People's Health Assembly 2012: Global Health Initiatives, Civil Society and the Evolution of Accountability, Part 3: ART and Accountability in South Africa
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
427
On Slideshare
320
From Embeds
107
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 107

http://www.globalhealthobserver.org 106
http://feeds.feedburner.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • District government often sidelined in setting up of relationships

Transcript

  • 1. NGOs, Antiretroviral therapy (ART) and Accountability in South AfricaEU-funded GHI INCO-DEV Project School of Public HealthAnnie Neo Parsons University of the Western CapeDr Johann CailholDr Thuba MatholeProf David Sanders
  • 2. ART in South Africa• Government ART service delivery problems: financing, human resources, access• Service delivery NGOs help provide cover where government struggles – Service delivery role (or ‘Operational’): provides tangible and in- tangible services – Advocacy role: “create and maintain political spaces in democratic discourse for often disadvantaged [communities].”• “NGOs are formally accountable to limited constitutents” – Who are an NGO’s constituents? – Does an NGO have clients or constituents?Doyle C. and Patel P. (2008) ‘Civil society organizations and global health initiatives: problems of legitimacy’ in Soc Sci Med66:1928-1938Evans B. and Shields J. (2006) Neoliberal restructuring and the Third Sector: Reshaping Governance, Civil Society and LocalRelations. Centre for Voluntary Sector Studies Working Paper Series: Ryerson University Faculty of BusinessKilby P. (2004) Accountability for Empowerment: Dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. Asia Pacific School ofEconomics and Government Discussion Papers: The Australian National University
  • 3. ART funding and GHIsGFATM Board•Donor governments•Developing country governments•Civil and private sector U.S. Government•Non-voting members Global Fund to U.S. President’s fight AIDS, TB Emergency Plan and Malaria For AIDS Relief Service Country recipient delivery NGOs Community-level ART services
  • 4. Preliminary taxonomy• Local level findings (facility, district) and relation to provincial/national structures• Three basic types of NGOs providing ART services in public health facilities – HR-focused (trainings; clinicians, data capturers, CHWs)• Defining issues: – External resources (in SA, almost all PEPFAR) – Community involvement – Management localityOssewaarde R., Nijhof A., Heyse L. (2008) ‘Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organizing betrays core missions of INGOs’ inPublic Admin. Dev. 28:42-53
  • 5. Large NGO working locally• History – Shift of services to HIV-centred work – Directly approached facility to offer services, sometimes after going through province/national• Funding – External resources (mostly PEPFAR)• Operations – NGO clinical staff provide ART services – Management based at provincial not local level
  • 6. “Large NGO acting small”• History – Shift of services to HIV-centred work – Approached district, consultation with province• Funding – External resources (mostly PEPFAR)• Operations – ART services provided by NGO staff – Management based at local level (near district offices)Kilby P. (2004) Accountability for Empowerment: Dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. Asia Pacific School ofEconomics and Government Discussion Papers: The Australian National University
  • 7. Local NGO• History – Community developed and managed• Funding – External resources (mostly small private funders)• Often aware of funding implications – In one case, refused direct PEPFAR funding• Operations – ART services provided by volunteer staff – Management based at community level
  • 8. An accountability gap• “There’s a big difference between spending money on a community and working with a community”• Accountability to constituents not required of NGOs – People cannot automatically hold an NGO to account, especially when they have limited alternatives to the offered service• However, accountability to stakeholders is required – Donor accountability usually financial/target-driven – Impacts on ability to be accountable ‘downwards’Lief W. (2006) ‘Accountability in International Development Aid’ Ethics and International Affairs 20:1-24
  • 9. To Conclude• NGOs should clarify if they work for or with communities• NGOs must clearly state who are their constituents – What is “the community”? (People within a geographic area, patients attending a facility, etc) – Is local government a proxy for communities? – Are Community Health Workers proxies for communities?• Ultimately: do NGOs determine a community’s needs, or do a community’s needs determine an NGO’s work?