HMSC - A Health Management System Collaborative - Presentation Transcript
THE H EALTH M ANAGEMENT S YSTEM C OLLABORATIVE Collaborating for the Nation’s Health … the 7 (10) DHBs
What this is not about …
Justifying an EHR
A heavy technical presentation
Reiterating the issues experienced in other places
The view from a CEO of a DHB
What we’ve done to date
What this is about …
Health is Facing Unprecedented Issues
Significant increase in acutes
Significant increase in chronic conditions
Workface issues
16000-20000 new nurses by 2025
GP shortages
Medical staff shortages
Increasing sub-specialisation
Issues for Health
Patient safety and care
Ageing population
Ageing staff
Pace of clinical technology advance
Increasing public expectation and political focus
Financial pressures
Issues for Health “ New Zealand is striving to … more efficient management of chronic conditions, the big clinical challenge of an ageing society …” “ ... to rationalise the hospital sector to assure its clinical viability” “… a need to improve efficiency incentives and information” “ hospital spending could be cut further, perhaps dramatically, by greater use of community services” “ Another concern is the sustainability of the health care service delivery model in the face of rising demands and looming health workforce shortages ” (OECD Economic Surveys : New Zealand 2009)
Issues for Health “ It is becoming generally accepted that continuing to deliver health care to New Zealanders using today’s model of care will, at best, become increasingly challenging and may, in due course, cease to be viable” (National Institute of Health Innovation 2008) “ We are reaching the limits of what we can achieve for chronic condition outcomes with a fragmented system” (NZ Ministry of Health 2008)
… But there are some potential glimmers of hope:
Underutilised skills and resources
GPs, community pharmacists, nurse practitioners
community providers
Devolution of secondary services to primary care
Long term approach to workforce issues – many and varied
“ The need for innovation in health care” (Ryall 2008)
No Easy Answers
No Easy Answers “ When physicians use health information technology to its full potential, the result is fewer deaths, fewer complications, and lower health care costs” (Amarasingham, M.D; Powe, M.D)
And very few of which can be enabled by current ICT systems All of which represent major service transformation
“ ICT diffusion could help the clinical revolution by: i) managing fast-changing medical best practice in a centralised database made available to all doctors..” ii) allowing shared electronic records of patient information, so as to allow new models of patient-centred delivery that minimise error and duplication” (OECD Economic Surveys : New Zealand 2009)
There is an even bigger picture Health is a key component of individual, societal and national success “ Health costs will impact national competitiveness” (OECD) The challenge for health is no less than national success An efficient and effective ability to exchange of information is only a part of the answer – but it is an essential part
Health Management System Collaborative Vision is to establish an individual-centric health information management service by “ wrapping the Health Management System around the individual” ...... rather than the provider.
“ Individual decision making by 21 DHBs may be too fragmented to make rational and coherent capital allocation plans; more regional and national collaboration is called for.” (OECD Economic Surveys : New Zealand 2009)
HMSC Vision - Key Attributes
The system will:
be supportive of users & evidence based
enable vastly improved shared access to an individual’s health information by all the clinicians involved in their care as well as by the individuals themselves.
allow people to be fully informed about their health & have improved ownership & participation in their own care
significantly expand the traditional view of a Patient Administration System (PAS) and Clinical Support Systems to be more integrated, more interactive, wider in scope and much richer in functionality
make the patient electronic record easily available across the continuum of care .
A major transformation… source: MoH
HMS must enable the transformation Pre-Requisites Current
Legacy systems
High cost for integration
Low level of integration between primary and secondary
Lack of standardisation
Provider focused – transactional episodes of care
Multiple sources of “same” information
Future
Single integrated health record
Patients access & contribute to their record
Role based access for health professionals
Information gathered as an integrated part of the care process
Capability for electronic communication between individuals & clinicians
Standardised care pathways & standardised information
Self care strongly supported by system & professionals
Clinician led
Focus on Primary, Community and individual
End to end process
Optimum total cost of ownership
Commitment to change (policy & service delivery)
Sufficient resources
Population view for planning and decision making
HMSC - Procurement Drivers * - MidCentral, Wairarapa & Whanganui Time Frame Driver 2007/08 NMDHB & SCDHB - scope was for wider patient-centric vision than “traditional” hospital provider based PMS. Reluctance to “catch up to the back of the pack”. Issued RFI 2008 Central Region DHBs* Group – issued same RFI with same patient-centric vision (and had agreed on a common hosting approach.) 2008 NDHB commences planning for replacement of PMS and achieving wider vision for Northland. Dec 2008 HMSC formed, creating scale needed to attract new solutions / vendor thinking. Aggressive timeline for RFI and RFP
RFI Process: Evaluation & Education Time Frame Activity Dec 2008 Three Auckland DHBs express interest, request reference in RFI document. RFI for the 7, potentially 10 - issued. Represents ≡ 60% of population. Jan – Feb 2009 Initial emphasis - Evaluating responses to meet aggressive timeline March 2009+
Primary emphasis now on “being informed”, i.e.
harvesting salient points from the responses
learning through evaluation and socialising the results
developing preferences re: services, potential solution and implementation
planning the procurement roadmap as an enablement stream
clinical engagement
Strong Clinical Engagement
Has been - and will be - a cornerstone of this activity:
RFI evaluation teams range in size from 9 to 30. In total there are 111 evaluators - 56% are health professionals. Evaluator Type No. of Evaluators % of all evaluators
6 5% DHB Health Professionals 48 43% All Health Professionals 62 56%
Strong Media & Industry Interest IT takes a back seat in shared health system evaluation Computerworld, 9 Apr 2009 DHB CEO backs collaboration on health software Computerworld, 3 Apr 2009 Better health services the goal The Nelson Mail, 7 Mar 2009 Health Collaborative reassures local vendors Computerworld, 7 Mar 2009 Patients to add to own health records Dominion Post, 3 Mar 2009 DHBs to develop shared records NZ Doctor, 25 Feb 2009 Health IT collaboration open to new members Computerworld, 21 Jan 2009
Want to Emphasise…
Engagement and participation of the Ministry
Through concept stages
Representation on
Project Governance Group
Project Operational Steering Committee
Observer/ex officio status
Alignment
“ The approach is consistent and complementary with Ministry thinking” (Alan Hesketh DDG Information MoH)
Want to Emphasise…
No predetermination of solution
architecture
vendor
software
country of origin
Genuine process to test market and invite solutions to the Collaborative’s needs
Challenges
Are not technical, nor a function of size
… for 4.5 million people - about the size of Manchester, or half the size of a large American HMO
Are societal, ethical, professionally behavioural
Are daunting, but not impossible
Challenges - Privacy Clearly still to be resolved However… Much of the necessary exchange happens now, with paper or fax based records NZ has good privacy laws in place – High principle, low regulation Recognises role of technology in information availability and that controlled sharing is critical to the economy
Challenges - Privacy
Much to learn from the “good” places - Canada “Privacy by Design”
Privacy is an important consideration – it should not be seen as a barrier or an excuse to stay frozen in immobility
Proceed carefully – but proceed
Challenges Existing New Zealand vendors feel threatened - or at least challenged No apology for that … NZ Health should not be behind the rest of the world Might have misread their customer’s need and vision? Instead - relish the opportunity… If vendors feel challenged, imagine what it feels like from here!
Instead of being challenged, we should seize an opportunity - for New Zealand, for the sector, for the vendors …but most of all for the health of the people of New Zealand, and the potential contribution to the country’s prosperity
Seven (ten) DHBs have recognised a need, and are collaborating to find the way forward
This is unique in the history of ICT in New Zealand Health
The drivers are compelling
The challenges are significant
In reality … there is no choice
Thank you
HMSC Governance Structure Chair – John Peters CEOs – Karen Roach, Julie Patterson, David Meates, Chris Fleming, Joy Cooper (Tracy Adamson), Stuart Wilson (for Murrray Georgel) Clinicians – CMAs Nigel Miller (CDHB) & Andre Nel (NMDHB) & Martin Wilson (Pegasus & CDHB) MoH – Alan Hesketh CIO – Nick Lanigan (NMDHB) Simpl – Bennett Medary OSC Chair - TBA
0 comments
Post a comment