Personal Learning Environments
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Personal Learning Environments



New presentation on Personal Learning Environments from conference on Scaffolding Learning - Web 2.0 and e-Portfolios at the University of South Denmark, May 2007

New presentation on Personal Learning Environments from conference on Scaffolding Learning - Web 2.0 and e-Portfolios at the University of South Denmark, May 2007



Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



207 Embeds 12,933 3435 1375 1192 1108 1028 530 409 279 236 233 137 135 120 118 115 115 91 85 84 82 79 77 74 71 70 70 69 68 65 62 59 56 52 46 45 42 42 35 34 34 33 31 26 24 24 24 23 23 22 19



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.


15 of 17 Post a comment

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Personal Learning Environments Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Personal Learning Environments Learning Environments Graham Attwell
  • 2. Personal Learning Environments - a concept based on Web 2 .0 and social software
  • 3. We are at present undergoing a deep and prolonged industrial revolution based on digital technologies
  • 4. The reform and reshaping of social systems and institutions has tended to lag behind in periods of rapid technological change
  • 5. Profound innovations in technology tend to be reflected in older paradigms
  • 6. for example the ‘virtual classroom’ or the ‘Virtual Learning Environment’
  • 7. The challenge
  • 8. It is not the development of technology per se which poses such a challenge to education systems and educational institutions
  • 9. but the changing ways in which people are using technologies to communicate and to learn and the accompanying social effect of such use
  • 10. My Space and Bebo
  • 11. Web logs
  • 12. Flickr, Second Life
  • 13. f orming and participating in on-line social networks and communities
  • 14. The reaction of education systems and institutions to the rise of social networking has been at best bewilderment, at worst downright hostility
  • 15. a refusal to engage in these issues risks school becoming increasingly irrelevant to the everyday lives of many young people
  • 16. and particularly irrelevant to the ways in which they communicate and share knowledge
  • 17. Web 2.0 allows young people to be active co-creators of knowledge
  • 18. We have to review the industrial schooling model including the organisation of institutions and pedagogy and curriculum
  • 19. It is not just young people who use social software for learning
  • 20. Social software is widely used in the workplace for informal learning
  • 21. Most informal learning is learner driven, problem based, or motivated by interest
  • 22. Google is the most used e-learning application
  • 23. most learning is unaccredited
  • 24. people learn through legitimate peripheral participation
  • 25. Knowing is .... located in relations among practitioners, their practice, the artefacts of that practice, and the social organization…of communities of practice Lave and Wenger, 1991
  • 26. Lurking is a means of becoming integrated in distributed communities of practice
  • 27. In such communities of practice formal learning materials are seldom used
  • 28. We have ignored the vast potential of freely available ‘objects’ of all kinds for learning purposes .
  • 29. changes in the way in which we learn and develop new competences is a challenge to our traditional subject organisation
  • 30. And although most countries have adopted a rhetoric of lifelong learning, there is little sign that education systems have sufficiently changed to facilitate such a movement.
  • 31. The answers?
  • 32. How can we support lifelong competence development?
  • 33. Personal Learning Environments have the potential to meet such a challenge
  • 34. PLEs are not another substantiation of educational technology but a new approach to learning
  • 35. A response to pedagogic approaches which require that learner’s e-learning systems need to be under the control of the learners themselves.
  • 36. and recognise the needs of life-long learners for a system that provides a standard interface to different institutions’ e-learning systems, and that allows portfolio information to be maintained across institutions.
  • 37. Learning is now seen as multi episodic, with individuals spending occasional periods of formal education and training throughout their working life.
  • 38. PLE are based on the idea that learning will take place in different contexts and situations and will not be provided by a single learning provider
  • 39. the idea of a Personal Learning Environment recognises that learning is continuing and seeks to provide tools to support that learning
  • 40. Using whatever tools and devices which the learners choose
  • 41. It also recognises the role of the individual in organising their own learning
  • 42. PLEs can help in the recognition of informal learning
  • 43. PLEs can develop on the potential of services oriented architectures for dispersed and networked forms of learning and knowledge development.
  • 44. “ the heart of the concept of the PLE is that it is a tool that allows a learner (or anyone) to engage in a distributed environment consisting of a network of people, services and resources. It is not just Web 2.0, but it is certainly Web 2.0 in the sense that it is (in the broadest sense possible) a read-write application.” Stephen Downes, 2006
  • 45. The promise of Personal Learning Environments could be to extend access to educational technology to everyone who wishes to organise their own learning.
  • 46. The ‘pedagogy’ behind the PLE – if it could be still called that – is that it offers a portal to the world, through which learners can explore and create, according to their own interests and directions, interacting at all times with their friends and community
  • 47. the PLE will challenge the existing education systems and institution
  • 48. New forms of learning are based on trying things and action, rather than on more abstract knowledge.
  • 49. Policies to support the development and implementation of PLEs
  • 50. encouraging and supporting the development of communities of practice and engagement in those communities
  • 51. decisions over funding and support need to be taken as close to practice as possible
  • 52. a broader understanding of digital literacy and its integration within the curriculum s
  • 53. recognise different forms and contexts of learning
  • 54. the development and adoption of new pedagogies
  • 55. the co-shaping of technologies bringing together techies and teachers, enterprises and institutions
  • 56. Thanks for Listening Wales Wide Web -