Grant Thornton - Food Snapshot Summer 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Grant Thornton - Food Snapshot Summer 2012

on

  • 3,409 views

Several large M&A transactions announced during the first half of 2012 indicate that the food and beverage industry is experiencing strong M&A activity. Driving this activity are challenges and ...

Several large M&A transactions announced during the first half of 2012 indicate that the food and beverage industry is experiencing strong M&A activity. Driving this activity are challenges and competitive pressures that food and beverage executives face, including keeping up with healthier consumer lifestyles, assessing the impact of budget-conscious shoppers, and mitigating food safety concerns and their associated compliance costs. However, the ongoing burden of rising commodity prices is finally subsiding, giving way to profitability enhancements, including food and beverage companies outperforming 2007 public stock market levels.

Key findings in this report include:
•Reported deal value exceeded $6 billion during the first six months of 2012, a 30% increase over the same period last year.
•Wheat and corn prices declined 25% and 13% respectively, over last year’s prices.
•International average valuations have fallen during the past 12 months, in stark contrast to improving valuations in the United States.
•As coffee bean prices dropped 32% over the past 12 months in response to expectations of a robust harvest from Brazil, companies have reduced retail prices, although not to the same degree as input costs have fallen.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,409
Views on SlideShare
552
Embed Views
2,857

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0

5 Embeds 2,857

http://grantthornton.pl 2821
http://grantthornton.gruffi.com 33
http://grantthornton.local 1
http://yazz.pl 1
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Grant Thornton - Food Snapshot Summer 2012 Document Transcript

  • 1. Food & BeverageIndustry SnapshotGrant Thornton Corporate Finance Summer 2012Deals continue to perkGrant Thornton Corporate Finance LLC Overview Contact information(GTCF) is pleased to present its semiannual The food and beverage industry has been a very activeFood & Beverage Industry Snapshot for sector for M&A activity since the beginning of the Brian Basilsummer 2012. This snapshot contains timely year, and there are indications that this trend will Director Grant Thornton Corporate Financecommentary on key factors affecting the food continue. Reported deal value exceeded $6 billion T 248.233.6930and beverage industry, an overview of trends during the first six months of 2012, a 30% increase E brian.basil@us.gt.comin M&A and a summary of industry stock over the same period last year. Driving this activity Erik Egerermarket performance. This issue also features are factors that have been addressed in earlier issues Managera section focused on the coffee sector, which of this publication, such as the move toward healthier Grant Thornton Corporate Financeincludes trends, M&A activity and public lifestyles, budget-conscious consumers and food safety T 248.213.4227 E erik.egerer@us.gt.commarket information. concerns (and their associated compliance costs). These Through offices in more than 100 factors continue to present industry participants withcountries worldwide, the partners and challenges and competitive pressures that often leademployees of Grant Thornton International to M&A activity. Recently, another trend has had aLtd member firms serve several hundred generally positive effect on manyfood and beverage clients ranging from food and beverage participants,global conglomerates to middle-market particularly downstream.companies in all sectors of the industry. continued >GTCF teams have advised on more than50 food and beverage industry M&Atransactions over the past three years.
  • 2. Commodity price index Trends in the metrics Total U.S.-target food and beverage M&A activity for the first Crude oil Corn Wheat half of 2012 was essentially flat compared with the same period400% last year, which was one of the strongest six-month periods since 2007. However, deal value increased by 30% (from $5 billion to $6.5 billion) because several large transactions, including the300% following, were announced in the first half of the year: • Kellogg acquired The Wimble Company (which sells snack200% products under the Pringles brand) from Procter & Gamble for $2.7 billion. This acquisition helps Kellogg expand its global snack business by adding to its existing brands such100% as Keebler and Cheez-It. • Italian dairy company Parmalat announced in May 12 its 0% intent to acquire Lactalis American Group, a U.S.-based Jan Oct Jul Apr Jan Oct Jul Apr Jan Oct cheese manufacturer, for $904 million. This acquisition will 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 facilitate Parmalat’s entry into the U.S. market and expandSource: International Monetary Fund the company’s product line. • In May 2012, refined sugar processor Imperial Sugar sold itsFalling commodity prices stake in Wholesome Sweeteners to Arlon Capital PartnersAs illustrated in the food and beverage commodity price index for $177 million. This transaction was completed in an effort(CPI) chart shown above, commodity prices have subsided to increase Imperial Sugar’s liquidity because the companyfrom the highs seen in early 2011. Wheat and corn prices had been facing financial problems due to rising input costsdeclined 25% and 13%, respectively, over last year’s. Crude oil (mainly raw sugar prices). Imperial Sugar was sold to Louisprices dropped 4% over the past 12 months, largely as a result Dreyfus Commodities for $150 million in June 2012.of increased OPEC production, looming European economic • The world’s no. 1 brewer (by sales), Anheuser-Busch InBev,concerns and slower growth in emerging markets (such as recently offered to purchase the 65% share in Mexico’sChina and India), whose tremendous demand had previously Grupo Modelo that it does not already own. Grupopushed up commodity prices. While prices remain high on Modelo produces the Corona brand, which is the best-a historical basis, the recent softening in the commodity selling imported beer in the United States. The deal, whichmarket is a positive sign for the food and beverage industry. contemplates a value of $29 billion for Grupo Modelo, hasHigher commodity prices have exerted considerable pressure been approved by Modelo’s board of directors.on margins in recent years, but that pressure is now easing. continued >Meanwhile, consumers worried about their budgets have beenresistant to accepting price increases; indeed, many of them Food and beverage industry M&A activityhave been choosing lower-cost items instead. While most # of announced transactions Total disclosed deal value ($ billions)observers feel, at least for the moment, that the slowdown in # Transactions Deal value ($ billions)the Chinese economy is temporary, the current commodity 400 $120market is making it somewhat easier for food and beveragecompanies to operate profitably. The longevity of this trend 350 $100will depend largely on whether China resumes its aggressive 300growth and whether and when the European economic crisis $80can be averted/addressed. 250 For the time being, the benefits associated with lower 200 $60commodity prices are accruing primarily to producers, distributorsand retailers. Consumer prices have not yet responded — the 150 $40U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported a 3% rise in the food and 100beverage CPI over the past 12 months — but if commodity prices $20continue to fall, consumers might still benefit. 50 0 $0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 1H 2011 1H 2012 Sources: GTCF research; certain financial information provided by S&P Capital IQ2 Food & Beverage Industry Snapshot – Summer 2012
  • 3. The GTCF Food and Beverage Index depicted at leftGrant Thornton Corporate Finance Food and Beverage Index reflects data from industry participants that are broadly GTCF Food and Beverage Index S&P 500 categorized as either food processors, food distributors, food retailers or beverage companies. This data shows that food160% and beverage companies have outperformed the S&P 500 for140% the past several years, and the gap appears to be widening. We expect this gap to widen further, especially if commodity prices120% continue to ease. And while overall public market performance remains slightly below its 2007 peak, the food and beverage100% industry is performing well above 2007 levels. Although not all participants are performing uniformly well, the industry taken 80% as a whole is a bright spot in today’s economy. Another way to look at public market performance is by 60% examining EV/EBITDA multiples, which provide insight into how valuable a company is when both debt and equity are taken 40% Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Mar into account. These multiples also allow observers to compare 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 the values of companies that have different business models.Sources: Public company filings; certain financial information provided by S&P Capital IQ As shown in the chart below, EBITDA multiples for all categories have risen since last year. These increases are attributable to growth expectations in the near term as well The prevalence of larger M&A transactions is a strong as the likelihood of profitability enhancements resulting fromindication of a robust deal market. Accordingly, deal activity commodity price declines.in the food and beverage sector is expected to remain healthy Notably, food and beverage companies in the United Statesthrough 2012, continuing the trend we have observed over the appear to be performing very well compared with those in thepast few years. Both financial and strategic buyers are flush European Union (EU) and those whose revenue is heavilywith cash and are under pressure to deploy it. Further, barring EU-dependent. Considering the present state of the Europeanany action by the federal government, the capital gains tax rate economy, it should come as no surprise that EU companieswill increase from 15% to 20% at the end of the year. In 2010, are trading more than 2.5x lower than their U.S. counterparts.the market expected capital gains rates to rise during 2011, so Additionally, their average valuation levels have fallen during thewe saw heavier-than-normal deal activity, particularly in the past 12 months, in stark contrast to improving valuations in thefourth quarter of 2010. We expect that 2012 could exhibit a United States. Unless and until the economic issues in the EU aresimilar pattern. Companies considering a sale will likely try to resolved, we expect these differences in valuation to persist.complete the sale by the end of the year. continued >Food and beverage EBITDA multiples Average metrics Historical metrics % of 52-week Enterprise LTM LTM EV/ 06/30/11 Category EV/EBIT high value ($M) EBITDA % EBITDA EV/EBITDA Food distributors 83.0% $ 7,812 4.0% 12.0x 9.5x 9.4x Food retailers 82.7% 28,541 13.5% 15.4x 10.4x 10.0x Food processors 92.6% 26,525 16.1% 13.9x 11.2x 10.4x Beverage companies 94.9% 42,566 22.7% 16.0x 12.5x 11.1x U.S. average 88.3% 26,361 14.1% 14.3x 10.9x 10.2x EU average 87.2% 54,522 11.3% 10.4x 8.3x 8.8xAs of 06/30/2012Sources: Public company filings; certain financial information provided by S&P Capital IQ3 Food & Beverage Industry Snapshot – Summer 2012
  • 4. Sector focus — coffeeAs one of the most widely enjoyed beverages in the UnitedStates and globally, coffee comprises a critical sector of thefood and beverage industry. Made from beans harvested inLatin America, Africa and Southeast Asia, and subsequentlyroasted to create a unique flavor, coffee has become as much anexpression of individual taste as the automobile has. The industry is segmented into growers, roasters andretailers, with retail sales occurring along several paths. Oneis the at-home market, which includes instant coffee alongwith ground and whole gourmet beans sold in grocery storesor coffee shops. Another is the away-from-home market,which includes coffee shops, combination stores such as TimHortons, and operations such as McDonald’s. The thirdsegment is one that we highlight because of its recent growth:the single-serve coffee market, as epitomized by Keurig’sK-Cup®. In reviewing the coffee industry as a whole, wefocus most closely on the retail channels because they drivesales throughout the sector. Further, many retailers such asStarbucks look to integrated roasting to assure quality andprovide consistency across all stores. Vertical integration isalso a social mechanism that allows retailers to encouragethe sourcing of beans from fair trade growers, which stressreasonable working conditions and fair wages. Over the past several years, demand for coffee has increasedacross all retail sectors, including at-home coffee, specialtycoffee served at cafés, and one-cup coffee brewers. While thesesubsegments have historically been somewhat distinct, thenotion that companies sell products that fit into only one ofthese categories is no longer true — premium coffee is beingsold at supermarkets for at-home purposes, higher-end coffeeshops are now offering ground and whole beans, and severalcompanies appear to be interested in entering the single-serve • As consumer preferences shift to higher-end roasts,coffee sector. companies such as McDonald’s, Dunkin’ Donuts and Tim Hortons, all of which are commonly known for selling• Primary brands for the at-home coffee segment include lower-quality blends, are now beginning to offer freshly Folgers (owned by J.M. Smucker), Maxwell House (owned brewed premium roast coffee. McDonald’s has even started by Kraft), and Nescafé (owned by Nestlé). Premium blends a coffeehouse-style chain called McCafé that features a line continue to penetrate the supermarket channel; Starbucks of specialty drinks. has introduced Via Instant Coffee, and J.M. Smucker has acquired the licensing rights to sell packaged Dunkin’ • A newer product that has become widely successful over Donuts coffee. the past 10 years is single-cup coffee. Keurig — owned by Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) — currently• Even though companies such as Starbucks, Caribou Coffee, leads the single-serve coffee market but faces increased and Peet’s Coffee & Tea offer at-home coffee, their primary competition because its main patents related to the K-Cup focus is on serving gourmet coffee in the form of cappuccino, are set to expire in September 2012. Kroger and Safeway latte and espresso at their cafés. These coffeehouses have are already planning to launch private-label coffee pods become more and more popular because they offer a place that work with the Keurig machine. In an attempt to hedge where patrons can study, socialize or simply relax with a projected losses, GMCR has partnered with Caribou hot (or cold) cup of joe in hand. Increasing demand for this Coffee, Starbucks and Dunkin’ Donuts for production of atmosphere has driven industry growth. these brands of coffee in its K-Cups. continued >4 Food & Beverage Industry Snapshot – Summer 2012
  • 5. Coffee beans trade as a commodity whose price is Notable transactionsdependent on supply from the once-per-year harvest along Almost 40 transactions have been announced within the coffeewith demand trends. The companies discussed earlier in this market since the start of 2011. Some of these transactions arearticle have performed well on average, despite the recent described below:volatility in the coffee bean market. The price of coffeebeans has fluctuated much like the prices of wheat, corn and • In February 2011, J.M. Smucker acquired Rowland Coffeecrude oil, increasing through April 2011 and then trending Roasters, maker of the leading Hispanic coffee brands Cafédownward. As shown in the chart below, coffee bean prices Bustelo and Café Pilon, for more than $350 million. Thisrose 33% from November 2010 to April 2011 as adverse acquisition improves J.M. Smucker’s place among Hispanicweather conditions in Brazil and Colombia limited the coffee drinkers in the United States.supply of coffee beans. Additionally, stronger demand fromemerging markets put upward pressure on prices. This, plus • In October 2011, J.M. Smucker acquired a majority ofincreased fuel and packaging costs, translated to higher retail Sara Lee’s North American foodservice coffee and teacoffee prices for consumers as roasters and retailers cautiously business for $430 million. This acquisition will bolsterpassed on rising expenditures. For example, J.M. Smucker (the J.M. Smucker’s position in the coffee market. Sara Lee soldmanufacturer of Folgers, Millstone and packaged Dunkin’ the majority stake because the unbranded business facedDonuts coffee) raised prices for its coffee brands sold in the challenges to growth.United States by 10% in February 2011 and 11% in May 2011.This followed two price increases in 2010. And Starbucks • Sara Lee recently split up into two pure-play publicmarked up the price of packaged coffee by 17% in July 2011. companies: a meat-focused Hillshire Brands Company As coffee bean prices have dropped 32% over the past 12 and an international coffee and tea company called D.E.months in response to expectations of a robust harvest from Masters Blend. (The Sara Lee brand has not completelyBrazil, companies have reduced retail prices, although not to ceased to exist; it is being used for certain bakery and delithe same degree as input costs have fallen. For example, both products distributed by Hillshire Brands.) Before debutingKraft and J.M. Smucker have lowered their coffee prices by 6% D.E. Masters Blend as a stand-alone business, Sara Leetwice — once in August 2011 and again in May 2012. chose to strengthen its offerings through acquisitions, Consumer prices tend to be somewhat insulated by short- which included The Coffee Company (Netherlands), Teaterm swings in coffee bean prices due to extensive use of hedging. Forté (United States) and Expresso.Coffee (Brazil).However, if changes in input pricing persist, retail costs willeventually rise or fall because hedging is short-term by nature. • Diversification through M&A has become a key strategy for Starbucks. Most recently, the coffee giant announced its intent to buy Bay Bread and its La Boulange bakery brandPrice of coffee beans — U.S. cents per pound (lb) for $100 million in order to improve its food offerings. 250 Moreover, Starbucks acquired juicer Evolution Fresh for $30 million during November 2011 in an effort to expand into the health and wellness sector. In addition to pursuing 200 acquisitions, Starbucks plans to open a new Tazo tea shop this year and has decided to offer its own single-cup brew 150 called Verismo. The company also expects to begin selling beer and wine in various locations in Atlanta and southern 100 California by the end of 2012. Starbucks is in the early stages of its diversified growth strategy, and while some 50 experts claim the company might face growth challenges, others are intrigued and believe that Starbucks will 0 continue to succeed. Jan Jun Dec Jan Jun Dec Jan Jun Dec Jan Jun 2009 2010 2011 2012 Although M&A transactions involving retail operationsSource: International Coffee Organization command the headlines, a considerable amount of deal activity occurs within the roasting market; some retail operators purchase roasters in an effort to secure vertical integration. Since 2011, there have been 13 reported transactions involving roasters (a sizable number of deals are not announced publicly). continued >5 Food & Beverage Industry Snapshot – Summer 2012
  • 6. Analysis of a cross-section of publicly traded companies in the coffee space Revenue ($M) Enterprise EV/ Coffee companies Description/key brands HQ LTM 6/20/12 value EBITDA At-home Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (NasdaqGS:GMCR) Single-cup cofee United States $3,472 $3,699 5.6x Kraft Foods (NasdaqGS:KFT) Maxwell House United States 54,885 95,322 10.9x Nestlé S.A. (SWX:NESN) Nescafé Switzerland 89,622 200,816 11.5x The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) Folgers, Millstone United States 5,526 10,181 9.1x Average $38,376 $77,504 9.3x Away-from-home Caribou Coffee Company (NasdaqGS:CBOU) Roaster and retailer United States 335 230 8.4x Peet’s Coffee & Tea (NasdaqGS:PEET) Roaster and retailer United States 378 745 16.3x Starbucks Corporation (NasdaqGS:SBUX) Roaster and retailer United States 12,596 38,761 16.3x Tim Hortons (TSX:THI) Quick service restaurant/roaster and retailer Canada 2,937 8,619 12.5x Average $4,061 $12,089 13.4x Other Coffee Holding Co (NasdaqCM:JVA) Distributes coffee to independent roasters. United States 177 35 70.6x 1 Farmer Brothers Co. (NasdaqGM:FARM) Roaster and distributor United States 494 139 n/a Average $336 $87 n/a Group average $17,042 $35,855 11.3x As of 6/30/2012Sources: GTCF research; certain financial information provided by S&P Capital IQ1 Data point excluded as an outlierPublic company comparables The away-from-home segment includes four well-knownThe at-home coffee industry is largely composed of diversified coffee shop chains whose EBITDA trading multiples averagefood companies; coffee accounts for a minority of sales for three 13.4x — far higher than multiples for the at-home sector. Theof the four participants listed in this category. For example, market is clearly dominated by Starbucks, whose revenue isonly 10% of Kraft’s total revenue for the year ended December more than four times greater than that of Tim Hortons, its2011 came from coffee sales, and less than half (42%) of J.M. closest competitor. However, the segment has been underSmucker’s total revenue for the year ended April 2012 was increasing pressure because chains such as McDonald’s andderived from the retail sale of U.S. coffee. However, we have Dunkin’ Donuts have introduced premium blend coffee.included these companies in our analysis because they own Valuation multiples, however, remain very strong in the away-iconic coffee brands such as Maxwell House, Nescafé, Folgers from-home sector at more than 13x EBITDA. These multiplesand Millstone. These well-known brands dominate shelf space largely reflect the premium prices Starbucks and other high-at major retailers and are very popular among consumers. end coffeehouses are able to command (as opposed to the Despite its relative youth, GMCR — also listed in the economy pricing of McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts).at-home segment — has single-handedly commercialized the continued >one-cup brew. The K-Cup has quickly established itself amongiconic brands and, while GMCR serves a different targetconsumer, we have classified it in the at-home category becauseof its self-brewing characteristics. GMCR’s trading multipleshave experienced considerable volatility over the past severalyears. As the K-Cup gained a sizable following, the company’sstock price soared; more recently, however, the impendingexpiration of its key patents has placed GMCR’s marketdominance at risk, and its valuation multiples have come downdramatically (the company traded at more than 15x EBITDAat the end of 2011).6 Food & Beverage Industry Snapshot – Summer 2012
  • 7. Grant Thornton Corporate Finance Food and Beverage Index S&P 500 GTCF Food and Beverage Index GTCF Coffee Index200%150%100% 50% 0% June Sep Dec Mar June Sep Dec Mar June Sep Dec Mar June Sep Dec Mar June Sep Dec Mar June 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012Sources: Public company filings; certain financial information provided by S&P Capital IQ In terms of stock performance, the GTCF Coffee Index Conclusion(consisting of the 10 publicly traded companies listed on the Coffee is a staple beverage for millions around the world.previous page) has outperformed both the GTCF Food and Competition in the United States is fierce, with a handful of brandsBeverage Index, and the S&P 500 for the past several years. The controlling more than 85% of total retail market share. The U.S.fluctuations in the GTCF Coffee Index during 2011 and 2012 coffee market has been reshaped in the past two decades — firstare largely due to the volatility of GMCR’s stock. As we have by Starbucks, which introduced many Americans to a traditionalseen, GMCR’s stock enjoyed a tremendous upswing in the European taste, and more recently with the advent of one-shotfirst half of 2011 as one-cup brews became immensely popular, brewing, which allows a consumer to prepare a high-qualitybut the company has watched its stock price fall since then cup without making a whole pot. Further up the supply chain,because of expected losses from its pending patent expiration. recent trends have included vertical integration (through retailers’In contrast, stock prices for Starbucks, Caribou Coffee, Peet’s purchase of roasters), consolidation within the roasting space, and aCoffee & Tea, and Tim Hortons — all of which have stand- focus on fair trade coffee.alone retail locations — have seen slight fluctuations but have M&A activity has played a key role in reshaping the coffeetypically increased since 2009. industry. Consolidation among roasters and vertical integration by retailers buying roasters are being complemented by notable purchases of local and regional independent coffee shops. This activity augments existing organic growth strategies both in the United States and internationally. We expect M&A to continue playing a pivotal role in the coffee industry as participants face new challenges in the coming years. •About Grant Thornton Corporate Finance LLCGrant Thornton Corporate Finance LLC provides boutique investment banking services to privately held middle-market businesses in the United States and around the world. As a recognized advisoron middle-market mergers and acquisitions, we offer a range of investment banking services including sell-side advisory, buy-side advisory, management buyouts, restructurings and capital raising.Grant Thornton LLP provides investment banking services through its wholly owned broker-dealer subsidiary Grant Thornton Corporate Finance LLC, member FINRA, SIPC.About Grant Thornton LLPThe people in the independent firms of Grant Thornton International Ltd provide personalized attention and the highest-quality service to public and private clients in more than 100 countries.Grant Thornton LLP is the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd, one of the six global audit, tax and advisory organizations. Grant Thornton International Ltd and its member firms are nota worldwide partnership, as each member firm is a separate and distinct legal entity.The factual statements and data from third-party sources contained herein are taken from sources believed to be reliable, but such statements are made without representation as to accuracy orcompleteness or otherwise. Grant Thornton Corporate Finance LLC does not engage in the business of recommending or effecting transactions in securities. The above information is presentedsolely in connection with describing Grant Thornton Corporate Finance LLC’s mergers and acquisitions services, and should not be considered as constituting a research report or as providinginformation reasonably sufficient upon which to base an investment decision.© 2012 Grant Thornton LLP All rights reserved U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd7 Food & Beverage Industry Snapshot – Summer 2012