructure deployments – 1U/2U moderate density Virtualized • Higher density IT deployment, (16) servers per/rack Network Area Storage Area • Each rack = engineered for 4kW Total PWR capacity • (96) Total server racks = 384 kW of available power load • 230.4 kW total power deficiency to accommodate total IT power load, thus requiring the elimination of IT server racks for future deployments There is no power available for the remaining (36) = Moderate density rack (i.e. </= 4kW Racks.13 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 14. Physical impacts to the data centerTypical virtualized IT infrastructure deployments (blade servers) Virtualized (blades) • Higher density IT deployment, (3) blade chassis per/rack • Each rack = engineered for 4kW Network Area Storage Area total PWR capacity • (96) Total server racks = 384 kW of available power load • 1.056 kW total power deficiency to accommodate total IT power load, thus requiring the elimination of IT server racks for future deployments There is no power available for the remaining (76) = High density rack (i.e. </= 4kW Racks.14 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 15. Physical impacts to the data centerIT deployment progression from low – high density15 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 16. Physical impacts to the data centerBest data center layout practices for mixed IT deployments Non-virtualized and/or virtualized • Plan for higher density IT deployments of a minimum of (16) Network Area Storage Area servers per/rack • Engineer each rack for 8kW of total rack PWR capacity • Accommodates mixed IT infrastructure deployments, i.e. 4kW, 6kW, 8kW, or 12kW deployments • (2) Low density racks @ 4kW each • (4) Moderate density racks @ 8kW each • (2) High density racks @ 12kW each • Average 8kW for each rack Accommodates a mix of 4kW, 8kW, and = Mixed density racks (i.e. 4kW, 8kW, 12kW 12kW IT infrastructure deployments16 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 17. Physical impacts to the data centerBest data center layout practices for blade server IT deployments Non-virtualized and/or virtualized blade environments • Plan for contained high density IT Network Area Storage Area blade deployments • (3) chassis per/rack(min) • 15kW of power for each rack (min) • Modular containments of 4, 8, 12, or 16 blade racks • Contained hot isles Accommodates a highly dense blade server = High density rack (i.e. </= 4kW environment17 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 18. The basis for converged data centerframeworks Architecture Architecture Infrastructure Infrastructure Facilities Facilities Strategy18 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 19. SummaryKey take-aways• Integrate applications, infrastructure, and facilities strategies, plans, designs, and deployments as an overall ―standardized‖ framework;• Develop a set of standards that depicts an overall “basis of design” within the three (3) core areas defined above;• Get everyone synchronized and drinking from the same cup, i.e. executive management, IT, facilities, and other stakeholders.19 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 20. Download Now Get the Mobile App Download content from this session with the free Mobile App. Text the word “Discover” to 474747 or m.hp.com/events20 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 21. Find out more Attend these sessions Visit these demosTuesday Wednesday Thursday • Rack and Power Innovations• 1:30 PM RT2835 • 11:15 AM TB2192 • 10:00 AM CDA3243 (intelligent infrastructure and Whats keeping you from Enterprise Group and HP Labs Rack to the future: Can HVDC). implementing green IT? present: next generation data liquid-cooling really lower centers—weve come a long your data center TCO? • Modular data center solutions• 2:45 PM TW2834 way, baby! from HP Energy and sustainability • 11:15 AM TB2742 management workshop: • 01:30 PM BW3018 End-to-end POD • Net Zero Energy Data Center Data center floor to facilities The impact and correlation of deployments: fact or fiction? Demo management virtualization and data center facilities strategies • 1:30 PM TB2193 • Energy Sustainability• 4:00 PM BB2104 Data center infrastructure Management Demo The energy efficient data • 2:45 PM TB2194 management: HPs approach center Key trends: how IT innovation to capacity planning and • HP Critical Facility Services: is changing the data center power Enabling future IT technologies • 04:00 PM TB2195 Power play: HP and ABB Your feedback is important to us. Please take a few minutes to complete the session21 survey.2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. © Copyright
  • 22. Thank you© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 23. Back-up slides© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 24. Business case for virtualization When you virtualize your infrastructure you put yourself on the path to two types of savings: capital cost savings and operational cost savings. Reduced capital costs Reduced operational • Server hardware costs and cooling • Power • Storage hardware • Server provisioning and • network hardware mgmt • Data center space • Disaster recovery • Data center power • Unplanned/planned • Data center cooling downtime 24 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 25. Capital cost savings Capital cost savings come in the form of reduced expenses for IT hardware and data center facilities.Costs Savings How achieved Fewer servers due to typical consolidation ratios ofServer hardware 50% or more 6:1 or more onto virtual machinesStorage ~25% Increased storage utilization up to 80% on SANshardwareNetwork Up to 70% Fewer servers mean less switching & connectivityhardwareData center Fewer servers lead to less facilities space, power, Up to 60%space and cooling infrastructures 25 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 26. Operational cost savings For virtualized environments, operational cost savings stem from reductions in power and cooling costs, management costs, and costs associated with server downtime. Cost Savings How achieved Power and Fewer servers due to consolidation ratios of $800+ per server virtualized cooling 6:1 or more on to virtual machines Server Fewer servers to provision, use of template- provisioning costs 10x in time based VMs and time Fewer servers to restore, faster restore of Disaster recovery Up to 75% virtual machines Unplanned Ability to move VMs between physical Up to 75% downtime machines while performing maintenance 26 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 27. Virtualization Trade-Offs Upside Downside  Performance • Availability  Provisioning • Performance  Availability/Disaster Recovery • Compliance  Staffing • Problem isolation  Legacy support • Staffing  Development/Testing • Tools  Higher facilities utilization • Possible facilities power/cooling issues • Requires tight correlation between IT & Facilities strategies/plans.27 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
  • 28. Data center facilities - virtualization trends &impacts• Much higher IT Infrastructure densities• Modular DC and raised floor areas, i.e. data halls and modularity within the data halls.• IT rack deployments within structured power ranges and deliberate power load densities, i.e. 4, 8, 12, or 16 kW racks within each Data Hall.• Highly scalable facility space/power/cooling plans and designs• Power loads at watts per sq/ft no longer applicable - Power loads engineered as watts per/rack Source Rack Power Load Density Rack power load 4-8 kW Low-nominal power load/density Rack power load 8-12 kW Medium-nominal power load/density Rack power load > 12 kW High-nominal power load/density28 © Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.

×