Bo Becker: "Corporate credit and business cycles"

775 views

Published on

A presentation held by Professor Bo Becker, Stockholm School of Economics, at the high level seminar "Towards a sustainable financial system", hosted by the Stockholm based think tank Global Challenge in cooperation with London School of Economics and Swedish House of Finance on September 12th 2013.

Published in: Economy & Finance, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
775
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
16
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Bo Becker: "Corporate credit and business cycles"

  1. 1. Corporate credit and business cycles Bo Becker Stockholm School of Economics and NBER
  2. 2. Corporate credit • Important to firms • Important to investment in new physical and intangible capital • Important to investors (households, retirement savings, insurance industry, banks)
  3. 3. Corporate credit is cyclical: US -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 1953:Q1 1954:Q1 1955:Q1 1956:Q1 1957:Q1 1958:Q1 1959:Q1 1960:Q1 1961:Q1 1962:Q1 1963:Q1 1964:Q1 1965:Q1 1966:Q1 1967:Q1 1968:Q1 1969:Q1 1970:Q1 1971:Q1 1972:Q1 1973:Q1 1974:Q1 1975:Q1 1976:Q1 1977:Q1 1978:Q1 1979:Q1 1980:Q1 1981:Q1 1982:Q1 1983:Q1 1984:Q1 1985:Q1 1986:Q1 1987:Q1 1988:Q1 1989:Q1 1990:Q1 1991:Q1 1992:Q1 1993:Q1 1994:Q1 1995:Q1 1996:Q1 1997:Q1 1998:Q1 1999:Q1 2000:Q1 2001:Q1 2002:Q1 2003:Q1 2004:Q1 2005:Q1 2006:Q1 2007:Q1 2008:Q1 2009:Q1 2010:Q1 2011:Q1 2012:Q1 Growth of stock of corporate debt Source: US Flow of Funds NBER Recessions
  4. 4. Corporate credit is cyclical: Europe Source: Mario Draghi, ”Euro area economic situation and the foundations for growth”, March 14, 2013
  5. 5. Reason for cyclicality What happens in bad times Implications for fiscal and monetary policy Demand is cyclical Firms don’t want to invest Support firms (not banks) Supply is cyclical Banks are constrained, won’t lend (Holmström Tirole 1997) Non-standard measures that support bank equity/lending = Government investment in banks such as TARP Matching frictions are cyclical Harder to separate good from bad credit risks, or firms lack equity to support borrowing (Bernanke and Gertler 1989) ? Reasons for cyclicality
  6. 6. Friction cyclicality – what does the evidence say? • Market frictions - Information or agency • [Information] Worse lemon problems in borrowing market - Banks have considerable information at all times - Perhaps not that important? • [Agency] Not much direct evidence - Curious, since Bernanke-Gertler is standard reference
  7. 7. Demand cyclicality – what does the evidence say? • Obvious mechanism: firms wish to invest less in bad times, need less funding • Evidence is supportive - Even the least constrained firms in the economy tend to invest less in recessions 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% Ex: Wal-mart capital expenditure over assets, 4Q
  8. 8. Supply cyclicality – what does the evidence say? • Kashyap, Stein and Wilcox (1993) showed that US firms issue more commercial paper and borrow less from banks in bad times - But not the same set of firms borrow through time (Kashyap and Stein 1999) - Could be there are large firms (CP) and small firms (loans) - In bad times, large firms do bigger share of investment • To address, need to keep firms fixed: compare same firm through time • Becker Ivashina (JME, fothc.) compares bonds and syndicated loans issued for large US firms 1991-2011 - Bond market acts as thermometer for banks - A given firm often gets a loan in good times, issues bonds in bad times
  9. 9. Lending more volatile than bond issuance Source: Becker Ivashina (2013 European Financial Review)
  10. 10. Also true in Europe Source: Becker Ivashina (2012 European Financial Review)
  11. 11. “I am skeptical that one can say much about time variation in the pricing of credit--as opposed to equities--without focusing on the roles of institutions and incentives. The premise here is that since credit decisions are almost always delegated to agents inside banks, mutual funds, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, and so forth, any effort to analyze the pricing of credit has to take into account not only household preferences and beliefs, but also the incentives facing the agents actually making the decisions. And these incentives are in turn shaped by the rules of the game, which include regulations, accounting standards, and a range of performance-measurement, governance, and compensation structures.” Jeremy Stein, Feb 7, 2013 Why is supply of loans cyclical?
  12. 12. Why is supply of loans cyclical? • Household preferences and beliefs - Irrational behavior - Animal spirits - Incomplete information • Rules of the game - Regulation - Accounting standards - Performance-measurement - Governance - Compensation structures
  13. 13. Reaching-for-yield “…looking for seemingly safe but higher-yielding debt-like securities” Raghuram Rajan, 2010, Fault Lines “[A] sustained period of very low and stable yields may incent a phenomenon commonly referred to as ‘reaching for yield,’ in which investors seek higher returns by purchasing assets with greater duration or increased credit risk” Janet Yellen, 2011 “ fairly significant pattern of reaching-for-yield behavior emerging in corporate credit” Jeremy Stein, 2013
  14. 14. Reaching-for-yield in insurance portfolios 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% NAIC 1 (AAA-A) NAIC 2 (BBB) NAIC 3 (BB) NAIC 4 (B) NAIC 5 (CCC) • US insurers focus on safe corporate bonds • In part, response to capital requirements: lower risk = less capital • Within a capital bucket, more of risky bonds • Reach for yield - Build up of risk in good times - May add to cyclicality 0.3%Cap. req.: 0.96% 3.39% 7.38% 16.96% Insurers’ acquisitions of new corporate bonds pre-crisis Insurers’ acquisitions of new IG corporate bonds pre-crisis Source: Becker Ivashina (2013, accepted Journal of Finance) 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% Yield spread 1 (safest) 2 3 4 (riskiest)
  15. 15. Reaching for yield exacerbates credit cycles Loading up on risk in good times Stepping back in crisis Appetite comes back Source: Becker Ivashina (2013 Credit Flux)

×