Diagnosis of New Onset Vocal Cord Paralysis Using Acoustic Analysis

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Diagnosis of New Onset Vocal Cord Paralysis Using Acoustic Analysis - Presentation Transcript

    1. Diagnosis of New Onset Vocal Cord Paralysis Using Acoustic Analysis
      • Yu Wei
      • Hamid GholamHosseini
      • Andrew Cameron
      • Michael J Harrison
      • Ahmed Al-Jumaily
    2.  
    3. The clinical challenge
    4.  
    5. Clinical significance
      • Hoarse, raspy voice
      • Inability to swallow safely
      • Inability to cough
    6. A variety of diagnostic solutions….
      • Can we apply acoustic analysis to diagnose new onset vocal cord paralysis??
    7. But hasn’t this been done before?
    8. Hoarseness diagram
      • A means of detecting and classifying pathological voices based on
      • Glottal to Noise Excitation Ratio
      • Period Perturbation Quotient
      • Energy Perturbation Quotient
      • Mean Waveform Matching Coefficient
    9. So why did we think we could do any better?
      • Not validated as a screening tool
      • Non-specific
      • Developed from databases of pathological voices
    10.  
    11.  
    12. So why did we think we could do any better?
      • Specific to one vocal cord pathology
      • Data collected from patients before and after development of vocal cord pathology.
    13. Methods
      • Data collected from 33 patients.
      • Vocal sampling pre and post-operatively.
      • Postoperatively, patients were classified into two groups based on patient and physician perceptions
        • hoarse
        • Non-hoarse
      • Data sets were interrogated to develop discriminatory algorithm
    14. Analysis
      • Following preliminary analysis, sustained ‘eee’ data point selected as most discriminatory.
      • Wavelet packet analysis was performed to characterise potential discriminatory features
      • A Support Vector Machine was used to identify characterising features of the hoarse group.
      • Discriminatory efficacy was compared with the Hoarseness Diagram
    15. Results – Hoarseness diagram
    16. Results – experimental algorithm Classification accuracy Applying algorithm to post-operative signals only 82.5% Applying algorithm to pre and postoperative signals of patients who developed hoarseness 93.5%
    17. Conclusion
      • We have successfully identified features on acoustic analysis which are associated with recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.
    18. Limitations of this research
      • American accents only!
      • Algorithm tested against clinician perception – not the ‘gold standard’ test
      • larger data sets will be required to comment on the sensitivity and specificity of our algorithm as a diagnostic test
    19. Where to next??
      • Test our algorithm by adding further patients
      • Test our algorithm against the ‘gold standard’ – direct visualisation of the vocal cords.
      • Improve the quality of our data collection by having patients make highly discriminatory sounds.
    20.  

    + HINZHINZ, 1 month ago

    custom

    98 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Andrew Cameron
    Middlemore Hospital
    www.middlemore more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 98
      • 98 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags