Enhancing Fed Gov Transparency DemocrAssessment And Participative Planning

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    2 Favorites & 1 Group

    Enhancing Fed Gov Transparency DemocrAssessment And Participative Planning - Presentation Transcript

    1. Participative Planning & DemocrASSESSment “CROWD-SHAPE THE MONEY” Project Strengthening e-Participation at key decision points in Federal Innovation and Performance Management Presented April 19 By M. Lennon at eDemocracyCamp2 Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet George Washington University
    2. Scope of e-Participation focus Not Talking about What this talk is about Innovation w/in Fed Agency • Legislative activities Programs – Lawmaking Transforming critical – Budget authorization decision-making • Campaign-related activities through e-Participation activities – 1 Participative Planning - • Regulation-making Given a budget and activities direction, selecting where, what and how to get the work done – 2- DemocrAssessing - how well (or not) specific activities are going Questions can be directed to 2 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com
    3. What has changed that makes the window of opportunity right TODAY? • New Leadership • Success through innovative involvement of the public • Maturing Government Processes – 10+ year track record of Results Gathering and Performance Evaluation at the Department level – More consistent Investment Governance methods • Web 3.0 opportunities create new forms of interaction – Revolution in technology allows large-scale collaboration, includingcan be directed to and synthesizing Questions capturing 3 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com individual feedback
    4. Key Decision Points in the Government Change Process Pre - Acquisition Acquisition Sustainment Key Business Program Alternative Project Decision Planning Authorization Selection Decision Executive Review & Milestones Points: 0 1 2 3 text 4 text Aquisition Acquisition 3A Segment 2 Concept Alternative Low Rate Phases Selection 1A Selection Prototype 2A Production Production Blocks 3B Segment 3 Project Life Cycle Project LiFE Cycle Need Identification / Program Initiation (PI) Concept & Technology Development (C&TD) Capability Development & Demonstration (CD&D) Production & Deployment (P&D) Operations & Support (O&S) Capital Planning & Investment CPIC SELECT - Screen, Score, Select CONTROL Monitor Direct Corrective Action EVALUATE Conduct Eval Knowledge Harvest Phases control Questions can be directed to 4 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com
    5. Key Decision Points in the Government Change Process Pre - Acquisition Acquisition Sustainment Key Business Program Alternative Project Decision Planning Authorization Selection Decision Executive Review & Milestones Points: 0 1 2 3 text 4 text Acquisition 3A Segment 2 Concept Alternative Low Rate Phases Selection 1A Selection Prototype 2A Production Production Blocks 3B Segment 3 Project Need Identification / Concept & Technology Capability Development & Production & Operations & Support Life Cycle Program Initiation (PI) Development (C&TD) Demonstration (CD&D) Deployment (P&D) (O&S) CONTROL EVALUATE CPIC SELECT - Screen, Score, Select Monitor Conduct Eval Direct Corrective Action Knowledge Harvest Phases Questions can be directed to 5 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com
    6. Quick Win – DemocrAssessment Mashup • A Program-level Scorecards based on 3 sources – Current Budget (Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/budget) – Current Performance Rating (Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/expectmore) – Incorporate Citizen Feedback Questions can be directed to 6 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com
    7. Example (Pell Grant Program) Agree with Rating? 90% 10% Agree with Future spending? 75% 25% Additional comments here Questions can be directed to 7 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com
    8. Why would a public servant want to launch an PLANNING e-Participation initiative? • Improve the quality and diversity of innovation options • A legitimizer -- demonstrate public support • Reduce decision-making uncertainty – Reduce unknowns in key strategic decisions – Enhance Visibility into range, intensity & dimensions of social and psycho-demographics around program – Prioritization of complex and competing interests • Identify risks – Outsiders tend to identify unorthodox or unconventional risks better than inside “Experts” • Promote transparency – Promote faster response capability, introduce credible sources of faster feedback, • Become inspired and empowered – Re-discover why s/he went into public service Questions can be directed to 8 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com
    9. Questions for Discussion • Identifying top Intervention Opportunities • Identifying Pitfalls • Assessing Feasibility • Resources – Technologies – Partners & Collaborators – Volunteers • Policy Questions can be directed to 9 Michael.Lennon@Adlenn.com

    + Gov2.0Gov2.0, 6 months ago

    custom

    238 views, 2 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Strengthening e-Participation at key decision point more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 238
      • 237 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 2
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.slideshare.net

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on http://www.slideshare.net

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events