Subnational election harvard


Published on

Analisys of subnational elections in Ukraine made by Fund for Good Politics

Published in: News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Subnational election harvard

  1. 1. I. Administrative Background II. Election Process III. Voters’ Expectations IV. 2010 Local Elections Results V. Conclusions
  2. 2. • According to the Constitution Ukraine is an unitary state with a republican form of government. • Administrative-territorial structure consists of: –24 oblasts plus Autonomous Republic of Crimea (ARC) – regional level; –Kyiv and Sevastopol have a special legal status; –177 cities «of oblast significance»; –488 rayons – regions are divided into districts («rayons»); –over 12 000 towns and villages.
  3. 3. •The administrative division in Ukraine was directly inherited from the republican administration system of former Soviet Union – «matryoshka».Administrativesignificance Territorial division Region (Oblast) City District (Rayon) Town Village
  4. 4. Region/District Level City/Town/Village Level
  5. 5. • Article 118 of the Constitution states that «executive power in oblasts, rayons and the cities of Kiev and Sevastopol is carried out by local state administrations». • In practice it means that Local Government bodies delegate (transfer) their executive power to Local State Administrations. • Local State Administrations main functions are: –to ensure adherence to the Constitution and the laws of Ukraine as well as presidential decrees; –to ensure the implementation of national and regional programs for social, economic and cultural development, environmental protection and others; –to draft and implement oblast and rayon budgets; –to provide implementation reports on local budgets and programs; –to coordinate with local self-governments.
  6. 6. De Jure De Facto Executive power transfer Domination through budgeting Executive power Executive power
  7. 7. • Two-fold structure of Local Government: executive power is separated from representative local bodies. • On region and district levels local councils delegate their executive power to centralized executive bodies – Local State Administrations, which are controlled by President and Cabinet of Ministers. • On municipal level Local State Administrations dominate on local executive committees through control of budgeting process. • De facto violation of subsidiarity principle as well as European Charter of Local Self-Government.
  8. 8. 1st year - 2004 Constitution Term 2nd year - 2004 Constitution Term 3rd year - 2004 Constitution Term 4th year - 2004 Constitution Term 5th year - 2004 Constitution Term Return to 1996 Constitution
  9. 9. • Dates of elections are not in line with the Constitution. • On average, the Law on Local Elections is amended 2-3 times right before the date of ordinary or extraordinary election. • Most amendments concern: –Voting system (proportional, mixed, majoritarian); –Formation of Territorial Election Commissions (TECs), which ascertain the final results of election; –Subordination of election commissions (on local, district and region levels); –Registration of candidates and parties.
  10. 10. Rayon Council 50% of seats 50% of seats Oblast Council 50% of seats 50% of seats District Level Region Level party-list proportional system «winner-takes-all» system Parties Registered for Elections Parties Registered for Elections party-list proportional system «winner-takes-all» system
  11. 11. Local Level Mayor Town/City Council 50% of seats 50% of seats Mayor Village Council 100% of seats Parties Registered for Elections Parties Registered for Elections party-list proportional system «winner-takes-all» system «winner-takes-all» system «winner-takes-all» system «winner-takes-all» system
  12. 12. Brovary – small town near Kyiv. On 31st of October a voter faces tough choice, having received 7 ballot papers…
  13. 13. Local Level Mayor Brovary Town Council 50% - proportional representation 50% - majoritarian representation Brovary Rayon Council 50% - proportional representation 50% - majoritarian representation Kyiv Oblast Council 50% - proportional representation 50% - majoritarian representation District Level Region Level
  14. 14. •Central Voting Commission has established 670 TECs, including 49 TECs – on region and city level. •These 49 TECs are responsible for control of election process in 25 regions (including ARC), 24 cities (excluding Kyiv).
  15. 15. Source: «Ukrainian Week»
  16. 16. • Balance of party representatives in TECs is shifted in favor of pro-Yanukovich parties. • Opposition is discriminated. • Non-parliament parties are also discriminated.
  17. 17. • Similar cases of «unfair play» were registered throughout Ukraine: – Kyiv, – Cherkasy, – Kharkiv, – Sumy, – Ternopil, – Ivano-Frankivsk, – Odesa, – ARC.
  18. 18. Source: UCEPS
  19. 19. Source: UCEPS
  20. 20. Source: UCEPS
  21. 21. Source: UCEPS Are you ready to take part in protests if the results of Local Elections will be falsified?
  22. 22. Source: UCEPS
  23. 23. Source: Segodnya Oblast councils, where PR will have majority of seats Oblast councils, where PR will form coalition with allies Oblast councils, where PR will form coalition with allies Oblast councils, where PR will form coalition with allies Oblast councils, where PR will be minor partner in coalition Oblast councils, where opposition will have majority of seats
  24. 24. •Party of Regions has won 2010 Local Elections despite the decline of its public support on nation-wide scale. • ¾ of Oblast Councils (eldest «matryoshka» level) will be under control of Party of Regions and only ¼ under control of opposition:  Svoboda (Ternopil, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk oblasts);  BYuT (only Rivne oblast). •Was the result boosted by falsifications and unfair play? Yes, but this is only one part of the truth. Another part is that the majority of voters consider it as a fair result.
  25. 25. • Infringed system of local government, de facto violation of subsidiarity principle and the European Charter of Local Self- Government. • Complicated voting system, simultaneous elections to different levels (local, district, region). • Frequent amendments to the Law on Local Elections. • Unfair formation of TECs – balance of members is shifted in favor of pro-Yanukovich parties. • Administrative barriers, «party cloning», unauthorized extra printing of ballot papers and other manipulation techniques.
  26. 26. •Falsification does not mean infringement of democracy. •High negative expectations about transparency of election process along with low willingness to take part in protests. •Thus, democracy as well as election process is understood as «free ride» competition of elites. •Democracy is associated with «disorder», while «order» is more important than democracy.
  27. 27. •On the whole, the first steps, which are needed to be done towards better and more European outlook of local government, are clear:  Decentralization and deregulation of local government;  Budgetary and financial self-sufficiency;  Reform of Local State Administrations system;  Recovery of executive power within local government bodies.
  28. 28. •Will it be for good? The question remains open due to such factors:  Understanding of democracy as «free ride» competition of elites;  High level of tolerance to corruption (134th place in 2010, «Corruption Perception Index», Transparency International). •Deregulation and decentralization of local government can bolster corruption on local level. Thus it should be done step-by-step along with «democracy promotion» programs and anti-corruption fight.
  29. 29. Thank you for your attention!