Communication For Social Change

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

3 comments

Comments 1 - 3 of 3 previous next Post a comment

  • + carolavendano carolavendano 4 months ago
    Very good!! I love it! Do you have some more texts about this subject to share with us?
  • + rencejean10 rencejean10 4 months ago
    i need more on social changes in Netherlands if you have kindly send on my
    email rencejean10@yahoo.com tnx....
  • + guest81493c5 guest81493c5 8 months ago
    thank you for communication-for-social-change
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

21 Favorites & 1 Group

Communication For Social Change - Presentation Transcript

  1. Communication for Social Change A key to participatory development
  2. It is easy to write recipes, but it´s difficult to communicate with people Franz Kafka  
  3. Purpose of this presentation
    • Community radio is part of a larger conceptual framework: communication for development and social change
    • It emerges from social struggles and resistance (Bolivia, Colombia 50’s, France & Italy 70’s, South Africa 80’s, Philippines, Indonesia 90’s)
    • Important to understand the general context of communication applied to development
    • Schematic, for the purpose of establishing differences between trends and models
    • Presentation based on discussions within RF working group & papers by Waisbord and Morris
  4. A look back in history…
  5. Post World War II context
    • Major powers compete to gain control of regions in the developing world
    • Liberation struggles & decolonisation process in Africa, Asia and Latin America
    • The chessboard: domination by the force of weapons or through co-operation and debt?
    • New development paradigms are born – the Marshall Plan
    • Independences negotiated in Africa
    • Rationalisation of war industry
  6. Development perspectives
    • Paternalistic vision: to level the differences between rich and poor countries
    • Rise the income of poor rural families
    • Expand consumer markets towards the south
    • Technologies seen as the panacea
    • Development understood as increased productivity & trade
    • Cold War: information & manipulation
  7. Fifty years later…
  8. The cemetery of development
    • Half century of missed opportunities:
    • Water pumps without water
    • Roads that lead nowhere
    • Hospitals without health staff
    • Schools without teachers & books
    • Dusty video & radio equipment in state media
    • Backyards full of rusty donated vehicles
    • Immunisation rates down, HIV/AIDS up
    • White elephants in Africa, Asia and Latin America
  9. Who’s fault?
    • Government corruption
    • Vertical planning from development agencies
    • No dialogue with beneficiaries
    • Communication absent in the process
    • Knowledge arrogance
    • Weak community organization
    • Illegitimate local leadership
    • Submissive relations with power structures
    • No sense of ownership
    • No capacity to voice community views
    Planners Community
  10. The story of a community dream What the donor thought the community wanted... How it was described in the project document… What the consultant recommended… How programme implementers designed it… The way it was installed in the community… What the community really wanted but was not able to communicate…
  11. Paradigms (1950-2000)
    • Based on Modernisation Theories ( diffusion ):
      • Diffusion of innovations
      • Social marketing
      • Health promotion
      • Edutainment (education & entertainment)
    • Based on Dependency Theories ( participation ):
      • Development communication
      • Alternative, horizontal, dialogic
      • Participatory communication
      • Communication for social change
  12. I. Modernisation theories
    • “ Deficit of information” causes poverty
    • Traditional cultures, a barrier for modernisation & development
    • One only model of development: copy industrialised nations
    • Selling the image of international co-operation to developing countries
    • Impressive growth & expansion of communications technologies: radio, TV
  13. Diffusion of innovations
    • “ Poor lack of knowledge” - Knowledge viewed as a exclusive privilege of the North
    • Transfer of knowledge to change behaviour
    • Adoption of western innovations & transfer of media technology and models
    • Communication models alien to local needs: awareness, interest, decision, trial, adoption
    • Decision-making made elsewhere by donors & funding agencies
    • Intensive involvement of government media
  14. Social marketing
    • Propaganda-based techniques from WWII & commercial advertising models
    • Advertising jargon: “clients”, “consumers”, “Reduce distance between consumer & product”
    • Military jargon: “targets”, “campaign” , “tactics”
    • Influence of behavioural change theories
    • Intensive use of mass media & add agencies
    • Ignorance of local cultural context
    • Lack of analysis of structural causes
    • Biased self-promoting quantitative evaluations
  15. Health promotion
    • Established from health services perspective: “the doctor knows better” - prescriptive
    • Believes individual behaviour responsible for health problems - Blames the victim
    • Promotes official public health policies
    • Ignores political, cultural & social conditions
    • Often lacks of communication expertise
  16. Education & entertainment
    • “ Edutainment ”, an improved version of IEC
    • More emphasis on educational process
    • Mix of mass media & interpersonal communication: media “not the silver bullet”
    • Creativity: TV & radio dramas, songs, etc
    • Direct link with health services
    • Promote women & youth local organisations
    • Criticism: How much education and how much entertainment? – Long-term impact?
  17. II. Dependency theories
    • Growth of social & political movements in Africa, Asia, Latin America
    • Analysis of structural causes (political, economic, social) of underdevelopment
    • Oppose to neo-colonial strategies
    • Builds alliances between workers, peasants, intellectuals of North & South
    • Social participation & organisation is key
    • Criticism of media dependency & diffusion
  18. Development communication
    • Works with community & involves people
    • Communication to promote participation
    • Promoted by FAO in rural areas in the 70’s
    • Specific analysis of local problems
    • Increased attention to culture & identity
    • Relate to local organisations & co-operatives
    • Training of change agents – “extension workers”
    • Specificity vs. massive use of media
    • Remained institutional & programme-linked model
  19. Alternative, dialogic, horizontal
    • Born from struggle against dictatorships
    • Rejection of hegemonic mass media - MacBride
    • Interpersonal, horizontal & dialogic (Freire)
    • Use of appropriate low-cost media tools
    • Mushrooming of grassroots' experiences - radio
    • Demystification of technology tools
    • Appropriation of media tools & contents
    • Development of critical sense towards media
    • Criticism: isolated, small, no impact, no evaluation
  20. Participatory communication
    • Increased involvement of social & community organisations
    • Media & contents decided democratically within the community
    • Social empowerment, networking & organisation objectives
    • The communication process is more important than the end products
    • Ownership of media tools
  21. Communication for Social Change
    • Concept articulated by RF , April 1997
    • Recovers lessons learned & experiences from developing countries
    • Process of dialogue and debate, based on tolerance, respect, equity, social justice & active participation of all stakeholders
    • Rejects hierarchic & mass media intensive models of communication
    • Aims community empowerment & local decision-making process
  22. Main differences
    • Structural causes
    • Horizontal
    • “ Concientisation”
    • Social change
    • Active & critical
    • Agents of change
    • Dialogue & debate
    • Specific , diverse
    • Long-term / process
    • Behavioural causes
    • Vertical
    • Persuasion
    • Individual change
    • Passive & “bancaria”
    • Objects of change
    • Massive diffusion
    • General assumptions
    • Short-term / messages
    Participatory model Hierarchic model
  23. Diffusion model
    • Problem: lack of information & knowledge
    • Solution: knowledge -> attitudes -> practice
    • Conceptual framework: modernization through diffusion of innovations
    • Definition of communication: information transfer – vertical
    • Methods of communication: information dissemination – mass media
    • Goal: outcome oriented – behaviour change
    • Types of interventions: Social Marketing, Edutainment (entertainment-education)
  24. Participatory model
    • Problem: structural inequalities
    • Solution: participation -> community empowerment
    • Conceptual Framework: dependency, social mobilisation
    • Definition of communication: information exchange –horizontal dialogue – respect knowledge & culture
    • Methods of development communication: grassroots participation – community interaction
    • Goal: process oriented – social change
    • Types of interventions: Participatory Action Research (PAR), Rapid Participatory Appraisal (RPA), development, alternative, participatory, dialogic communication
  25. Horizontal Vs. Vertical
    • People are dynamic communicators participating in social change, with a critical approach to information
    • People perceived as mere passive receivers of information and instructions, decisions made by others
  26. Process Vs. Campaign
    • People taking in hand their own future through a process of democratic participation in communication planning
    • Campaigns are expensive and not sustainable, they mobilise but they do not build capacity at the community level
  27. Long-Term Vs. Short-Term
    • Communication and development, are long-term processes which need time to be assumed and appropriated by people
    • ‘ Annual report’ donor driven projects do not acknowledge the cultural realities and often oversize results & outputs
  28. Collective Vs. Individual
    • Communities act collectively in the interest of the majority, avoiding the risk of loosing power to a few
    • People targeted individually are detached from their community and from their communal forms of decision-making
  29. With… Vs. For…
    • Researching, designing, disseminating messages with the community & by the people, to establish dialogue and debate
    • Designing, pre-testing, delivering, evaluating messages to or for… remains external to communities
  30. Specific Vs. Massive
    • Communication process & messages should specifically adapt to each social group in terms of content, language & media
    • Using the same mass media, messages & strategies in diverse cultural contexts, and for different social sectors of society
  31. People needs Vs. Donor musts
    • Community based research to identify, define & discriminate -with the people- the felt needs and the real needs
    • Communication projects on donor-driven needs: privatisation, birth control (family planning), extensive farming
  32. Ownership Vs. Access
    • Ownership of media and communication tools provides voice and opportunity with no restriction
    • Access to information channels is a step forward, though often controlled and regulated by others
  33. Consciousness Vs. Persuasion
    • A process of bring up consciousness and deep understanding about social reality, problems, and solutions
    • Persuasion to change behaviour and perform acts on specific issues is only sustainable with permanent stimulus & funds
  34. CFSC – main principles
    • [1] Sustainability of social changes is certain when individuals & communities affected become owners of the communicational process & contents
    • [2] CFSC, horizontal & participatory, aims to strengthen community links and amplify the voices of the poorest; based on the notion of the appropriation of the communicational process and the development of local contents
  35. CFSC – main principles …
    • [3] Communities should be the agents of their own social change and master the communication process
    • [4] Emphasis on promoting dialogue, debate & negotiation, building alliances; rather than persuasion, pure transfer of information & external knowledge
  36. CFSC – main principles …
    • [5] The CFSC process should go beyond individual behaviours and take into consideration social norms, current policies, local culture & tradition, and the general context of development
    • [6] Dialogue & participation are key to strengthen cultural identity, trust, commitment, ownership of ideas & expressions, and community organisation
  37. CFSC – main principles …
    • [7] CFSC rejects the linear model of transmission of information from a central sender towards a individual receiver, and promotes a circular process of interactions where knowledge is shared and collective action is taken
  38. Communication resources The up-side down pyramid community organisations media D $ 1,000.000.000 $ 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000.000
  39. $ Communication resources The pyramid community organisations media D
    • If community media is the answer, what is the question?
    Alfred E. Opubor
  40. A question of power
    • Communication for Social Change contributes to put the decision-making about development in the hands of the people
    • It consolidates the capability of communities to confront their own ideas about development with planners
    • Within the community itself it favours the strengthening of democratic process
  41. A question of identity
    • Participatory communication contributes to install cultural pride and self-esteem
    • It reinforces the social tissue through the strengthening of indigenous & local forms of organisation
    • It protects traditions and cultural values, while being able to incorporate new elements
  42. Steve Biko
    • It is through the evolution of our own genuine culture that our identity can be fully discovered.
  43. Five conditions for CFSC
    • Essentials in the process of CFSC :
    • [1] Community participation & appropriation
    • [2] Language & cultural pertinence
    • [3] Development of local contents
    • [4] Use of appropriate technology
    • [5] Networking & convergence
  44. Articulating the local
    • The consequence of losing one’s ability to articulate the local is unavoidable if coverage and audiences expand. The capacity to articulate the local constitutes a crucial component of the political potential of citizen’s media.
    • Clemencia Rodríguez
  45. Introducing technology
    • When a new technology is introduced to a different setting, what is transferred is not only the technology itself, but also a set of assumptions and practices regarding the particular technology and its use.
  46. New discourse of development
    • Acknowledging failures
    • Rejecting top-down approaches
    • Promoting participatory planning & monitoring
    • Community involvement & ownership
    • Sustainable development
    • Acknowledging role of communication for social change & development
  47. Demand & Supply
    • Development organisations slowly moving towards new paradigm
    • Gap between demand & supply
    • No qualified communication strategists to deal with planners & experts
    • Lack of comprehensive long-term vision
    • Improvising short term training for staff at project level – many “doers”, few thinkers
    • Universities not providing the needed human resources: changing names but same curricula
  48. Anybody out there?
    • Many professionals claim to subscribe to communication for social change, even social marketing defenders
    • Communication Initiative lists hundreds specialists from Europe & North America
    • However, at programme & project level, difficult to find development & social change communication strategists, only journalists
    • Development agencies improvising communicators from any other discipline & field of experience
  49. The ivory tower
    • Academic world has often turn its back to development issues
    • Journalists are trained by thousands, not communicators – media bias
    • Training based on alien models & theories
    • Satisfying demands of artificial markets
    • Ignorance about our own thinking
    • New curricula are needed
  50. The iceberg
    • Communicators learn from experience
    • Rich environment in Third World, lessons
    • Most of experiences remain hidden
    • Task of universities:
      • Reveal and analyse experiences
      • Train new comunicators
      • Facilitate networking
  51. The New Communicator
    • Theoretical & practical balance
    • Direct experience in development
    • Knowledge of communication practices
    • Strategic, long term thinking
    • Understanding technology is just a tool
    • Flexibility in the alternative use of media
    • Role of amplifying the voices of voiceless
    • Work rooted in cultural identity & dialogue
    • http:// www . comminit . com / making - waves . html
    • webinfo @ rockfound .org
    Making Waves: Participatory Communication for Social Change
  52. The Communication Initiative
    • www. comminit .com
  53. Alfonso Gumucio Dagron 28/05/09 Alfonso Gumucio-Dagron
    • - Bolivia, South America
    • Managing Director CFSCC
    • Filmmaker, journalist & writer
    • - Development communication since 1978
    • - CIMCA (NGO): miners’ radio stations
    • - UNICEF 1990-97 (Nigeria & Haiti)
    • - Guatemala since 1998 - consultancy work
    • - The Rockefeller Foundation / CFSC
    • - Denise Gray-Felder, Vice-President

+ Alfonso GumucioAlfonso Gumucio, 2 years ago

custom

3997 views, 21 favs, 4 embeds more stats

A slide presentation on the evolution of communicat more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 3997
    • 3979 on SlideShare
    • 18 from embeds
  • Comments 3
  • Favorites 21
  • Downloads 0
Most viewed embeds
  • 13 views on http://www.dcomstrat.com
  • 3 views on http://dcomstrat.com
  • 1 views on http://simplywired.org
  • 1 views on http://www.simplywired.org

more

All embeds
  • 13 views on http://www.dcomstrat.com
  • 3 views on http://dcomstrat.com
  • 1 views on http://simplywired.org
  • 1 views on http://www.simplywired.org

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Groups / Events