Text Messaging - Benefits for Patient and Health Provider - Presentation Transcript
Text Messaging Benefits for Patient & Health Provider
Did Not Attends (DNA’s)
Wasted or underutilised resources
Patients don’t receive care that may improve quality of life
May present later with worse problems requiring more resources than previously
Efficiency & cost
More cell phones than people in NZ
Text costs approx half a stamp or call to mobile
Low human resource cost as many done at once
Text messaging pilots
Two District Health Boards – Counties Manukau & Bay of Plenty
Goal was to reduce DNAs
Analysis of DNA rates before & after texting
Analysis included ethnicity in Counties Manukau
Counties Manukau DHB
DNA rate constant at 12% for some time
Research showed “forgot appointment” major reason given for DNA
Time gap between other reminder methods – letters & phone calls – and appointment
Counties Manukau DHB
Two texts sent
1st text – day before Outbound Callers attempt contact
2nd text – as close as possible to appointment
Counties Manukau DHB
Extracts from Patient Management System uploaded to Dialhog website
1st text – goal to reduce need for reminder phone call & therefore reduce expenses
2nd text – different timings for morning & afternoon appointments to increase immediacy
Counties Manukau DHB
Text messages generally from family & friends so an opportunity & potential hazard
Text should be personalised with information relevant to the particular patient
Text replies routed as emails to relevant booking area for follow up
Content easily changed e.g. H1N1
Counties Manukau DHB
Manukau SuperClinic rollout started March 07 and was completed mid June 07
DNA rate in initial area dropped from 13% to 11% (15% reduction)
40% of patient records had cellphone numbers recorded in any of three phone fields
Counties Manukau DHB Results
Counties Manukau DHB Analysis of Results
17% reduction in overall DNA rate all from 50% of patients who received texts
Maori DNA rate reduction 10% above average
Patient reminded by text 33% less likely to DNA
6500 patients attended who wouldn’t have
Bay of Plenty DHB
Utilise most of the Counties Manukau DHB strategy
Change to reflect difference in their Call Centre system
1 st text only to unconfirmed patients
No significant changes to text content
Bay of Plenty DHB
Pilot started in November 08 ran till end Mar 09
Clinics added during period, particularly March
Successful results have meant subsequent expansion of program
Bay of Plenty DHB
Only clinics in texting program at end Mar available to work with for analysis
Two comparisons decided on
Jan – Mar 08 compared with Jan – Mar 09
Mar 08 compared with Mar 09
Bay of Plenty DHB Results Clinics using texts at Mar 09 Clinics NOT using texts at Mar 09 Jan 08 - Mar 08 11.19% 5.72% Jan 09 - Mar 09 9.57% 6.27% Change -14.48% + 9.62% Mar 08 12.03% 5.76% Mar 09 8.85% 6.47% Change -26.4% + 12.3%
Bay of Plenty DHB analysis of results
44% of patient records with cell phones. 38% received text
Patient texted 38% to 69% less likely to DNA
In Mar 09 there were 510 DNAs from 5764 appointments in texted clinics
Would have been 693 DNAs based on Mar 08
Return on investment
Appts texted clinics Mar 09 5254
DNA’s 510
Expected DNA’s (Mar 08%) 708
Extra attendees 198
Value @ $100 per appointment $20,000
Texting cost in March $1200
$1 spent on texting = $16 savings
Patient Acceptance “Recently you recvd a txt reminder about appt at {LOCATION} Hospital. Plse text bk YES if you liked reminder txt, NO if you didn't. Any other comments. Thanx “ Texts sent Response rate Approve Disapprove Counties Manukau DHB 361 46% 99% 1% Bay of Plenty DHB 160 55% 99% 1%
Patient Acceptance BOP Comments
“ Yes thanks” or “Yes thank you” (5 times)
“ Yes it’s a great idea” (4 times)
“ Yes it was good” (2 times)
“ Yes! What a great service. The reminder text was much appreciated. Thank you!!”
“ Yes very good. Makes life easy”
“ Yes I thought it was very helpful we all lead busy lives and a little reminder never hurts”
“ Yes excellent service thanks”
Patient Acceptance Survey Analysis
50% response = high level of engagement
Surveys confirm each other & very high level of patient acceptance
Patients see texting as valuable self-management tool
Patients see texting as the friendly personal face of the Health Provider
Information Security
All communication & transmission encrypted using https
All data stored in encrypted databases in physically highly secure premises
Different views on text content, privacy requirements and retention periods
Different text content choices
No names other identifiers or replies
*SCREENING APPT REMINDER* - {Appt Date} @ {Appt Time} at {Location}. To change, ph 0800 000 000. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS TXT.
Names NHI Numbers & replies
{Title} {LastName} {NHI-NO} reminding you of appt at {LOCATION} {APPT-TIME} {APPT-DAY} {APPT-DATE}. Plse reply or ph 222 1234 if you cannot attend
Letter / text security comparison
Letters & texts can go to a wrong or an old address
Letters & texts can be read by others if left unattended
Texts may be marginally more secure as they do not generally get delivered to a shared space
Scalability
Some scalability issues with database searches encountered as service expanded at Counties Manukau
User setting allows time period to be specified
Other issues addressed by providing separate database and functional areas for some service areas
Current customers include
Counties Manukau DHB
Bay of Plenty DHB
Southland DHB
Capital & Coast DHB
Waitemata DHB
BreastScreen Auckland
BreastScreen South
BreastScreen Counties Manukau
BreastScreen Waitemata/ Northland
Other health users
Text reminders work as effectively for small as well as large providers
0 comments
Post a comment