Using Mobile Phones to Deliver Person-centred Population Health Prograames - Presentation Transcript
Dr Robyn Whittaker Clinical Trials Research Unit Using mobile phones to deliver person-centred population health programmes
Mobile phones in health
Appointment reminders
Reporting test results
Text medication reminders
Support self-management
Self-testing & adjustment medications
Telemedicine
Remote sensors
Access to personal health information
Population health programmes
Stand-alone
Person-centred/individualised
But at less cost
With the reach of mass media
Behaviour change support to reduce the risk of disease
Examples
Txt messaging stop smoking support (00/01)
Video messaging stop smoking support (06/09)
Multimedia messaging depression prevention
(2008/11)
STOMP programme
Voice or web registration
smoking history, triggers etc
0 weeks
Quit Day
free text messaging begins
1-3 weeks Daily text message countdown + action plan Quit calendar web page Personalised text message tips Introduction to CellPall (“quit buddy”) Text your friends “ TXT crave” 4 personalised text message tips per day Quiz or poll eg “top 5 reasons to quit” Web page Quit Meter (eg $ saved), profiles Target Date Quit Relapse 6 weeks 26 weeks
Why mobile phones?
Wide reach - more mobile phone accounts than people
Delivery via method that is already integrated into daily life
Always with people regardless of location
Less ‘digital divide’ than with other technological methods
Household Economic Survey
Less socio-economic gradient than access to internet
ACNielsen Survey 04
No difference between Maori & non-Maori % using mobile phones
Regular txt messaging higher in Maori and Pacific than others
STUB IT participants 24% Maori 10% Asian 7.5% Pacific
STOMP: % quit at 6 weeks Age Gender Ethnicity Income Region
Overall relative risk 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.5, p <0.0001
Functionality meets theory
Benefits/barriers
Outcome expectations
Self-efficacy
Positive reinforcement
Observational learning
Preparation cues/triggers
Social support
State behavioural intentions
Tailoring
Engagement
Functionality meets theory
Benefits/barriers
Outcome expectations
Self-efficacy
Positive reinforcement
Observational learning
Preparation cues/triggers
Social support
State behavioural intentions
Tailoring
Engagement
Provide information
Proactive & timely messages
Video messaging
Ask for help on demand
Social network/contacts
Long-term
Direct & individual
Interactive
Proactive & timely
STUB IT
select two message time periods
automatically sends out randomly within those time periods
e.g. first cigarette in the morning, lunch break, after work
“ Good reminders of what I’m trying to do”
Ask for help when/where needed
Text ‘CRAVE’
Get immediate txt or video in response
Context-specific (drinking, stressed, boredom)
Text RELAPSE
Get 3 messages over next 2 hours
Motivation to keep going
Go to website & increase messages
Provide observational learning
Role models
‘ Ordinary’ kiwis going through quitting or same issues as them
Talk about what difficulties they have experienced & what they did to get through it or how they faced it
Feel good cos got through another day/ sorted a problem
Promote social support
STOMP: Txting friends & family on quit day in order to get messages of support
STOMP: Quit buddy
What they liked about STUB IT
“ The constant/daily support”
“ Felt like I was quitting as a group”
“ Real people doing it”
“ That people were sharing their own experiences so I was not feeling alone”
Provide long-term support
MEMO:
Mobile website for summary info & how to get help out to 12 months
Tailored
Select Quit Date
Select role model or topics of interest
Select appropriate time periods
Use nickname
Relapse programme
Provide interactivity
Data collection questions
How many cigs have u smkd in past 7 days?
CRAVE
Polls & surveys in STOMP
How long does it take nicotine 2 leave yr body? 2hrs, 2days or 2 wks
Submit video messages in STUB IT
Participants website
Results - STOMP
1705 participant RCTrial
Doubled short-term quit rates
28% cf. 13% (RR2.20, 95% CI 1.79-2.70)
Equally effective for all sub-groups
As effective for Māori as non-Māori
Results – STUB IT
Failed to recruit sufficient participants to show statistically significant difference
36.7% have not gone back to daily smoking at 6 mths cf.25.8%
Why?
Readiness to quit of target popn
‘ Ahead of the curve’ wrt mobile technology
Competition/Incentives/Low coverage
Acknowledgements
Prof A.Rodgers, Dr S.Merry, RB.Lin,M.Wills, M.Jones, T.Corbett, Dr D.Bramley, Dr T.Riddell, Dr S.Denny, R.Maddison, C.Bullen, H.MacRobbie, P.Salmon, V.Parag, Dr K.Stasiak, M.Shepherd, Dr H.McDowell, I.Doherty, Dr S.Ameratunga
0 comments
Post a comment