Goldcorp Offer for Osisko

4,892 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
4,892
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4,292
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Goldcorp Offer for Osisko

  1. 1. STRATEGY. DISCIPLINE. EXECUTION. Goldcorp Offer for Osisko January 13, 2014
  2. 2. Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of the US Securities Act, as amended, the US Exchange Act, as amended, and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbour” provisions of such laws and applicable Canadian securities Laws concerning the proposed transaction and the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Goldcorp Inc. (“Goldcorp”) and Osisko Mining Corporation (collectively, the “Combined Company”) and estimated production and mine life of the various mineral projects of Goldcorp and Osisko. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc, the estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the realization of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production, capital expenditures, costs and timing of the development of new deposits, success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, hedging practices, currency exchange rate fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, timing and possible outcome of pending litigation, title disputes or claims, limitations on insurance coverage, expectations as to the anticipated timing, mechanics, completion and settlement of the Offer (as defined herein), the market for and listing of the common shares of Goldcorp, the value of the common shares of Goldcorp received as consideration under the Offer, the ability of Goldcorp to complete the transactions contemplated by the Offer, reasons to accept the Offer, the purpose of the Offer. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes”, or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might”, “seeks” or “will”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or intentions. Forward-looking statements are made based upon certain assumptions and other important factors that could cause Goldcorp’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business strategies and the environment in which Goldcorp will operate in the future, including that Goldcorp will be successful in acquiring 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Osisko, that all required third party regulatory and governmental approvals to the transaction will be obtained and all other conditions to completion of the transaction will be satisfied or waived, the price of gold and silver, anticipated costs and the ability to achieve goals. Many of these assumptions are based on factors and events that are not within the control of Goldcorp and there is no assurance they will prove to be correct. Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others, gold price volatility, discrepancies between actual and estimated production, mineral reserves and resources and metallurgical recoveries, mining operational and development risks, litigation risks, regulatory restrictions (including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability), activities by governmental authorities (including changes in taxation), currency fluctuations, the speculative nature of gold exploration, the global economic climate, dilution, share price volatility, competition, loss of key employees, additional funding requirements and defective title to mineral claims or property. Although Goldcorp believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Goldcorp or Osisko to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: future prices of gold, silver, copper, lead and zinc; risks related to the integration of acquisitions; risks related to international operations, including economic and political instability in foreign jurisdictions in which Goldcorp and Osisko operate; risks related to current global financial conditions; risks related to joint venture operations; actual results of current exploration activities; environmental risks; possible variations in ore reserves, grade or recovery rates; mine development and operating risks; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities; risks related to indebtedness and the service of such indebtedness, the common shares of Goldcorp to be issued in connection with the Offer having a market value lower than expected, the businesses of Goldcorp and Osisko not being integrated successfully or such integration may be more difficult, time-consuming and more costly than expected and the expected combined benefit from the Offer not being fully realized or realized within the expected time frame, as well as those factors discussed in “Reasons to Accept the Offer” in Section 4 of the take-over bid circular to be dated on or about January 14, 2014 (the “Circular”), “Purpose of the Offer” in Section 5 of the Circular, “Plans for Osisko” in Section 6 of the Circular and “Acquisition Risks” in Section 7 of the Circular as well as those risk factors discussed or referred to in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in each of Goldcorp’s annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2012 and Osisko’s annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2012 and other reports filed with the applicable securities regulatory authorities in Canada and available under Goldcorp’s or Osisko’s profile at www.sedar.com, respectively. The foregoing factors are not intended to represent a complete list of the factors that could affect Goldcorp and the acquisition of Osisko by Goldcorp. Additional factors are noted elsewhere in the Offer and Circular and in the documents incorporated by reference therein. Although Goldcorp has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are as of the date hereof or as otherwise indicated and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Except as otherwise indicated by Goldcorp, these statements do not reflect the potential impact of any non-recurring or other special items or of any dispositions, monetizations, mergers, acquisitions, other business combinations or other transactions that may be announced or that may occur after [the date hereof]. Forward-looking statements are provided for the purpose of providing information about management’s current expectations and plans and allowing investors and others to get a better understanding of Goldcorp’s operating environment. Goldcorp does not intend or undertake to publically update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. Any forward-looking statements of facts related to Osisko discussed or disclosed herein are derived from Osisko’s publicly filed documents or records. This presentation does not constitute an offer to buy or an invitation to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy or invitation to sell, any securities of Goldcorp or Osisko. Such an offer may only be made pursuant to an offer and take-over bid circular Goldcorp intends to file with the Canadian securities regulators and pursuant to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any other such jurisdiction. In accordance with applicable Canadian securities regulatory requirements, all mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates disclosed herein have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), classified in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining Metallurgy and Petroleum’s “CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves Definitions and Guidelines” (the “CIM Guidelines”). The terms “mineral resources”, “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” are recognized by Canadian securities regulatory authorities, however, they are not defined under U.S. SEC Industry Guide 7 and are not recognized by the Securities and Exchange Commission and may not be recognized by the securities regulatory authorities of other jurisdictions. Pursuant to the CIM Guidelines, mineral resources have a higher degree of uncertainty than mineral reserves as to their existence as well as their economic and legal feasibility. Inferred mineral resources, when compared with measured or indicated mineral resources, have the least certainty as to their existence, and it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral resource as a result of continued exploration. Pursuant to NI 43-101, inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of any economic analysis, including any feasibility study. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral resource exists, will ever be converted into a mineral reserve, or is or will ever be economically or legally mineable or recovered. All amounts are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. 2
  3. 3. Compelling Transaction Rationale Consistent with Goldcorp’s Strategic Focus Continued Portfolio Enhancement Canadian Malartic’s large ~10 million ounce(1) gold reserve supports a low cost, long life mine Focus on Gold Canadian Malartic is built and in production, expected to produce in excess of 500 koz of gold annually Large Operating Mine in Low Political Risk Jurisdiction Québec is one of the best jurisdictions for mining globally Acquisition will create Québec’s leading gold producer(2) Leverages Goldcorp’s existing investments in Québec and Ontario with participation in corporate and regional synergies Disciplined Growth Transaction to be immediately accretive on key per share operating and financial metrics, including free cash flow, operating cash flow, net asset value, gold production and gold reserves(3) Acquisition maintains Goldcorp’s strong balance sheet and financial strength HIGH QUALITY GOLD MINE IN EXCELLENT JURISDICTION (1) See Appendix Note 1 (2) Post ramp-up of Éléonore (3) See Appendix Note 2 3
  4. 4. Acquisition is Consistent with Goldcorp’s Strategic Focus Quality Growth Cost Management Low Political Risk Responsible Mining Practices TOGETHER CREATING SUSTAINABLE VALUE Peer-Leading Balance Sheet 4
  5. 5. Summary of the Offer Offers Immediate and Certain Value • Key Conditions Timing Each Osisko shareholder will receive C$2.26 in cash and 0.146 of a common share of Goldcorp for each share of Osisko held Represents aggregate consideration mix of approximately 38% in cash and 62% in Goldcorp shares • Premium • • The Offer C$5.95 per Osisko share, implying an aggregate equity purchase price of approximately C$2.6 billion (the “Offer”) 28% premium to 20-day volume-weighted average price of Osisko from all trading on Canadian exchanges as of January 10, 2014 • • 15% premium to the closing share price of Osisko on January 10, 2014 • • • Minimum tender of 66 2/3% of Osisko’s shares on a fully-diluted basis • • Offer is open for acceptance until February 19, 2014 Premium in addition to recent strong share price appreciation (+33% since early December(1)) Osisko shareholder rights plan being cease traded or waived Not subject to Goldcorp shareholder approval or any financing conditions Offer and circular to be filed by January 14, 2014 and mailed to shareholders by no later than January 28, 2014 (1) Based on TSX closing price of Osisko on December 3, 2013 of C$3.88/sh 5
  6. 6. Strong Value Proposition for Osisko Shareholders Opportunity to Participate in the Leading Senior Gold Producer • Premium Cash and Share Offer that provides immediate and certain value • Greater Liquidity, Dividend Participation and Meaningful Ownership in one of the lowest cost senior gold producers with a strong balance sheet allowing Osisko shareholders to participate in Goldcorp’s monthly dividend • Exposure to Goldcorp’s High Quality Asset Portfolio and industry leading growth profile providing leverage to higher gold prices • Disciplined and Focused Management Team with a proven track record of value creation • Continued Participation in future success at Canadian Malartic and Osisko’s other properties • Diversification of operating and financial risks and Participation in Synergies with Goldcorp’s Québec and Ontario operations 6
  7. 7. Fully-Financed Offer Strong Balance Sheet Maintained • • Goldcorp will maintain the strongest balance sheet amongst its peers post acquisition Net Debt in $B and as a % of Market Cap.(2) 65% C$1.0 billion cash portion of the Offer to be financed from $1.25 billion Acquisition Facility in place CASH & EQUIVALENTS 55% Average Net Debt as % of 43% Market Cap: 41% $0.6B $3.85B LIQUIDITY $1.25B 23% (1) 16% $2.0B 11% $2.1B ACQUISITION FACILITY 47% $3.2B $1.2B $5.1B $9.8B $3.1B $3.1B UNDRAWN REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY KEY MESSAGE INVESTMENT GRADE BALANCE SHEET (1) Cash & equivalents and revolving credit facility based on financial information as of December 31, 2013 (2) As of January 10, 2014; All amounts as reported in company financial statements and adjusted for subsequent transactions. Goldcorp’s net debt position adjusted to include $414mm of attributable Pueblo Viejo project debt. PF Goldcorp assumes $0.9B in additional debt and the assumption of Osisko’s net debt estimated at $0.2B. PF Goldcorp market capitalization assumes 64.7M additional shares being issued to the shareholders of Osisko. Average net debt of 41% excludes standalone Goldcorp. 7
  8. 8. Strong Dividend Track Record Transaction Does Not Impact Dividend • Goldcorp current monthly dividend of $0.05 per share 27% 27% 30% 30% 24% 19% 12% 8% 0% 0% Kinross 6% Barrick Newmont 2013E Yamana Goldcorp 2014E Dividend as % of Operating Cash Flow(1) O S I S K O S H A R E H O L D E R S T O B E N E F I T F R O M M O N T H LY D I V I D E N D (1) Bloomberg consensus as of Jan. 10, 2014 Goldcorp shown on a standalone basis 8
  9. 9. Strategic Opportunity for Goldcorp Shareholders Canadian Malartic: A High-Quality Gold Mine In An Attractive Location Adds High Quality Gold Mine Located in Low Risk Jurisdiction Leverage to Gold Price Strong Cash Flow, Limited Capital Risk Value Enhancement Opportunities • Canadian Malartic would be one of Goldcorp’s leading mines in terms of free cash flow, production and net Adds asset value(1) Cornerstone Gold Operation • • Increases presence in Québec and Canada Production contribution over 1 million ounces from Québec, post Éléonore ramp up • High quality mine containing gold reserves of approximately 10 million ounces with low all-in Adds Cornerstone Gold Operation sustaining costs(1) • • Solid returns even at low gold prices Limited capitalCornerstone Gold Operation Adds risk • • Participation in corporate and regional synergies Canadian Malartic expected to benefit from Adds Cornerstone Gold Operation Goldcorp’s technical and operating expertise (1) Non GAAP Financial Information; See Appendix Note 2 Pictures shown are from Osisko’s presentation for Q3 2013 “Operating and Financial Results” and from an August 2013 presentation “Canadian Malartic Mine – Photos” 9
  10. 10. Strategic Opportunity for Goldcorp Shareholders Canadian Malartic: Over 1 Million Ounces of Gold Produced Large, bulk tonnage open pit mine located in the heart of Québec’s prolific Abitibi Gold Belt, approximately 20km west of Val d’Or • The mine began commercial production in May 2011 and recently produced its millionth ounce of gold(1) • Strong operating team • Canadian Malartic is expected to produce in excess of 500 koz of gold per year over a long mine life Category Gold Production & Cash Costs(4) 600 Reserves(2,3) Tonnes (Mt) Gold Grade (g/t) Cont. Gold (Moz) Proven 48.8 0.89 1.4 Probable 261.8 1.04 8.7 Total Reserves 310.6 1.01 Gold Prod. (koz) Gold Picture from Osisko’s website 10.1 $952 $1,000 $909 $770 400 388 200 $800 485 $600 $400 200 $200 0 (1) As per Osisko’s disclosure on November 21, 2013 (2) Based on Osisko’s disclosures February 19, 2013; See Appendix Note 1 (3) Reserves calculation as of January 1, 2013 (4) 2011 and 2012 actuals from Osisko Annual Reports for the respective years; 2013 estimate from November 8, 2013 Third Quarter Results press release For additional information on Canadian Malartic reserves and resources, please see Appendix 2011A Cash Costs (C$/oz) • $0 2012A 2013E 10
  11. 11. Strategic Opportunity for Goldcorp Shareholders Investment In An Attractive Jurisdiction • • Québec is consistently ranked as one of the best jurisdictions for mining Strong regional focus with several world-class operations provides platform to realize regional synergies Fraser Institute: Top 20 Jurisdictions in the Americas Based on Policy Potential Index(1) Musselwhite Red Lake & Cochenour Éléonore Abitibi Gold Belt Porcupine Source: Osisko’s web site (1) CANADIAN MALARTIC Alberta New Brunswick Wyoming Nevada Utah Yukon Quebec Nova Scotia Saskatchewan Ontario Nfld&Lab. Alaska Manitoba Chile French Guiana Arizona NWT B.C. Michigan Colorado Fraser Institute Annual Survey of Mining Companies 2012/2013 (score out of 100) 92.6 90.8 90.1 85.3 83.8 83.8 81.9 81.8 81.6 78.3 76.8 75.5 73.4 67.7 64.6 64.2 63.7 63.6 62.3 61.9 11
  12. 12. Growing Presence in Québec and Canada Low Risk, Supportive Jurisdictions • • Significant increase in gold reserves in Québec and Canada Canada to contribute nearly 50% of total gold production; increase when Éléonore ramps-up 2014E Gold Production Guidance(3) Gold Reserves in Québec(1) Dominican Republic 3.0 Moz ~333% Increase 13. 13.1 Moz Canada 11% Argentina 13% 8% Guatemala 5% USA Gold Reserves in Canada(2) 4% 34% 9% PRO FORMA 6% 44% ~3.6M oz 5% 12.9 Moz ~80% Increase Mexico Goldcorp (1) (2) (3) 32% 23.0 Moz Canadian Malartic 27% Outer ring represents pro forma production Inner ring represents Goldcorp standalone Goldcorp standalone includes Éléonore as of December 31st, 2012 Goldcorp standalone includes Red Lake, Porcupine, Musselwhite and Éléonore as of December 31st, 2012 Osisko based on consensus estimates of 550 koz; Pro forma assumes full year production for 2014; Goldcorp based on 2014 guidance as per January 8, press release 12
  13. 13. Leading Production Growth Profile Low Cost Growth Profile Provides Growing Returns • Strong growth even with larger pro forma production base 2013E-2016E Production Growth(1)(2) 50% 44% 41% 40% 30% 26% 23% 23% 20% 20% 10% 4% 0% 0% Goldcorp PF Goldcorp Yamana AngloGold Agnico Eagle Newcrest Newmont Kinross Barrick -7% -10% M A I N TA I N S L E A D I N G G R O W T H P R O F I L E (1) (2) Based on street consensus estimates except for Goldcorp which is based on 2013 actual and the 5-year forecast from its January 8, 2014 press release Pro forma Goldcorp includes Osisko’s 2013 production estimate of 485 koz as part of the denominator in the calculation of the growth rate (2016E for consensus production for Osisko is estimated at 592 koz) 13
  14. 14. Transaction Summary Creates Value for All Shareholders Goldcorp would become the largest gold producer in Québec – well positioned to pursue synergies Enhanced mine portfolio and strong growth profile provides superior returns in all gold price environments Maintains Goldcorp’s low cost profile and strong balance sheet Low capital, technical and political risk Existing financial strength of Goldcorp coupled with robust cash flows from world-class asset portfolio provides basis for sustainable and superior shareholder returns going forward KEY MESSAGE T O G E T H E R C R E AT I N G S U S TA I N A B L E V A L U E 14
  15. 15. The Goldcorp Advantage SUPERIOR INVESTMENT PROPOSITION QUALITY GROWTH COST MANAGEMENT PEER-LEADING BALANCE SHEET RESPONSIBLE MINING PRACTICES LOW POLITICAL RISK 15
  16. 16. APPENDIX - NOTES Note 1: Total proven and probable mineral reserves are as at January 1, 2013 and are estimated at 310.6 million tonnes at 1.01 g Au/t for 10.1 million ounces. Source: Osisko news release dated February 19, 2013 “Osisko Updates Reserves at Canadian Malartic”, available under Osisko’s profile at www.sedar.com Note 2: Free and adjusted operating cash flow, net asset value, and gold production and reserves are non-GAAP performance measures which Goldcorp believes that, in addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, Goldcorp and certain investors use to evaluate Goldcorp's ability to generate cash flows, its operating and economic performance and to provide measures which management uses internally to assess and evaluate the overall performance of its business and those of acquisition candidates and to highlight trends in the overall business. Accordingly, the measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. Free cash flows are calculated by deducting from net cash provided by operating activities, Goldcorp's share of expenditures on mining interests, deposits on mining interest expenditures and capitalized interest paid, and adding Goldcorp's share of free cash flows provided by operating activities from Alumbrera and Pueblo Viejo. Adjusted operating cash flows comprises Goldcorp’s share of operating cash flows before working capital changes, dividends from associates and adjusted operating cash flows provided by Alumbrera and Pueblo Viejo. Net asset value is estimated as the discounted future after-tax cash flows expected to be derived from a mine site, less an amount for costs to sell estimated based on similar past transactions. When discounting estimated future after-tax cash flows, the Company uses its after-tax weighted average costs of capital. Estimated cash flows are based on expected future production, metal selling prices, operating costs and non-expansionary capital expenditures, excluding those cash flows arising from future enhancements of the asset. Note 3: The terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” defined in accordance with NI 43-101 differ from the definitions in US SEC Industry Guide 7 (“SEC Industry Guide 7”) under the US Securities Act. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority. In addition, the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. 16
  17. 17. APPENDIX – Goldcorp Gold Mineral Reserves(1) PROVEN (as of December 31, 2012) Ownership GOLD Tonnage Grade PROBABLE Contained Tonnage Grade PROVEN & PROBABLE Contained Tonnage Grade Contained mt g Au/t m oz mt g Au/t m oz mt g Au/t m oz 78.75 0.36 0.91 2.51 0.23 0.02 81.26 0.36 0.93 66.76 0.76 1.63 66.76 0.76 1.63 18.91 9.43 5.74 Alumbrera 37.5% Camino Rojo 100.0% Cerro Blanco 100.0% Cerro Negro 100.0% Cochenour 100.0% Dee 40.0% El Morro 70.0% El Sauzal 100.0% Eleonore 100.0% Los Filos 100.0% 72.61 0.96 Marigold 66.7% 23.37 Marlin Musselwhite Noche Buena Penasquito Heap Leach(2) 100.0% 100.0% 0.04 11.08 0.01 18.87 9.43 5.72 20.42 1.44 0.95 20.42 1.44 0.95 233.95 0.56 4.24 215.56 0.36 2.49 449.51 0.47 6.73 4.42 1.52 0.22 12.48 7.56 3.03 12.48 7.56 3.03 2.25 224.10 0.72 5.18 296.71 0.78 7.43 0.68 0.51 173.06 0.50 2.77 196.43 0.52 3.28 3.52 3.37 0.38 3.91 4.91 0.62 7.44 4.18 1.00 5.26 6.79 1.15 5.97 5.94 1.14 11.23 6.34 2.29 100.0% 41.97 0.41 0.56 41.49 0.33 0.43 83.46 0.37 0..99 100.0% 335.03 0.71 7.67 194.94 0.47 2.95 529.97 0.62 10.62 Porcupine 100.0% 27.79 1.57 1.40 80.98 1.13 2.94 108.78 1.24 4.35 Pueblo Viejo 40.0% 13.88 3.49 1.56 96.06 2.74 8.45 109.94 2.83 10.01 Red Lake 100.0% 2.00 11.85 0.76 8.49 9.04 2.47 10.48 9.57 3.23 San Nicolas 21.0% Wharf 100.0% 10.32 0.81 0.27 11.80 0.82 0.31 22.12 0.82 0.58 Penasquito Mill Totals (2) 100.0% 21.67 41.10 63.01 1. All Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources have been estimated as of December 31, 2012 (with the exception of Peñasquito) in accordance with the standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum and National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43101”), or the AusIMM JORC equivalent. These estimates, as well as all other scientific and technical information relating to Goldcorp’s mineral properties contained herein, have been prepared by employees of Goldcorp, its joint venture partners or its joint venture operating companies, as applicable, and have been reviewed and approved by Maryse Belanger, P. Geo., Senior Vice-President, Technical Services of Goldcorp, a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. These estimates incorporate current and/or expected mine plans and cost levels at each property. Varying cut-off grades have been used depending on the mine and type of ore. Goldcorp’s normal data verification procedures have been employed in connection with these estimates. For a breakdown of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by category and for a more detailed description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used in calculating Goldcorp’s Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources, please refer to Goldcorp’s most recently filed Annual Information Form/ Form 40-F filed with Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Also refer to Appendix Note 3 for further details on Mineral Reserves. Mineral Reserves are estimated using appropriate recovery rates and US$ commodity prices of $1,350 per ounce of gold, $24 per ounce of silver, $3.00 per pound of copper, $0.80 per pound of lead, and $0.85 per pound of zinc, unless otherwise stated: Alumbrera , $1,400/oz gold and $3.20/lb copper; Pueblo Viejo and Dee,$1,500/oz gold, $28/oz silver, $3.00/lb copper. 2. Peñasquito reserves estimated as of December 20, 2013; Refer to January 8, 2014 National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report filed on SEDAR for more details 17
  18. 18. APPENDIX – Osisko Gold Mineral Reserves PROVEN (as of January 1, 2013) Ownership GOLD Tonnage Grade PROBABLE Contained Tonnage Grade PROVEN & PROBABLE Contained Tonnage Grade Contained mt g Au/t m oz mt g Au/t m oz mt g Au/t m oz Canadian Malartic + Barnat 100.0% 41.80 0.94 1.26 256.90 1.04 8.60 298.60 1.03 9.86 Gouldie + Jeffrey* 100.0% 3.66 0.78 0.09 5.41 0.78 0.14 9.08 0.78 0.23 Stockpiles 100.0% 3.47 0.51 0.06 0.00 3.47 0.51 0.06 Totals 1.40 8.72 10.12 * Jeffrey represents 70% portion owned by Osisko Source: Osisko news release dated February 19, 2013 “Osisko Updates Reserves at Canadian Malartic”, available under Osisko’s profile at www.sedar.com 18

×