Equivalence Testing for Secular Equilibrium<br />Paul Black, Ph.D.<br />Mark Fitzgerald, Ph.D.<br />Dave Gratson, M.S.<br ...
Background<br />Examining a Site with potential radionuclide contamination in near-Surface Soils<br />Radionuclides of int...
What is Secular Equilibrium?<br />A definition:The half-life of the precursor (parent) radioisotope is so much longer than...
In reality…..Approximate Secular Equilibrium<br />The open nature of the system<br />The relative geochemical mobility of ...
Evaluation Issues - Analytical<br />Statistically compare Site and Background data<br />If the Site is not contaminated th...
Evaluation Issues - Statistical<br />Statistically test radionuclide data for SE…..<br />Background should exhibit approxi...
A Statistical Hypothesis<br />Under the assumption of SE, activity concentrations should be the same for some radionuclide...
“Standard” Statistical Test<br />Test null hypothesis “H” vs. alternative “not H”<br />For SE testing, “H” assumes:<br />A...
Practical Considerations<br />Under SE, the mean radioactivity for the radionuclides will be identical<br />But, will the ...
Disincentive to Data Collection<br />Also - under this standard classical ANOVA set-up …<br />Since SE is the null hypothe...
Equivalence Testing<br />Changes hypothesis of interest to:<br />μ1 ≈ μ2 ≈ μ3 ≈ … ≈ μk<br />Doesn’t expect the means to be...
Multivariate Analysis<br />Under SE, correlation between the radionuclide measurements can be expected (not good for ANOVA...
Proportional Activity<br />Analysis aided by conversion to relative proportional activity<br />Tends to remove outliers<br...
Equivalence Test Set-Up<br />Testing:                                     versus<br />The value Δ determines the level of ...
Example for 3 dimensions (radionuclides)<br />Equivalence region is the colored circle<br />Δ is the radius of the circle<...
The Test Statistic<br />The equivalence test is based on the F statistic:<br />Calculation of p-value is somewhat complex<...
The Test Statistic<br />The intuitive notion is the following:<br />Construct a confidence region for the mean proportions...
Example confidence region that does not pass equivalence test (3-D)<br />
Example confidence region that does pass equivalence test (3-D)<br />
Example Data<br />Site with potential uranium chain contamination<br />Data collected on 4 radioisotopes in the decay chai...
Boxplots<br />
Scatterplots<br />
Boxplots of Proportions<br />
Scatterplot of Proportions<br />
Results of ANOVA Tests<br />
Results of Equivalence Test<br />
Site Application<br />Evaluation of radionuclide analytical data<br />Comparison of Site and Background data<br />Coupled ...
Closing Remarks<br />Equivalence Testing is a statistical method that accommodates small differences that are expected but...
Resources<br />Guided Interactive Statistical and Decision ToolsGiSdT – Open Source, based on R (www.r-project.org)<br />W...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Secular Equilibrium Presentation For Aehs

1,443

Published on

Evaluation of Secular Equilibrium using Equivalence Testing. Paul Black, Mark Fitzgerald, David Gratson

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,443
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Some contamination potential – background comparison problems are analytical problem related – lack of secular equilibrium is statistically related
  • P_i here represents the proportion of radioactivity due to radioisotope i for a single sample.Negative correlation since proportions – roughly -1/k.
  • Mu_{p_i} is the mean proportion of activity for radioisotope i.
  • Constrained to 3-D simplex
  • S_p is the sample covariance matrix
  • S_p is the sample covariance matrix
  • Note: 2-D example is actually just a t-test, but for illustrative purposes, showing a confidence region in 2-D
  • Note outliers – and effect on something like ANOVA (will overestimate sigma, lead to easy acceptance)
  • Note high correlations – correspondence of outliers
  • Note: after adjusting for correlation … not quite as clear if they’re the same, though th-232 is not highest.
  • Correlation low and slightly negative – Outliers mostly gone
  • Note:univariate confidence bounds, but real confidence interval is elliptical in 4-space
  • Note:univariate confidence bounds, but real confidence interval is elliptical in 4-space
  • Transcript of "Secular Equilibrium Presentation For Aehs"

    1. 1. Equivalence Testing for Secular Equilibrium<br />Paul Black, Ph.D.<br />Mark Fitzgerald, Ph.D.<br />Dave Gratson, M.S.<br />Neptune & Company, Inc.<br />
    2. 2. Background<br />Examining a Site with potential radionuclide contamination in near-Surface Soils<br />Radionuclides of interest are naturally-occurring<br />Uranium (U), thorium (Th), radium (Ra)<br />Problems seen with analysis of radionuclide data<br />Background not consistent for radionuclides in the same chain (analytical problem)<br />Lack of (approximate) secular equilibrium in background (statistical problem)<br />
    3. 3. What is Secular Equilibrium?<br />A definition:The half-life of the precursor (parent) radioisotope is so much longer than that of the product (daughter) that the radioactivity of the daughter becomes equal to that of the parent with sufficient time<br />Implication:Concentration activities are the same for some radionuclides in the same chain<br />
    4. 4. In reality…..Approximate Secular Equilibrium<br />The open nature of the system<br />The relative geochemical mobility of each radioisotope<br />The system environment (e.g., soil, rock, water)<br />The passage of sufficient time for the buildup of daughters (ingrowth)<br />post-contamination<br />The effects of laboratory radiochemical analysis.<br />
    5. 5. Evaluation Issues - Analytical<br />Statistically compare Site and Background data<br />If the Site is not contaminated then statistical background comparisons should “pass”<br />Site data showed unexpected differences from Background data because of analytical issues<br />Preparation methods involved HF for Background, but not for all the Site data (some HNO3)<br />Led to consideration of secular equilibrium (SE) for evaluation of the radionuclide data<br />
    6. 6. Evaluation Issues - Statistical<br />Statistically test radionuclide data for SE…..<br />Background should exhibit approximate SE<br />Lack of Site contamination implies approximate SE<br />However, standard statistical methods showed a lack of SE in these cases<br />Statistical differences driven mostly by<br />Analytical method differences<br />
    7. 7. A Statistical Hypothesis<br />Under the assumption of SE, activity concentrations should be the same for some radionuclides in a decay chain<br />Since the analysis endpoint of human-health or ecological risk is typically based on the mean concentration…..<br />SE holds only if:<br />μ1 = μ2 = μ3 = … = μk<br />for radionuclides 1 through k<br />
    8. 8. “Standard” Statistical Test<br />Test null hypothesis “H” vs. alternative “not H”<br />For SE testing, “H” assumes:<br />All the radionuclide means are exactly equal<br />Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) method applies<br />This is a “point” null hypothesis<br />Burden of proof is on demonstrating SE does not hold<br />With sufficient data lack of SE will always be shown<br />Statistically<br />This is a problem when Site = Background<br />
    9. 9. Practical Considerations<br />Under SE, the mean radioactivity for the radionuclides will be identical<br />But, will the measured radioactivity be identical?<br />Different radionuclides might be measured by different methods<br />E.g. alpha spectroscopy vs. beta emissions<br />Natural effects (geochemical, etc.)<br />Small differences can be expected, even in Background, but ANOVA cannot accommodate them (“point” null problem)<br />
    10. 10. Disincentive to Data Collection<br />Also - under this standard classical ANOVA set-up …<br />Since SE is the null hypothesis, the less data collected, the better the chance that SE will be “accepted”<br />If there is no contamination, but there are slight differences in the measured means, then the more data collected, the more likely SE will be “rejected”<br />Responsible party has no incentive to collect more data – not a desirable situation<br />
    11. 11. Equivalence Testing<br />Changes hypothesis of interest to:<br />μ1 ≈ μ2 ≈ μ3 ≈ … ≈ μk<br />Doesn’t expect the means to be exactly equal but rather “practically the same” – or “practically equivalent”<br />Switches null and alternative hypotheses<br />Assume that the means are not “practically equivalent” (null hypothesis)<br />Burden of proof is now on the data to demonstrate approximate SE (alternative hypothesis)<br />
    12. 12. Multivariate Analysis<br />Under SE, correlation between the radionuclide measurements can be expected (not good for ANOVA)<br />If a radionuclide is naturally at greater concentration for a given sample, then SE says that all radionuclides will have higher radioactivity for that sample<br />In practice, can often see outliers in activity concentrations, but they appear simultaneously for all radionuclides (in the same chain)<br />How to address strong correlation?<br />Data transformation<br />
    13. 13. Proportional Activity<br />Analysis aided by conversion to relative proportional activity<br />Tends to remove outliers<br />Correlation between radionuclides normalized (now small and negative) <br />Universal scale, making equivalence easier to define (in the null hypothesis)<br />
    14. 14. Equivalence Test Set-Up<br />Testing: versus<br />The value Δ determines the level of deviation from equal proportions of radioactivity that will be considered equivalent<br />Defines a spherical region in k-dimensions<br />
    15. 15. Example for 3 dimensions (radionuclides)<br />Equivalence region is the colored circle<br />Δ is the radius of the circle<br />
    16. 16. The Test Statistic<br />The equivalence test is based on the F statistic:<br />Calculation of p-value is somewhat complex<br />
    17. 17. The Test Statistic<br />The intuitive notion is the following:<br />Construct a confidence region for the mean proportions (an ellipse in k-dimensions)<br />If the entire confidence region lies within the equivalence region, then reject the null hypothesis and declare the mean proportions equivalent – in secular equilibrium<br />That is, are the means close enough!<br />Otherwise, approximate SE is not proven<br />
    18. 18. Example confidence region that does not pass equivalence test (3-D)<br />
    19. 19. Example confidence region that does pass equivalence test (3-D)<br />
    20. 20. Example Data<br />Site with potential uranium chain contamination<br />Data collected on 4 radioisotopes in the decay chain<br />U-238 (half-life of 4.5 billion years, α decay)<br />U-234 (half-life of 245,500 years, α decay)<br />Th-230 (half-life of 75,380 years, α decay)<br />Ra-226 (half-life of 1,602 years, α decay)<br />
    21. 21. Boxplots<br />
    22. 22. Scatterplots<br />
    23. 23. Boxplots of Proportions<br />
    24. 24. Scatterplot of Proportions<br />
    25. 25. Results of ANOVA Tests<br />
    26. 26. Results of Equivalence Test<br />
    27. 27. Site Application<br />Evaluation of radionuclide analytical data<br />Comparison of Site and Background data<br />Coupled with statistical Background comparison tests<br />Lack of SE implies contamination<br />Or something else is wrong (analytical, background)<br />However, SE does not necessarily imply Background<br />
    28. 28. Closing Remarks<br />Equivalence Testing is a statistical method that accommodates small differences that are expected but are practically unimportant<br />Small differences due to natural or analytical effects<br />This method could also be applied to Background comparisons in general (for metals, etc.)<br />
    29. 29. Resources<br />Guided Interactive Statistical and Decision ToolsGiSdT – Open Source, based on R (www.r-project.org)<br />Web-based (free access)<br />EnviroGiSdT<br />Pc-based (free download)<br />E-mail for more information:pblack@neptuneinc.org<br />
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×